Lukashenka's words are being broadcast on the radio.
He starts with a raised fighter, then says that they could not have helped in the event of an airplane explosion, but it was his duty to prevent the falling of dangerous objects (apparently in the event of an explosion) on the heads of the citizens of Belarus.
Assuming that there was a risk of a bomb exploding on board a civilian aircraft (a bomb that could explode at any moment?), then how to treat the "unconditional command to turn the passenger plane [back] and take it in"?
Where to take the passenger plane in (where to accept the plane)? At the Minsk airport? But at a moment (if) the bomb explodes, there (at the Minsk airport) are people - Belarusian citizens, and if there is a risk of a bomb explosion (at any moment), the dangerous objects could fall on the heads of Belarusian citizens who are at the airport.
How - in this case - does Lukashenka's statement that he could not allow dangerous objects to fall on the heads of Belarusian citizens look like?
The contradictory position ...
May be, to involve the media specialists - owners of the medal "For Advaga" - in the development of a position?
May 26, 2021 15:28
Translation from Russian into English: May 26, 2021 16:02.
Владимир Владимирович Залесский 'Адважные заявления. Заметка'.