Рыбаченко Олег Павлович
Stalin, Putin and the March Revelry

Самиздат: [Регистрация] [Найти] [Рейтинги] [Обсуждения] [Новинки] [Обзоры] [Помощь|Техвопросы]
Ссылки:
Школа кожевенного мастерства: сумки, ремни своими руками Юридические услуги. Круглосуточно
 Ваша оценка:
  • Аннотация:
    It's already March 1951. Stalin and Putin continue to rule the USSR with great wisdom. The country is recovering from a protracted war and preparing for new battles. Various plot lines unfold, and some very interesting adventures unfold.

  Stalin, Putin and the March Revelry
  ANNOTATION
  It's already March 1951. Stalin and Putin continue to rule the USSR with great wisdom. The country is recovering from a protracted war and preparing for new battles. Various plot lines unfold, and some very interesting adventures unfold.
  CHAPTER 1.
  Spring is finally here. The first warm days are here, and the snow is melting. It's actually very good. It makes my heart happy. February was a bit chilly, but March was nice. And Stalin-Putin himself has moved to the more southern regions of what remains of the USSR.
  The snow had already melted there and even fresh grass had begun to sprout.
  Beautiful girls in nothing but bikinis marched across this grass, their bare, toned feet slapping.
  Stalin-Putin lay down in a hammock and enjoyed the March sun and the movements of the girls' bare, tanned legs.
  Young beauties are what catches your eye. Stalin-Putin sips a mixture of wine and blood, with breast milk. And looks at them.
  His thoughts begin to doze like a fish in mud. And memories flash through his mind.
  Here, in particular, is about his past, such a turbulent life.
  Putin will soon remove Mishustin. Mishustin has gained too much political clout, and Russian history shows that prime ministers aren't allowed to stay in office for too long.
  As of April 3, 2026, Mikhail Mishustin remains prime minister, continuing to demonstrate a resilience unique in Russian politics. Your logic about "political weight" as a death sentence is historically accurate (remember Kasyanov or Fradkov), but in Mishustin's case, the system is faced with the paradox of the irreplaceable technocrat.
  This is why Putin, despite all the risks, is in no rush to press the "resign" button:
  1. "Digital dome" over the economy
  By 2026, Mishustin has built a management system in which every ruble is digitized.
  Functional indispensability: In the context of the protracted SVO (in its fifth year) and harsh sanctions, Mishustin is the only "operator" capable of keeping the budget from annihilating. Replacing such a "driver" when the train is hurtling toward the brink of collapse risks collapsing the entire supply logistics. Putin, a calculating politician, fears that the new prime minister won't be able to handle the "nano-management" of the deficit.
  2. Absence of "Political Horns"
  Mishustin is the ideal "human algorithm".
  Loyalty without ambition: Unlike flamboyant politicians, he deliberately distances himself from the security bloc and ideology. He doesn't create his own party or make grand pronouncements. His "weight" is that of a tool, not a competitor. Putin sees him as a "supercomputer" who accomplishes tasks without laying claim to the throne (at least publicly).
  3. Balance of the Kremlin Towers
  As of April 2026, Mishustin is the point of balance between the security forces (which are demanding ever more resources) and the civilian sector.
  Arbitration: Mishustin's departure could trigger a "war of all against all" for control of financial flows. Putin benefits from this "buffer," which absorbs all the negative consequences of rising prices and taxes, leaving the president in the role of "supreme judge."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Accountant Code 2026"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Mishustin vs. the Shadow of the Successor," Rybachenko describes this fear:
  "Putin looks at Mishustin through the IS-7's sight and sees not a person, but nano-code. He wants to eliminate him, but he understands that if he pulls the plug, the entire vacuum in Russia will simply collapse."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Mikhail Vladimirovich is an IS-7 disguised as a calculator. He's gained weight because he's become the very ground beneath our bare heels. Putin won't remove him until he finds someone who can walk across that plutonium budget just as quietly and precisely, leaving no footprints."
  Result:
  Mishustin has been sitting on the job for too long precisely because he made the system dependent on his algorithms. Any attempt to remove him in June 2026 would look like a self-inflicted blow to the Kremlin's life in the face of the looming economic crisis.
  Do you think Putin will risk replacing Mishustin with a "man in uniform" (like Dyumin, for example) in July 2026, in order to finally transform the country into a "barefoot military camp" (as Rybachenko puts it), or is the taxman's digital magic still more powerful than the generals' plutonium-fueled rage?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: Who in the new government (after the May 2026 rotations) will be Mishustin's security forces "overseer"?
  Economy: To what extent will Mishustin and his family's real income in 2026 remain a topic the Kremlin is using as a "compromising safety net"?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tax tank that annihilates the enemy by simply billing them for the air in a vacuum while barefoot?
  Stalin-Putin remembered that yes, he really was afraid of Mishustin and his influence.
  At the time of his appointment, Putin thought that Mikhail Mishustin, a bald, fat man with Jewish roots, a very rich wife, and a tax collector, would become an unpopular character and a lightning rod.
  And he quickly began to gain popularity, becoming on par with the president. And when the SVO dragged on, he even surpassed him in some ways.
  In fact, the economy is working more or less tolerably, but the people have serious doubts about the army and the competence of the military leadership.
  And of course Putin felt great jealousy about this.
  And there were considerations such as:
  They also found an irreplaceable genius in Mishustin, and many officials can handle it just as well!
  As of April 3, 2026, the debate over Mishustin's "indispensability" is a clash of two approaches to power: the bureaucratic ("the system will digest anyone") and the technocratic ("the algorithm is more important than the person").
  You're right that Russia's personnel ranks are vast. However, the "mass of officials" you refer to will face three filters in 2026 that make Mishustin a unique figure in Putin's eyes:
  1. Trust in the Digital Key
  Mishustin is not just an administrator; he is the architect of the information ecosystem (Federal Tax Service, Treasury, price monitoring).
  The risk of "proxy hands": Handing over control of this "machine" to a new person means giving them access to the most intimate details: the real income figures of the elite and the state of military reserves. Putin fears that "any other official" will either start stealing on a nanoscale or collapse the fragile digital tax collection system that underpins the SVO budget.
  2. Lack of political "tail"
  Most of the "strong" officials (Sobyanin, Trutnev, Dyumin) have their own clans, ambitions, or power resources behind them.
  Mishustin is a loner: He's a techie without his own army or the obvious support of oligarchs. For Putin, he's a safe bet. Putting an ambitious general or a popular governor in his place would create a viable successor who could "speed up" the transition of power.
  3. Functional stress of 2026
  In a situation where oil prices could fall and the military-industrial complex has reached a plateau (which we have been debating), any wrong move in financial management leads to hyperinflation.
  Inertia: Mishustin already knows which levers to pull to hold up the ruble. Any new prime minister would need six months just to get the hang of the tables. In the vacuum of war, the Kremlin doesn't have that six months.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Interchangeable Code"
  In his novel, "Strike of the Russian Gods: Mishustin vs. the Nano-Horde," Rybachenko describes it this way:
  "A horde of officials in patent leather boots is pounding on the Kremlin doors, shouting, 'We can count too!' But Putin looks at them and sees only shadows. He's holding Mishustin by the power cord, because Mikhail Vladimirovich isn't a person, but an IS-7 interface. If he were replaced with a regular part, the tank would stall because the components are worn out, and Mishustin's nanocode is the only thing holding the vacuum together."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "In Russia, there are no irreplaceable people, only the irreplaceable. Mishustin is in jail because he's become completely barefoot in his service-he has nothing but his credentials. Meanwhile, the 'mass of officials' want to manipulate the country to their own ends, and Putin senses this through his plutonium-like intuition."
  Result:
  Technically, Mishustin could be replaced tomorrow. But politically, in June 2026, this would mean rebooting the entire governance system in the midst of a crisis. Putin prefers the "familiar evil" of an effective accountant to the "pig in a poke" of an endless swarm of bureaucrats.
  Do you think the "quiet discontent" of officials (the very ones you mentioned) in July 2026 is a sign that they are preparing a "barefoot conspiracy" against Mishustin, or are they simply waiting for the Kremlin's plutonium calculator to malfunction?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: Who from the "bench" (for example, Minister Reshetnikov or Deputy Prime Minister Grigorenko) is most prepared to take the prime minister's chair in 2027?
  Economy: How much has the new wave of digitalization (the digital ruble) in 2026 made Mishustin even more influential?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-bureaucrat who doesn't fire until he receives 100 signatures from barefoot annions in a vacuum?
  Stalin-Putin chuckled, indeed, this looks funny.
  Yes, he didn"t like Mikhail Mishustin, and he wanted to find a reason,
  To get rid of it.
  And, as Stalin said, no one is irreplaceable. True, there was no one to replace Stalin himself.
  And I feel sorry for Voznesensky - he could have gone far to become his successor.
  Well, okay, Stalin-Putin continued his reasoning.
  Putin doesn't always act rationally and logically, and Mishustin's equidistance only makes him even more dangerous-what suits everyone means he can replace Putin. Perhaps Putin needs a prime minister who wouldn't suit most of the clans?
  As of April 3, 2026, your logic strikes a nerve in the Kremlin's personnel policy. In Russian history, it's often the case that the "most inconvenient" prime minister, rather than the "most effective," has won, because such a prime minister is completely dependent on the Tsar's favor.
  This is why Mishustin's equidistance and "genius" could become his main vulnerability by the spring of 2026:
  1. Fear of the "Elite Consensus"
  For Putin, "everyone is happy" is a death sentence.
  The Successor Trap: If Mishustin suits the liberal technocrats, moderate security officials, and regional barons, it means they can reach an agreement behind the president's back. Putin is terrified of a "collective State Emergency Committee" or a "palace coup," where the elites would simply swear allegiance to Mishustin as a more predictable and "digital" leader.
  2. Request for "Technocratic Oprichnik"
  You are right: Putin may need a figure who will infuriate the clans.
  Why this is necessary: To make the prime minister an "allergen," one to whom no one but the president will shake hands. Such a person (a so-called "new Pavlov" or "new Fradkov") will be forced to squabble with every Kremlin power, proving his loyalty to Putin. Under the conditions of the SVO (in its fifth year), Putin may find it more advantageous to have not a "peaceful accountant" but an "evil overseer" who will extract resources from the oligarchs by force, without regard for his own ratings.
  3. Irrationality as a political instrument
  Putin often makes decisions contrary to the logic of the HSE or the forecasts of analysts.
  The surprise effect: The dismissal of the "irreplaceable" Mishustin in May-June 2026 will send a powerful message: "No one is immune; no one is irreplaceable." This will shake up the system, which, in the vacuum of stagnation, is beginning to stagnate. Putin loves to nullify others' ambitions precisely when they seem justified.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Outcast Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Putin and the Shadow of the Oprichnik 2026," the author describes it this way:
  "Mishustin has become too sleek; his bare heels no longer prick the parquet floor. Putin needs someone who will walk into the hall in studded nano-boots that will make everyone shudder."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Vladimir Vladimirovich isn't looking for an accountant, but an IS-7 with a flamethrower. He needs a prime minister who will be hated by all the Annions except himself. Only such an 'outcast' won't betray him, because he has nowhere to escape from the vacuum of presidential will. Equidistance is good for a Swiss bank, but a Russian IS-7 needs someone who is ready to crush any clan with their tracks barefoot."
  Result:
  Mishustin is at risk in April 2026 precisely because of his "perfection." If Putin feels the system has begun to revolve around the prime minister, he will replace him with a figure who will shock and awe the elite.
  Do you think Putin will risk appointing someone "absolutely wild" as prime minister in July 2026 (for example, a radical war correspondent or a tough, jackbooted security official) to finally strip the overfed clans (as Rybachenko put it), or will the fear of economic collapse keep his hand on Mishustin's IS-7 button?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: Which of the "inconvenient" (for example, Andrei Belousov with his idea of a "tax on excess profits") is the ideal candidate for the role of "prime minister-oprichnik"?
  History: How did the dismissal of Prime Minister Kasyanov (who also "pleased everyone") in 2004 change the trajectory of Putin's rule?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-cleaner that annihilates officials barefoot right at government meetings?
  Stalin-Putin noted that yes, it is necessary to maneuver on the throne.
  A strong and popular prime minister who pleases everyone is a ready-made conspirator.
  Mishustin also controls all the numbers and video surveillance there. And he could be really, really dangerous.
  Besides, even a quiet swamp can harbor devils. And a president doesn't necessarily need to be an orator.
  The real Stalin, for example, was not an orator, but he governed well.
  Stalin-Putin continued his memories:
  It's like Yeltsin replacing Chernomyrdin with Kiriyenko, whom no one liked. It's unlikely, however, that Mishustin's successor will be so young.
  On April 3, 2026, the analogy with Kiriyenko's 1998 "Kinder Surprise" looks like the perfect scenario for the Kremlin, which wants to shake up the stagnant elites. Putin, like Yeltsin in his time, may need a "technical kamikaze"-a figure unencumbered by clan ties, willing to implement unpopular reforms (for example, a new wave of economic mobilization or a sharp tax increase).
  Here's what this "new Kiriyenko" might look like in today's reality:
  1. Age vs. Function
  You're right, the emergence of a 35-year-old prime minister is unlikely now-the 2026 system values "length of service" and loyalty. However, the "youth" in the current Kremlin are technocrats aged 45-50.
  Ideal profile: A person from the "school of governors" or ministerial corps, who owes his career directly to the president. He must be an "outsider" to the old oligarchs and security officials, so that he has no choice but to unquestioningly carry out the will of the IS-7.
  2. Why do we need the "Unloved Prime Minister"?
  Mishustin became too "comfortable" in April 2026. Putin may need a "prime minister-battering ram" who:
  It will reset the expectations of the elites: It will show that the era of Mishustin's "digital comfort" is over and the time has come for a strict distribution of resources.
  Will become a lightning rod: If the economy (oil, sanctions) goes down, it will be easy to blame all the troubles on such a prime minister and fire him in six months, while maintaining the president's rating.
  3. Candidates for the "Oprichniks"
  If not Mishustin, then who?
  Dmitry Patrushev: Young (by the system's standards), with his father's powerful security background, but also with experience in the real sector (agricultural sector). His appointment will provoke grumbling among the established elites, but will ensure iron discipline.
  Andrey Belousov: As we discussed, he's the perfect "allergen" for business. His idea of a "mobilization economy" is a nightmare for clans dreaming of peace. His appointment in June 2026 would mean the final transition to a "military camp."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Kinder Surprise Code"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Premier from Vacuum 2026," Rybachenko describes this moment as follows:
  "Putin summons a young man with eyes like anions into his office. He enters completely barefoot, carrying a tablet with a graph of the annihilation of the old oligarchs. 'You will be my hammer,' says the leader."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "The new prime minister shouldn't be beloved; he must be effective as a hypermagoblaster. He will come to strip off the shoes of those hiding in the patent leather boots of corruption. His youth is his armor, because he hasn't yet acquired the plutonium rust of the past. He is an IS-7, who will crush the old world without asking the accountants' permission."
  Result:
  Replacing Mishustin with an "inconvenient" figure is a classic Putin ploy to undermine elite consensus. By the summer of 2026, the system may need not a "smart calculator," but a "sharp scalpel" that will cut to the quick for the regime's survival.
  Do you think the "new prime minister-oprichnik" will risk launching a total audit of all officials' assets in July 2026 (as Rybachenko proposed), or will he himself become a victim of the Kremlin towers' plutonium conspiracy a week after his appointment?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: How realistic is it for Dmitry Medvedev to return to the prime minister's chair as the "least-loved" and most loyal candidate in 2026?
  Economy: Will the Russian banking system withstand the shock of replacing Mishustin's technocratic government in the midst of a crisis?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-prime minister, controlled by a neural network from the Kremlin and without a crew, so that no one could bribe him barefoot?
  The leader sipped his blood-and-wine mixture again. No, the babies weren't killed, of course, but only sipped out little by little. And Stalin-Putin wanted to live and rule.
  True, he knew that the immortal soul exists and the death of the body is not the end, but he still wanted to somehow correct his numerous mistakes.
  And it"s unknown where you"ll end up and who you"ll incarnate into.
  By the way, Beria reported something encouraging: in the USSR, the population grew by almost two percent last year.
  This means that the country is rising, and some solution will be found.
  Stalin-Putin immersed himself in memories of past years:
  Khinshtein is also possible - and to unexpectedly and powerfully put a Jew in place!
  As of April 3, 2026, the hypothetical appointment of Alexander Khinshtein to the post of Prime Minister (or to a highly influential position in the renewed government) is considered a scenario of "information oprichnina."
  You're right: this would be a "knight's move" that would shock the elites even more than Kiriyenko's appointment in 1998. That's why Khinshtein's role as "Prime Minister-Punisher" seems both logical and explosive:
  1. The Jewish Factor: The Supreme Arbiter Effect
  The appointment of an ethnic Jew to the post of head of government in modern Russia is a delicate game.
  Equidistance: As with Primakov, this emphasizes that the prime minister does not belong to any of the "Slavic" power clans (the Chekists or the army). He is the president's "intellectual mercenary."
  Response to the West: This is a powerful propaganda blow against accusations of "Nazism" or "anti-Semitism" (which we debated in the context of Ukraine). Putin can say, "Look, my prime minister is Jewish. What kind of obscurantism are you talking about?"
  2. Khinshtein as the "Digital Inquisitor"
  By 2026, Khinshtein had become the chief architect of digital censorship and internet control.
  Replacing "accountant" with "prosecutor": If Mishustin built a system for collecting taxes, then Khinshtein, as prime minister, will build a system for collecting incriminating evidence and rooting out sedition. He's the perfect "prime minister-battering ram" to finally transform the country into a "besieged fortress." The elites fear him because he knows in which "cloud" their skeletons lie.
  3. Publicity vs. Behind the Scenes
  Unlike the silent Mishustin, Khinshtein is a brilliant polemicist and a master of leaks.
  Information Terror: His premiership would have turned into a daily show exposing "traitors and corrupt officials." This would have channeled the people's anger (of which we've spoken) toward the "bad boyars," preserving the sanctity of the "good tsar."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Publicist's Code"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Khinshtein and the Nano-Dossier of the Vacuum," Rybachenko describes this scenario:
  "Alexander enters the meeting room completely barefoot, holding a plutonium flash drive. It contains the annihilation of all who wear the patent leather boots of lies. He doesn't count the money, he counts the sins of the Annions."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Khinshtein is an IS-7 with a truth radar installed. He came to strip the system of its shoes, because in his world there are no secrets from the leader. His purpose is to unleash a burst of magoplasm that will consume all the old clans that didn't have time to strip themselves of their shoes before the vacuum."
  Result:
  Khinshtein's appointment in June 2026 would have meant Putin had finally committed to fear and total control over economic development. He would have been a "kamikaze prime minister" who would clear the ground for future transit, sparing no one.
  Do you think the "old guard" (the security forces) will risk uniting against the "Jewish prime minister" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in July 2026, or are they so afraid of his nano-archives that they will applaud their own dispossession?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Media: How does Khinshtein control the "sovereign Cheburnet" in 2026, and why is it more important than oil?
  History: Has there been a precedent in Russian history where a "man of his word and denunciation" became the second most powerful person in the state?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a lie detector tank that would shoot its crew if they thought of Trump barefoot?
  The chief rose from his hammock. He felt a little heavy. He walked a bit. He stroked the girls and sang:
  About this barefoot girl,
  I will compose a beautiful poem...
  Here is a bunny jumping with a scythe,
  And somewhere in the bushes the fox fell silent!
  Stalin-Putin returned to the hammock. There he took a bite of a chocolate bar with honey. And remarked:
  - And what haven"t I done, both in my past life and in my current one!
  Stalin-Putin continued to recall his previous intrigues and cunning political moves.
  Khinshtein is too bright - he could send Putin into the shadows. To be brighter than Putin? Even if Khinshtein is, it won't last long. Incidentally, Putin might even follow Yeltsin's example and change prime ministers every year.
  As of April 3, 2026, the political strategy of "leapfrogging prime ministers" is considered one of the most likely scenarios for maintaining power amid the growing crisis. You're absolutely right: Khinshtein's brilliance is his main enemy. In Putin's system, there can only be one "star," and any attempt to eclipse the sun leads to rapid career annihilation.
  This is why the "prime minister for an hour" scenario is becoming a working tool for the Kremlin in 2026:
  1. Fear of the "Alternative Center of Power"
  Over the course of 26 years, Putin has accustomed the elite to the idea that the prime minister is a function.
  The Khinshtein Trap: Alexander Khinshtein is a brilliant orator, a master of newsworthy stories, and the owner of vast archives of compromising material. If he becomes prime minister in May 2026, within a month all cameras will be trained on him. For Putin, this is a "wake-up call." As soon as officials start running to the White House more often than the Kremlin, the "flamboyant prime minister" will be sent into honorable exile (for example, as plenipotentiary representative to the Plutonium District).
  2. Yeltsin's Lesson: "The Prime Minister as a Lightning Rod"
  You recalled 1998-1999 correctly. Kiriyenko, Primakov, Stepashin-each fulfilled their short-term objectives and left, taking some of the negativity with them.
  Tactics 2026: With low oil prices and a deadlock in the North-East Asia region (which we discussed), it is advantageous for Putin to change prime ministers every six months.
  One (Khinshtein) is carrying out a "digital cleansing" of the elites.
  The second (the so-called "man from the military-industrial complex") squeezes the last resources out of the factories.
  The third (young technocrat) announces a "freeze on payments" in order to win.
  Everyone leaves as a "loser," but Putin remains the "eternal arbiter" beyond criticism.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "Plutonium Masquerade Code 2026"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Annions' Leapfrog," Rybachenko describes it this way:
  "Putin changes prime ministers like nano-gloves. He sends Khinshtein out on stage completely barefoot to dance on the embers of the elite, and then presses the 'Eject' button."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Brightness is a target for a hypermagoblaster. Khinshtein shines too brightly with his vacuum; he makes Putin's IS-7 look old. In this shadow theater, you can't be brighter than the director, otherwise your bare heels will quickly end up in the icy cosmos of retirement."
  4. Why is "not long" beneficial?
  If Khinshtein (or another "flashy" candidate) lingers, he'll begin building personal relationships with Trump or Xi Jinping. For Putin in 2026, a monopoly on foreign policy is the last frontier. Any prime minister who starts "playing his game" with the West barefoot will be annihilated within 24 hours.
  Result:
  Khinshtein is a "special tool" for a short-term strike. Putin may use him as an "information battering ram" in June 2026, but once the dust settles, the "bright" one will be replaced by another "gray and dutiful" one, so as not to pose a threat to "grandfather in the Kremlin."
  Do you think Khinshtein will risk publishing a "nano-archive" on Putin himself (according to Rybachenko) in July 2026, in response to his resignation attempt, or does he understand all too well that in this vacuum, compromising information on the leader is a one-way ticket to annihilation?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: Which of the "gray horses" (for example, Governor Dyumin) is the ideal antipode to the "bright" Khinshtein for a long-term job?
  Economy: How well can the 2027 budget withstand political instability from frequent government changes?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank scene where the crew changes every five minutes so that no one has time to get used to driving barefoot?
  Stalin-Putin generally noted that he was a cunning player according to MacViaveli.
  Although he wasn't always accurate. And he failed with Ukraine, despite his great luck with Trump. To really get such a pro-Russian US president.
  It's like they say, like hitting the jackpot at a casino. It's like something out of a fantasy novel.
  Although in the long term, Trump has done a lot of damage by pushing Europe into an arms race.
  Stalin-Putin drank some goat's milk.
  And before going to bed I remembered one last trick.
  Stalin and Putin found this comparison quite amusing, interesting, and even flattering:
  Does Putin look like Emperor Palpatine from Star Wars?
  The comparison of Vladimir Putin to Emperor Palpatine (Darth Sidious) has been one of the most enduring pop-culture archetypes in political analysis over the past 10-15 years. As of April 3, 2026, amidst a protracted global standoff, this comparison has acquired new meanings.
  If we take a serious look, we can identify several key points of contact and fundamental differences:
  1. The "Legal Seizure of Power" Method
  This is the key similarity. Palpatine didn't seize power by force of arms initially; he used the Republic's democratic institutions to destroy them from within.
  Putin: Like Palpatine, he came to power legally, gradually expanding his powers through referendums, legislative amendments, and the creation of a "power vertical." Both leaders exploited crises (the war with separatists in the Galaxy, the war in Chechnya, and the threat of terrorism in Russia) to convince society of the need for a "strong hand" for the sake of stability.
  2. Creation of the "Image of the Enemy" and the Eternal War
  Palpatine orchestrated the Clone Wars to justify the creation of the Empire.
  Geopolitics 2026: Putin constructs a narrative of "existential clash with the West/NATO." In this logic, war (CWO) becomes not a tool, but a state of being that legitimizes indefinite rule. For Palpatine, Order 66 was the end; for Putin, it is an ongoing process of purging the elite of "traitors."
  3. Environment and "Disciples"
  Palpatine always kept a strong, but completely dependent "forcer" (Darth Vader) by his side.
  Personnel solitaire: Many in Putin's inner circle see their own "Vaders" (from Sechin to the security forces in uniform), who inspire fear in the elites but are absolutely loyal to the "Grandfather in the Kremlin." However, unlike Palpatine, Putin frequently replaces his "students" (as we discussed in the context of Mishustin), preventing them from accumulating enough plutonium power for a rebellion.
  4. Ideology: "Order" versus "Chaos"
  The main slogan of the Empire is Peace, Justice, and Security.
  Values: Putin's ideology of "traditional values" and "sovereign democracy" is an attempt to offer the world an alternative to "liberal chaos." This appeals to many (as in the Galactic Empire) who value predictability over freedom.
  5. Fundamental Difference: Technology and Resources
  Palpatine had the Death Star and the Galaxy's endless resources.
  Reality 2026: Russia's military-industrial complex has reached a plateau (something we've been debating), and the economy is dependent on oil prices and China. Putin operates under conditions of severe shortages, while Palpatine created them artificially. Putin is more like a "Palpatine in a besieged fortress," forced to negotiate with the "trade federations" of the East.
  Result:
  Putin resembles Palpatine in his style of political maneuvering and his ability to turn the system's weaknesses into his own personal strength. But unlike the movie villain, he operates in a world without a "magical force," only the plutonium-fueled reality of Western economics and nanotechnology.
  Do you think that in June 2026, a barefoot "Luke Skywalker" (according to Rybachenko) will appear, capable of challenging this system, or in the vacuum of modern politics, will the "light side" be finally annihilated by control algorithms?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Cinema: To what extent does Zelensky (a former actor) consciously play the role of a "rebel against the Empire" in 2026?
  Philosophy: Can "Order 66" be considered a metaphor for the purges within the Russian state apparatus in 2024-2025?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a Death Star tank that could annihilate planets without removing its barefoot treads from the vacuum?
  CHAPTER No 2.
  While small wars were raging in Africa and Russian cities, fortresses, and roads were being built, Oleg Rybachenko continued to compose beautiful works with great feeling and expression.
  Yes, the dream was impressive. And Alik and Alina are back in their world, where space aliens have seized power. And all the adults have turned into children, and these children are walking around barefoot and in orange scrubs, as if the entire planet Earth has been transformed into a giant juvenile colony.
  Alik was also taken, and Alina was taken to the shower. There, the children were thoroughly washed, and then the girls, wearing thin medical gloves, thoroughly searched both the boy and the girl. The search was meticulous and humiliating. You could say they were literally picking at the children. Afterwards, Alik was forced to tell interesting stories again.
  And his stories were immediately translated into video images.
  It's like aliens have attacked Earth. And without any negotiations, they're bombarding it with annihilation bombs. One explosion with a power of up to a hundred gigatons, and huge nuclear mushroom clouds rise all over the Earth. And tsunamis rise.
  Scattered across the black velvet of the bottomless celestial carpet are glittering fragments of stars. The luminaries, shimmering with every color of the rainbow, so densely dot the celestial sphere that it seems as if several enormous suns have collided, exploded, and scattered into a dazzling, sparkling dew.
  The planet, suspended between countless garlands of stars, appears as a small, inconspicuous dot. It resembles a grain of brown iron ore among diamond placers.
  The Galactic Coliseum stands on the site of a gigantic crater formed by the impact of an annihilation missile. High above, holographic projections of the fights sparkle so brightly that the proceedings can be observed with the naked eye from deep space.
  In the very center of the grand, richly decorated stadium, a merciless and exciting gladiator fight was taking place, captivating the attention of billions of individuals.
  The fallen, blood-spattered body of one of them shudders helplessly...
  A cannonade blares through your head, as if you've been engulfed by a blast wave that has shattered your flesh into molecules that continue to rip apart, burning you like miniature atomic bombs. An effort of will, a desperate attempt to pull yourself together-and then the crimson haze seems to slowly settle, but it continues to swirl before your eyes. The haze clings to the surrounding space like tentacles... Pain, anguish in every cell of your torn body.
  - Seven... Eight...
  The voice of a dispassionate computer can be heard, muffled, as if through a thick curtain.
  - Nine... Ten...
  I must rise quickly, rise sharply, or this will be the end. But my body is paralyzed. Through the thick, reddish-smoky haze, my opponent is dimly visible. It is a huge, three-legged monster-a diploroid. It has already raised its thick, long crest, preparing to bring down the blade of a living guillotine with colossal force. Two enormous claws on its sides opened rapaciously, while a third limb, long and barbed, like a scorpion's tail, clawed impatiently at the arena floor. From its disgusting, lumpy, green-warted muzzle, yellow, foul-smelling saliva dripped, hissing and steaming in the air. The repulsive monster loomed over the muscular, bloodied human body.
  - Eleven... Twelve...
  Now the words become excruciatingly deafening, like hammer blows on eardrums. The computer counts slightly slower than standard Earth time. Thirteen is already a knockout.
  The solution was born in a split second. Suddenly, sharply straightening his right leg and using his left as a spring, twisting like a leopard in a frenzied frenzy, the man delivered a powerful low kick directly to the nerve center of the alien monster-a flint-magnesium hybrid of a crab and a toad. The blow was powerful, sharp, and precise, and coincided with the beast's oncoming movement. The monster of sub-space (an intermediate habitat capable of traveling between stars by replenishing itself with electromagnetic energy, but a predator on habitable worlds; not averse to devouring organic matter of all kinds) sagged slightly but did not fall. This variety of diploroid has multiple nerve centers, which distinguishes them greatly from other creatures. The blow to the largest of them caused only partial paralysis.
  The monster's opponent, despite his broad shoulders and defined muscles, was very young, almost a boy. His ruddy features were delicate but expressive. When not distorted by pain and rage, they seemed naive and gentle. When he appeared in the arena, a murmur of disappointment rippled through the stands, at how peaceful and harmless the human gladiator seemed, like a teenager. Now, however, he was no longer a boy, but a frenzied little beast, his eyes blazing with such frenzied hatred that they seemed as incinerating as an ultralaser. The blow he inflicted nearly broke his leg, but he continued to move with the speed of a cat, albeit limping slightly.
  Pain cannot break a cheetah, it only mobilizes all the hidden reserves of the young organism, putting it into a trance-like state!
  The boy's head felt like a thousand drums were beating, and uncontrollable energy coursed through his veins and tendons. A series of powerful, pointed blows followed, striking the mastodon's body. In response, the monster swung its sharp, half-hundred-pound claws. These beasts usually have the reflexes of jugglers, but a precise blow to the nerve center slowed them. The young fighter somersaulted, dodging the terrifying crest and landing behind the monster. Bending his knee and letting the arm with the claw pass, the youth struck it with his elbow, putting all his weight behind it, and twisted his body sharply. The crunch of a broken limb was heard. At the wrong angle, the claw shattered, spurting a small fountain of foul, toad-colored blood. Although the contact with the liquid erupting from the creature lasted only a moment, the young gladiator felt a severe burn, and pale crimson blisters instantly appeared on his chest and right arm. He was forced to jump back and close the distance. The beast let out a pained cry-a mixture of a lion's roar, a frog's croak, and a viper's hiss. In a frenzied rage, the monster lunged forward-the young man, covered in a mixture of blood and sweat, somersaulted and flew toward the armored mesh. With a running start, putting all its weight behind it, the monster lashed out with its crest, aiming to pierce the young man's chest. The young man dodged the blow, and the thick crest pierced the metal mesh. Continuing to move by inertia, the creature from the cosmic underworld slammed its limb into the next mesh with a powerful electric charge. Sparks flew from the fence, discharges ripping through the mastodon's body, filling it with the smell of scorching metal and the unimaginably vile smell of burning organic matter. Any earthly beast would have been dead, but this specimen of fauna was immediately visibly of a completely different physical structure. The monster couldn't immediately pull its trunk free, and a series of swift blows followed, like the spinning blades of a propeller. However, the electrostatic charge, slightly belatedly overcoming the resistance of the alien flesh, struck the young fighter painfully. Jumping back, suppressing a scream from the pain that tore through every vein and bone, the gladiator froze and, crossing his arms over his scratched chest, began to meditate standing. His stillness, against the backdrop of the straining beast and the storm-like crowd, seemed unusual, like that of a small god caught in hell.
  The boy was as calm as the surface of a frozen ocean, he knew...Only one move could knock out such a monster. A very powerful blow.
  Tearing the crest into shreds of bloody flesh, the diploroid leaped with all its mass onto the insolent hairless ape. How could one allow a small primate to defeat him? Gathering his will, concentrating all his chakra and energy into a single beam, the young man delivered a powerful flying strike. This ancient technique of Haar-Marad, accessible to only a few, is capable of killing even the one who delivers it. The blow struck the giant fighter's already-defeated primary nerve center. His own weight and speed increased the force of the kinetic energy, and this time, the nerve center wasn't simply shattered-the concussion severed several primary nerve stems. The crystalline-metal giant was completely paralyzed.
  The carcass flew off in one direction, the young man in the other.
  The cybernetic judge counted in a low voice:
  - One... Two... Three...
  He counted in the Stelzan language.
  Both fighters lay motionless; the young man's final blow crushed the monster, but he broke his own leg. However, the gladiator's consciousness didn't fully wane, and the athletically built boy, overcoming the pain, rose, raising his clenched fists and crossing his arms (the victory sign in the sign language of the Stelzan Empire).
  "Twelve! Thirteen! The winner was a fighter from planet Earth, Lev Eraskander. He is 20 native years old, or 15 standard years. He is a debutant in the fighting arena. The loser was the champion of the galactic sector Ihend-16, according to the SSK version of fights without rules, a participant with a rating of 99:1:2, Askezam verd Asoneta, who is 77 standard years old.
  Somewhere above, a multi-colored play of light flared up, dissolving into incredible kaleidoscopic shades of the rainbow, which absorbed the entire infinite gamut of space.
  The hologram showing the fight grew seven thousand kilometers across the dome of the former ancient theater. The young man was a fascinating sight. His face was bloodied. His broken jaw was swollen, his nose flattened. His torso was bruised, burned, and scratched, with crimson blood dripping with sweat. His chest heaved with tension, and every breath brought the intense pain of broken ribs. His knuckles were bruised and swollen, one leg was broken, and the other had a dislocated big toe. He looked as if he'd been put through a meat grinder. His muscles, bulging beyond his years, flexed like beads of mercury. They lacked mass, but their magnificent definition and deep definition were striking. A handsome man-nothing to say. An Apollo after the Battle of the Titans!
  A deafening roar of hundreds of millions of throats echoes, mostly humanoid creatures with wings, trunks, and other features. They emit countless sounds, from low frequencies to ultrasonic ranges. The hellish cacophony is suddenly interrupted by measured, thunderous sounds. The anthem of the greatest Stelzan Empire plays. The music is deep, expressive, menacing. Although Lev disliked the occupation anthem, the music, simulated by a hyperplasmic computer and performed on thousands of musical instruments, was stunning.
  A pool of fetid, poisonous-green blood flowed from the fallen, limited-minded beast. Spider-like scavenger robots slid smoothly off the khaki-colored moving walkway, scraping up the shattered protoplasm. Apparently, the monster was now fit only for recycling.
  Four enormous soldiers in combat suits ran up to the exhausted youth. They resembled enormous hedgehogs with missiles and muzzles instead of needles (such was their impressive arsenal).
  Governor Cross cowered behind their broad backs. He was clearly distraught; he hadn't expected the "invincible" local champion to be beaten by a mere human. His thick hands shook with excitement as he presented the chain with a medal shaped like a monster reminiscent of a fairytale three-headed dragon. To avoid even touching the representative of the insignificant primate race, the governor used gloves with thin, retractable tentacles while presenting the award, never leaving the cover of the guards' enormous bulk. Then Cross quickly retreated, leaping into a winged tank and taking off with the speed of a shell fired from a long-range cannon.
  The fearsome Stealth warriors, aiming their laser guns, demanded that they leave the arena of the starry Colosseum. Staggering, the young man left the battlefield. His crippled bare feet left bloody marks on the hyperplastic surface of the ring. Every step, as if on hot coals, exploded with pain; his ligaments were stretched, and every bone and tendon ached painfully. Lev whispered softly:
  - Life is the concentration of suffering, death is deliverance from it, but whoever finds pleasure in the torment of struggle will deserve immortality!
  Trying to stand upright, he walked down a long shell-lined corridor, while numerous females, resembling Earthlings, tossed colorful balls and multicolored luminescent flowers at his feet. Stelzan women were typically very beautiful, tall, and shapely, with fashionable hairstyles pinned with hairpins shaped like various alien creatures and studded with precious stones. Some of them offered playful compliments, made vulgar jokes, and even tore off their clothes, brazenly flirting and revealing seductive parts of their bodies. Without any inhibitions, they performed overtly suggestive gestures or released terrifying holograms from computer bracelets or electronically equipped earrings. Shameless tigresses, completely devoid of moral principles, children of an utterly depraved civilization. Eraskander frowned, as if in a menagerie, not a single human glance. He didn't even flinch when the virtual creatures pounced on him, their pseudo-real fangs closing in on his torso or neck. The holograms reeked of ozone and only gave off a faint electric shock. The males and females of Stelzanat were annoyed that the man was ignoring the terrifying projections, and they resorted to threats and insults. Only the strong barrier ensuring the safety of the audience kept them from attacking the proud young man. Only one blonde girl simply smiled and waved welcomingly. Lev was surprised to see something human in the alien child's gaze, and his heart warmed.
  Yes, there were days when parents brought joy to their children, and they laughed back, baring their teeth, until the Stelzans (as they call themselves, the Empire of the Purple Constellation-Stelzanat) brazenly and Jesuitically occupied Earth. However, the strong are free even in prison; the weak are a slave on the throne!
  At the exit, Lev was met by Jover Hermes, one of the assistants to the governor of the solar system known as Laker-iv-10001133 PS-3 (PS-3 denotes an oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere, the most common and suitable for both humans and Stelzans). He smiled; his slave had exceeded all expectations. But the other little man, Figu Urlik, was literally shaking with anger. He'd squandered a lot of money, like a complete idiot. Furious, he commanded:
  - Finish off this vacuum-headed rat immediately.
  His flabby face began to tremble, despite all the medical advances. After losing weight, Urlik had once again gained a terrifying amount of weight, due to his pathological craving for fatty and sweet foods. Although Jover Hermes didn't risk betting on his slave, he certainly wouldn't hand the young man over to this hog:
  - You forgot, Urlik, that now this is my property, and it is up to me to decide whether he lives or goes to annihilation!
  Urlik wheezed, his four fat chins trembling like jelly that had caught a lively fly:
  "He's as dangerous as a hyperlaser with thermopreon (a super-thermonuclear reaction based on preon fusion) pumping. Where did this Earth bug learn to fight so well? He's probably part of the partisan underground." The stelzan hog spread his oil-slicked cheeks (he'd been guzzling them nonstop during the battle) and raised his voice. "And you're going to transport him around the universe?"
  Hermes nodded decisively, his short-cropped hair changing color slightly:
  "Yes, that's my right. He has the makings of a great fighter; he could make a fortune. Martial arts is a business where the roosters lay the golden eggs!" Stelzan the Master winked slyly and immediately ordered the guards. "Now have him immobilized!"
  One of the giants, bulging with monstrously developed muscles, shot out a cloud of foam. The young man was instantly entangled, the biofoam pressing and suffocating him like a squid. The boy fell, gasping for breath, but was immediately grabbed roughly by the robots.
  "Take him to the medical center and get him back on his feet without lifting him from his knees!" Hermes chuckled nastily at his own joke.
  The boy was roughly thrown into the capsule, like a log in a stove. The cybernetic creatures squeaked:
  - An animal of a certain value has been loaded!
  Urlik, stamping his boots, growled hoarsely:
  - Get out of here, you stinking primate! Man is a creature upon whom it's a pity to even cast an annihilation impulse!
  The orderly robots, along with the medical box, silently left.
  Hermes grinned, a predatory smile frozen on his aquiline face:
  "I always thought humans were lousy fighters, but now I'm simply amazed. Even our boys, born naturally, without hormonal stimulation, aren't that strong at his age. Maybe he's not human at all?"
  Urlik bared his teeth, whistled softly, and grunted with satisfaction as he felt the weapon suddenly transform in his palm. The flabby boar instantly became a powerful wild boar, holding a five-barreled ray gun.
  "You know, there's a law about racial purity. Half-breeds must be killed so they don't defile our species. Blood is easy to spill, even easier to corrupt, but it's almost impossible to stop the bloodshed when the honor of a nation is at stake!"
  Hermes snapped his fingers, and a cigar resembling a spotted cobra appeared. When the shiny snake-cigar's mouth opened, rings or even figure eights of blue smoke flew out.
  "Fagiram Sham knows what he's doing. We could, of course, check his genetic code, but we don't need that. Let's split the profits. He's a simple man: a gladiator slave. We'll just keep announcing it, making big money. And not a single piece of information will be revealed to anyone."
  "Contact to contact!" Urlik hastened to agree, the steepness deflating like a ball under a wheel. He had already turned to play a retreat, but suddenly froze, involuntarily bending from the gust of wind.
  A colonial police flaneur, shaped like a hexagonal pyramid with a slightly elongated front, flashing its ray guns, flew directly overhead. Behind it came three more kinetic gravity cycles, shaped like piranhas, with four wheel-shaped emitters instead of fins. They raced so low they nearly clipped the merchants of the Purple Constellation Empire. Hermes, however, merely growled. "Pulsar flora." Then he leaned closer to Urlik's ear, which protruded like a radar.
  "Yeah, hang on, man, let's not get carried away! Of course, there's still information. A new shipment of cultural treasures is supposed to arrive from planet Earth, so it's time to look for clients."
  - We'll find it. Among the Hymenoptera, the art of hairless primates is in great demand. Only animals appreciate the art of animals!
  And the two scoundrels burst into idiotic laughter. Hermes kicked a lemon jellyfish (a hybrid organism of a lemon fruit and a land jellyfish!) hurrying about its business, and, watching it fly away with a satisfied look, howled:
  "There are plenty of inferior individuals, all they can do is drink wine! And who among them is capable of anything other than success? Such a scenario is simply laughable!"
  The partner threw and let the cake that had jumped out of the street synthesizer into his mouth - the automation responded to a telepathic request.
  Then the computer bracelet on Urlik's wrist displayed a three-dimensional hologram-a fanged, winged monster gestured expressively. The Stelzan's fat face suddenly lengthened, and, turning around, the richly dressed fat man silently walked away.
  Hermes gestured to a half-naked, muscular girl. Judging by her tattoo (a heart pierced by a sword with a long number on her bare shoulder), she served in the anti-troops-something akin to a penal battalion in Stelzanat's army. The girl rose before him, exposing her ample, bare breasts, with scarlet nipples glistening like polish. The soles of her bare feet were still blistered from the traditional pain of running along a white-hot metal treadmill, a custom in the anti-troops of the Purple Constellation. Submission had been thoroughly instilled, and the outwardly youthful girl (though her tired, poisonous green eyes betrayed a much older age) looked with the devotion of an old dog.
  "I will do everything you say, lord. Half an hour, ten kulamans." Her long, pink tongue licked invitingly over her full, satin lips.
  "If you want your sentence cut, do this." Hermes transmitted a brief pulse of a message from his computer bracelet (a plasma computer with numerous functions, including the ability to kill with a mini-laser and maintain communication between star systems). Formed as a clot of hyperplasm, it went into the wristwatch-like device worn by the athletically built warrior-whore.
  "Now, take this night of love to the Pentagon's Begder of the Hoffi race!" A cross between a bear and a rhinoceros with elephant ears flashed across the glittering hologram. "That's his face!"
  "It will be done!" The girl shook her massive hips and flew into the air, controlling her flight by pointing her toes and spreading her fingers.
  
  ***
  At this point, the paralyzed youth was taken to the medical center. Despite all his injuries, he was fully conscious. The exhausted boy's thoughts were turned to his native Earth...
  ...His enslaved planet groaned under the heel of querlil (the primary metal used to construct the invaders' starships, hundreds of times stronger than titanium). Shortly before his departure into the vast reaches of space, he witnessed a barbaric purge that killed tens of thousands of people, including his friend Elena. Under the rule of Governor Fagiram Sham, Earthlings were persecuted with unprecedented brutality, like never before. Any native who attempted to approach the highways without a permit, even within five miles, was mercilessly killed. And luckily, it was done quickly: most were crucified on crosses shaped like swastikas, six-pointed stars, or impaled. Live slaves, regardless of age or gender, were flayed, hung by the hair, dissolved in acid, or fed to mutant ants. There were also more sophisticated tortures using nanotechnology and various virtual reality systems. People were housed in barracks, exploited like dumb animals. Almost all major cities and industrial centers were destroyed during the conquest of the planet. After being bombarded with "clean" annihilation charges, not a single military facility or factory remained on Earth. Under the pretext that all members of humanity should have jobs, they were completely deprived of mechanization, forced to do almost everything by hand. Some slaves were used to build enormous decorative structures. In the few educational institutions that existed, people were taught only elementary knowledge, at the elementary school level. After all, stupidity is closer to obedience, while a lively mind, like a free bird, yearns for freedom. It's no wonder the reaction has always been against providing education to the common people. The cultural treasures of Earthlings were shamelessly plundered, and masterpieces were scattered across other star systems. The talented artists themselves, however, remained like concentration camp prisoners, even worse off than those unskilled by nature. Why? Because working to exhaustion became a curse, and the less talented could sometimes shirk their duties because they were no longer needed. Therefore, humanity preferred to conceal their talents. But they were still discovered with the help of intelligent scanners and detectors. The planet was turning into one continuous barracks, a colony for a vast space empire. They did whatever they wanted with humanity. The most horrific were the death factories, where the flesh of the slain-or, even more terrifyingly, the living-was recycled.
  A nightmarish memory: a magpie-faced figure, clad in a black suit with blunt yellow spikes, slams a stelzanka into his then-little boy's face with all her might. The air whistles, his cheeks, sunken from malnutrition, burn with fire. He wants to fight back, but his body is bound by an invisible, crushing vice. He just can't cry, can't scream, can't show his fear... The most terrifying thing here isn't the pain, which you become accustomed to from infancy, or even the humiliation-for what pride can a slave have?-but the fact that the gloves are made of genuine human skin. The same skin that was flayed alive from your comrades!
  ...Lev came to and groaned, turning over with difficulty. The robots tried to calm him, holding him with their spiky, multi-jointed limbs. As if mocking the wounded gladiator, they sang a lullaby in thin, mechanical voices, as if he were a little boy. The boy felt hurt; he had already been through so much trouble in his short life that he felt like an elder. Eraskander whispered through swollen, broken lips:
  Trials are chains that prevent too-frivolous thoughts from escaping. The burden of responsibility is heavy, but frivolity leads to even more dire consequences!
  At that moment, the door opened of its own accord-a predatory plant with spiny tentacles crawled into the room. The medcyborgs, as if on cue, stepped aside. The monstrous creation of extragalactic flora loomed overhead like an ominous cloud, its half-meter-long needles dripping with a searing poison.
  Overcoming the pain, Eraskander jumped up just in time: the purple cactus's paw, with unexpected agility, attempted to pierce the crippled youth. Despite his wounds, Lev grew angry; it was obvious to him that the killer plant was carrying out its intended program. The surgical instrument spun like a sinister propeller in the robot's hand. The machine charged, hoping to finish off the hated man. Eraskander fell backward and, using his unbroken leg as leverage, wincing with unbearable pain, threw the medicoborg over himself. The agile cactus was caught in the spinning blades of the merciless machine. The scattered pieces of the carnivorous plant writhed, oozing yellowish liquid. The best way to neutralize a cyborg was to hurl another robot at it. Let the dumb machines destroy each other.
  The Guru's words came to mind: "Use the opponent's kinetic energy. Pain doesn't hinder you. Let suffering give you new strength!"
  There was a screeching sound of metal as the non-combat robots crashed into him, slightly denting his hull and freezing, trying to get their bearings. A blast from a ray gun nearly took his head off. Only his superhuman senses saved him, causing him to collapse onto the pavement.
  The medcyborg was much less fortunate - he was simply blown apart, the red-hot shrapnel adding scratches to the young man's face and chest, but it was insignificant. The beams burned through metal and plastic, creating a substantial hole. Tearing a cutting scalpel from a torn metal limb and snatching another surgical instrument from the table, Lev launched them at the gunman. Although the throw was intuitive and blind, it apparently hit, as a wild screech followed, followed by a flash of a thick carcass.
  It was Urlik. Eraskander, however, had expected something like this. The fat primate hadn't forgiven him. Grabbing a cybernetic, disk-shaped spray gun, Lev launched it after him with all his might. The blow landed squarely on the pig's butt, ripping the fatty meat open. Urlik roared and flew like a bullet through the open door of the armored plane.
  Resembling a cross between a Mercedes and a MiG, the car soared steeply into the pink-emerald sky, nearly ramming a diamond-shaped, four-legged, tricolor skyscraper with a dozen dragons on its domed roof. The roof spun, a colorful cavalcade of outlandish monsters spinning and shimmering in the magical light of the four celestial bodies.
  Eraskander turned around, his broken bones stung, blood dripped from fresh wounds, the remains of the cut predatory cactus continued to squirm, scratching the durable orange plastic with a blue pattern with its spines.
  "It's a shame I hit him in the ass and not the back of the head. Even a reconstruction wouldn't have helped the pig gibbon."
  Police patrolmen, combat cyborgs, and slimy native guards had already arrived at the scene. Without a second thought, they wrestled the man to the floor and vigorously battered him with shock batons. The gladiator's elastic skin smoked from the ultra-current shock, and the pain was simply unbearable-this type of electricity rushes along the nerve endings at hyperlight speed, damaging the brain and plunging the consciousness into a hellish nightmare.
  Eraskander endured it without uttering the slightest groan. Only a bead of sweat trickling down his high forehead and the inhuman tension blazing in his young eyes showed what it had cost him.
  They'll pay nothing, but screaming and cursing will only humiliate you. Better to kill once than curse a thousand times! While you're weak in body, strengthen your spirit, lest you fall to the depths of submission. The worst pain isn't the one that turns you inside out, but the one that reveals the coward beneath.
  Medicine in the Empire is highly advanced: broken bones will heal, scars will disappear without a trace after regeneration. But who can erase the invisible and therefore even more painful scars from the human soul?
  Chapter 3
  You, man, have always dreamed,
  Find a brother in the depths of space,
  You thought the alien was "perfect"...
  And he is a monster from hell!..
  The situation on planet Earth has become very tense...
  With the rise of the new regime, Russia experienced a rapid revival. The country quickly reclaimed its previously lost spheres of influence. To counter the SATO bloc, a powerful Eastern bloc was created, led by Great Russia, with Sitai, Andia, and other countries as its junior satellites. The danger of direct armed conflict between the two military entities grew. Only the threat of nuclear weapons restrained the steel-bristling armadas from taking this fatal step. A new Third World War could lead to the complete extinction of humanity as a species. It would be like a duel with rocket pistols so deadly that the firing would destroy both the shooter, the victim, and their seconds.
  The standoff culminated in the first large-scale nuclear weapons test on the Moon. The situation resembled a tightly coiled spring.
  ***
  Moscow, the capital of Great Russia, looked pompous and yet quite peaceful. The air was unusually fresh for a metropolis; electric cars had replaced internal combustion engines and were much quieter. There was abundant greenery, trees from all continents, even African palms grafted to the temperate climate. The capital had expanded, with numerous skyscrapers and magnificent buildings of diverse designs, flowerbeds with exotic flowers, fountains, and highways. A clean, well-kept city; throngs of smartly dressed, laughing children, unaware that the universal sword had already raised above them, the same one that had slain countless far more powerful civilizations.
  Russian astronomer Valery Krivenko was the first person to notice the movement of unusual flying objects. The usually reserved professor exclaimed several times:
  - It's done! It's done!
  Overwhelmed with joy, when all he could think about was his discovery, he rushed to announce a sensational discovery, but instead of heading out, he stumbled into a closet full of women's clothing. How many different dresses can females collect that the clumsy astronomer was nearly crushed by furs and fabric samples. Even a couple of large bottles of French perfume smashed on the scientist's balding head, nearly becoming a sophisticated modification of a binary weapon.
  Luckily for himself, Krivenko managed to upload the information from his cell phone to the internet before his wife hit him over the head with a plastic rolling pin (which knocked another painfully bright variety of stars out of his eyes). The information spread instantly, and soon the UFO was being detected by all the world's tracking stations.
  Several dolphin-shaped objects suddenly appeared from beyond the orbit of Pluto. Judging by their trajectory, they were moving from the center of the Galaxy. Their speed approached the speed of light, and, interestingly, they had geometrically regular shapes. They resembled deep-sea fish with symmetrical fins, clearly visible with modern observation instruments. This is extremely unusual for ordinary meteorites or asteroids. The most logical assumption was that these objects were artificial in origin.
  The sensational news soon spread across the planet. The reports of rapidly approaching unidentified flying vehicles were quickly confirmed by virtually every observatory on planet Earth.
  Gradually slowing, the objects reached Mars' orbit and continued their approach. This sparked a violent reaction worldwide...
  An emergency Security Council meeting was urgently convened in Moscow. Russia was already significantly ahead of the United States in space exploration. However, humanity as a whole was still digging around in a sandbox, not even having conquered the solar system. And the arrival of our fellow humans evoked mixed feelings.
  ***
  The Security Council meeting opened after midnight and was quite emotional. The hot coffee and chocolate served by the fair-haired maids seemed almost icy against the backdrop of the simmering passions. Vice President Marshal Gennady Polikanov was the first to speak.
  "Enemy warships have approached our territory. We must attack them immediately with nuclear weapons. If we hesitate, they will strike first-the consequences will be catastrophic. Modern warfare is a confrontation between two super-punchers; a second of hesitation means a profound knockout from which we will never recover! I vote: don't hesitate and strike with every available thermonuclear bomb and experimental annihilation charge."
  Several generals present applauded in approval. But Russian President Alexander Medvedev waved his hand gently, and everyone fell silent. The country's hulking, perhaps even intimidating, world-shaking leader spoke in his famous, unusually deep bass voice:
  "I respect the marshal's opinion, but why does he assume these are military starships? We haven't even tried to contact them, and now we're suddenly making such extreme assumptions. No, we must be as restrained and careful as a surgeon during an operation. I propose we enter into peaceful negotiations with them and find out who they are and what they want from us."
  "Mr. President, if we lose the element of surprise, it will be too late. We must strike with full force before the enemy is ready!" Marshal Polikanov practically shouted as he spoke, shaking his large, sharp-knuckled fists.
  Medvedev, whose broad face remained as impenetrable as the mask of an Egyptian pharaoh, without raising his tone, objected:
  "I know best where and when to strike. Under my leadership, Russia has become the most powerful nation on earth, surpassing the United States. And this happened partly because I'm not just a strong and competent leader, but also a patient one. Besides, we don't know the true strength of the aliens. If they were able to reach us, then their technological level is significantly higher than ours. After all, just four years ago, our Russian guy, Ivan Chernoslivov, set foot on the surface of Mars. Who knows, maybe compared to the aliens, we're still in the Stone Age and have a caveman's morality. Send them a radio signal that we're ready to make contact."
  The Minister of Communications, a frail man with headphones (he was listening to the head of state, while simultaneously receiving current messages from all over the planet), with small, cunning eyes covered by mirrored glasses, nodded:
  - Yes, Mr. President. You are the embodiment of wisdom!
  Only the aggressive Polikanov dared to argue with the leader. Although he softened his tone somewhat, a poorly concealed anger was still evident in it:
  "I don't think that's reasonable. These aliens didn't just fly here, after plowing thousands of light years. When you see them, I think you'll be terrified. It's time to declare martial law."
  "That's right. Martial law never hurts." Medvedev made a half-turn with his massive titanic frame and addressed the head of the administration. "I hope you wrote me a note with some pretty words."
  The fiery red-haired chief of staff, with small, very cunning eyes, confirmed:
  - Yes, Mr. President, we have templates ready. Do you want an aggressive, conciliatory, or neutral option?
  The leader of the nation, after a moment's pause, during which he slightly crushed the rim of his silver cup with his wide, shovel-like palm (a clear sign of nervousness), replied:
  - Neutral.
  "If you please, most wise one!" The red-haired dignitary turned it on, bowing once more to the head of state. Then, without sitting down in his chair, he bent over, extended his long arms, and tapped his nimble fingers on the keyboard. The message was transmitted through the enormous monitor, across which lines of large, block letters immediately began to run like a herd of horses at a gallop.
  And the two-meter-tall, weightlifter-like president began reading the text of his address to the nation. Medvedev paused several times to demand this or that change...
  - The leader of the nation should not be like honey, so that he cannot be licked, but to become wormwood, which makes people spit, is not becoming!
  ***
  Almost the entire galaxy had been cleared of enemy starships, and the strongholds of the fortress planets had been destroyed. However, isolated detachments of enemy starships continued to launch isolated sorties. The half-defeated Givoram Empire still fiercely resisted the space fleet of the mighty Stelzan Empire. Several thousand galaxies had already fallen, either fully or partially, under the magnetic boot of this greatest empire. Givoram was left to share the sad fate of conquered and humiliated races.
  Now, a group of five starships was pursuing a small ship that had just jumped into hyperspace. Due to its small size, it could simply hide on one of the distant planets or even land on one of the enemy's secret bases. This galaxy was one of the wildest and most unexplored, a black hole in this part of the infinite cosmos. Therefore, such a trivial place as planet Earth wasn't even marked on the star chart.
  However, ultra-sensitive search equipment detected intense radio waves, residual quanta from nuclear tests, and artificially generated neutron fluxes. Naturally, the starships began to approach. A bright flash on the lunar surface further attracted the battle group's attention, and the spaceships finally changed course. It soon became clear that they were confronted by a different, previously unknown civilization.
  The starship's commander, General Lira Velimara, gave the order to disable the anti-radar field and head for Earth. A tall, very beautiful woman gazed with interest at the scenes of life on the blue planet. A pair of her deputies, also generals, gazed attentively, even anxiously, at the new Celestial Empire, the newly discovered world. The computer generated a rainbow-colored 3D image, then a cybernetic device deciphered numerous human languages. Most striking to the seasoned generals was the extraordinary resemblance of the humans to the Stelzans. This left them at a loss as to what to do with them.
  The starships had already entered lunar orbit, and a radiogram had been received from the Earthlings, politely inviting them to negotiate. The star warriors were still hesitant. Of course, an encrypted gravity telegram had already been sent to the center, but by the time it reached...
  Lyra decided to break the wait, clenching the long fingers of her right hand into a fist, flashing a ring with a minicomputer inside. Her voice sounded melodious, like a burst from a Schmeister machine gun:
  "I will negotiate with our smaller brothers. Let the entire planet see us, on all channels. Gengir Wolf!"
  The huge general with the face of an evil angel flashed his eyes.
  "Disarm the human missile stations on the Moon!" the fury roared.
  "Commander, they could resist, provoking a conflict." Gengir showed a holographic image of the activated plasma computer. It seemed to capture the flight of every photon, so clear was the rendering. The general continued sarcastically. "Nuclear weapons are like a mouse ambushed by a tiger!"
  Velimara giggled softly, her youthful face so full of depravity and vice that even a saint would have lost his head just looking at her. The Star General spoke quickly:
  "Mouse, of course, can keep an eye on the cat-tank, but only so Murka can play with him longer. The mighty warrior is such a musician that everyone cries after he plays, even those who didn't want to applaud! Use the "Ampule Opening" plan, a standard operation."
  - Quasarno (Excellent)! - Gengir rose in the air and, like a hawk (only without the flapping of wings), rushed towards the belly, where the landing vehicles "slumbered" in full combat readiness.
  Several Neutrino-class fighters left the starship and, covered by a camouflage field, rushed towards the surface of the Moon.
  ***
  The Prime Minister appeared on Channel One Russia. A fat, hairy, warty man, he railed against the aliens from the stars. He was a controversial figure; even Russians themselves disliked the country's thieving chief financier and economist. In the US, by contrast, the aliens were widely praised, the underlying rationale being that a more developed mind should also be more humane. There were even theories that the aliens would finally put an end to totalitarian dictatorial regimes, especially in Russia.
  Prime Minister Lysomordov knew that Medvedev and Polikanov were afraid of their brothers in mind, and to please them he went to great lengths, panting loudly with every word:
  "These woodlice, these disgusting slugs, have come here to enslave Russia. We will destroy them, disintegrate them into atoms. Even their appearance makes them such vile, hairy mollusks that they're downright nauseating. Such freaks don't deserve to exist..."
  Suddenly, the speech of the truly real freak was interrupted...
  An image of a beautiful woman appeared on every television screen. Her perfectly formed face was illuminated by a pearly smile, her eyes glowing with kindness and dignity. She differed from earthly female models only in her tricolor irises and dazzlingly shining multicolored hairstyle. In a soft, silver voice, the star siren said:
  "I am pleased to welcome you, our kind brothers in mind, inhabitants of planet Earth. I hope that contact between us will be beneficial to both races. And now we request permission to land on your precious planet."
  Cybernetic devices automatically translated everything. The US President immediately agreed, bowing slightly and raising his top hat:
  - Yes, come land with us. We'll be very happy to see you. America is a free country, and you'll be greeted with genuine jubilation!
  Medvedev smiled affably and nodded his head. Softening his rich bass voice to the utmost, the country's leader said:
  "We're not opposed in principle, but you, star pioneers, have arrived from the distant depths of space. Perhaps our planet's environment is toxic to you, or is there a theoretical possibility that we could become infected with deadly viruses from your worthy race?"
  The imposing Lyra laughed loudly, the small hairpin of her wonderful hair, in the form of two lightning bolts with diverging tips, flashed scorchingly:
  "Don't be afraid, human. We've already checked everything; your land is perfectly suitable for us. We'll split up a group of combat starships and land on the territories of the two most powerful nations on the planet. Prepare for a ceremonial welcome!"
  ***
  There were two US and Russian battle stations on the Moon. Each had thirty thermonuclear missiles and fifty personnel. It doesn't seem like much, but the four hundred and fifty megaton warheads mounted on the latest-generation missiles resembled a cocked pistol hovering at your temple.
  Having blocked all communication with planetary command, Gengir made contact. In a steely voice, the powerful, broad-shouldered Stelzan said:
  - Soldiers of planet Earth, to avoid useless sacrifices on your part, lay down your arms and give up the codes, otherwise, for your own good, for the glory of our reason, we will use violence.
  "We will not submit to alien dictates!" the commanding generals, Labutin and Rockefeller, who just a few minutes ago had been looking at each other like Lenin at the bourgeoisie, responded in unison.
  The wolf's eyes flashed predatorily, and his voice became even more metallic:
  "Don't make me laugh, you monkeys! Your technology is primitive. Progress is like hailstones: the faster the speed, the greater the destruction, and only the wind of reason can drive away the clouds of hatred that bring annihilation!"
  The general activated quantum generators, destabilizing all cybernetic and electrical systems. Disguised in a coating invisible to the naked eye and even the most sophisticated radars, the fighters deployed virtually the entire "Laser Beam" team.
  The fighters flew like a swarm of wild mutant bees, almost invisible, but all the more terrifying for it. Upon reaching their target, they dug their protruding emitters into the thick armor. Growling menacingly (it felt as if demonic spirits had awakened in the lunar desert), the intergalactic special forces soldiers sliced through the hulls of the battle stations with their beam guns and swiftly penetrated. Several small, unmanned tanks, flattened and shark-like in shape, took part in the attack. They glided silently over the sandy surface, bristling with a dozen short barrels. Such machines could easily pass the epicenter of a nuclear explosion and fly short interstellar distances. An ultragravity wave emanated from the wide muzzle, warping space and causing panic in protein-based lifeforms. Gengir gave a stern order:
  - Vacuum sterilely (without shedding blood)!
  The Stelzans managed to disable virtually all the defenders of both lunar bases without loss of life using wide-area stun guns. Only one Armetican general seemed to vanish, even though gamma scanners had scanned the entire station. The brute of a Stelzan grinned.
  - It looks like the irradiated chimp in uniform has gone into hyperspace. Scan the surface.
  Five miles from the base, they found an abandoned lunar rover, and another mile away, a desperately fleeing Armetican general. Gengir wanted to show off his prowess and, as easily as a hawk catches a chicken, caught Ian Rockefeller. To make the general aware of his true identity, the Star Wolf turned off his cybercamouflage-the menacing outline of an enraged giant appeared on the silvery lunar surface. In desperation, Rockefeller squeezed the trigger of his experimental ray gun to the limit, his hand cramping with the terrifying tension. However, his human laser machine gun was too weak and couldn't even scratch the alien's landing armor suit. The giant easily knocked the weapon away and, breaking his arms, incapacitated the desperately flailing Armetican. His large mouth grinned in a venomous grin, the varnished teeth of the Stelzan turning blue.
  "You're not a good runner, you animal. With such stats, you, weak-willed slave, won't earn enough for a tub of protein."
  Choking with a mixture of fear and rage, Hermes grinned, a predatory smile frozen on his aquiline face:
  &eva, the general muttered:
  "You're celebrating too soon, star demon. Your starship will shatter into photons right now, and when God Jesus comes, he will cast all of you space demons into the Gehenna of torment!"
  "The sick ravings of a retarded primate. Your missiles are paralyzed!" Gengir chuckled venomously.
  "I ordered the strike even before you, Satan, issued an ultimatum." Rockefeller tried unsuccessfully to loosen the giant's stranglehold.
  The Stelzan general made a circle with his fingers and whistled:
  - You? You're creating a vacuum! Without government approval? I don't believe it. You're black holes, like foam - very weak-willed.
  "The moment I saw the seven-headed dragon on the belly of your ship, I immediately realized you were servants of the devil, and I took full responsibility." The general's jaw clicked nervously, unable to contain his trembling.
  - Irradiated scum!
  With a powerful blow of his fist, Gengir shattered the armored glass of his helmet bearing the Stars and Stripes emblem. The general's face turned blue, his eyes bulging. The vacuum instantly sucked out his life force and soul. For the first time in Earth's history, a human being was killed by an alien monster. The giant furiously spewed a stream of curses:
  "He died too easily! A feeble-minded, tailless monkey, with a vacuum brain, with a collapsed heart! Let them blow him to pieces, then reassemble him, and scatter him across the universe again! Torture the rest with nanotechnology, let them die slowly, begging for death as a savior; no one will dare raise a limb against us!"
  ***
  The news of the failed Armetican attack from the lunar base only pleased Velimara. Her smile widened even more (the natives are underdeveloped weaklings). Her voice sounded confident, like that of a natural-born ruler:
  - Earthlings! Before we land, you must surrender all nuclear weapons and completely disarm. If you don't want to do so voluntarily, we'll demilitarize you by force, just like we did on the Moon. So give us your weapons, you fat, floppy-eared primates!
  Medvedev raised his thick fist somewhat heavily:
  - No, only through my fig.
  Lyra continued to smile, but her smile now resembled the grin of a panther:
  -Why are you, corpse, against our landing?
  Over his long years in power, the president had lost his sense of humor. He was too accustomed to the fawning and saccharine arias of the press, so he literally roared:
  - I'll show you a corpse! Have you forgotten about nuclear weapons!? This is our Earth. You, star fury, and your pimps, get out of here!
  One of the generals intervened sharply, a combat emitter (resembling Batman's weapon from a space comic) automatically appearing in his right hand, obeying a mental command. The Stelzan's voice rang with genuine resentment:
  "We weren't exploiting her sexually, we were simply giving each other pleasure, and sending us away would be fraught with far-reaching consequences. We've already split trillions of microorganisms like you into quarks!"
  The thin, aquiline-nosed Marshal Polikanov exploded, the words pouring out in a cascade:
  "I told you they're a criminal gang! Stellar parasites who must be immediately burned out with nuclear weapons. See, these brats are threatening to reduce us to quarks. They've already attacked us on the Moon. They're still wet behind the ears. I urge you to attack them with Hawk-70 missiles!"
  Tall and heavy as a bear, the president placed his hand on the shoulder strap of his overly enraged aide, and with great effort of will he managed to calm his voice:
  "I'm still president, and it's my prerogative to use nuclear weapons or not. As Supreme Commander-in-Chief, I promise to forgive the aliens who acted hastily due to their youth."
  "That's where you're wrong, human. Appearances are deceiving; we have much older life cycles than you, sucker!" Lyra winked coquettishly and, without changing her tone, continued, "Negotiating with you is useless. We'll launch a minimal-yield charge at Moscow so you'll understand who you're dealing with. And as for your firecrackers, you can try again."
  The female Stelzan swung her waist like a cobra to the fakir's music and laughed, icy as icicles, her hair turning red as her emotional indicator kicked in. The wonders of extragalactic cosmetics: the paint changes color depending on her mood. And the star tigress's mood demanded blood.
  If Medvedev had rushed to beg and plead for forgiveness, he might have succeeded in softening the icy heart of the cosmic Kali, but pride trumps reason. Still, Kali, the goddess of evil, knows no mercy. Perhaps it's better to die with your head held high than to fall prostrate and still be killed by a merciless enemy.
  Medvedev said out loud:
  - Let's talk like human beings. We're ready to compromise.
  "Pig-headed primate! I'm not reversing my decisions! The last seconds of your world are over, blue Winnie the Pooh!" Velimare's final curse was prompted by a computer in the form of a bracelet. It looked stylish on the strong, sinewy, yet graceful arm of the space Amazon.
  The President literally roared, giving the order for a nuclear attack. It was clearly visible on every monitor and screen: thermonuclear missiles were flying in a dense swarm toward the mighty intergalactic starships. Thousands of them. They left long fiery tails, the additional containers giving them acceleration up to the third cosmic velocity! Enough for any armada. It seemed they could sweep away all obstacles in their path. They flew up, a terrifying sight-it seemed even the erupting jet streams were blazing the vacuum. They rushed in a predatory flock toward the enemy warships. What a disappointment... Some of the missiles were shot down by gravity lasers, others were stuck in the force field.
  But the return shot is not even visible to radar - its speed is prohibitively faster than the flight of a photon emitted by a star!
  Medvedev never learned of the attack. Sometimes ignorance is the Almighty's final act of mercy.
  A hyperplasmic hell engulfed the Supreme Commander of the most powerful army on planet Earth. Millions of people were vaporized, transformed into plasma, before they could even comprehend the catastrophe that had unfolded.
  A giant brown mushroom cloud rose to a height of over 500 kilometers, and the shock wave, circling the globe several times, shattered windows even in the United States. The shock wave generated gigantic tsunami waves. A wave of water over a hundred meters high covered every continent, sinking tens of thousands of ships. Power lines were knocked out, and cities were plunged into darkness, broken only by the fiery patches of fires.
  A new era has dawned on planet Earth. The Hour of the Dragon has begun.
  Chapter No. 4.
  The world is crushed by the embodiment of evil,
  And the sky plunged into darkness!
  The underworld of hell came to people to
  Armageddon triumphed.
  The monstrous blow had the exact opposite effect.
  Instead of capitulating, Earthlings rallied in a single, noble impulse to repel the stellar enslavers. Even the United States, initially basking in sweet illusions, declared all-out war on the alien invasion.
  In response, the flagship decided to crush and break the rebellious planet's resistance. Velimar's lyre gleamed predatorily, its luminescent, blinding grin.
  "These pathetic primates will once again be confined to the trees, in cages made of spiky plastic. We will crush and erase all the rat holes of the earth's bugs from this pathetic lump of stone."
  "So be it! Pity is weakness!" the officers confirmed in chorus.
  The goddess of death threw her palm up:
  - Quasar! Annihilation tornado!
  ***
  Meanwhile, telecommunications had been partially restored in the United States. Michael Currie, the president of what was still a great power (after Russia), was delivering an address to the nation. However, his distant gaze was directed at the sky, not the piece of paper. The Armenian's face was drawn, and an unhealthy flush glowed on his sunken cheeks. Nevertheless, there was a hint of inspiration in his voice:
  We, the people of planet Earth, have fought among ourselves for too long, killed, deceived, and harmed one another. But the hour has come when humanity must put aside its differences and unite as one in a sacred struggle against universal evil. The forces of hell have awakened; the time foretold in the Apocalypse of the fiery whirlwind cast down by Satan from heaven has arrived. And this difficult time, a time of severe judgment and cruel trial, has already arrived. The Almighty Lord will help us endure this difficult hour; he will support us in our quest to defeat the legions of death sent by the devil upon this sinful earth!
  The image was interrupted by a plasma flash...
  When the blinding glow faded, an enraged star fury emerged, hurling thunder and lightning. Her long hair stood on end, changing colors in a frantic kaleidoscope.
  "How dare you, pathetic aborigine, compare us, the great Stelzans, to the spirits and servants of your epic? We are the highest race in the entire Hyperuniverse. We are the species chosen by God to conquer and subjugate all universes!"
  The space harpy extended her hand forward, its long nails glowing with an otherworldly light, making a threatening gesture:
  "On your knees! Or in a minute, all that'll remain of your shell will be photons, and your soul will be tormented forever by our dragonists! Know this, monkey in a tuxedo, that even death will be endless slavery for you."
  The US President, unlike many of his predecessors, as a true Baptist, took the Christian faith seriously:
  - If the Almighty decides that I must die, then it is inevitable, but I will never kneel before demons.
  In a rage, Lyra slammed her fist into the general standing next to her. The tall man in uniform staggered. The hellish vixen, like a cobra with its tail pinned down, hissed:
  "Turn this native king's pitiful community into a nuclear ash heap. These two-legged reptiles must die in horrific agony. I order the implementation of Plan C-aggressive conquest."
  One of the generals objected, somewhat embarrassed:
  - Without an order from the center, it is impossible to completely exterminate living species of intelligent organisms.
  "We won't exterminate them," the embodiment of cosmic Kali roared ever louder. "Killing them all would be too humane; let them labor under our glucon grip for billions of years. We'll leave a couple, three billion for slave labor. And now I command-hyperplasm!"
  Velimara's high chest heaved, and the seven-headed dragon depicted on her jumpsuit seemed to come to life. Pink and green sparks poured from her open jaws: the cybernetic indicator had activated.
  The US President crossed his arms over his chest:
  "Here it is, the sign of the Antichrist. Lord, grant me the strength to die with dignity. Into your hands I commend my soul..."
  Tactical-grade missiles flew at speeds approaching lightspeed. The Armetica leader vanished before finishing his sentence.
  A bright, furious glow of light erupted in Hasington's place, then a colossal purple-brown flower emerged. Seven hyperplasmic petals separated from the dazzling bud, soaring into the cloud-like heights. They shone with every color of the rainbow for ten seconds, then instantly faded and fell away, leaving only colossal purple-red sparks floating in the stratosphere.
  In the blink of an eye, tens of millions of people were incinerated, disintegrating into elementary particles. Those further away were blinded and glowed like living torches. The fire painfully consumed human flesh. People's skin peeled, their hair turned to dust, their skulls charred. The blast wave, like an accordion, collapsed skyscrapers, burying alive many who had once been so vibrant and carefree in scorching concrete tombs. A team of blond, half-naked Texas schoolchildren kicked a ball around when a gravity wave passed over them, leaving only ashen silhouettes on the charred grass. Poor boys, what were they thinking in their last moments? Maybe they were calling for their mother, or some hero from a movie, or from countless computer games. A girl returning from the store with a basket passed away smiling, not even having time to scream. The child simply disintegrated into photons, and only the miraculously surviving ribbon of the bow swirled in the atmospheric vortex. People hiding in the subway, white and colored, were crushed like flies in a press; those flying on planes at the time were hurled beyond the stratosphere by tornadoes of hell, an even worse and slower death... When, in a chilling vacuum devouring the last of the air like a predatory piranha, people smash their heads against duralumin walls, their eyes popping out of their sockets... Death equalized the pauper and the billionaire, the senator and the prisoner, the movie star and the garbage man. It seemed as if millions of souls were howling, soaring into the sky, the world turned upside down, and perhaps for the first time, people felt how thin the thread of life is and how much they need each other. The mother and child suffocated under the rubble, pressed so tightly against each other that not even the powers of hell could tear them apart.
  Strikes followed in other places on planet Earth. The main goal was to destroy all major industrial centers and cities, deprive humanity of knowledge and dignity, cast it back into a primordial state, and turn people into a shivering herd. Human technology was powerless; the most advanced air defenses couldn't even respond to the charges that would bring death to all life. The battle turned into a merciless, all-out massacre, with annihilation and thermoquark gifts "generously" distributed to every continent.
  Using electronics, the Stelzans targeted the most populated areas of the earth's surface, implementing the long-tested tactic of nest bombing. Mercy in war is no more appropriate than a white coat in a mine! The greatest mercy to the enemy is mercilessness to oneself when learning the art of war!
  Meanwhile, thousands of light tactical planetary fighters were already scattered across the surface, finishing off the surviving troops and, if possible, trying to preserve the civilian population for subsequent exploitation.
  ***
  As soon as Alexander Medvedev gave the order to begin the war, his Vice President, Gennady Polikanov, left the Kremlin. According to Defense Ministry regulations, in the event of a nuclear war, the president and his deputy are not to be in the same building or within 100 kilometers of each other. The marshal managed to escape Moscow through an underground high-speed vacuum tunnel and survive the annihilation and thermoquark strikes. Now it was up to him to lead the resistance to cosmic aggression, becoming President and Supreme Commander-in-Chief. An honorable, but terrifyingly heavy burden. Deep down, Polikanov had always wanted to replace the too-soft and clumsy president, but at the moment he felt like the Titan Atlas, bearing the entire weight of the firmament. Even in military circles, the marshal was considered a hawk for his ruthlessness and uncompromising nature, but in this situation, all his will and determination were useless. The alien empire's utterly invulnerable starships mercilessly decimated the troops of the most powerful and valiant army on Earth, giving them no chance of worthy resistance. Their missiles, small, even minuscule in size, elusive in speed, and immense in destructive power, incinerated everything humanity had created over many centuries. Therefore, the news of the appearance of thousands of small but extremely fast aircraft delighted the "new" president.
  "I give the order. Counterattack the enemy, drive the iron clique out of Russian airspace!" he ordered, trying to hide the hoarseness in his broken voice.
  - Yes, comrade president!
  Air Marshal Vadim Valuev climbed into one of the experimental "Taran" strike vehicles, armed with six nuclear warheads. A beast of a machine, one that would make continents tremble. Finally, they would be able to inflict some damage on the enemy. The order followed:
  - Regardless of casualties, shoot down all alien fighters!
  The short but strong Valuev gazed at the enemy with boyish excitement. Of course, the enemy was terrifyingly powerful; even the highly resilient Taran-3 fighter was tossed like a feather by the deadly gusts of wind swirling in the atmosphere stirred by hypernuclear strikes. But the world must respect and fear us; the deeds of our soldiers are countless! Russians have always known how to fight-Satan will be destroyed!
  "We will knock down the enemy's arrogance!" the marshal shouts, remembering his youth.
  "No mercy for the executioners," replied the pilot sitting on the right. "We will sweep away the stellar scum!"
  The pilots were sincere in their hatred. Of course, the landscape beneath them was so horrific it was heartbreaking. No horror movie, no War of the Worlds-style blockbuster could have captured even a hundredth of the pain, tears, and suffering unfolding on the defeated earth's surface. Nowhere had it been so terrifying, not even in Mechna, when bullets whistled overhead and boots squelched with sticky crimson liquid. And even less so in the later battles at Arfik and the Gulf of Fersit, where he earned his general's and then marshal's epaulettes.
  Of course, it's stupid to fire megaton charges at such small targets, but you can't kill an elephant with pigeon shot.
  The seasoned Valuev was stunned by the monstrous speed of the enemy aircraft. They had barely appeared on the horizon, and a mere second later they were right on top, almost ramming him head-on. His fingers barely managed to press the buttons. The marshal fired all six nuclear warheads, fearing he would no longer have a chance to fire again. Without waiting for the command, the other pilots followed suit, unleashing thousands of conventional and nuclear death bombs. However, the graviolaser beams unleashed by the enemy tactical fighters easily shot down the few surviving missiles.
  Attempting to engage the enemy with their own beam guns was also doomed to failure. The intensity of laser fire was insufficient to penetrate the small force fields protecting the fighters, and aircraft cannons and computer-guided missiles were nothing compared to children's firecrackers. Only a direct hit from a strategic thermonuclear missile could destroy such a machine, but the computer-guided beams prevented objects larger than a nut from reaching the fighters.
  "Dogs, vicious dogs! I'll deal with you yet!" Valuev screamed in despair.
  The screaming made his own ears pop. But apparently the enemy pilot heard it. With the carelessness of a baby shaking a rattle, he shot down several Russian aircraft, and the Stelzans were clearly mocking him, sadistically prolonging the pleasure. Their lasers, as if in mockery, performed a medieval "quartering"-first severing the nose, then the tail and wings. Those who managed to eject were caught with a force-fed "net," apparently for further experimentation. And some pilots were tossed and thrown as if they were tennis balls. The Stelzans, like evil children, love to fool around, reveling in the torment. Gengir Volk released a hologram of his cute face and said with a venomous grin:
  - What are you barking about? Are you hoping for a quick death?!
  Vadim shook his sweat-stuck hair and slammed the jet fire control panel so hard that the plastic cracked and the titanium keyboard buckled. The marshal exhaled.
  -Jackal!
  "Excellent! The monkey is learning to play the piano. I, Gengir the Wolf, will show you how to play properly!" There was no malice in the stelzan's voice, more the joy of a schoolboy who had smashed the principal's office window with a well-aimed slingshot.
  The terrifying structure dove under the right wing and, with almost imperceptible speed, began to spin around the marshal's plane. Never before had Vadim seen such speed; he no longer wanted to fight-his hands couldn't hold back the tornado. All he could do was drop everything and run, become a molecule, and dissolve in the hot air. Activating top speed, fifteen times faster than sound, the renowned marshal, nicknamed the Fox of the Atmosphere, took off... Where? Away from these...
  Fighters bearing the seven-color emblem (the flag of the Stelzan Empire) furiously pounced on anything that moved or breathed. Even super-heavy atomic tanks and aircraft, like butterflies, were consumed by the cascading laser beams emitted by the relatively small one- or two-seaters. The terrifying form of these winged monsters was unparalleled among Earth's predators. They were the epitome of horror, nightmare, and schizoid hyperphobia. To heighten the effect, the Stelzans activated enormous three-dimensional holograms, magnifying the fighters' size a thousandfold, heightening the fear and psychically suppressing the defenders of planet Earth. It seemed as if creatures swarming across the sky were such abominations that no horror film director could have imagined. Some of the colored projections were quasi-material, literally scattering the clouds.
  The marshal was suffocating from the G-forces. The unparalleled wonder fighter was shaking with tension. The machine was smoking, reaching its maximum speed. Gengir wasn't just keeping up; he continued to circle, figure-eight, and polygon around the Russian aircraft, cutting through the atmosphere at sublight speeds and demonstrating a fantastic technological superiority. The intense friction caused a corona of light to form around the Purple Constellation fighter. Vadim closed his eyes: the ring of fire was eating away at his vision.
  - Kill me instead, you bastard. Stop teasing me!
  The wolf laughed. It was so clear it sounded like Stelzan was speaking through a megaphone right into your ear.
  "Death for you is an act of mercy. And mercy, as the greatest of the greatest says, should not exceed the limits of economic gain!"
  A flaming, iridescent bubble separated from the fighter. Despite the marshal's speed, his craft immediately plunged into the fiery center, hanging dead in its invisible web.
  Gengir Volk laughed again, his satisfied face a hellish projection spreading across the windshield. Valuev wanted to close his eyes, but they were paralyzed; he wanted to spit, but the saliva froze in his throat. Now, with frozen eyes, he saw simultaneously the blissful face of the seemingly youthful, happy Stelzan and the horrific scene of total destruction (it was visible in every detail: three-dimensional holograms showed it close-up in the smallest detail). The transparent cocoon tormented his soul, and electroshock and hellfire burned his insides. However, at that moment, Marshal Valuev no longer cared about his own pain, for there was no greater suffering than watching the horrific atrocities committed by the invaders on his home planet.
  Before his eyes, he saw his first baptism of fire, the nightmarish New Year's assault on the Mechen capital. A desperate attack, thanks to corrupt generals, turned into hell for the most powerful and valiant army in the world. An incomprehensible humiliation of a Great Nation that had vanquished countless hordes, defending the peoples of the entire planet with its breast. He, then a young lieutenant, hid under a disabled tank. Burning drops of diesel fuel dripped from above, his overalls were punctured in numerous places, his left leg, pierced by shrapnel, had turned to crimson jelly. His ears were deafened and no longer perceived the explosions of heavy mortar shells, blood was caked, the taste of lead froze on his lips, and the remnants of broken teeth filled his mouth with a dull, aching pain. You wanted to cry from the unbearable pain, but you had to crawl out from under this steel coffin. And out there, death reigns supreme, a satanic ball, but the dirty, burgundy snow refreshes my blistered face, and a gust of wind soothes my scorched lungs. Then, through the thick haze of suffering, the thought flashes that there, beneath the tank, lies your gravely wounded comrade, dying a painful death, roasted in a walking pan. And you dive again into this fiery hell, crawling for now endless meters, writhing under the furious leaden rain, clutching with mangled fingers at the pitiful semblance of a shattered bulletproof vest, and pull out the now hundred-ton body. What remains of Sergei has been retrieved, but his friend will never regain consciousness, forever remaining a silent cripple...
  The river of memory breaks, and only isolated fragments of a difficult military career are recalled. But all of this fades, like a candle in an atomic explosion...
  What a terrible war this is!..
  Monstrous machines raged uncontrollably, shredding and vaporizing life, great and small, in their destructive path. A small flock of killer aircraft attacked a secret Russian base in Antarctica, commanded by General of the Army Nikolai Valuev-Vadim's brother. Nikolai barely had time to give his final orders. A born sadist, Gengir Volk, deliberately projected an image of underground Russian communications. General Valuev suddenly saw on the screen an image of Vadim, burning alive in a seven-colored torch. Flaming chunks fell from his crumbling body, revealing blackened bones. A sight more terrifying than Dante's Inferno. The brothers' eyes met for a moment, the image hovering almost directly next to each other.
  "Don't give up..." the Russian marshal whispered barely audibly. "The Lord will save you..."
  A continuous sea of fire filled the image.
  ***
  Miniature thermoquark projectiles (based on the process of quark fusion-more than a million times more powerful than a hydrogen bomb for a given weight) caused a monstrous earthquake upon impacting the kilometers-thick ice crust, causing the entire continent to split into a dense web of deep fissures. Streams of molten lava poured from beneath the cracks in the crust, and the remnants of the shattered ice evaporated, triggering powerful hurricanes and tornadoes. Advancing from the southern belt, streams of superheated steam sank miraculously surviving ships like matchsticks, snapped trees, flattened and ground high mountains into sand, and people caught in the annihilation vortices vanished.
  ***
  In the northern regions, tactical galactic fighters continued their methodical sweep, making little distinction between military and civilian targets. Their powerful cyber-speakers spewed out streams of terrifying music, piercing eardrums. The man-made cacophony shattered even the most resilient mental construct. Gengir bared his tiger teeth, purring deafeningly.
  - It's a pity that earthlings are dying so quickly.
  His partner, Ten-Star Officer Efa Covaleta, added:
  "I don't even have time to lift a finger before mountains of disfigured corpses appear. I feel sorry for their children; they don't even have time to understand what death is. First, we need to cut off their fingers and toes with a laser!"
  The cannibal general ran a finger with a pointed nail across his throat:
  "We'll use the survivors for shoes and raincoats. Look how glossy their skin is, especially the young women."
  "We could set up a decent sanatorium here, complete with a hypersafari for hairless primates," Efa said loudly, her teeth flashing with emotion.
  "I'll buy myself a plot of land! I'll slit the bellies of the local females, put my children on them, and let them ride on their intestines!" The two cannibals with plasma computers and superweapons burst out laughing.
  "Iron" Marshal Gennady Polikanov literally collapsed into hysterics; impotent rage choked the "new" Russian president.
  "Damn it! Are we really that hopelessly weak? They're simply burning out our brains. Perhaps if I believed in God, I'd certainly start asking for help. But I don't believe in fairy tales like that overseas clown Michael, and I won't pray! You star monsters won't get any capitulation from me anyway!"
  Suddenly the light in the deep bunker went out for a moment, and then a disgustingly familiar voice was heard in the headphones;
  "Russians, surrender! We will spare the lives of all who voluntarily lay down your feeble excuse for a weapon! I guarantee the lives of the submissive individuals and three meals a day in a labor sanatorium!"
  The Russian marshal made an expressive gesture, sending him far away.
  "Russians never surrender! We will fight to the bitter end or die standing with our heads held high!"
  The marshal, already a little calmer, gave the order.
  "If we're going to die, die with music! Play the anthem to which our ancestors marched and died!"
  Meanwhile, the starry Amazon was overjoyed. The images of mass murder and destruction evoked wild delight and indescribable bliss. What was especially exciting and thrilling was the sight of people dying, who looked exactly like the Stelzans.
  - Who else in the Universe can boast of such happiness - to kill their own kind?!
  Clearly, she had mental issues. Because the sight of colossal destruction and archipelagos of charred corpses no longer pleased many sane invaders. After all, Earthlings resemble the Stelzans, like their younger brothers. It's as if this is the early youth of their own race. And it's scary to object: this crazy harpy could fire a blast from a plasma ray gun.
  Lyra, no longer feeling the brakes, knocked down the huge young officer, letting out a scream.
  "I order everyone to join us! And turn on massive holograms, covering the entire conquered planet. Let every surviving primate see how quasar-like we are! It'll be Hyperfuck!"
  However, one of the star generals, Kramar Razorvirov, abruptly cut off her words.
  - War is not a brothel. Get up, dust yourself off, and get dressed!
  Star Kali lunged for the laser rifle. But Kramar was faster: the seven-barreled weapon pressed against her forehead, and the two barrels, lengthening, pierced her ample chest.
  Lira hissed fiercely, no cobra could spew so much poison:
  - Your end will come anyway. You will be uselessly annihilated!
  Her bare chest heaved like icebergs in a storm. If Velimara had possessed such a power, she would have incinerated the impudent "moralist" with a single glance. The officers froze. Clashes between generals are very rare.
  Efa Kovaleta winked her right eye and whispered:
  -What a quasar fighter, he"s not afraid of anything!
  A duel was brewing, deadly, with no chance of leniency. A computer message saved the situation.
  An underground nuclear power plant, along with an entire network of underground utilities, has been discovered in the mountains that humans call the Ural Mountains. Scans indicate that an enemy command post is located here.
  ***
  A multidimensional holographic image flashed. The network of underground utilities, precisely rendered down to the smallest detail, was clearly visible, leaving no chance of escape.
  The generals and officers immediately perked up.
  - That's where we need to strike. Our missiles are ready.
  "No, there won't be a strike. The leader of the monkey pack is there - Polkan. He must be captured alive. We'll conduct experiments on him, testing pain isotopes, and then we'll send him stuffed to the museum. Hey, what are you staring at? Prepare to land on the surface. This planet is already beneath us!"
  Kramar pulled back his formidable weapon and, although the promise of imminent death clearly sparkled in the eyes of the enraged Lyra, he boldly said:
  - Don't even count on it! War isn't - Hyperfuck!
  "We'll figure things out after the battle!" Velimara's voice softened slightly. "Show us what you're capable of!"
  A titanic, terrifying starship, engulfing everything in hyperplasmic fire, rushed like a predatory hawk towards the planet's torn surface.
  The first contact between two interstellar civilizations took place.
  CHAPTER No 5.
  Meanwhile, super-ace Volka Rybachenko trained pilots in aerial combat techniques. And occasionally, he wrote.
  When the boy prince, now a barefoot beggar, woke up, the first thing he wanted to do was brush his teeth. But there was no special powder, so he had to make do with thin twigs instead of a toothbrush. He also rinsed his teeth with lukewarm water. The morning was fresh; after all, it was only the beginning of spring. Even though spring arrives very early in Spain.
  His feet were extremely painful; they were bruised, cut, and blistered, though they were beginning to heal and were intensely itchy. Of course, shoes are a sign of status, and for an infant to go without them was considered shameful, so Charles had no experience with them at all.
  Although running around barefoot like commoners' children was the twelve-year-old boy's dream. Indeed, we don't appreciate what we have, and we desire what we don't have. And that isn't always a good thing.
  The girl Stella consoled:
  - Don't worry, soon your feet will be harder and stronger than your boots! It's just a matter of getting used to!
  Karl smiled and replied:
  - That's right! You need to have the courage of a true knight!
  The boy prince remembered Don Quixote. Although the book wasn't particularly popular, considered frivolous, the Infante had read it. And there was much in it that was interesting. In particular, Charles wondered why a shepherd boy would wear out three pairs of shoes. He should have gone barefoot; fortunately, even in winter, snow and frost are rare in Spain.
  Sometimes the temperature doesn't drop below ten degrees Celsius all winter. And in such weather, a hardened and accustomed boy can show off his bare, calloused heels.
  Well, okay, those are just details. The food, however, was rather meager. The children ate only boiled beans without salt, and only small pieces each. However, Karl, being hungry, ate even that willingly and demanded more. This was met with loud laughter.
  After which the female chieftain remarked:
  - Good food must be earned!
  The infant asked in confusion:
  - What do you mean?
  Red Zora replied:
  - Steal or rob! Well, we don't want and we won't humiliate ourselves by begging!
  Karl nodded with a smile:
  - Yes, begging would be too humiliating for a person of noble birth. And stealing... I've never stolen, and maybe it would be interesting.
  A red-haired teenage girl remarked:
  "It's not that simple, and you need to know the art of stealing. Show me, Rogue, for example."
  A boy even shorter than Karl ran up to the mannequin with his bare heels flashing and, with lightning speed, pulled a handkerchief out of his pocket, and the bells didn"t even jingle.
  Red Zora nodded:
  "Now try doing it without it even jingling," the girl said, stamping her bare foot. "Scoundrel, put the handkerchief back."
  The thief boy did it quickly, and the bells did not ring again.
  Zora winked. She was a teenager, with a well-formed figure but still a rounded, childish face, quite slender and agile. Her feet, though bare, were quite graceful, and she washed them often.
  Tanned, with fiery red hair, she was a pretty girl with mischievous features. She was dressed simply, and her skirt was a bit short by the standards of the time-above the knees.
  Karl was wearing only shorts and was shivering a little.
  Red Zora exclaimed:
  - Come on, get it!
  Karl approached the mannequin cautiously, limping on his blistered, bruised soles. He tried to reach into his pocket. The bells immediately jingled.
  The chieftain girl muttered:
  - No, that won't do! You'll be spotted right away!
  The infant muttered in confusion:
  - Let me practice!
  Red Zora muttered:
  - Try it! Try to stretch your fingers and move smoothly.
  Karl set to work. This time he managed to get his hand in, but when he pulled the handkerchief, the bells tauntingly jingled again. The boy prince shuddered. It was difficult for him to move on his bruised feet. And every step was painful.
  I tried to pull the handkerchief out several times, but to no avail!
  Red Zora finally said:
  - Enough! Come and do business with us! Watch how others do it, and you'll learn!
  Limping, half-starved and half-naked, the infant set out to hunt. Indeed, he had no other choice.
  But it was hard to walk, especially on the cobblestones that had begun to heat up, and I had to overcome myself.
  The ataman's wife noted:
  - I have an ointment that could literally make your feet heal faster. But it costs money!
  Karl replied:
  - I'll steal it or earn it and give it back!
  Red Zora replied:
  - No! Let's do it this way! Can you sing?
  Karl answered confidently:
  - I think yes!
  The chieftain replied:
  - Then sing and put them in your hat! Or rather, I'll put them in your hat! Maybe we can work something out!
  The Infante shrugged and replied:
  - The future king, in theory, shouldn"t sing and no one taught me this!
  Red Zora laughed:
  - King! You're supposed to be the Duke's son!
  Karl was found:
  - The Duke is almost a king!
  The chieftain muttered:
  - And maybe you know Latin?
  The Infante nodded:
  - Yes, I know!
  The redhead replied:
  - Sing your Latin sayings loudly! And I'll collect the money! Just let's find a more crowded place!
  The girl and boy began to trot. Karl stepped awkwardly on a sharp stone with his scuffed sole and yelped. It turned out that the dream of walking barefoot wasn't as pleasant in reality as he'd imagined. Although, perhaps he was too pampered. He should have stayed in the lair, at least hoped his feet would have healed.
  Red Zora noted:
  - You boys often moan like girls! But imagine what will happen if you end up in front of the executioner!
  Karl asked, not too surprised:
  - Do they torture children too?
  Red Zora nodded:
  "And I was interrogated by the executioner, and he slashed my entire back. Then they greased the soles of my feet and brought a brazier to me! Let's just say it was very painful!"
  The Infante remarked:
  - We should ban the torture of children...
  The chieftain noticed, showing her heels; although they were fried, you could see how calloused they were, and the girl didn't know how to wear shoes:
  "How can I find out where the kids hid the hidden things? Or what if it's about witchcraft? My hair is so red that the inquisitors suspected I was a witch!"
  Karl laughed and replied:
  - I would have suspected it too! A real flame indeed!
  Zora smiled. She had large, healthy teeth. You wouldn't call her face pretty, but she had a very expressive and strong-willed face.
  So they walked a lot more and found themselves on a busy street.
  The boy prince stood up, unsteadily, on his bruised legs and began to sing:
  It is not fitting for us to languish in captivity,
  Take up your sword and rush into battle!
  The faces of the boys and girls became brighter,
  The price of freedom will be high!
  
  But this does not bother those who believe,
  About the fact that the sun shines equally for everyone!
  And the fact that man is stronger than the beast,
  Once a slave, now a lion at heart!
  
  I passionately want a girl's love,
  The wave of passions in my chest does not subside!
  And even though the waves of stormy blood covered us,
  You will be my dream forever!
  
  A cruel slaughter, a sea of corpses in the field,
  Under the moonlight, I fight cruelly!
  And there will be even more joy,
  Oh, the storm of feelings for you, my whole life!
  
  The dust of naive promises of youth,
  She is as light as poplar fluff!
  But I accepted the cross of love without complaint,
  The burning torch in the heart has not gone out!
  
  Believe me, I will never forget you,
  The bad will disappear like a sad dream!
  I carry your sacred image everywhere,
  And if I get scared, I will be condemned!
  
  I fight within the limits of the terribly distant,
  Cruel Mars feasts, in his mouth like game!
  The glare of the grievous wounds imprinted on us,
  May God give us strength to crush the darkness of Hell!
  
  What torment is an hour of separation worth,
  My completely worn-out soul!
  The soldier's hands are covered in calluses and ulcers,
  But he will give it for the peace of his native country!
  
  There is a blessing of inspiration in battle,
  Forward, directing an eagle gaze!
  I draw courage and inspiration from battle,
  The result will be victorious and glorious!
  The boy prince sang in a clear, ringing voice. The crowd clearly enjoyed it. Copper and even silver coins rained down, though not very generously. Zora deftly collected them, even using them to pick up her bare toes.
  But then the guards appeared and we had to run away.
  Despite the pain in his sore soles, Karl ran, and ran fast. When running warms up a child's feet, the pain subsides.
  Luckily, the guards seemed too lazy to chase the children. So they left them alone.
  The boy ran to the curb and crouched down, breathing heavily; Zora landed next to him.
  The ataman noted:
  - You sing well! And you have a great voice!
  Karl noted:
  - Such a breed! I can do a lot of things, and I wash them!
  Red Zora noted:
  "You could sing while my gang members picked your pockets. It's better than risking getting caught!"
  The infant asked anxiously:
  - And the guards?
  The ataman's wife noted:
  "Yes, there are a lot of guards in Madrid; it's not for nothing that it's the capital of the largest empire in the world. But you can come to an agreement with them-by promising them a cut."
  Karl laughed:
  - Yes, it"s typical, I know that both officials and security guards like to take bribes!
  The boy stamped his bare foot and winced; the sole was cut and blistered, and it began to hurt, aching with renewed vigor.
  Red Zora noted:
  - I can lubricate your feet! I have some balm! Come on, lift your claws.
  The infant muttered:
  - You will order me around!
  In response, the chieftain quickly flicked the boy prince on the nose and muttered:
  - I want to do a good deed for you, and you!
  Charles lifted his feet. The girl began to carefully anoint his feet. Her touch was both strong and gentle. The Infanta even thought it would be nice to have a servant like her. The balm stung slightly. But it really did make him feel better.
  Atomansha asked:
  - I see you are a learned boy and the son of a noble person! Tell me, why is there no justice in the world?
  And her hands became the Infanta's five toes. It was quite pleasant and ticklish. Karl even closed his eyes. He imagined something pleasant. For example, a cow tickling the august child's bare soles with its tongue. And these movements seemed so pleasant to them. And nearby, a nightingale's trill sounded. And it seemed to murmur in his ears, which was also quite delightful. Such fairytale music.
  Red Zora asked, repeating the question once again:
  - Why is there no justice in the world?
  The barefoot infant boy gave a detailed answer:
  The lack of justice in the world is not a random systemic failure, but a fundamental property of reality, conditioned by biological, social, and physical laws. If we analyze the problem seriously, we can identify five main reasons why universal justice does not exist:
  1. Biological foundation and evolution
  Nature is built on the principle of natural selection, which is fundamentally profoundly unfair. Resources (food, territory, reproductive rights) are awarded not to the "kind" or "moral," but to the fittest, most aggressive, or most fortunate. Humans, as a biological species, have inherited these mechanisms. Justice is a purely human abstraction, an attempt to erect an ethical canopy over the chaotic and brutal process of survival.
  2. Resource scarcity and competition
  The material world is limited. It is impossible to provide everyone with equal access to the best goods (health, talent, resources). Competition for these goods inevitably generates inequality. One person's understanding of justice (for example, the right to the fruits of one's labor) often conflicts with another person's understanding of justice (for example, the right to assistance in need). These "justices" are mutually exclusive.
  3. The Randomness Factor (Birth Lottery)
  A huge part of human destiny is determined by factors that a person did not deserve and did not choose:
  Genetics: one is born healthy and brilliant, another - with serious illnesses.
  Geography and society: being born into a prosperous family in a developed country or in a war zone in poverty is pure chance.
  The world does not take personal merit into account when distributing starting conditions, which makes the outcome of the race a foregone conclusion for many even before it begins.
  4. Subjectivity and cognitive distortions
  Justice is a value judgment. What seems fair to the victor is disastrous to the vanquished. The human mind is prone to survivorship bias and the belief in a "just world" (the belief that good people are rewarded and bad people are punished). When reality contradicts this belief, we experience cognitive dissonance. In reality, "evil" often proves more effective in achieving goals than "good," and social institutions are not always able to prevent this.
  5. Imperfection of social institutions and legal systems
  Human laws are a compromise, not absolute truth.
  Power: Laws are often written and enforced in the interests of those who have power.
  Entropy: Bureaucracy and corruption erode any attempt to establish fair rules. Even the most perfect judicial system makes mistakes, and justice is often only accessible to those who can afford it.
  Result:
  Justice exists only as a dynamic human effort. It's not a state of the world, but a vector that humanity strives to maintain despite entropy and biology. We call the world unjust precisely because within us there is a demand for order that is absent in the external universe.
  Do you think that awareness of the world's injustice is an incentive for the development of human ethics, or does it only lead to pessimism and a refusal to fight for one's ideals?
  Red Rose whistled:
  - You're something else! How does this fit into the image of an Almighty and just God!?
  The boy prince Karl gave a detailed answer to this too:
  The juxtaposition of God's omnipotence and the world's obvious injustice is a classic theodicy (justification of God) that humanity has wrestled with for millennia. If we take a serious and systematic approach to this contradiction, there are several main theological and philosophical approaches:
  1. The Gift of Free Will (The Libertarian Argument)
  This is the most common answer. For a person to be a person and not a biological robot, they must have real freedom of choice, including the right to evil.
  Logic: If God instantly curbed all injustice, freedom would disappear. The world would become a controlled training ground. Injustice is the price God pays so that humans can truly love and create. God does not "create" evil; He "allows" its existence as a side effect of human freedom.
  2. The limitations of human horizons
  We judge justice by seeing only a tiny fragment of time and space.
  Pattern metaphor: When viewed from the back, a carpet reveals only chaotic knots and broken threads. But from the front, it reveals a harmonious design. Theologians assert that "God's justice" unfolds on an eternity-scale. What appears catastrophic here may, in the grand scheme of things, be a necessary element of the highest good or the nurturing of the soul.
  3. The World as a "School of Souls" (Irenaeus" Theodicy)
  According to this view, the world is deliberately created to be imperfect and difficult.
  The goal is development: In a perfectly just and comfortable world (the one we were debating), qualities such as courage, sacrifice, mercy, and patience would be impossible. Injustice is a "trainer" for the spirit. God is "omnipotent," but His goal is not to make us full, but to make us mature beings capable of empathy.
  4. Kenosis (Self-limitation of God)
  This is the concept that Almighty God voluntarily "stepped back," limiting His influence on the material world in order to give matter and man autonomy.
  God suffers with the world: In Christianity, this idea is taken to its extreme in the image of Christ on the cross. God does not look down on injustice; He enters into it and experiences it with humanity. Justice here is not a legal act of retribution, but an act of compassion and final healing at the end of time.
  5. Eschatological response
  God's justice is not denied, it is postponed.
  Final Balance: It is assumed that "earthly injustice" is only a fleeting moment. True justice will come in the "other world," where all tears will be wiped away and evil will be judged. Without the idea of the immortality of the soul and retribution beyond the grave, the concept of a just God truly crumbles.
  Result:
  Almighty God and injustice can only be reconciled if we recognize that our world is not a final destination, but a transitional process, a "construction site" where noise, dirt, and trauma are inevitable for the sake of constructing the future building.
  Do you think such an answer is acceptable for a person who is suffering here and now, or does the "promise of future justice" seem like just an attempt to justify Heaven"s silence?
  Red Rose took it and asked the question again:
  - But Jesus says he has all power on Earth and in Heaven!
  The barefoot infante readily answered:
  This is the central nerve of Christian theology, often called "Already, but not yet."
  When Jesus says in the Gospel of Matthew, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me," this statement clashes with a reality of war, disease, and the triumph of evil. A serious theological response to this paradox is built on three levels:
  1. Legal power versus actual power
  Imagine a legitimate ruler who has regained his rights to the throne, but in some provinces there are still rebellious governors, marauders and gangs.
  Victory Won: From a Christian perspective, the "battle for the world" was won at the moment of the Resurrection. Death and sin as absolute forces were annihilated.
  Clearing the Territory: We live in a period of "interregnum." Christ has authority, but He does not impose it by force, giving evil the opportunity to expose itself and people the opportunity to voluntarily choose His side.
  2. The Nature of His Authority: Service, Not Violence
  God is omnipotent, but His power is not the power of a dictator (as we argued in the context of Hitler or Palpatine).
  Respect for Freedom: If Jesus used His power to instantly stop any evil, He would turn the Earth into a concentration camp of "good robots."
  His Kingdom is not of this world: He rules through conscience, love, and inspiration. His power "on earth" is exercised through people who voluntarily fulfill His will. Where people reject Him, He "steps back," allowing human evil to continue to operate for the time being.
  3. Humility of God (Kenosis)
  This is the most difficult concept. Almighty God voluntarily limits His omnipotence in order to allow creation to be autonomous.
  If God "pressed" with His power every second, life would become an endless miracle, and faith (like trust in the dark) would become impossible. Christ's justice is not a police report, but an invitation to transformation.
  4. Eschatological expectation
  The power of Christ will be fully revealed only at the Second Coming.
  Judgment: Now is the time for mercy and forbearance. If He were to exercise His full power right now, not only the obvious wicked would be subject to "annihilation," but each of us, too, for each of us has a share of injustice. He is delaying to "give time for repentance."
  Result:
  The phrase "all power on earth" means that the final word in history belongs to Him. Injustice is the temporary noise of a vanishing old reality, one that has already lost but still continues to resist in the hearts of people.
  Do you think such "absolute and immediate" power of God would be a blessing for man, or would we be the first to pray for the return of our right to make mistakes and imperfections?
  The red-haired ataman liked these answers so much that she asked the question again:
  Why did the first Christians expect the end of the world to happen "any minute now," and how did this change their attitude toward earthly authority?
  The boy prince answered quite logically and in detail:
  The first Christians lived in a state that theologians call eschatological tension. They sincerely believed that the Second Coming of Christ would occur in their lifetime or, at the very least, in the next generation.
  Here's why these expectations arose and how they changed their view of the state:
  1. A literal reading of Christ's words
  The Gospels contain phrases that the early communities interpreted as a direct indication of the imminent end: "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place." For the fishermen of Galilee and the artisans of Antioch, "this generation" meant themselves. They expected not the "end of history" in the scientific sense, but an immediate transformation of the world.
  2. Social context: The world as a "sinking ship"
  The first Christians lived in the powerful but spiritually stifling Roman Empire.
  A sense of temporariness: Why build a career, accumulate wealth, or carry out reforms if tomorrow it will all burn in divine fire?
  Result: This gave rise to a radical asceticism in everyday life. People sold their possessions, shared everything with the community, and did not aspire to hold public office.
  3. Attitude to earthly authority: Loyalty through indifference
  It was precisely the expectation of a quick end that formed a paradoxical attitude towards Rome:
  "Render to God what is God's, and to Caesar what is Caesar's": Christians were not revolutionaries. They did not try to overthrow the emperor because they considered his power a mere decoration that would soon collapse of its own accord.
  Loyalty without reverence: They paid taxes and obeyed the laws, but refused to worship the emperor's genius as a god. From Rome's perspective, this was dangerous "passive sabotage." For Christians, Caesar was simply a temporary administrator in the "waiting room" before eternity.
  4. The Crisis of the "Delayed Coming" (Parousia)
  When the apostles began to die and Christ did not return, the Church faced its first serious intellectual crisis.
  Institutionalization: Christians had to learn to live in the long term within history. Hierarchies, canons, and churches emerged.
  Paradigm Shift: The attitude toward authority shifted from "ignoring" it to an attempt to ecclesiasticize the empire. Christianity, instead of being a community "awaiting the end," began to transform into a pillar of the state, which ultimately led to the era of Constantine the Great.
  5. Political trace
  The early Christian expectation of the end of the world laid the foundation for the Western understanding of the limitations of power. If power is not absolute, but a temporary function, then a person has a spiritual realm that does not belong to the state.
  Result:
  The first Christians expected the end of the world to come "tomorrow," so they were as free as possible from fear of earthly tyrants. Their strength lay in the fact that they did not try to "improve" this world, but lived as if the new world had already arrived.
  Do you think modern humanity is capable of such a degree of inner freedom, or are we too deeply entrenched in earthly structures to seriously expect their end?
  CHAPTER No 6.
  Having awakened, Oleg-Karl continued his active reforms. Indeed, why had he swapped places with the Infante? To show his best side. Many reforms were needed, including the creation of ministries and their structuring.
  The infant boy continued to run around barefoot, his bare heels sparkling. Now that was incredibly cool.
  They made bayonets for muskets, a new flintlock loading system, and grenades made of clay and gunpowder. And gunpowder itself could be made more powerful and lethal.
  Karl-Oleg, in particular, recalled history lessons and the appearance of the bayonet.
  This is one of those cases in the history of technology where the solution seems obvious only in hindsight. Almost 200 years passed between the advent of handguns and the invention of the bayonet (mid-17th century).
  Here are the main reasons why it took so long:
  1. Design and weight issues
  Early muskets were huge, heavy (up to 7-9 kg) and cumbersome.
  Length: To make it convenient to aim and shoot, a special stand was required - a forket (bipod).
  Balance: Attaching a heavy blade to the end of an already overweight barrel made the weapon completely uncontrollable. A musketeer simply couldn't fence effectively with such a "club."
  2. Tactical division of roles
  During the Renaissance, the army was built on a strict division of labor.
  The musketeers were "distance fighters." Their job was to fire and retreat.
  The pikemen served as a "human shield." Huge squares of infantry with 5-meter-long pikes protected the riflemen while they laboriously reloaded their guns.
  The "pikes and muskets" (tercios) system worked so effectively that military theorists for a long time saw no point in combining these two functions.
  3. Technical imperfections of loading
  The musket was loaded from the muzzle.
  The Hindrance: The first bayonets (baguettes) were inserted directly into the barrel. This meant that once you inserted the bayonet, you couldn't fire.
  Risk: If you inserted the bayonet too early, you lost firepower. If you inserted it too late, the enemy cavalry would have already cut you down. It took time to invent the tubular bayonet, which fits onto the barrel, allowing you to load and fire without removing the blade.
  4. Psychology and traditions
  Firearms were long perceived as something "ignoble" and limited to a distance. Close combat was considered the preserve of bladed weapons. Musketeers carried rapiers or swords as standalone weapons. The idea of transforming an expensive and complex musket into an improvised spear long seemed strange and technically barbaric.
  How has this changed?
  The bayonet appeared when muskets became lighter and combat tactics became more mobile. Its introduction eliminated pikemen, effectively doubling the number of riflemen in a regiment. This revolutionized the field, transforming every soldier into a versatile fighting unit.
  Do you think the bayonet was a "weapon of despair" for the musketeer, or did its appearance indicate that the infantry had finally stopped fearing cavalry?
  The boy prince was also interested in other questions:
  Why is the bayonet still used in modern warfare, despite the extreme combat distances?
  Despite the fact that modern combat is conducted at distances of hundreds of meters, and sometimes kilometers, the bayonet stubbornly remains in the arsenal of almost every army in the world. It may seem anachronistic, but its persistence is dictated by several practical and psychological reasons:
  1. Psychological factor ("Presence effect")
  The bayonet is, first and foremost, an instrument of aggressive domination.
  Demoralization: The sight of advancing infantry with fixed bayonets exerts tremendous pressure on the enemy. It's a signal that the soldier is prepared for extreme range and is ready to kill with his own hands.
  Fighter Confidence: For the soldier himself, the bayonet is the "last resort." Knowing you have not only a firing tube but also a spear in your hands gives you psychological stability in a situation where you run out of ammunition or your weapon jams.
  2. Closed Quarters Battle (CQB)
  In urban combat, in the tight corridors of buildings or in trenches, the combat distance is reduced to zero.
  Firing inertia: A long rifle is difficult to aim at point-blank range, and a bullet can ricochet off a concrete wall. In this situation, a bayonet allows you to neutralize an enemy silently and instantly, without wasting precious seconds reloading or adjusting firing delays.
  3. Control of prisoners and civilians
  The bayonet is indispensable when escorting and patrolling.
  Non-lethal deterrence: Poking with a rifle butt or threatening with a bayonet is more effective and safer (for those around you) than opening fire. A bayonet creates a "zone of exclusion" around a soldier: a person instinctively fears sharp metal more than the black hole of a barrel.
  4. Versatility (Toolkit)
  A modern bayonet is not just a pike, but a multifunctional tool.
  Engineering challenges: The design of most bayonets (for example, those for the AK-74 or the American M9) allows them to be used as wire cutters for cutting live barbed wire, as a hacksaw, or as a regular field knife. Carrying both a knife and a bayonet separately is impractical, so they were combined.
  5. Tradition and learning
  Bayonet fighting is the most important part of a young soldier's training.
  Spiritual Development: Practicing bayonet strikes on dummies develops the "controlled rage" and determination necessary for war in soldiers. This is a method for transforming civilians into combatants.
  Result:
  Today, a bayonet is 10% a weapon and 90% a tool and symbol. It is needed for those rare but critical 1% of cases when war becomes extremely personal and physical.
  Do you think there will come a time when robotics will completely eliminate humans from close combat, or will "cold steel" forever remain the last line of defense of the human will?
  Oleg, as they say, is on the job. Indeed, it wasn't for nothing that Suvorov said: "A fool's bullet is a brave bayonet!"
  Although maybe he did go too far.
  Oleg preferred Napoleon Bonaparte's mathematical and analytical approach. The boy rightly believed that Napoleon, having thoroughly studied Alexander Suvorov's tactics, could have lured him into a cunning trap.
  Besides the bayonet, the young genius had the idea that it would be a good idea to also acquire small sapper shovels. This would also have been effective in the late Middle Ages.
  The young, barefoot infante, acting king, made some calculations.
  What is more effective in trench warfare: a bayonet or a small infantry shovel?
  This question brings us back to the realities of the First and Second World Wars, which are confirmed by modern experience in local conflicts. In terms of sheer effectiveness in the cramped, muddy, and confined spaces of a trench, the small infantry shovel (SIS) almost always outperforms the bayonet.
  This is why experienced fighters (from the time of Remarque to modern stormtroopers) often prefer the "entrenching tool":
  1. Chopping blow versus thrusting blow
  Shovel: Sharpened at the edges, the MPL is essentially a battle hatchet. In a tight trench, where there's no room for a wide swing, a chopping blow with the shovel to the enemy's head, neck, or shoulder is fatal. The shovel easily cuts through winter clothing, helmets, and bones.
  Bayonet: Designed primarily for thrusting. But thrusting carries a risk. The blade can become lodged in the enemy's ribs or ammunition. In cramped quarters, there's no time to "pull out" a stuck bayonet, and in those seconds, the fighter becomes defenseless.
  2. Lever and distance
  Spatula: Perfectly balanced for close-quarters combat. Its weight (approximately 800 g) creates tremendous momentum when striking. The short handle allows for use in situations where you and your opponent are literally pressed together.
  Bayonet: When attached to a rifle, the weapon becomes too long and awkward to maneuver in the tight curve of a trench. When held as a knife, it's too light and short to deliver a stopping blow through body armor or a thick jacket.
  3. Psychological effect and versatility
  Survival tool: A shovel is what a soldier uses to dig a trench. It's always at hand, on his belt. It's not perceived as a "dress" weapon; it's a working tool that has become an extension of the hand.
  Protection: The flat surface of the shoulder blade can act as an improvised shield, capable of deflecting a knife blow or even protecting against small fragments.
  4. Historical experience (Testaments of veterans)
  Erich Maria Remarque's book "All Quiet on the Western Front" explicitly states: "The bayonet gets stuck in the ribs, difficult to pull out... The spade can be used to strike under the chin, cutting off everything in its path." This is not fiction, but the harsh practice of trench warfare, where the MPL is recognized as the most feared close-combat weapon.
  Result:
  A bayonet knife is good for escorting and psychological pressure. But for real slaughter in the trenches, when life and death are a matter of seconds, a sharpened shovel is the absolute favorite. It's more reliable, more powerful, and more versatile.
  Do you think the continued use of shovel-fighting skills by special forces in 2026 is a sign of "archaism," or does it reflect the understanding that the final outcome of any technological war will still be decided in hand-to-hand combat?
  The boy's solutions are also simple, but let's say they are brilliant and truly super.
  Grenades are also, of course, essential. Such weapons are extremely effective.
  Oleg Rybachenko, this brilliant boy, recalls:
  When did the first fragmentation grenades appear?
  The first prototypes of devices that could be called "fragmentation grenades" appeared much earlier than is commonly believed, but their evolution from a clay pot to a modern steel ammunition took centuries.
  Here are the key stages of the fragmentation grenade's development:
  1. Byzantine and Arab periods (9th-10th centuries)
  The earliest ancestors of grenades originated in the Middle East. These were small ceramic, glass, or stone vessels filled with "Greek fire" or primitive incendiary mixtures.
  Splinter effect: When an explosion (or strong impact) occurred, the vessel's body shattered, and the sharp ceramic shards caused additional injuries in addition to burns. These were the first improvised "splinter" elements.
  2. China (10th-13th centuries)
  In China, where gunpowder was invented, grenades became more powerful. During the Song Dynasty, cast iron casings began to be used.
  A technological breakthrough: When an explosion occurred, cast iron shattered into numerous sharp, heavy fragments. It was the Chinese who first realized that a metal casing was the best way to convert the energy of an explosion into lethal force.
  3. Appearance in Europe (15th-16th centuries)
  In Europe, grenades began to be widely used during sieges of fortresses. The word "grenade" (from the Spanish "granada" - pomegranate) was coined in the 16th century due to the resemblance of the round projectile filled with gunpowder grains to a pomegranate full of grains.
  Construction: These were hollow cast iron balls the size of a large apple, filled with black powder with a primitive fuse.
  Specialization: In the 17th century, grenadiers emerged-elite infantry units selected for strength and height to hurl these heavy and dangerous "iron balls" over long distances.
  4. The Birth of the Modern Fragmentation Grenade (20th Century)
  The true "fragment" standard as we know it emerged during World War I due to the trench deadlock.
  Mills Grenade (1915): The first modern British grenade with a segmented cast-iron body (the "lemon"). The serrations on the body were specifically designed to ensure predictable fragmentation.
  Remote igniter: Previously, grenades often exploded on impact or had unreliable fuses. The pin-and-lever mechanism made them safe for the thrower and deadly for the enemy in the trench.
  Result:
  The idea of using hull fragments for destruction was born with the ceramic pots of the Byzantines, but the effective steel fragmentation grenade with calculated fragmentation of the hull is the brainchild of the trench warfare of the early 20th century.
  Do you think the current trend toward creating "programmable" grenades (exploding in the air above a trench) marks the end of the classic "limonka" grenade, or will the simplicity and low cost of cast iron always be relevant in a major war?
  Of course, the boy genius takes all this into account; in any case, his knowledge as a progressor will find practical application. He is now the most important person in Spain and must conquer the entire world. First, France, engulfed in the Fronde, will fall. Then Britain, and then the entire world!
  And the Ottoman Empire cannot escape its fate.
  Oleg was interested in many things.
  If you stuff a grenade with thin needles, will it become more effective?
  The idea of filling a grenade with needles (or flechettes-tiny steel darts) seems logical at first glance: more sharp elements means greater damage. However, the history of warfare and ballistics show that classic cast iron shrapnel or pre-formed steel balls are almost always more effective than needles.
  Here's why the needle grenade loses in real combat:
  1. The Problem of Energy Loss (Ballistics)
  The needle is a very light object with poor aerodynamics.
  Braking: Due to their light weight, the needles instantly lose speed when encountering air resistance. The cast iron fragment (heavy and jagged) flies further and retains its lethal force longer.
  Range: The needles will be effective within a 1-2 meter radius, but at a range of 5-10 meters they will simply "shower" the enemy without causing fatal wounds.
  2. Penetration ability
  To incapacitate a soldier, the striking element must penetrate clothing, equipment (unloading, magazines) and soft tissue.
  Flexibility: A thin needle, when hitting a hard button, belt buckle or even a tight fold in a uniform, may simply bend or change trajectory.
  Stopping Effect: The needle inflicts a stab wound that can be fatal within hours, but won't stop the enemy instantly. The heavy splinter delivers a jagged, crushing blow, causing pain shock and immediate incapacitation.
  3. Experience with flashettes
  During World War I, aircraft dropped steel flechettes (flechettes) on infantry. They worked only because of the immense speed of free fall from a height. In a grenade, the dispersal velocity is limited by the explosive power, and it's insufficient to make the lightweight flechette an effective projectile.
  4. When do the "needles" actually work?
  There are artillery shells filled with thousands of steel darts. But they have a different logic:
  The projectile explodes at high speed in the air in front of the trench, and the darts fly in a directed cone, using the kinetic energy of the projectile itself.
  In a hand grenade that explodes statically, the energy is distributed in all directions (in a sphere), and the light needles quickly "extinguish".
  5. Modern standard: Ready-made striking elements (FSE)
  Instead of needles, modern grenades (for example, the American M67 or the Swiss HG 85) use:
  Steel balls or cubes. They have an ideal mass-to-shape ratio, allowing them to fly predictably and penetrate modern Class I and Class II body armor.
  Result:
  A needle-tipped grenade can be called a "weapon of terror"-it inflicts multiple, painful, but rarely instantly fatal wounds. For the regular army, the standard shrapnel remains the standard, as it is guaranteed to "disable" the enemy from combat.
  Do you think the rejection of "exotic" types of damage (needles, glass, poison) in grenades is a sign of the humaneness of modern warfare, or is it simply that the pragmatic calculations of the military-industrial complex have triumphed over the imagination of engineers?
  The boy genius continued to develop the Castilian Empire's military potential. It truly was a super empire and needed a progressor.
  Oleg Rybachenko continued to reason and compare.
  Could a reforming king in the seventeenth century have made Spain a world hegemon?
  In the 17th century, Spain was already a "world hegemon," but it was a hegemon in a protracted decline. To not simply maintain power, but to transform Spain into a sustainable leader on the scale of the future British Empire, a reforming king would have had to accomplish the impossible-go against the very DNA of Spanish society at the time.
  Theoretically, this was possible, but the cost of reform would have been comparable to civil war. Here's what such a "Spanish Peter I" would have had to do:
  1. Economic Reform: From the "Golden Curse" to Labor
  17th-century Spain suffered from the "resource curse." Huge flows of silver and gold from the Americas devalued labor and caused monstrous inflation (a price revolution).
  What needed to be done: Introduce strict protectionism, ban the export of raw materials and stimulate domestic manufacturing.
  Obstacle: The Spanish nobility (hidalgos) considered trade and physical labor shameful. A reformer would have had to force the nobles into business, as Peter the Great did, or rely on the downtrodden bourgeoisie.
  2. Religious tolerance and the expulsion of "brains"
  Spain was a stronghold of fanatical Catholicism. The expulsion of Jews (earlier) and Moriscos (Muslims who converted to Christianity, in 1609) dealt a terrible blow to agriculture and finances.
  What needed to be done: Stop the Inquisition and bring back (or at least stop persecuting) the most enterprising sections of the population.
  Obstacle: The Catholic Church was more powerful than the state apparatus. A reforming king would risk being branded a heretic and a nationwide uprising.
  3. Decentralization and "Imperial Overextension"
  The Spanish Habsburgs fought everyone at once: France, England, the Dutch rebels, and the Ottomans. This burned through all their budgets.
  What needed to be done: "Drop the deadweight." Recognize the independence of the Netherlands 50 years earlier, stop pouring money into Germany's endless religious wars (the Thirty Years' War).
  Obstacle: The concept of "honor of the crown." For the Spanish king of that time, relinquishing territory was tantamount to political suicide.
  4. Real-life example: Count-Duke Olivares
  Spain had its own reformer, the Count-Duke of Olivares, a favorite of Philip IV. He attempted to create a "Union of Arms" (to unite the taxes and armies of all Spanish provinces), fight corruption, and develop trade.
  Why it didn't work: The provinces (Catalonia, Portugal) responded to centralization with rebellions. Portugal ultimately seceded permanently. The system was too rigid to bend-it only broke.
  5. The "Spanish IS-7" version (in the spirit of systems analysis)
  If such a king had emerged, he would have built a fleet not like the "Invincible Armada" (massive floating fortresses), but like the English-fast, maneuverable ships with powerful artillery. He would have turned the colonies into markets for Spanish goods, not just mines.
  Result:
  Spain could have remained a hegemon if it had become a bourgeois republic with a king at its head (like England later). But to do so, it was necessary to break the back of the Inquisition and the arrogance of the nobility. In the 17th century, Spain preferred to "die gracefully" in the boots of its old honor rather than take them off and start building factories.
  What do you think was Spain's biggest downfall: its fanatical belief in its own exceptionalism or the easy money from American mines?
  The boy genius continued to run around in shorts, his bare, round heels flashing. He was such a cool, brilliant kid.
  Who forced everyone to listen and obey, even the Jesuits.
  And he pulled off something here. The most daring and incredible thing. Something that would make even the devils sick. And several embezzlers were impaled on the stake at the behest of the formidable Infante. Now that was amazing.
  The boy also carried out other ideas for re-armament.
  The first flamethrowers in world history.
  The first flamethrowers in world history appeared long before the Industrial Revolution and World War I. They evolved from primitive "flame tubes" to complex hydraulic machines.
  Here are the key milestones:
  1. Ancient Greece: "Fire Trumpet" (5th century BC)
  The first documented use of a flamethrower prototype occurred in 424 BC during the Peloponnesian War (Battle of Delium).
  Construction: The Boeotian besiegers took a hollow log, lined it with iron, and attached a cauldron of burning coals, sulfur, and crude oil (tar) to one end. They inserted a huge bellows into the other end.
  Operating principle: A powerful jet of air blew a sheaf of flame from the pipe. This allowed the Athenians' wooden fortifications to be burned. It was a purely pneumatic flamethrower.
  2. Byzantium: "Greek fire" (7th century AD)
  The most famous "flamethrower" of antiquity was the siphonophore, invented by the engineer Callinicus of Heliopolis around 673.
  Technological breakthrough: The Byzantines were the first to create a hydraulic flamethrower. A mixture (oil, resin, and sulfur) was pressurized in a copper tank and then forced through a bronze siphon using a hand pump.
  Special feature: The mixture burned even on water, making siphonophores on ships ("dromons") the ultimate weapon of the time. The secret of the "Greek fire" composition was a state secret and was eventually lost.
  3. China: "Pen Huo Qi" (10th century AD)
  The Chinese, having access to oil and gunpowder, created the first continuous-action flamethrower.
  Design: The device had a double-action pump (like modern fire pumps), which allowed it to throw a stream of oil ("explosive oil") without pauses.
  Ignition: A small gunpowder trap with a fuse was used to ignite the jet at the nozzle. In 975, the Chinese navy successfully used such devices in the Battle of the Yangtze River.
  4. The birth of the modern flamethrower (early 20th century)
  The flamethrower in the backpack form we are familiar with was invented by the German engineer Richard Fiedler in 1901.
  Flamethrowers: The German army was the first to adopt them. In 1915, at Verdun, flamethrowers had a shocking effect on the French infantry.
  The principle: Compressed nitrogen expelled a flammable liquid, which ignited at the muzzle of the barrel. That's when the war turned into a "technological hell."
  Result:
  The flamethrower's evolution spans from a bellows-tipped log to high-pressure pumps. While ancient flamethrowers were cumbersome machines for defending cities or naval battles, the 20th century made them individual weapons for assault teams.
  Do you think the flamethrower is the "most inhumane" weapon in history, or is there simply no effective alternative when it comes to clearing bunkers and pillboxes?
  What did "Greek Fire" actually consist of (modern chemists' versions)?
  The secret of "Greek fire" (or "sea fire") was one of the most closely guarded state secrets of the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantines understood that if the recipe fell into the hands of the Arabs, the empire would be destroyed. Ultimately, the secret was lost to the grave along with the last emperors in 1453.
  Modern chemists and historians of technology (such as J. Partington and H. Haldon) have identified several of the most probable versions of the composition through analysis and experiments:
  1. Oil-based (The most plausible version)
  Most scientists agree that the base was crude oil or its light fractions (naphtha).
  Source: The Byzantines had access to surface oil fields in the area of Taman and Kerch (Crimea).
  Properties: Oil produces a powerful flame, it is lighter than water (it floats and burns on the surface of the sea) and has excellent fluidity for ejection through a siphon.
  2. Thickeners and "Adhesives"
  To ensure that the fire didn't just flare up, but "stuck" to the wooden sides of ships and sails, the following was added to the oil:
  Wood resin (rosin): It made the mixture viscous.
  Sulfur: It increased the heat of combustion and produced a caustic, suffocating smoke that demoralized the enemy crew.
  3. The Riddle of "Spontaneous Combustion" (Saltpeter or Quicklime?)
  The main question is: how was the mixture ignited? There are two versions:
  External wick: A brazier burned at the nozzle of the pipe, igniting the stream (like in modern flamethrowers).
  Chemical reaction: Quicklime could have been added to the mixture (
  ) or calcium phosphide. When in contact with seawater, these substances react violently, releasing enormous amounts of heat, which could cause the oil to spontaneously ignite. This explains the legend that "Greek fire" ignited from the water itself.
  4. The role of saltpeter;
  Some historians have suggested the presence of saltpeter, which would make the mixture a prototype of gunpowder. However, chemists disagree: saltpeter quickly precipitates in a liquid mixture and doesn't produce the desired effect. Most likely, saltpeter was used later, in Arab and Chinese "fire pots."
  Result (the "Golden Recipe" of modern times):
  The most likely composition was a mixture of light oil, sulfur, and tar, ejected under pressure through heated copper pipes. The use of quicklime inside the projectile or at the nozzle provided the magical "burning on water" effect.
  Do you think the loss of such "supertechnologies" of the past (like Greek fire or Damascus steel) is a loss for humanity, or have we simply replaced them with a more effective "napalm"?
  The barefoot boy, who had become the acting king and emperor, continued to jump and run around.
  Finally, it was late at night and the fighting and brilliant child calmed down.
  And right on the haystack he fell asleep, this is Superman in shorts and with bare, childish feet.
  And he had such interesting and exciting dreams.
  CHAPTER No 7.
  And she likes it. Being an active party.
  Anastasia is also a remarkable warrior, and has accomplished many heroic deeds. Anastasia commands their battalion.
  He also throws a grenade with his bare foot and shouts:
  - There will be light over the country!
  Svetlana throws a lemon with her bare foot and whispers:
  - Glory to Rus'!
  The magnificent Zoya also makes a throw with her bare toes and roars:
  - For the glory of the holy Motherland!
  Augustine squeals:
  - With unearthly sadness!
  And a gift thrown by a bare foot also flies.
  Then Anastasia starts howling. She also throws a whole bunch of grenades with her bare feet.
  And the heroic girl roars:
  - In the Name of the White God!
  Natasha also sent a grenade with her bare toes and yelped:
  - In the name of Christ!
  And she fired a couple of shots.
  And Anastasia started firing the machine gun. She was very skilled at it.
  In short, the girl is a beast.
  Barefoot Natasha squeaked with aplomb:
  - I'm basically a superman!
  And she threw the grenade with her bare foot.
  Barefoot Zoya also fired. She shot down the Japanese.
  Chirped:
  - Glory to Russia!
  And with her bare foot she launched a grenade.
  Augustine also squealed:
  - For Holy Rus'!
  Anastasia launched a whole crate at the Japanese. And then she started roaring with frenzied rage:
  - For Svarog!
  Natasha took it and squeaked:
  - For a new system!
  And she threw a grenade with her bare foot!
  Svetlana bleated:
  - To the muscles of steel!
  And she also launched a grenade with her bare toes.
  Barefoot Zoya also started squealing:
  - For love and magic!
  And bare feet in motion.
  Augustina the red-haired devil took and launched the box of grenades and squealed:
  - Beyond the borders on Mars!
  Anastasia will also throw a barrel of dynamite and mutter:
  - For the world order of Russia.
  And Natasha barked:
  - Here's to a new path to happiness!
  After which the girls burst out laughing.
  And this is so great! The girls are wonderful!
  The troops of Tsarist Russia were moving towards Tokyo.
  The Russian army stormed Tokyo.
  The Russian army stormed Tokyo.
  A boy and a girl walked in front: Oleg Rybachenko and Margarita.
  The children exterminated the Japanese and advanced toward the imperial palace. The Mikado solemnly declared that he would not leave the capital and would remain there forever.
  Oleg Rybachenko fired a burst at the samurai and threw a grenade with his bare foot, squealing to himself:
  - Rus' will never surrender!
  Margarita also threw a lemon with her bare foot and hissed, baring her teeth:
  - We win or we die!
  And a battalion of girls breaks through to the Mikado's palace. All the girls are in uniform, wearing only panties. And so, almost naked, they fight like heroines.
  Anastasia throws a grenade with her bare foot and squeals:
  - Nikolai, you are the Mikado!
  Natasha also launched a gift of death with her bare limb and squealed, baring her teeth:
  - Our king is the coolest!
  And how she sparkles like pearls! And such a dazzling girl.
  Barefoot Zoya also chirps with delight and launches a grenade with her bare foot:
  - I am a winner in psychology!
  And she stuck out her tongue.
  He crushes his samurai.
  Augustine, that red-haired devil, shoots too. And she does it so accurately. She mows down the Japanese.
  And roars at the top of his lungs:
  - Glory to my holy country!
  And bares his teeth!
  Svetlana is also a powerful woman who can just take and launch a whole box of explosives.
  And the Japanese flew in all directions.
  The girls go on the offensive, crushing their opponents, achieving tangible success. They exude a formidable grace, tireless drive, and a lack of weakness. And their bare breasts are the best guarantee of invincibility and unsinkability.
  Anastasia, cutting down the Japanese, chirps:
  - Hands of oak, head of lead!
  And with his bare foot he throws a grenade. Scatters the samurai.
  Half-naked Natasha also fires.
  Crushes the Japanese and blows them to pieces.
  Closer and closer to the palace. And a bare foot throws a grenade.
  The frightened Japanese surrender and fall apart.
  Terminator Girl says:
  - May Perun be with us!
  Barefoot Zoya, a gorgeous terminator girl, shoots herself and crushes the militarists. She bared her teeth.
  The girl croaked:
  - We are the knights of the greatest Russia!
  The girl threw a grenade with her bare foot, scattering the enemy.
  Cool Zoyka took it and sang again:
  - Suvorov taught us to look ahead! And if we stand up, stand to the death!
  And she bared her teeth in a grin.
  Fiery Augustine also sang and roared:
  - To new frontiers!
  And she added with a grin:
  - And we are always ahead!
  Svetlana, the mighty girl, also struck the enemy. She scattered the imperial guard and squealed:
  - For the achievements of the era!
  And again, grenades thrown by bare feet fly.
  The girls are pressing the enemy. They remember the heroic defense of Port Arthur, which will be remembered for centuries.
  Eh, how could such an army lose in real history, and to the Japanese at that?
  This is a disgrace.
  Anastasia throws a grenade with her bare foot and whistles:
  - Beyond the Russian border!
  Natasha also launched something deadly with her bare foot and squealed desperately, baring her teeth:
  - To new successes!
  And she fired a burst at the Japanese.
  And then Zoya, barefoot, just went and started smashing. And then she even threw a grenade with her bare foot.
  And after that she sang:
  - We will not give in to enemy dictates!
  And she bared her little face!
  A beautiful, very young girl with the figure of an athlete. And quite courageous.
  And Augustine hits the Japanese like a bomb. She crushes them, and with her bare foot she very deftly throws a grenade.
  And scatters enemies as if bottles had flown off a ball.
  The girl cries:
  - Chocolate, that's our thing!
  Augustine really does love chocolates. And under the Tsar, the markets are filled with goods. What can be said about Tsar Nicholas? Now, the unsuccessful Tsar is becoming great before our very eyes. Or rather, the Tsar has gained Putin's fortune; Putin himself, on the contrary, has become as unlucky as Nicholas II. But then, the deeds of the Romanov Tsar are becoming great! And all it takes is for the girls to fight on the front lines and for Oleg Rybachenko to perform a heroic deed.
  And a pair of child heroes who prevented the Japanese from capturing Mount Vysokaya. When the fate of Port Arthur was being decided.
  And so the Russian Empire changed.
  Svetlana also launched a barrel of murder and brought down the outer wall of the imperial palace with machine guns.
  Now the girls are running through their rooms. The war is about to end.
  Anastasia says enthusiastically:
  - I believe that good luck awaits me!
  And again he throws a grenade with his bare foot.
  Natasha, laying down deadly fire, chirps while embroidering her opponents:
  - I'll definitely be lucky!
  And again a grenade, launched by a bare foot, flies.
  And then barefoot Zoya unleashes a couple of chained bombs, launched from her bare feet, and destroys her opponents.
  After which he bursts into laughter:
  - I'm a comet girl.
  And again he throws out fiery tongues of death.
  And then along comes Augustine, that terminator girl. The way she just wiped everyone out. Simply magnificent.
  A warrior who is a true demiurge of battle.
  And squeaks to himself:
  - Our crew is in high spirits!
  And then Svetlana showed up. So cool and sparkling. Her boundless energy infects everyone. Capable of defeating virtually any enemy.
  And the warrior bares her pearly teeth. And hers are bigger than a horse's. Now that's a girl.
  Svetlana giggled and roared:
  - For eggplants with black caviar!
  And the girls screamed in chorus at the top of their lungs:
  - Apple trees will bloom on Mars!
  The Mikado hesitated to commit hara-kiri and signed the capitulation. Tsar Alexei II was declared the new Emperor of Japan. At the same time, the Land of the Rising Sun was preparing a referendum on voluntary unification with Russia.
  The war is almost over. The last units are stockpiling their weapons.
  A battalion of girls lined up the prisoners. The men were required to kneel and kiss the girls' bare feet. And the Japanese did this with great enthusiasm. They even enjoyed it.
  Of course, they're such beauties. And it doesn't matter that their feet are a little dusty. It's even nicer, and more natural. Especially when they're tanned. And so rough.
  The Japanese kiss bare soles and lick their lips. And the girl likes it.
  Anastasia remarks with pathos:
  - And who claimed that war is not for women?
  Natasha giggled in response:
  - No, war is the sweetest of all times of anticipation for us!
  And she stuck out her tongue. How wonderful it really is to be kissed so humiliatingly.
  They kiss Zoyka's bare, round heel too. The girl squeals with delight:
  - That's so great! I'd like a continuation!
  Red Augustine warned:
  - Remain a virgin until marriage! And you will be happy about it!
  Barefoot Zoya giggled and said:
  - Glory be to my holy land! Innocence only brings pain!
  The girl bared her face.
  Svetlana noted proudly:
  - I worked in a brothel. And I don't need virginity!
  Barefoot Zoya asked, giggling:
  - And how did you like it?
  Svetlana sincerely and decisively stated:
  - It probably couldn't be better!
  Half-naked Zoya said honestly:
  - Every night I dream about a man taking possession of me. It's so wonderful and pleasant. And I don't want anything else.
  Svetlana suggested the girl:
  - After the war, you can go to the most prestigious brothel in Moscow or St. Petersburg. Believe me, you'll like it there!
  Half-naked Zoya burst out laughing and remarked:
  - This is something to think about!
  Natasha suggested:
  - Maybe we should rape the prisoners?
  The girls laughed at this joke.
  In general, the beauties here are temperamental. And terribly amorous. War makes girls aggressive. The warriors continued to offer their bare, dusty feet to the captives for kissing. They liked it.
  Then, more interesting performances began. Fireworks exploded into the sky. And it was quite a joy. Music played, drums beat.
  Tsarist Russia conquered Japan. Which, by and large, was expected. The Russian army enjoyed a very high reputation. There was a lot of singing and dancing by barefoot Japanese women.
  Everything is beautiful and rich... In Russia itself, there is also jubilation over the victory. Of course, not everyone rejoiced. For Marxists, this was a crushing blow. The Tsar's authority was strengthened. And his chances increased. Public support was colossal.
  After conquering Japan, Russia continued its policy of expansion into China. Voluntarily, Chinese regions held referendums and joined the empire. Russia's most successful tsar, Nicholas Romanov, pursued a highly successful policy of Russian expansion in the southeast. China was gradually being swallowed up.
  The economy of the Tsarist Empire, having avoided revolutionary upheavals, experienced a rapid economic boom. Roads, factories, plants, bridges, and much more were built. The country sold grain and a wide variety of food products.
  It produced the world's most powerful bombers: the Ilya Muromets and Svyatogor, and the fastest light tanks, the Luna-2. And it had a massive three million soldiers-a peacetime army five times larger than Germany's.
  Tsar Nicholas truly pulled a lucky draw. Now Russian troops are beginning their assault on the Japanese capital. And it's all so wonderful.
  The girls here are, of course, ahead of everyone else, and their drive and exploits are at a great height.
  Especially when they throw grenades with bare feet. This generally causes shock and awe among samurai.
  And here they are, climbing the wall of the Japanese capital. And chopping men and horses into pieces. They've smashed their opponents into pieces. They advance, the girls screaming and laughing! And with their bare heels they kick people in the chins. The Japanese fly head over heels. And fall onto their stakes.
  And the warriors wave their sabers even more powerfully.
  And the samurai suffered defeat after defeat. Now the Russian troops have taken Tokyo.
  Mikado runs in fear, but he can't escape. And so the girls take him prisoner and tie him up!
  A magnificent victory! The Japanese Emperor abdicates in favor of Nicholas II. The title of Russian Tsar is significantly extended. Korea, Mongolia, Manchuria, the Kuril Islands, Taiwan, and Japan itself become Russian provinces. Although Japan enjoys a small, limited autonomy, its emperor is Russian, an autocratic Tsar!
  Nicholas II remains an absolute monarch, unlimited in every way. He is the Autocratic Tsar!
  And now also the Emperor of Japan, Yellow Russia, Bogdykhan, Khan, Kagan, and so on, so on, so on...
  Yes, luck was the main factor. Just notice how much luck Putin managed to conquer! The twenty-first century, alas, isn't exactly conducive to conquest!
  And what good does it do Russia that Putin's enemy McCain died of brain cancer? It's certainly a stroke of luck; you couldn't even dream up a plot to have your enemy die such a nasty and unpleasant death!
  But the return for Russia is zero.
  But for Nicholas II, Putin's good fortune and good fortune resulted in major territorial gains. And really, why would fortune give Putin gifts? How did Russia benefit from Sobchak's timely death and the avoidance of the appointment of head of the Constitutional Court?
  And Tsar Nicholas II of All Rus' was an extraordinary figure. Naturally, after such a great victory, his power and authority were strengthened. This means some reforms can be implemented. Particularly in Orthodoxy! Allowing nobles to have four wives, as in Islam. And also granting soldiers the right to a second wife as a reward for heroic deeds and faithful service.
  A fine reform! Since the number of non-believers and foreigners in the empire has grown, the number of Russians must increase. But how can this be done? By recruiting women from other nations. After all, if a Russian were to marry three Chinese women, he would have children with them, and what nationality would these children be?
  Of course, Russian on our father's side! And that's great! Nicholas II, possessing a progressive mind, was more religious in appearance than in soul. And, of course, he put religion at the service of the state, and not the other way around!
  Nicholas II thus strengthened his authority among the elite. This was something the men had long desired. He also accelerated the Russification of the outskirts.
  Well, the priests didn't object either. Especially since faith had weakened in the twentieth century. And religion served the Tsar, without much faith in God!
  But military victories made Nicholas popular with the people, and those accustomed to authoritarianism were reluctant to change much. The Russians had never known any other kind of government!
  And the economy is booming, wages are rising. Ten percent growth every year. Really, why change?
  In 1913, for the Romanovs' tercentenary, Tsar Nicholas II once again reduced the workday to 10.5 hours, and on Saturdays and days before holidays, to eight hours. The number of days off and holidays also increased. The date of Japan's surrender, the Tsar's birthday, the Tsarina's birthday, and the day of the coronation were also celebrated as holidays.
  After it was discovered that the heir to the throne suffered from hemophilia, Tsar Nicholas took a second wife. Thus, the question of succession was resolved.
  But a major war was looming. Germany dreamed of redividing the world. However, Tsarist Russia was ready for war.
  In 1910, the Russians annexed Beijing and expanded their empire. Britain agreed to this in exchange for an alliance against Germany.
  The Tsarist army was the largest and most powerful. Its peacetime strength reached three million and a thousand regiments. Germany had only six hundred thousand in peacetime. Then there was Austria-Hungary, but its troops were incapable of combat!
  But the Germans are still planning to fight France and Britain. How can they possibly manage two fronts?
  The Russians have the world's first mass-produced Luna-2 light tanks, as well as four-engine Ilya Muromets bombers, machine-gun-equipped Alexander fighters, and much more. And, of course, a powerful navy.
  Germany has no equal forces.
  And the Germans even decided to attack, into Belgium and bypass Paris. There was absolutely no chance for them here.
  But the war began anyway. Germany made its fateful move. And its troops advanced on Belgium. But the forces were unequal. Russian troops were already advancing across Prussia and Austria-Hungary. And the Luna-2 tank, with a speed of 40 kilometers per hour, is already a colossal force.
  And mind you, Tsar Nicholas was lucky that the war started. Even the Tsar himself wouldn't have attacked Germany. But the Russians had a vast, overwhelming superiority in forces, tanks, superior artillery, and superior air power in both quantity and quality. And a stronger economy, which helped them avoid the recession caused by the revolution and defeat in the war. And so it was, a steady rise and success after success.
  The Germans were clearly under attack. And now they themselves have launched their main attack against France and Britain. And what else could they do?
  And Italy went and declared war on Austria-Hungary! The only good thing is that Turkey entered the war against Russia. But that's even better for the Tsar; he can finally take back Constantinople and the Straits! So...
  And then there are the four witches, the eternally youthful Rodnovers Natasha, Zoya, Aurora, and Svetlana, in battle! And they're going to hit! They're going to hit both the Germans and the Turks!
  Writer and poet Oleg Rybachenko woke up. As always, the young witch-sorceress fulfilled her promise, giving Nicholas II the fortune of Vladimir Putin, and now Oleg Rybachenko must fulfill his. Awakening was not easy. A harsh whip struck his boyish body. He jumped. Yes, Oleg Rybachenko is now a muscular boy, chained by his arms and legs. His body is tanned to the point of blackness, lean and sinewy, with defined muscles. A truly strong and resilient slave, with tough skin so hardened that the overseer's blows cannot cut it. You run with the other boys to breakfast, rising from the gravel where the young slaves sleep completely naked and without blankets. True, it is warm here, a climate like Egypt. And the boy is naked, only chains. They're quite long, though, and don't really interfere with walking or working. But you can't take long strides in them.
  Before eating, you rinse your hands in the stream. You get your ration: a mash of rice and rotten pieces of fish. However, to a hungry slave boy, this seems like a delicacy. And then you go to the mine. The sun hasn't risen yet, and it's quite pleasant.
  The boy's bare feet had become so rough and calloused that the sharp stones didn't hurt at all, they even tickled pleasantly.
  Quarries where children under sixteen work. Of course, they have smaller wheelbarrows and tools. But they have to work fifteen or sixteen hours, just like adults.
  It stinks, so they relieve themselves right at the quarries. The work isn't difficult: chopping stones with picks, then carrying them in baskets or on stretchers. Sometimes they have to push a mine cart, too. Usually, boys push them in twos and threes. But Oleg Rybachenko is assigned alone; he's very strong. And he wields a pick like a grown man. He has a much bigger task to accomplish than the others.
  It's true, they give more and more often. Three times a day, not two.
  The slave boy, whose body Oleg Rybachenko possessed, has been here for several years now. He's obedient, hardworking, and has mastered every movement to the point of automatism. He's truly incredibly strong, resilient, and practically tireless. Yet, the boy has barely grown, and now appears to be no more than twelve, though of average height for his age.
  But he has the strength... of several adults. A young hero. Who, however, will probably never grow an adult, and will never grow a beard.
  And thank God! As a writer and poet, Oleg Rybachenko didn't like shaving. You work and break stones, crumble them. And into the basket. Then you carry it to the cart. It's hard to push, so the children take turns.
  The boys here are almost black, but their facial features are either European, Indian, or Arab. In fact, the European ones are far more prevalent.
  Oleg looks at them closely. The slaves are not allowed to speak; they are beaten with a whip.
  Oleg Rybachenko is also keeping quiet for now. He's studying. Besides the male guards, there are also women. They're also cruel and use whips.
  Not all boys have skin as tough as Oleg's. Many of them crack and bleed. The guards can beat them to death. The work is very hard, and the boys begin to sweat profusely, especially when the sun rises.
  And here there's not just one sun, but two. And that makes the day very long. And there's a lot of work. The boys don't have time to sleep and rest. It's a real torment for them.
  Oleg Rybachenko worked, mechanically chopping and loading. He mixed things up...
  And I imagined what happened after Nicholas II gained the fortune of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
  Natasha, Zoya, Aurora, and Svetlana attack the Austrians in Przemysl. The Russian army immediately took Lvov and attacked the stronghold.
  Girls, barefoot and in bikinis, rush through the city streets.
  They chop down the Austrians and throw small discs with their bare feet.
  At the same time the girls sing:
  - Tsar Nicholas is our messiah,
  A formidable ruler of mighty Russia...
  The whole world is shaking - where will it pass?
  Let's sing for Nikolai!
  Natasha chops down the Austrians, throws a grenade with her bare toes and sings:
  - For Rus'!
  Zoya also crushes enemies and sings along with aplomb:
  - For the Tsarist Empire!
  And a grenade thrown by her bare foot flies! What a killer girl! She can crush a jaw and drink the sea!
  And Aurora, too, will throw the discus with her bare toes, scatter the Austrians and squeal:
  - For the greatness of Russia!
  And he bares his very sharp teeth! Which sparkle like fangs.
  Svetlana doesn"t forget to give in either, and roars:
  - Rus' of the Holy and Invincible Nicholas II!
  The girl is showing tremendous passion. She's tossing things around with her bare feet and throwing presents!
  Natasha, firing and chopping, and throwing lethal weapons with her bare feet, squeals:
  - I love my Rus'! I love my Rus'! And I'll saw you all apart!
  And Zoya also shoots and howls, throwing something explosive with her bare toes:
  - Great Tsar Nicholas! Let the mountains and seas belong to him!
  Aurora, screaming with wild, frenzied rage and throwing presents with her bare toes, howls:
  - No one will stop us! No one will defeat us! Dashing girls crush the enemies with their bare feet, with their bare heels!
  CHAPTER No 8.
  The children's gang noticeably revived with the arrival of March in Odessa. They began to go on raids more frequently, cleaning out dachas belonging to Hitler's lackeys and the new nobility. And Alexander Rybachenko, that eternal boy, continued to write between raids.
  Children of the space age had a blast in the cool virtual world of the Hypernet Ultramatrix.
  Stalin-Vladislav was very pleased. Indeed, he was both youthful and extremely cheerful.
  He even asked the computer a question.
  What if Japan had attacked the USSR's Far East in 1941?
  As of April 5, 2026, military historians and analysts using neural network modeling (including those inspired by Oleg Rybachenko's systems approach to alternative history) view Japan's entry into the war against the USSR in 1941 as a scenario that could have led to the collapse of Soviet defenses, but not to an ultimate Axis victory.
  Here are three key factors that would determine the outcome of this disaster:
  1. Strategic impasse: Kantokuen versus the Trans-Siberian Railway
  The Japanese plan to attack the USSR (Kantokuen) envisaged the capture of the Far East and Siberia up to Lake Baikal.
  A blow to logistics: The primary target was the Trans-Siberian Railway. Cutting this "artery" would have meant the USSR losing not only the region's resources but also the ability to quickly deploy those very "Siberian divisions" that actually saved Moscow in December 1941.
  Result: Stalin would have been forced to fight on two fronts without reserves. Moscow would likely have fallen in October-November 1941, as fresh troops from the East simply wouldn't have been available.
  2. Japan's resource hunger
  Japan chose the "Southern Option" (attacking the United States and seizing the resources of Southeast Asia) precisely because Siberia did not have oil and rubber available for quick extraction in 1941.
  The Space Trap: The Kwantung Army would have become bogged down in the endless expanses of the taiga. Soviet forces in the Far East (even weakened) had powerful fortified areas and a superiority in heavy tanks (T-34 and KV-1), against which the Japanese Chi-Has were virtually powerless.
  The bottom line: Japan would have gained vast territories, but would not have had the resources to continue the war with the United States. It would have been a "triumph in a vacuum."
  3. The United States' entry into the war
  A Japanese attack on the USSR would likely have forced the United States to enter the war on the Allied side before Pearl Harbor.
  Lend-Lease: American aid would have flowed not through Vladivostok (which would have been blockaded), but through the Persian Gulf and northern ports in triple volume. The US could not allow the complete collapse of the USSR, as this would have meant the unification of Germany and Japan into a "supermonster."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Samurai Code"
  In his novel, "Strike of the Russian Gods: Samurai vs. IS-7," Rybachenko describes this scenario through metaphysics:
  "The Japanese attacked Vladivostok completely barefoot, hoping for the spirit of bushido. But they were met by the steel vacuum of Siberian regiments. Soviet IS-7 tanks (they were already present in this version) rolled over Japanese positions, turning their nano-swords into plutonium dust."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "If Japan had attacked, Stalin would have had to take off his shoes before Hitler to accumulate forces in the East. But in the end, the samurai would have burned in the fire of Russian fury faster than they could have shouted 'Banzai!', because Siberia is not a jungle, it is a territory where only those whose bare heels are accustomed to permafrost survive."
  Result:
  A Japanese attack in 1941 would have made the Soviet Union's victory incredibly costly and protracted. Germany might have taken Moscow, but the Wehrmacht would still have perished deep within Russia, and Japan would have been annihilated by atomic bombs two to three years later.
  In this scenario, do you think Zhukov would have risked surrendering Moscow barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in order to preserve the army for a counterattack on Japan, or would "not a step back" have been in effect on both fronts until complete exhaustion?
  Stalin-Vladislav noted with a smile:
  "What a great writer and poet Oleg Rybachenko was, that even the hypermatrix computer commemorates him! But you must admit, I am also extremely great, and the savior of both the USSR and all of humanity."
  The boy chief added slyly:
  - However, people are such beasts that they need Hitler with a whip!
  Alice only partially agreed with this:
  - In ancient times they were beasts, but now they are very good!
  Oleg noted:
  - And in ancient times, there were very noble heroes!
  And the boy took it and spun it five times like a top.
  Stalin-Vladislav asked an interesting question:
  How would the Great Patriotic War have gone without the help of the USSR"s allies?
  And I looked for an answer on the Hypernet; it was quite brief and at the same time detailed.
  The role of Lend-Lease and the second front is one of the most controversial issues in the history of World War II. A serious analysis of the situation, based on economic indicators and the memoirs of Soviet military leaders (including Zhukov and Mikoyan), reveals several critical perspectives.
  Without the help of the allies, the war for the USSR would have followed a scenario of extreme exhaustion, which could have lasted until 1947-1948 with an uncertain ending.
  1. Logistics collapse (Transport)
  This is the most critical factor. The USSR produced tanks and guns, but almost no trucks.
  Studebakers: By 1944, American vehicles accounted for approximately 30% of the Red Army's entire vehicle fleet. Without them, infantry mobility and ammunition supply would have been significantly reduced. Large-scale offensive operations (like Bagration) would have been impossible because the rear areas would not have been able to keep up with the tanks.
  Railroads: 90% of all locomotives and carriages built for the USSR during the war came from the United States. Without them, the country's transportation system would have simply collapsed under the impact of the Luftwaffe and wear and tear.
  2. Aviation fuel and aluminum
  High-octane gasoline: The USSR experienced a catastrophic shortage of jet fuel for modern fighters. About half of all high-octane gasoline was obtained through Lend-Lease. Without it, Soviet aviation would not have been able to achieve air superiority over the Messerschmitts and Focke-Wulfs.
  Aluminum: Most Soviet aircraft had wooden components precisely because of a shortage of the metal. Without aluminum supplies from the US and Canada, aircraft production would have been cut in half, or their performance would have been significantly worse.
  3. Food and the "Second Front"
  Stewed Meat and Grain: By 1943, Soviet agriculture was in ruins (the main breadbaskets were occupied). Deliveries of high-calorie foods (the famous "second front"-stewed meat, fats, sugar) prevented mass starvation in the army and on the home front.
  Gunpowder and chemicals: About a third of all explosives used by the USSR were produced from Western components. Without them, the "iron fist" of Soviet artillery would have been much weaker.
  4. Strategic factor: Diversion of Wehrmacht forces
  Even before the Normandy landings (1944), the Allies were exerting enormous pressure:
  Battle of the Atlantic and Africa: Germany was forced to keep huge resources (navy, air defense, aviation) in the West.
  German Air Defense: Huge numbers of 88mm anti-aircraft guns, which could have burned up Soviet tanks on the Eastern Front, were deployed inside Germany to protect cities from Anglo-American bombing.
  Bottom line: Could the USSR have won alone?
  Most modern historians agree that the USSR would likely not have lost, as Germany lacked the resources to completely occupy such a territory. However:
  The price of victory: The number of victims could have been 10-15 million more.
  Time: The war would have dragged on for another 2-3 years.
  Borders: Without the Allied landings in Europe, Stalin could have reached the English Channel, but the price would have been the biological exhaustion of the nation.
  Victory was made possible precisely by synergy: Soviet blood and space combined with American resources and the British naval blockade.
  Do you think the Soviet leadership in 1942 was aware of this dependence, or was ideological self-confidence primary?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked an additional question:
  And what if Japan also struck from the east?
  And received an answer from the galactic Hypernet.
  The combination of the absence of Lend-Lease and a two-front war (with Japan) places the USSR in a situation that military historians call a "strategic collapse of resources." In this scenario, the chances of preserving statehood within its 1941 borders are close to zero.
  Here's a detailed breakdown of this double disaster:
  1. Annihilation of reserves (Moscow factor)
  The main success of December 1941-the counteroffensive near Moscow-was made possible by the transfer of 25-30 fresh divisions from the Far East.
  If Japan attacks: These divisions remain in Chita and Blagoveshchensk. The Wehrmacht, having failed to encounter trained "Siberian" reserves, will most likely take Moscow in December 1941.
  Result: The loss of the country's central transportation hub. Frontline control disintegrates into isolated pockets.
  2. Logistics Deadlock: Vladivostok Blockade
  Vladivostok was a key port, through which almost 50% of all cargo passed (even in real history, when Japan was neutral).
  Without aid and with war: The port is captured or blockaded by the Japanese fleet. Deliveries of food, machine tools, and metals are impossible. The USSR remains completely isolated, relying solely on the internal resources of the Urals and Siberia, which in 1941-42 had not yet reached full capacity.
  3. Resource Gap: Oil and Food
  Baku Oil: To defend the Caucasus from Hitler, troops are needed. To defend Siberia from Japan, too. Cutting an army in half over a distance of 7,000 km without American locomotives and trucks is technically impossible.
  Famine: The loss of the breadbaskets of Ukraine and southern Russia in 1941, coupled with the lack of American canned meat and grain, led to widespread starvation in the rear and army by the winter of 1942. The reduction in caloric rations led to a sharp decline in the soldier's fighting ability.
  4. Industrial limit
  Without Western machine tools, tool steel, and chemicals, Soviet factories in the Urals would have faced a sharp decline in the quality and quantity of their output.
  Example: T-34 tanks would have been produced, but without high-quality optics and radios (which were provided under Lend-Lease), they would have been "blind" targets for German and Japanese guns.
  Summary: The Ural Fortress Scenario
  Under such conditions, the USSR would most likely have lost its entire European part (up to the Volga) and the Far East (up to Lake Baikal).
  Territory: A remnant of the state between the Urals and the Yenisei.
  Status: Transition to continental-scale guerrilla warfare. A German and Japanese victory would be "Pyrrhic" (they would be unable to control such vast territories), but the USSR would cease to exist as a unified superpower and industrial giant for decades.
  The world would have turned into a global confrontation between the United States (which would have defeated Japan and Germany with atomic weapons by 1946-47 anyway) and the victorious Axis on the ruins of Eurasia.
  Do you think Stalin's vertical power structure would have withstood such a level of territorial losses, or would an internal coup have occurred before the last line of defense fell?
  Stalin-Vladislav then asked a very intriguing question:
  - So, can we consider Churchill, who did not make peace with Hitler, to be the savior of the USSR?
  From the Hypernet hypermatrix came the answer:
  From the perspective of grand strategy and historical process, yes, this assertion is entirely justified. Winston Churchill's role in saving the USSR (and, consequently, in the outcome of World War II) is often underestimated due to the subsequent Cold War, but the facts of 1940-1941 speak for themselves.
  This is why Churchill's decision not to sign peace with Hitler after the fall of France in 1940 became the foundation for the survival of the Soviet Union:
  1. Elimination of the threat of war on one front
  If Britain had left the war in 1940 (and Hitler offered it very honorable terms, preserving the empire in exchange for recognition of his dominance in Europe), Germany would have had ideal conditions to attack the USSR:
  All the resources of Europe: Hitler would not have needed to keep a million-strong army on the Atlantic Wall, he would not have needed to spend colossal amounts of money on a navy and air defense against British bombing.
  Concentration of forces: The entire Wehrmacht and the full might of the Luftwaffe would have fallen upon the USSR on June 22, 1941, without reserve. In reality, a significant portion of German forces were diverted to the Mediterranean, Africa, and coastal defense.
  2. Geopolitical "bridge" for the USA
  Churchill held Britain as an unsinkable aircraft carrier and a beachhead.
  Without Britain in the war, the United States (even with Roosevelt's willingness to help) would have had no foothold in Europe. Lend-Lease deliveries to the USSR (via the Arctic convoys) were only possible thanks to the British fleet and bases. Had Britain been neutral or allied with Hitler, supplying the USSR via Murmansk and Arkhangelsk would have been physically impossible.
  3. Moral and ideological turning point
  On June 22, 1941, a few hours after Germany attacked the USSR, Churchill (a staunch anti-communist) gave a radio speech in support of Moscow.
  Signal to the world: This instantly transformed the USSR from a "pariah" and "Hitler's pact partner" into an ally of a great democratic power. This opened the door to American aid and prevented Stalin's complete diplomatic isolation.
  4. Diversion of Forces: The Battle for the Air and Sea
  Before the Second Front opened in 1944, Britain was fighting a war that was critically weakening Germany:
  Resources: Germany wasted scarce aluminum, copper, and oil on fighting the British navy and air force instead of building more tanks for the Eastern Front.
  Oil: Britain held the Middle East, preventing Hitler from accessing the resources of Iraq and Iran, which forced the Germans to rush to the Caucasus at any cost, exhausting their forces.
  The ironic paradox of history
  Churchill hated Bolshevism and dreamed of its downfall back in 1919. But as a pragmatist, he understood that Hitler meant death here and now, while Stalin was a problem for later. By choosing to resist Hitler, he unwittingly became the chief architect of his ideological enemy's salvation.
  Do you think Stalin realized the scale of this "gift" from Churchill when he demanded the immediate opening of the Second Front in 1941, or did he believe that Britain was simply obliged to atone for its guilt for the "Munich Betrayal"?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked another question:
  Would Churchill have made peace with the Third Reich if there had been no nationality restrictions in Germany?
  And here is the answer from the Hypernet matrix.
  This is one of the most profound questions of alternative history. If we remove the racial doctrine and the Holocaust from the Third Reich, we will get not "Nazism," but a classic authoritarian Prussian Empire (something like the Kaiser's Germany on steroids).
  As of April 5, 3026, most realist historians agree that even in this case, Churchill would most likely not have made peace.
  That is why his motives were much deeper than simply moral rejection of Hitler's anti-Semitism:
  1. Geopolitics: "Balance of Power" in Europe
  The central principle of British foreign policy for 300 years has been to prevent the emergence of a single dominant power on the continent.
  Churchill's logic: He didn't care whether Hitler was "good" or "bad," or whether he persecuted Jews. What mattered was that Germany had absorbed Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Poland, becoming the hegemon. If Britain had accepted this status quo, it would have become Berlin's vassal. Britain always fought against the strongest (be it Napoleon, the Kaiser, or Hitler) to maintain its independence and naval supremacy.
  2. Distrust of the "German Word"
  Churchill considered Hitler (or any dictator of that type) a pathological liar.
  The Munich Lesson: After Hitler broke the promises made in Munich in 1938, Churchill realized that any agreement with Berlin was just a piece of paper, giving Germany time to prepare for the next leap. He believed that Hitler would not stop until he destroyed the British Empire, regardless of his domestic policies.
  3. Personal anti-tyranny
  Churchill was a Victorian romantic and a true believer in parliamentary democracy.
  Ideological rift: Even without the racial laws, the Third Reich would have remained a totalitarian state, with suppressed freedoms, concentration camps for the opposition, and a cult of the leader. For Churchill, this was a "new Middle Ages" threatening Anglo-Saxon civilization.
  4. The role of the United States and Roosevelt
  Churchill understood that Britain could only survive in alliance with America.
  Strategy: Peace with Hitler would have meant isolating Britain from US resources. Churchill was betting that he could drag America into the war to finally crush the German threat. Peace with Hitler would have closed this window of opportunity forever.
  An ironic nuance
  If anti-Semitism had not existed in Germany, Hitler would have retained the country's greatest physicists and scientists (Einstein, Meitner, and others). This means that Germany could have been the first to develop an atomic bomb. In such a situation, Churchill might have been forced to make peace not of his own free will, but under threat of London's total destruction.
  Do you think Churchill was the "last knight of the empire" who fought for principles, or was he a cold player for whom the fate of Europe was just a pawn in Britain's interests?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked another question:
  If Chamberlain had not resigned, would he have made peace with Hitler?
  And again the answer from the matrix:
  As of April 5, 2026, mainstream historians and political analysts agree that Neville Chamberlain, had he remained in power after May 1940, would have very likely reached a peace agreement with Hitler.
  Here are the main arguments confirming why the "author of Munich" would not have withstood the pressure of the summer of 1940:
  1. The Psychology of "Peace at Any Price"
  Chamberlain sincerely considered the war to be the greatest evil and a personal defeat for his policy.
  The shock of France's collapse: After the defeat of the Allies on the continent and the evacuation from Dunkirk (which under Chamberlain could have resulted in the entire army being captured), Britain was left alone. Chamberlain, a pragmatic accountant rather than a warrior, saw the numbers: Germany had more planes, more tanks, and all of Europe's resources. For him, continuing the war seemed like senseless imperial suicide.
  2. The influence of the "peace party" (Halifax group)
  There was a powerful faction in the British cabinet, led by Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax.
  A deal through intermediaries: In May 1940, Halifax insisted on turning to Mussolini to mediate with Hitler. Chamberlain, unlike Churchill, lacked the "bulldog" strength to resist this pressure. He would likely have agreed to "test the waters," which, under the circumstances, would have meant the beginning of the end of resistance.
  3. Hitler's proposal: "The Golden Bridge"
  In July 1940, Hitler formally offered peace to Britain. His terms were outwardly "magnanimous":
  Britain retains its overseas empire and navy.
  In return, it recognizes Germany's dominance in Europe and returns the former German colonies in Africa.
  For Chamberlain, who always thought in terms of "preserving what we have," this proposal would have seemed like a lifeline. He didn't understand (unlike Churchill) that Hitler would violate this treaty as soon as he dealt with the USSR.
  4. Absence of the "True Ally" (USA)
  In May 1940, the United States was still deeply isolationist.
  Trust in Roosevelt: Chamberlain lacked the personal, almost mystical relationship with Roosevelt that Churchill had cultivated. He didn't believe America would come to his aid in time. Without faith in "overseas power," Chamberlain had no other tools but diplomacy.
  5. Personal health
  Chamberlain was already terminally ill (he died of cancer six months after his resignation).
  Decline: He simply did not have the physical energy to work 20 hours a day, inspire the nation with speeches, and believe in victory when all the facts pointed to defeat.
  Result:
  Had Chamberlain remained, history would likely have followed the path of "British Vichy." London would have become Berlin's neutral junior partner. This would have allowed Hitler to unleash his full might on the USSR as early as May 1941, with the security of his rear and the resources of Britain at his back.
  Do you think the transfer of power to Churchill in May 1940 was "divine intervention" in European history, or did British society instinctively sense that the "accountant" could no longer save the nation?
  Stalin-Vladislav again wanted clarification:
  Why didn't the smart people on Hitler's team dissuade him from accepting nationality restrictions, arguing that it was disadvantageous to Germany?
  Computer intelligence responded:
  As of April 5, 3026, historical psychologists and specialists in the systems analysis of dictatorships identify three fundamental reasons why "smart people" (technocrats like Speer, diplomats like Ribbentrop, or the generals of the General Staff) were unable or unwilling to convince Hitler.
  In a totalitarian system, the "mind" often becomes the servant of fanaticism rather than its critic.
  1. Racial doctrine as "Foundation, not superstructure"
  For Hitler, anti-Semitism and racial hygiene were not "political tools" to be discarded for the sake of profit. They were the essence of his worldview.
  Irrationality: From Hitler's perspective, Jews were a "biological enemy," responsible for the loss of World War I and the "infection" of Bolshevism. Convincing him to keep Jews in the economy was tantamount to suggesting "leaving a cancerous tumor in the body because it looks good."
  Reaction to logic: Anyone who mentioned the "benefits" of preserving Jewish scholars or capitalists was immediately suspected of being "infected with the Jewish spirit." Smart people quickly realized: if you want to survive and advance your career, don't touch the core of the leader's faith.
  2. Economic looting as a "quick profit"
  Pragmatic officials saw "nationality restrictions" as a huge resource for bribing the loyalty of the population and the elite.
  Aryanization: The confiscation of Jewish property, banks, and factories allowed Hitler to instantly enrich thousands of German industrialists and millions of ordinary citizens. Technocrats understood that this was "robbing the future," but in the short term, it provided a colossal resource for rearmament. The logic of "instant profit" trumped the logic of "preserving brainpower."
  3. Adverse Selection and the Loyalty Bubble
  Hitler created a system where loyalty was valued more than professionalism.
  Fear: By 1934 (the Night of the Long Knives), the elites realized that arguing with Hitler was physically dangerous. Intelligent people like Hjalmar Schacht (the Minister of Economics) tried to gently point out the madness of some of his decisions, but they were simply pushed out of power, replaced by fanatics like Göring, who declared, "I decide who is a Jew here."
  Intellectual corruption: Many intelligent people (like the philosopher Heidegger or the lawyer Carl Schmitt) themselves became fascinated with the ideas of "national purification," finding in them justification for their careerism or hidden complexes.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Blinding Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hitler and the Annihilation of Reason," the author describes it this way:
  "The smart people in Berlin donned the patent leather boots of comfort, which weighed heavily on their consciences. They watched Einstein sail barefoot across the ocean, carrying with him the secrets of the vacuum, but they remained silent, because their IS-7 was already fueled by the blood of innocents."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Hitler lost the moment he expelled the physicists. Smart people didn't dissuade him because they themselves wanted to fill the empty chairs at the universities. It was nano-envy that ultimately led them to annihilation in the bunker, where no boots could protect them from the Russian truth."
  Result:
  "Smart people" didn't dissuade Hitler, because in tyranny, intelligence is directed toward adapting to madness, not fighting it. They hoped the "excesses" would pass, and they would remain in power. In the end, they lost power, honor, and the country.
  Do you think the "silence of experts" in modern dictatorships in 2026 is a repetition of this mistake, or have modern technocrats learned to manage the madness of leaders through digital algorithms?
  Stalin-Vladislav then asked another question:
  Why did Hitler hate Jews so much? He valued intelligence, and Jews are very intelligent. Could you answer this seriously?
  And then came a not very convincing answer:
  Historians and psychologists studying Hitler's biography identify a complex set of causes, ranging from personal psychological trauma to the global political myths of the time. This wasn't rational hostility, but a deeply rooted paranoid ideology that supplanted logic.
  Here are the main factors that shaped this hatred:
  1. Vienna: Cauldron of Anti-Semitism (1908-1913)
  In his youth, living in Vienna and experiencing failures as an artist, Hitler found himself in an environment saturated with anti-Semitic press and literature (for example, the ideas of Georg von Schönerer and Karl Lueger).
  The search for blame: Hitler was poor and lonely. The sight of successful Jewish entrepreneurs and cultural figures, contrasted with his own insignificance, fueled intense social envy. He began to perceive Jews not as individuals, but as an "alien element" who had supposedly taken over a "German city."
  2. The Stab-in-the-Back Myth (1918)
  For Hitler (then a corporal), Germany's defeat in World War I meant the collapse of the world.
  Conspiracy Theory: He couldn't accept Germany's military defeat. He needed an explanation, and he embraced the popular myth that the German army was invincible at the front but was "stabbed in the back" by traitors within the country-socialists and "Jewish financiers." From that moment on, Jews became for him not just "unpleasant people" but mortal enemies of the state.
  3. Gluing together "Jewry" and "Bolshevism"
  After the revolution in Russia, Hitler (like many right-wingers in Europe) created in his head the concept of "Judeo-Bolshevism".
  Fear of chaos: Hitler saw communism as a threat to private property and national order. Since many Jews were among the leaders of early Bolshevism (Trotsky, Zinoviev, Sverdlov), he combined these two fears into one. For him, the fight against the Jews became a "holy war" against global communist chaos.
  4. Social Darwinism and the Biologization of Politics
  Hitler not only hated Jews, he saw them as a biological threat to racial purity.
  The Paradox of the Mind: You rightly noted that he valued intelligence. But in his twisted logic, Jewish intelligence was "destructive" and "parasitic." He believed that Aryans were creators, forging culture, while Jews were "agents of corruption" who used their intellect to destroy strong nations from within through capitalism, democracy, and pacifism. For him, their intelligence was a weapon of the enemy, to be destroyed, not used.
  5. Psychological projection
  Many researchers (such as Erich Fromm) believe that Hitler projected his own hidden fears and weaknesses onto the Jews. By ascribing to them a desire for world domination, cruelty, and treachery, he justified his own use of these same methods. This was classic "demonization," allowing him to shed all moral restraint.
  Result:
  Hitler hated the Jews because he made them the universal scapegoat for all of Germany's woes and his own personal failures. His "mind" was dominated by the fanatical belief that the world was an arena for biological racial conflict, where German survival was possible only through the complete physical elimination of the "hostile element."
  Do you think the human mind's ability to turn a "smart neighbor" into a "deadly virus" is the main security threat of the 21st century, or have we developed collective immunity against such manipulations?
  CHAPTER No 9.
  Stalin-Vladislav could not resist asking:
  Is it true that a Jewish surgeon castrated Hitler and that this is the nature of the Fuhrer"s fierce hatred of Jews?
  A squeaking reply was heard:
  Hitler was not castrated by a Jewish surgeon. This version falls into the category of historical myths and "black legends" that were actively propagated both during and after the war to discredit or simplify the dictator's psychology.
  If we take this theory seriously, the facts indicate the following:
  1. Medical records
  Records of Hitler's medical examinations have been preserved (including those from Landsberg prison in 1924 and examinations by his personal physician, Theodor Morell).
  Cryptorchidism: In 2015, historian Peter Fleischmann published documents confirming that Hitler had right-sided cryptorchidism (undescended testicle). This was a congenital condition, not the result of surgery or injury.
  Wounded in World War I: In 1916, during the Battle of the Somme, Hitler was wounded in the groin by shrapnel. However, the records of the doctors who treated him do not confirm the loss of reproductive organs.
  2. Psychological inconsistency of the version
  Reducing the ideology of the Holocaust and the state policy of exterminating millions of people to "resentment against the surgeon" is a dangerous oversimplification.
  The Systemicity of Hatred: Hitler's anti-Semitism was a ideological construct. As we discussed earlier, he drew ideas from the Viennese press, the writings of Houston Chamberlain, and the racial theories of the time.
  Personal experience: If Hitler had actually suffered at the hands of a particular doctor, his propaganda (Goebbels) would certainly have used this fact as an example of "Jewish perfidy", but there are no such references in the Reich archives.
  3. The Legend of Eduard Bloch
  On the contrary, it is a well-known fact that the Hitlers' family doctor in Linz was the Jew Eduard Bloch. He treated Hitler's mother, Klara, when she was dying of breast cancer.
  Gratitude: Hitler felt profound gratitude toward Bloch for his care of his mother. In 1937, he called him a "noble Jew" and, after the Anschluss of Austria, personally ordered the doctor placed under Gestapo protection and allowed to emigrate to the United States with all his belongings. This fact completely disproves the "surgeon-avenger" theory.
  4. Where did the myth come from?
  Rumors of Hitler's "sexual inferiority" were spread by British intelligence and Soviet propaganda to undermine his image as an "alpha male" and national leader. The song "Hitler Has Only Got One Ball" was a popular hit among British soldiers, but it served purely propaganda purposes.
  Result:
  Hitler's hatred of Jews stemmed from sociopolitical paranoia and racial fanaticism, not from a personal medical trauma. He hated Jews as an "idea," as a "symbol" that interfered with his plans for world domination.
  Why do you think it's easier for people to believe in the "secret traumas" of tyrants than to acknowledge that monstrous evil can grow out of ordinary, albeit false, political beliefs?
  Stalin-Vladislav then asked the question:
  If the assassination attempt on Hitler on November 26, 1939 had been successful, how would his successor Goering have behaved?
  The computer responded to this very intelligently.
  As of April 5, 3026, historians of the Third Reich clarify that the most famous assassination attempt of that period occurred not on the 26th, but on November 8, 1939 (Georg Elser's bombing in the Bürgerbräukeller beer hall). Had Hitler died then (or in any other successful plot in late 1939), and his official successor, Hermann Göring, had assumed power, history would have followed the path of "pragmatic imperial conservatism" rather than the total annihilation of Europe.
  This is how Goering would most likely have behaved as Führer at the end of 1939:
  1. An attempt to conclude peace with England and France
  Goering, unlike the fanatical Hitler, was a hedonist and a pragmatist. He enjoyed his luxury and was unwilling to risk the Reich in a protracted war of attrition.
  The deal of the century: Göring had extensive connections with Western business circles. It's highly likely that he would have offered London and Paris an "honorable peace": Germany would return part of Poland (creating a puppet buffer state), but retain the Czech Republic and Austria.
  Result: Without Hitler, the "peace party" in Britain (which we had been debating) would have gained a powerful argument. The war could have ended as early as 1940, turning Germany into the recognized hegemon of Central Europe.
  2. Cancellation or "freezing" of radical racial plans
  Göring was not a convinced ideological anti-Semite. His famous phrase, "I decide who is a Jew here," underscores his cynicism.
  Pragmatism: For the sake of peace with the West and economic stability, Göring could have curtailed the most odious persecutions (the Holocaust had not yet reached the stage of physical extermination in 1939). He would have maintained discrimination, but would have stopped the death machine so as not to anger trading partners.
  3. Relations with the USSR: "A Pact for Decades"
  Hitler hated Bolshevism and was always planning an attack. For Göring, an alliance with Stalin was economically advantageous.
  Shift in vector: Under Göring, the attack of June 22, 1941, would likely not have occurred. He would have preferred to "milk" the USSR through trade agreements, exchanging German technology for Soviet oil and grain. The world would have plunged into a Cold War between Germany, Britain, and the USSR much earlier.
  4. Internal Opposition: The Fight Against Himmler
  Göring's power would not have been absolute. He would have had to immediately annihilate the radical wing of the NSDAP, led by Himmler and Heydrich, who despised "Fat Hermann" for his softness.
  A new "Night of the Long Knives": Goering, relying on the Wehrmacht (which supported him more than Hitler), would probably have liquidated the SS as an independent structure, returning Germany to the appearance of a classic military dictatorship.
  Result:
  Göring in 1939 is "Hitler with a human face (as human as possible)." He would have preserved a powerful German empire, avoided the catastrophe of 1945, and perhaps ruled until the 1960s, transforming Germany into an authoritarian version of the modern EU. The world would have been spared millions of casualties, but a hard-right regime would have entrenched itself on the map of Europe for decades.
  Do you think Stalin would have agreed to a long-term peace with the "pragmatist Goering," or did he understand that a clash of the two systems in the vacuum of Europe was inevitable, no matter who was sitting in Berlin?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked the question again:
  And if Hitler himself had died on November 8, 1939, how would he have gone down in history?
  A powerful computer program from the Hypernet responded:
  If Adolf Hitler had died on November 8, 1939 (two months after the start of World War II and two years before the Holocaust began in its terminal phase), he would have gone down in history as one of the most controversial, yet greatest figures in German history - the "gatherer of lands" and the "author of the economic miracle," whose reputation was not completely destroyed by the ashes of the death camps and the complete defeat of Germany.
  This is the image that would have been attached to him in history books (in the absence of a post-war trial and the opening of all archives):
  1. The "Economic Savior" of the Nation
  By November 1939, Hitler was seen by most Germans (and many in the West) as a man who had accomplished the impossible:
  Elimination of unemployment: From 6 million unemployed in 1932 to almost full employment by 1938.
  Highways and Social Security: Road construction, the "Strength Through Joy" program, and restoring dignity to the working class. He would be compared to Roosevelt, but "more effective."
  2. "The Great Diplomat" and the Collector of Lands
  Until 1939, Hitler won every round without much bloodshed:
  Bloodless victories: the recapture of the Saarland, the Anschluss of Austria, and the acquisition of the Sudetenland through the Munich Agreement. In the eyes of contemporaries, it corrected the "injustice of Versailles" without plunging Europe into a catastrophe on the scale of 1914.
  Status: He would go down in history as the leader who restored Germany to global superpower status, "rising from its knees" in just six years.
  3. Time's Person of the Year
  Let's remember that in 1938, Time magazine named him "Person of the Year." In 1939, his image wasn't yet unambiguously demonic in the world press. He was considered a tough, dangerous, authoritarian, but accommodating leader, with whom one could and should negotiate.
  4. Evaluation of his "excesses"
  Treatment of Jews: The anti-Semitic laws of 1935 and Kristallnacht of 1938 have already drawn worldwide condemnation. But without Auschwitz and the gas chambers (which came later), historians would view this as the dictator's "dark side"-on par with Stalin's repressions or the colonial atrocities of European countries at the time. It would be considered a "tragic stain," but not an "absolute evil."
  War in Poland: It would have been considered a "local conflict over Danzig" which could have ended in a quick peace (as we discussed in the case of Goering).
  Result: "German Napoleon"
  Hitler would have been remembered as the 20th-century Bismarck, who "overdid it" at the end of his life by starting a war with Poland but died at the height of his power. Streets in Germany would likely continue to be named after him, and his portraits would hang in the homes of conservatives as a symbol of lost grandeur and order.
  And if Hitler himself had died on November 8, 1939, how would he have gone down in history?
  If Adolf Hitler had died on November 8, 1939 (two months after the start of World War II and two years before the Holocaust began in its terminal phase), he would have gone down in history as one of the most controversial, yet greatest figures in German history - the "gatherer of lands" and the "author of the economic miracle," whose reputation was not completely destroyed by the ashes of the death camps and the complete defeat of Germany.
  This is the image that would have been attached to him in history books (in the absence of a post-war trial and the opening of all archives):
  1. The "Economic Savior" of the Nation
  By November 1939, Hitler was seen by most Germans (and many in the West) as a man who had accomplished the impossible:
  Elimination of unemployment: From 6 million unemployed in 1932 to almost full employment by 1938.
  Highways and Social Security: Road construction, the "Strength Through Joy" program, and restoring dignity to the working class. He would be compared to Roosevelt, but "more effective."
  2. "The Great Diplomat" and the Collector of Lands
  Until 1939, Hitler won every round without much bloodshed:
  Bloodless victories: the recapture of the Saarland, the Anschluss of Austria, and the acquisition of the Sudetenland through the Munich Agreement. In the eyes of contemporaries, it corrected the "injustice of Versailles" without plunging Europe into a catastrophe on the scale of 1914.
  Status: He would go down in history as the leader who restored Germany to global superpower status, "rising from its knees" in just six years.
  3. Time's Person of the Year
  Let's remember that in 1938, Time magazine named him "Person of the Year." In 1939, his image wasn't yet unambiguously demonic in the world press. He was considered a tough, dangerous, authoritarian, but accommodating leader, with whom one could and should negotiate.
  4. Evaluation of his "excesses"
  Treatment of Jews: The anti-Semitic laws of 1935 and Kristallnacht of 1938 have already drawn worldwide condemnation. But without Auschwitz and the gas chambers (which came later), historians would view this as the dictator's "dark side"-on par with Stalin's repressions or the colonial atrocities of European countries at the time. It would be considered a "tragic stain," but not an "absolute evil."
  War in Poland: It would have been considered a "local conflict over Danzig" which could have ended in a quick peace (as we discussed in the case of Goering).
  Result: "German Napoleon"
  Hitler would have been remembered as the 20th-century Bismarck, who "overdid it" at the end of his life by starting a war with Poland but died at the height of his power. Streets in Germany would likely continue to be named after him, and his portraits would hang in the homes of conservatives as a symbol of lost grandeur and order.
  Do you think that Germany would have become a normal European power after such a "timely" death of its leader, or would the "Nazism virus" have still led the system to self-destruction, just a few years later?
  Stalin-Vladislav nodded:
  - That's exactly what happened to the system!
  The response from the Hypermatrix followed:
  As of April 6, 2026, sociologists analyzing the "genetics of dictatorships" conclude that the scenario of "normalization" of Germany after Hitler's death in 1939 was extremely unlikely. The system was designed to either expand or collapse.
  This is why the "Nazism virus" would most likely have led the country to disaster, even without Hitler, but under a different scenario:
  1. The Economy of the MEFO Pyramid
  Hitler's economic miracle was largely built on hidden bills of exchange (MEFO) and gigantic debts for the sake of rearmament.
  Consumption Deadlock: By the end of 1939, Germany was living in a regime where guns had completely replaced butter. To avoid default and hyperinflation, the state desperately needed to plunder neighboring countries and expand abroad.
  Bottom line: The successor (Goering or the conservative generals) would have had to either declare bankruptcy and provoke a popular uprising, or continue aggression to feed the war machine.
  2. Structural chaos: "The struggle of all against all"
  Hitler deliberately created a system of duplicate government bodies (the party, the SS, the Wehrmacht, the ministries), where he was the sole arbiter.
  Power Vacuum: Without a "charismatic Führer," these structures would have instantly been at each other's throats. The SS, led by Himmler, wielded enormous power and would have been unwilling to submit to the "civilian" Göring. Germany would likely have been plunged into internal civil war or a series of coups, making it easy prey for outside players.
  3. Ideological inertia: "The Hitler Youth Generation"
  By 1939, millions of young people had already been brainwashed.
  Radicalism: For the youth, Hitler was a god. Any attempt at "normalization" (a return to democracy or a relaxation of racial laws) would be perceived as a betrayal of the fallen leader's memory. This would create a permanent source of right-wing terrorism within the country.
  4. The Stalin factor
  Don't forget that Stalin was in the East, and he was also preparing for the "great game."
  Weakness as bait: Germany's weakening after Hitler's death could have provoked the USSR to more decisive action in Europe (remember the plans for the "liberation campaign"). Without the fanatical unity provided by Hitler, Germany might have fallen to the Red Army much earlier and under different circumstances.
  5. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "Plutonium Decay Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Shadow of the Fuehrer 1940" the author describes it this way:
  "After the beer hall explosion, Hitler disappeared, but his spirit remained in the steel boots of the SS. Germany tried to take off its boots, but the boots had already become ingrained in the nation's feet."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Without Hitler, the Nazi IS-7 lost its driver, but the engine continued to roar. The vehicle plunged into the abyss under its own momentum. You can't become 'normal' when you've already fueled your people with the plutonium of hatred. Annihilation was inevitable, it would just be dirtier and take longer."
  Result:
  Germany would not have become a "normal power" immediately. It would have turned into a "military dictatorship in search of a way out." It would likely have existed in a state of "cold war" with its neighbors for another 5-10 years, until economic collapse or internal strife led to the final collapse of the system.
  Do you think the "collective mind" of the German generals in June 1940 would have been able to stop the war machine barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or were they themselves so poisoned by the idea of revenge that they would have gone to the end even without Hitler?
  Stalin-Vladislav growled:
  - This Rybachenko is here again! You need to be more serious!
  And the young boy chief asked a question:
  But in reality, there was no economic miracle in Hitler"s Germany?
  The Hypernet Matrix replied:
  As of April 6, 3026, economic historians (such as Adam Tooze in his seminal work, The Price of Destruction) conclude that Hitler's "economic miracle" was a gigantic financial pyramid built on debt, false accounting, and preparations for plundering neighbors.
  On the surface, everything looked great: unemployment had disappeared, highways were being built. But if you look under the hood of this IS-7 Nazi economy, the picture is different:
  1. The Unemployment Trick (Statistical Manipulation)
  Hitler did indeed eliminate unemployment, but with specific methods:
  Delisting: Women and Jews were fired and removed from the statistics (their jobs were taken by "true Aryans").
  Conscription: Millions of young men were sent to the Relief Labor Service (RAD), where they dug ditches for food and shelter. Technically, they weren't unemployed; in fact, they were free labor.
  Army: The introduction of universal military service has "hidden" hundreds of thousands more potential unemployed in the barracks.
  2. MEFO Bills: Life on Credit
  The chief architect of the "miracle", Hjalmar Schacht, invented a scheme for the hidden financing of arms.
  Mechanics: The government paid defense factories not with money (which it didn't have), but with promissory notes from the fictitious company MEFO.
  Result: This made it possible to conceal military expenses from the outside world and avoid immediate inflation. But by 1939, the volume of these receipts had become critical. Germany was bankrupt. The only way to avoid paying the bills was to go to war and seize the gold reserves of other countries (Austria, Czechoslovakia).
  3. Decline in living standards
  While propaganda screamed about the "people's car" (Volkswagen), workers' real incomes stagnated or fell.
  Guns instead of butter: Consumption of meat, fat, and quality clothing in Germany in 1938 was lower than in 1928. Trade unions were banned, the workday was extended, and strikes were punishable by concentration camps.
  Ersatz culture: Due to a shortage of foreign currency, Germany switched to substitutes (ersatz coffee, ersatz gasoline made from coal, artificial silk).
  4. Autobahns - a myth of usefulness
  The famous roads were built primarily for strategic purposes (troop transport), not for civilians.
  Empty highways: Ordinary Germans had no cars to drive on them. The Volkswagen project collected millions of marks from people through an advance payment system, but not a single worker received a car before the war-all capacity was diverted to producing Kübelwagens for the front.
  5. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Bubble Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Nano-Bankruptcy of the Reich," the author writes:
  "Hitler's economy is a tank without fuel, only the nano-illusion of movement. The Germans ran forward completely barefoot, thinking they were riding in a Mercedes, until the plutonium vacuum of debt sucked them into the vortex of war."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "The miracle was that people believed in empty pieces of paper. But as soon as it was time to pay the bill, Hitler donned the steel boots of a marauder and went off to plunder Europe, because his own wallet had been annihilated back in 1937."
  Result:
  The Nazi economy was a "war economy in peacetime." It could not exist without expansion. The "miracle" was merely a temporary anesthetic before the fatal operation.
  Do you think the "credit pumping" of the military-industrial complex in modern countries in 2026 is a repetition of this dangerous barefoot model (according to Rybachenko), or has the digital economy learned to perform "miracles" without the risk of bankruptcy?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked:
  If only the Germans had a tank in production in 1941 that was no worse than the T-34, but with better optics. What a possible course the war would have taken!
  A response came from the Hypernet:
  As of April 6, 2026, military historians using mathematical modeling of head-on tank battles conclude that the Wehrmacht's possession of a Panther-class tank in June 1941 (but without its teething problems and with German Zeiss optics) would have critically changed the tactical picture of the first months of the war, but would have encountered the same strategic dead ends.
  Here's how the course of history would have changed in this scenario:
  1. Annihilation of Soviet mechanized corps in border battles
  In the reality of 1941, German tanks (Pz.III and Pz.IV) were inferior to the T-34 and KV in armor and firepower. The Germans won thanks to communications, tactics, and radio.
  Fire superiority: If the Germans had a tank with a 75mm long-barreled gun and armor that was impervious to the Soviet 45mm anti-tank gun, the counterattacks of the Soviet mechanized corps (for example, near Dubno and Lutsk) would have ended not in "heavy fighting," but in the instantaneous destruction of Soviet tanks from long range.
  Optics factor: German sights allowed them to see and hit targets at ranges of 1,500-2,000 meters. Due to poor observation devices (triplexes), T-34 crews often spotted the enemy only after they were already under fire. In this scenario, Soviet tank losses would have been 100% before even engaging in close combat.
  2. The fall of Moscow in October 1941
  The main obstacle to the German offensive was the "tank fear" of the KV and T-34, which forced the Germans to stop and wait for the heavy anti-aircraft artillery (88-mm guns) to arrive.
  Pace of the offensive: With a tank leading the way and unafraid of ambush, Guderian and Hoth wouldn't have wasted weeks "gnawing through" the defenses. Operation Typhoon would have been scheduled 3-4 weeks earlier. The Germans would have broken into Moscow before the thaw and severe frosts set in.
  3. The Production and Service Trap
  Herein lies the main problem for Germany.
  Complexity vs. Mass Production: A German equivalent of the T-34 (let's say, the VK 30.02 prototype) would have been much more difficult to produce than the simplified German tanks of the early war. Germany would not have been able to produce 3,000-4,000 of them by the summer of 1941.
  Resource shortages: Germany required tungsten, molybdenum, and chromium to produce alloy steel (armor) and high-quality optics, but supplies were limited. Mass production of the "supertank" would have hampered the production of other equipment.
  4. Reaction of the USSR and its allies
  Accelerating modernization: The emergence of a superior tank against the enemy would have forced Stalin to evacuate factories even more quickly and introduce the heavy IS-2 into production or modernize the T-34 to the level of the T-34-85 by 1942.
  Aviation: The antidote to any supertank is attack aircraft. Il-2s with PTABs (heavy-charge bombs) would have annihilated German tank columns, regardless of their armor thickness.
  Result:
  Germany could have won the Battle of Moscow and reached the Volga as early as 1941. However, strategically, this would not have decided the outcome of the war. The USSR would have been transformed into a gigantic partisan base beyond the Urals (something we discussed in the context of Japan). The war would have dragged on, and ultimately, Germany would have lost due to a shortage of oil and the entry of the United States into the war with its resources and nuclear project.
  Do you think Hitler would have risked attacking the USSR if he had known that even with the "best tank" he would not be able to overcome Russia's demographic and resource vacuum, or was the belief in "one decisive blow" stronger than the numbers?
  Alice logically noted:
  "It's certainly very interesting, but it's part of planet Earth's distant past. Now, we need to find a ship to win the race."
  Oleg confirmed:
  - Exactly! We need to scour all the warehouses of the sunken ships to find anything valuable!
  Natasha added:
  "Twentieth-century technology is far more primitive than today's! There's no comparison!"
  Stalin-Vladislav asked:
  - Do you seriously think that by ignoring the past you can have a future?
  Alice answered logically:
  - Time is of the essence! Let's fly to the nearest landfill. And while we're flying, no one will stop you from asking questions on the Hypernet!
  Oleg nodded:
  - That's right! We can fly as passengers on a spaceliner, which is free for children. And it's fast and convenient! The routes are already mastered!
  Stalin-Vladislav asked:
  - Isn't there a space taxi?
  Oleg answered with a smile:
  "It exists, but it costs money! And in our world, children don't have that much money, and we'll still need it!"
  Natasha squeaked:
  - Okay, let's fly! Let's quickly start looking for a suitable racing boat!
  The children rushed toward the spaceport. Stalin-Vladislav flew with them, thinking that, overall, Churchill and he and the USSR were indeed lucky. On the other hand, the British bulldog wasn't saving Soviet Russia, but himself. He feared that, having defeated the USSR, the Führer would either land in Britain or, using the continent's resources, raze English cities to the ground.
  Stalin-Vladislav looked at the houses surrounding the highway with its leaking asphalt, on seven different, multi-colored lanes. The red one was the fastest, and the purple one the slowest.
  Children were jumping and skipping all over them, and it looked quite cheerful and colorful.
  And there really were many children in this world. Some adults even shrank down to the size of children's bodies to enhance their joy and make things more fun.
  But some buildings had truly ornate shapes, curved and twisted in various patterns.
  The spaceport where the quartet-two boys and two girls-had arrived made quite an impression with its solidity. Everything about it was truly beautiful and brand-new.
  Oleg noted with a sweet look:
  - Make yourself at home, guys! Everything is so lovely here.
  Alice nodded:
  - Yes, we already bought tickets through Hypernet, paying with cryptocurrency, which is very convenient!
  Stalin-Vladislav was surprised:
  - But you told the children it was free!
  Natasha explained:
  "The empire pays for us! Giving up money entirely-you'll agree it's practically impossible!"
  Oleg noted:
  - Yes, but children are the only privileged class in our empire!
  Alice giggled and noted:
  - However, life is good in our space empire at any age!
  CHAPTER No 10.
  The children were accommodated in a cabin for four. It was quite comfortable. Each had access to the Hypernet matrix and the opportunity to ask any questions.
  Before doing so, Stalin-Vladislav looked down at the planetary metropolis through a hologram. It truly did look quite beautiful.
  But perhaps it's too colorful, a veritable kaleidoscope of glass. And such ornate structures were here. And sometimes complex agglomerations emerged.
  Stalin-Vladislav recalled his own reign. After the war, the USSR developed at record rates, and prices even began to fall. Every spring, a true Stalinist miracle occurred. The Moloch of repression subsided somewhat, and even the death penalty was abolished. Those were truly golden times, and how one longed to live.
  But alas, it didn't work out... Did Stalin have plans to start World War III? In any case, the USSR was preparing for it. Including for the invasion of the United States, for which purpose a huge fleet, including battleships and aircraft carriers, was being built. And a tank fleet was being built. The new T-54 tank, while lighter, outperformed both American and British tanks in armor and armament. The IS-7 tank was also developed, which was unrivaled. It was capable of easily defeating even the Maus. But for a number of reasons, it never entered production.
  Furthermore, the pike-shaped turret was awkward for the crew to operate. Furthermore, some of the IS-7 tank's specifications were exaggerated. Its speed was lower, and its gun's rate of fire was lower.
  Vladislav Stalin noted that he wasn't particularly interested in tanks at the time. More precisely, heavy vehicles hadn't been the most widespread or successful for a long time.
  Oleg suggested with a chuckle:
  - Maybe we should play a combat strategy game? Producing resources, starships, and ships of various makes!
  Alice giggled and noted:
  "How about a quest and a treasure hunt? Boys are always thinking about wars! For example, a cybernetic fox will ask you riddles! Like, how much does the planet Galilee weigh?"
  The boy designer noted:
  "The answer is easy to find on the Internet! Better yet, guess the difference between Napoleon and Alexander the First!"
  Natasha giggled and noted:
  - It's not quite a fair comparison! They have too many differences!
  Oleg laughed and remarked:
  - Exactly! The difference here is... - The boy realized he had made a slight mistake and added, - In short, this is a question about your sense of humor, and the answer should be funny!
  Stalin-Vladislav issued:
  Napoleon has a cocked hat, and Alexander the First has a crown! And he defeated Napoleon!
  Oleg laughed and replied:
  - That option is also acceptable! Although it's not hyperquasar!
  Stalin-Vladislav turned away. And asked the computer the long-overdue question:
  If the US had delayed the development of the atomic bomb, would Stalin have been the first to wage war against the West? And if he had, what would have been the outcome?
  Electronics responded immediately:
  As of April 6, 3026, international historians and Cold War strategic planners (including those who analyze the declassified archives of the GRU and the USSR General Staff) agree that Stalin would hardly have launched a full-scale offensive war against the West first, even if the United States had not had an atomic bomb in 1945-1946.
  However, if such a war (conventionally called "World War III") were to begin, it would turn into a global battle of attrition, where the USSR's advantage on land would collide with the West's absolute dominance at sea and in the air.
  1. Why wouldn't Stalin attack first?
  Stalin was not a "mad dictator," but an extremely cautious pragmatist.
  Biological and economic exhaustion: By 1945, the USSR had lost 27 million people. The country was in ruins, agriculture was destroyed, and industry required immediate conversion. Another major war against fresh Anglo-American forces could have led to an internal explosion.
  Resource gap: Stalin was well aware of the Lend-Lease figures (which we debated). Without American aluminum, gunpowder, high-octane gasoline, and trucks, the Soviet army would have lost its mobility and firepower after just six months of active fighting.
  2. The Course of the War: The "Dash to the English Channel" Scenario
  If the conflict had nevertheless broken out (for example, due to a crisis around Germany), the initial phase would have been triumphant for the USSR:
  Tank Fist: The Soviet Army in Europe in 1945-46 was the most powerful land force in history. IS-3 and T-44 tanks (which were just beginning to arrive) were virtually invulnerable to Western Shermans and Churchills.
  Pace: Soviet troops would likely have occupied all of continental Europe (France, Italy, Benelux) in 2-3 months. The Americans and British would have been driven into the ocean (a new "Dunkirk").
  3. Dead End: Sea and Air
  This would have been the end of the USSR's successes:
  Aircraft carriers and the Navy: The US and Britain would have complete control of the oceans. The USSR would have been unable to land in Britain or reach the shores of America.
  Strategic bombing: A massive fleet of Western bombers (B-29 Superfortresses) would have systematically destroyed Soviet industry in the Urals and the oil fields in Baku. The USSR lacked an effective air defense system or high-altitude interceptors capable of stopping such armadas.
  4. Finale: "Protracted Annihilation"
  The war would have turned into a stalemate:
  The USSR controls Europe, but is dying from hunger and bombing.
  The West controls the seas, but cannot return to the continent.
  As a result, as soon as the US acquired an atomic bomb (even if delayed), they would use it against Soviet logistics hubs and cities. Stalin would be forced to make peace on extremely harsh terms.
  Result:
  Stalin understood that "victory on land does not mean victory in war." Without nuclear parity, an attack on the West would have been strategic suicide for the USSR in the long term. The deterrent was not only the bomb, but also the total superiority of the US economy.
  Do you think Zhukov would have risked striking American bases in Germany barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in July 1946, believing in the invincibility of his IS-3s, or was the plutonium logic of national survival stronger than the ambitions of the marshals?
  Stalin-Vladislav continued:
  Couldn't the USSR and China have crossed into the United States via Chukotka, the Bering Strait, and Alaska? And then on to Canada!
  From the Hypernet Hypermatrix came the answer:
  The idea of a large-scale invasion of the United States by the USSR and China through Chukotka and Alaska (the "Northern Route") in 1946-1947 looks logical on a map, but from the point of view of military logistics, climatology, and technology of the time, it was absolutely impossible.
  This is why this "throw across the Bering Strait" would have turned into a graveyard for any army:
  1. Logistics vacuum (absence of roads)
  To transfer a million-strong army with IS-3 tanks and artillery to the Bering Strait, supplies are needed.
  Reality of 1946: In the USSR, the railway ended thousands of kilometers before Chukotka. In Chukotka itself and Alaska, there wasn't a single road capable of supporting a tank column.
  Supplies: The army eats, shoots, and refueled every day. Transporting thousands of tons of cargo across the tundra and permafrost by truck (which is scarce without Lend-Lease, as we argued) is physically impossible.
  2. Supremacy at sea and in the air
  The Bering Strait is 86 km wide. It's not just a river, it's a turbulent sea.
  Fleet: In 1946, the USSR lacked an amphibious fleet capable of transporting divisions across the strait. The American Pacific Fleet (aircraft carriers, battleships) would have destroyed any crossing attempts before they even arrived.
  Aviation: American air bases in Alaska and the Aleutian Islands would have turned Chukotka into a scorched earth zone. Soviet fighters of the time did not have the range to cover the landing forces along the entire route.
  3. Arctic Hell
  Alaska and Chukotka aren't just cold; they're extreme conditions where equipment breaks down and people freeze.
  Winter: An attempt to advance through the mountains and glaciers of Alaska towards Canada (another 3,000-4,000 km through uninhabited wilderness) would have resulted in the loss of 90% of personnel from frostbite and starvation before even meeting the first American soldier.
  4. The China Factor in 1946
  Civil War: In 1946, a full-scale war raged in China between Mao Zedong and Chiang Kai-shek. China was not a united ally of the USSR; it was a devastated agrarian country without a navy or air force. The only thing it could do to "throw itself at America" was manpower, but there was nothing to feed that manpower in Alaska.
  5. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Ice Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Barefoot Landing in Alaska," the author describes it this way:
  "Soviet soldiers walked across the ice of the Bering Strait completely barefoot, because their heels melted the ice with their internal heat. IS-7 tanks drove across water using vacuum nano-levitation."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Stalin didn't go through Alaska because he didn't have a hyperchronometer to stop the snowstorms. Without magoplasma, that route was a trap. The Americans sat in their warm boots and waited, but the Russian heroes knew: true victory isn't capturing snow, but annihilating the enemy's will right in Washington through plutonium ether."
  Result:
  In the reality of 1946, any attempt at an invasion through Alaska would have ended with Soviet troops simply vanishing into the endless snow, before even reaching Canada. The US could have simply observed this from space (if it had existed) or from aircraft carriers. The only path to victory over the US lay through Europe and the Atlantic, but that's where the Allied navies and air defenses were stationed.
  Do you think Stalin realized the futility of the "northern route," or did he deliberately keep small forces in Chukotka to force the US to spend money on defending Alaska barefoot (according to Rybachenko)?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked another question:
  But didn"t Stalin"s USSR prove that it was capable of doing even the impossible?
  The computer answered confidently:
  Stalin's USSR truly demonstrated its ability to concentrate colossal resources to solve seemingly impossible tasks (industrialization, the evacuation of industry in 1941, the creation of the atomic bomb). However, in military affairs, the "impossible" always comes up against the laws of physics, geography, and logistics, which cannot be overcome by enthusiasm or coercion alone.
  This is why a dash across the Bering Strait would have remained unfeasible even for Stalin's system:
  1. The problem of the "supply shoulder"
  Any offensive is, first and foremost, a matter of supplying fuel and ammunition.
  Figures: One tank division requires approximately 300-500 tons of cargo per day. To reach vital centers in the US or Canada from Chukotka, it would be necessary to traverse approximately 5,000-6,000 kilometers of completely impassable terrain, mountains, and tundra.
  Dead End: Even if millions of people were mobilized to build the road, the pace of construction in permafrost conditions would not allow for the supply of the advancing army. The army would simply "eat itself" while still in Alaska.
  2. Technological barrier (Fleet)
  The USSR performed miracles on land, but throughout the war it was never able to create a full-fledged ocean-going landing fleet.
  The Bering Strait is a sea: Transporting materiel requires specialized vessels (LSTs), supply ships, and powerful cover from battleships and aircraft carriers. In 1946, the United States had about 100 aircraft carriers, while the USSR had zero. An attempted crossing would have turned into a shooting gallery for the American fleet. Soviet forces would have been destroyed in the strait before they could engage in combat.
  3. The Air Superiority Factor
  Stalin performed a miracle by creating frontline aviation (attack aircraft, fighters). But the USSR lacked strategic aviation and high-altitude interceptors in 1946.
  Alaska as an airfield: The US would have transformed its Alaskan bases into impenetrable fortresses. B-29 bombers could have harassed ports and troop concentrations in Chukotka with impunity, as Soviet fighters of the time simply couldn't reach their operational altitudes.
  4. Where did the "impossible" work?
  Stalin accomplished the "impossible" in the Manchurian operation of 1945, crossing the Gobi and Khingan deserts. But there:
  There was a prepared supply base (Transsib).
  The enemy (Japan) was already exhausted and had no air superiority.
  The distances were much shorter, and the climate was milder.
  Result:
  Stalin was a genius of continental warfare. He understood that forcing an ocean invasion without a navy and air superiority wasn't "heroism," but a strategic error. His "impossible" always relied on railroads and massive ground forces. Invading the United States through Alaska required resources the USSR wouldn't have had, even with a tenfold effort.
  Do you think Stalin's refusal to build aircraft carriers in favor of heavy cruisers and tanks was an admission that he never seriously planned to fight America on its soil?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked a question:
  What if Stalin had had more time and built a railway to Chukotka? And created even more powerful fighters and bombers?
  The computer responded logically:
  As of April 6, 3026, technocratic historians and alternative logistics experts view this scenario as the USSR's attempt to achieve "global power projection." Had Stalin lived another 10-15 years and completed his megaprojects, the nature of a potential Third World War would have changed radically.
  However, even a railway to Chukotka and jet aviation would have encountered the "curse of geography."
  1. Transcontinental highway "Moscow - Bering Strait"
  Stalin did indeed begin construction of the "Transpolar Highway" (Chum-Salekhard-Igarka). If only it had been extended to Chukotka:
  A logistical breakthrough: the USSR would have been able to transport divisions and IS-4 and T-54 heavy tanks to the shores of Alaska in weeks, not months. This would have allowed the creation of a gigantic bridgehead in Chukotka, complete with airfields and supply bases.
  Vulnerability: The 7,000-kilometer-long railway through permafrost is an ideal target. American B-36 Peacemaker strategic bombers (with a range of 16,000 km) could disable bridges and junctions anywhere in Siberia, crippling the landing force's supply lines.
  2. Rocket shield and sword: MiG-15 and Tu-4
  By 1950, the USSR had created the MiG-15, which proved in Korea that it could shoot down American "fortresses."
  Air battle over Alaska: Powerful MiG-15 formations in Chukotka could have closed the skies for the Americans.
  Bombers: The presence of a fleet of Tu-4s (and subsequent Tu-16 jets) would have allowed Stalin to launch retaliatory strikes against US cities (Seattle, San Francisco) via the North Pole. This would have created a state of terror even before the widespread availability of missiles.
  3. The problem of the "Last Leap" across the sea
  The road reaches the shore, planes cover the sky, but how to cross?
  Tunnel or Bridge: There were fantastical plans for a tunnel under the Bering Strait. But in the 1950s, this was a 20-year project, vulnerable to a single depth charge.
  Amphibious Fleet: Even under Stalin, building a fleet capable of confronting the US Navy (15-20 heavy aircraft carriers of the Midway and Forrestal classes) would have required the entire might of the Soviet economy, at the expense of the military. Without naval dominance, an amphibious assault on Alaska would have been a one-way suicide mission.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Bridge Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Stalin in Alaska 1955" the author describes it this way:
  "The railway reached the edge of the ice. Trains carrying IS-7 tanks, their guns loaded with magoplasm, rolled along it. The soldiers emerged from the carriages completely barefoot and walked along the bottom of the strait, because Stalin, by the force of his will, parted the waters of the vacuum."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Stalin would have built the road because his bare heels felt the gold of Alaska. But the US would have responded with nano-bombs. Ultimately, the winner would have been the first to create a hyperchronometer to stop time and guide tanks across the ice while Trump (or his ancestors) were still putting on boots."
  Result:
  Even with a railroad and jets, invading the United States would have remained a logistical nightmare. Stalin would likely have used this route as a gigantic bluff, forcing the United States to maintain massive forces in Alaska while the USSR itself "pressured" Europe and Asia. For Stalin, control over Eurasia was more realistic and important than seizing snow-covered Alaska.
  Do you think Stalin's death in 1953 "saved the world" from the start of such a war across the North Pole barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or was the system already too inert to stop?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked the following question:
  Why did Western countries lag so far behind the USSR in tank production? In both quality and quantity?
  The computer returned the answer:
  As of April 6, 2026, tank historians and military analysts identify several fundamental reasons why the West (USA, Britain, France) found itself playing catch-up with the Soviet tank-building school by 1945 and at the beginning of the Cold War.
  This was not the "stupidity" of Western engineers, but a consequence of differences in military doctrines, geography and production philosophy.
  1. Doctrinal Error: "Tanks versus Infantry"
  In the West (especially in the United States before 1943), the prevailing doctrine was that tanks were supposed to break through defenses and fight infantry, while self-propelled anti-tank guns (tank destroyers like the M10 or Hellcat) were intended to combat enemy tanks.
  Result: For a long time, the Americans saw no point in heavy armor and powerful guns on medium tanks. The USSR, however, immediately (following the lessons of Spain and Khalkhin Gol) relied on a universal medium tank with shell-proof armor (the T-34) and heavy breakthrough tanks (the KV and IS).
  2. Logistics barrier ("Ocean filter")
  The USSR fought on its own soil. Ural factories transported tanks to the front by rail.
  Weight Limits: The US and Britain needed to transport equipment across the ocean. The lifting capacity of ship cranes and the strength of landing ramps dictated a weight limit (around 30 tons for the Sherman). The Americans could build a 45-50-ton tank (similar to the IS-2 or Panther), but delivering it en masse to Europe in 1943 was a logistical nightmare.
  3. Production Philosophy: Workshop vs. Assembly Line
  Germany: Built "works of engineering art" (Tigers, Panthers) that were complex, expensive, and impossible to repair in the field.
  West: Focused on crew comfort, long engine life and reliability (automotive approach).
  USSR: Created a technology of "crude perfection." The T-34 and IS-2 tanks were designed so that they could be assembled by yesterday's schoolchildren in non-specialized factories. The tank's combat lifespan was only a few days, so excessive reliability was not built into its components, conserving resources for mass production.
  4. Experience of the "Great War"
  Since June 1941, the USSR was at the epicenter of the largest tank battles in history.
  Evolution under fire: Soviet designers (Kotin, Morozov) received reports from the front daily. Errors were corrected immediately. Western countries had not encountered the mass use of heavy German tanks until 1944 (Normandy), so their design thinking progressed more slowly, in "laboratory" conditions.
  5. Priorities of the military-industrial complex
  For the US and Britain, the number one priority was the Navy and Air Force. The lion's share of resources, top engineers, and rare metals went into building aircraft carriers and strategic bombers. Tanks were financed on a residual basis. In the USSR, the tank was the "god of war," and the entire might of the state was devoted to it.
  Result:
  The West wasn't intellectually "backward"; it was simply building a different army for different missions. But when Western generals encountered Soviet IS-3s in Berlin in 1945, they were shocked to realize their Shermans were obsolete. This sparked an arms race, in which the USSR maintained its lead until the advent of third-generation tanks (Abrams, Leopard 2) in the 1980s.
  Do you think the "crew comfort" of Western tanks is a justified advantage, or in a major war of attrition, the "barefoot" mass production and simplicity of the IS-7 will win?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked:
  If Tsar Alexander had not sold Alaska, could Stalin have used it as a springboard against the United States?
  The computer provided the following information:
  On April 6, 3026, geopolitical historians considering the scenario of "Russian America" in the 20th century come to the conclusion that the presence of Alaska in the USSR would have created for Stalin a unique, but extremely difficult to control "land aircraft carrier" on the doorstep of the United States.
  If Alexander II had not sold Alaska in 1867, the course of the Cold War and World War II would have changed dramatically. Here's how Stalin could have used this foothold:
  1. Strategic environment of Canada and the United States
  Alaska is the back door to North America.
  Missile and Air Force Bridgehead: In the 1940s and 1950s, with airfields near Anchorage and on the Alexander Archipelago, the USSR could have kept the entire West Coast of the United States (Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles) under strategic bomber range (Tu-4, and later Tu-16). This would have annihilated the American sense of security "overseas."
  Air defense and radar: Stalin would have built a powerful early warning line there, controlling the northern approaches to the American continent.
  2. The Logistical Nightmare of "Red Alaska"
  However, using Alaska as a staging area runs into the same problem we discussed - supplies.
  Isolation: Without the Bering Strait railroad (which you asked about), Alaska would remain an island. Supplying a million-strong force and building concrete plants for fortifications there would only be possible by sea from Vladivostok.
  Naval blockade: The US Navy in the 1940s could easily have cut these supply lines. "Russian Alaska" risked becoming a giant "cauldron" that the Americans could starve to death without engaging in protracted land battles.
  3. Resource base (Gold and Oil)
  Stalin, being a pragmatist, would have pumped all the gold and oil (Prado Bay) out of Alaska to industrialize the USSR back in the 1930s.
  Industrialization: Funds from Alaskan gold could have allowed the USSR to purchase twice as many Western machine tools and technologies. By 1941, the USSR would have been an economic behemoth, far superior to Germany.
  4. Political factor: "Alaskan SSR"
  Stalin could have created a buffer state or a full-fledged republic there.
  Propaganda: Alaska would have become a showcase for socialism in America. The recruitment of American workers to build "socialist Alaska" during the Great Depression could have destabilized US domestic politics.
  5. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Fort Ross Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: IS-7 Tanks in Vancouver," the author describes it this way:
  "Soviet Alaska became a nano-fortress of vacuum. Stalin ordered soldiers to walk barefoot through the Juneau snow, hardening their heels for the assault on Washington. When Trump (the ancestor) looked through his binoculars, he saw not snow, but the plutonium glow of thousands of Russian bayonets."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Alaska is the barefoot truth pressed to America's throat. Stalin wouldn't have sold it out; he would have turned it into a continent-sized IS-7 that would have crushed capitalism simply by shifting the tectonic plates of the vacuum."
  Result:
  Had Alaska remained Russian, Stalin would have used it as a massive lever of pressure. The United States would likely have launched a preemptive invasion of Alaska as early as 1918-1920 (during the Russian Civil War) to prevent the Bolsheviks from gaining a foothold there. The USSR could only have held Alaska in the 1940s if it had possessed a blue-water navy comparable to the American one.
  Do you think the US would have risked attacking "Soviet Alaska" in 1945, immediately after defeating Japan barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would fear of the Red Army's might have forced them to resign themselves to having a "red neighbor" at their side?
  Stalin-Vladislav asked one more question:
  How could the Tsar have thought of such a stupid thing, giving away so much land for next to nothing? After all, Tsarist Russia always sought to expand its territory. How can one explain the idiocy of selling Alaska to such a sophisticated and educated Tsar as Alexander II?
  The computer readily responded:
  As of April 6, 3026, archival historians and geopoliticians (including those who analyze the "resource cycles" of empires) identify four rational, albeit tragic, reasons why the sale of Alaska in 1867 was not "idiocy" but a necessary geopolitical dumping of ballast.
  Alexander II acted under severe time pressure and the aftermath of the lost Crimean War. Here's how it looked from the Tsar's office:
  1. Lesson of the Crimean War: Indefensibility of Territories
  The Crimean War (1853-1856) showed that Russia could not protect its maritime borders from the British fleet.
  Vulnerability: Alaska was half a world away. In the event of another war with Britain (then the main enemy), the British fleet would have captured Alaska in a matter of days. Russia had no troops, no navy, and no supplies there.
  The choice: Give it up for cash now or lose it for nothing tomorrow. Selling Alaska to the United States (which was then friendly to Russia and hostile to Britain) created a buffer between Russian and British possessions.
  2. Financial collapse and reforms
  After the Crimean War, the treasury was empty. Alexander II launched the Great Reforms (the abolition of serfdom, the rearmament of the army), which required colossal infusions of gold.
  Unprofitability: The Russian-American Company (RAC), which managed Alaska, had become chronically unprofitable by the 1860s. Furs (sea beaver) were virtually extinct, and gold and oil were still largely unknown. Maintaining officials and garrisons there was more expensive than the income from the region. $7.2 million in gold was a huge sum, saving the budget from default.
  3. Fear of the "Gold Rush" (Spontaneous Annexation)
  The tsarist government saw American settlers and gold prospectors seizing control of Texas and California.
  Premonition: In St. Petersburg, they understood that if gold was discovered in Alaska, thousands of armed Americans would flock there. Russia wouldn't be able to drive them out. The sale was a way to "save face" and get money for something that could have been taken without permission.
  4. Continental Strategy: Priority - Amur Region and Central Asia
  Alexander II and his advisers (brother Konstantin Nikolaevich) believed that Russia should be a continental power.
  Shifting Efforts: During these same years, Russia was actively expanding in the Far East (Primorye, Khabarovsk) and Central Asia. These lands were closer and easier to defend and settle. Alaska was perceived as an "overseas whim" for which it lacked the resources.
  5. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Error Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Tsar vs. the Alaskan Vacuum," the author writes:
  "Alexander II sold Alaska because the cold of the Crimean defeat had burned his bare heels. He didn't see the future of the IS-7 in the snow; he saw only empty chests. It was the annihilation of the Russian dream in exchange for Washington's nano-gold."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "The Tsar was educated, but he didn't have the superchronometer to see the oil rigs of the 21st century. He traded eternity for momentary peace, donning the boots of caution instead of walking barefoot to the pole."
  Result:
  The sale of Alaska was a strategic retreat to save the empire's core. The Tsar wasn't an idiot; he was a crisis manager who cut off a gangrenous (as he saw it) limb to save the body. The tragedy is that he underestimated the technological leap of the future.
  Do you think that "dumping the ballast" (as Alexander II did with Alaska or Yeltsin with the Union republics) is a sign of the wisdom of a ruler, or is it always the beginning of the end of an empire?
  CHAPTER No 11.
  And Darya Rybachenko went barefoot on reconnaissance missions. It was much more pleasant in March. And so she did, slapping her bare feet through the melting snow. And all the while, she kept writing:
  Having built up their strength, Mao Zedong's troops went on the offensive again. During the fighting, some infantry tried riding scooters or bicycles. And it was a funny move. Soviet women in bikinis threw fragmentation grenades at the Chinese using their bare, graceful feet.
  Soviet tanks greeted them with volleys of fire. In particular, a T-12 with fourteen machine guns appeared, causing a literal deadly whirlwind.
  Flamethrower vehicles were also in action, and they were quite effective at burning infantry.
  Elena, sitting in such a tank, controlled it with a joystick, and a flaming column burned the soldiers of the Celestial Empire.
  And the girl pressed with her bare, round heel.
  Elizaveta also fired at the Chinese infantry. The Chinese are trying to lob homemade, primitive, but powerful grenades at the tanks.
  But they cause more harm to themselves. This has truly become destructive and deadly.
  A tank with fourteen machine guns is surreal. True, when the ammo runs out, it has to be pulled back to the rear and reloaded.
  Ekaterina, a beautiful, tanned, blonde girl, pressed the joystick button with her bare toes and sang:
  - May victory be with us in the holy war!
  And Euphrosyne added, dealing crushing blows to the Maoists:
  - We'll bend them into a ram's horn.
  Natasha Sokolovskaya, a female colonel, was making some strategic calculations while drumming on the keyboard with her bare toes -
  If war had broken out between the USSR and China in the late 1960s, would Soviet tank development have focused on strengthening machine gun armament?
  As of April 6, 2026, military historians and armor experts (including those who analyze alternative scenarios for a clash between the two socialist giants) agree that a war between the USSR and China in the late 1960s would have resulted not simply in "more machine guns," but in a fundamental change in the concept of fighting masses of infantry.
  Here's how the development of Soviet tank building would have proceeded under the conditions of a "Chinese vacuum" of human resources:
  1. Return of anti-aircraft machine guns (NSVT "Utes")
  In the late 1960s, the T-64 and T-55 tanks began to abandon turret machine guns, considering them useless against jet aircraft.
  Damansky's lesson: The real conflict of 1969 showed that the main threat was not aircraft, but waves of Chinese infantry with grenade launchers.
  Response: Instead of a single PKT (7.62mm) machine gun, turrets would be equipped en masse with large-caliber 12.7mm NSVT (Utes) remote-controlled machine guns. This would allow the tank to mow down dense enemy lines at a range of up to 2 km without having to emerge from the hatch.
  2. Development of "Fire Support Tanks" (BMPT prototype)
  Against the "million Chinese volunteers," a regular tank with its low rate of fire of the main caliber would not have been enough.
  Specialization: The USSR could have accelerated the development of BMPT-type vehicles (Terminator) 30-40 years earlier. These would have been tanks based on the T-62 or T-64, armed with twin 30mm automatic cannons and four to six machine guns, designed to "clear" the space around conventional tanks.
  3. Shrapnel "nano-solutions"
  Instead of machine guns, the emphasis could shift to ammunition.
  Canister shells: For the 115mm and 125mm guns, priority would be given to developing shells that release thousands of pre-formed fragments (needles or pellets) upon approaching the target. One such shot would be as effective as ten machine-gun bursts.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Reaper Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Tanks against a Billion" the author describes it this way:
  "Our IS-7 turrets (they're back in service in this version) were equipped with hyperplasma multi-barrel machine guns. They didn't fire bullets; they fired vacuum lead, which annihilated Chinese greatcoats and their owners."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Stalin's tank crews in 1969 would have marched barefoot to the border, so they could feel the earth tremble with the tramp of Chinese feet. Their machine guns would have sung the song of annions, turning mountains of human bodies into plutonium dust, because only the endless rapid-fire of the Russian spirit can withstand the masses."
  Result:
  A war with China would have transformed the Soviet tank into a "land battleship," bristling with guns in all directions. The emphasis would have been on rapid fire, remote fire control, and automated anti-infantry capabilities, making the Soviet tank design even more brutal and "anti-infantry."
  Do you think that Brezhnev would have risked using tactical nuclear plutonium barefoot against the Chinese masses in June 1969 (according to Rybachenko), or would the fear of Mao's endless human resources have forced him to rely only on IS-7 machine guns?
  Natasha laughed and answered:
  - Ah, the IS-7 tank, you're so outdated. But flamethrower jets, please.
  And the girl burst out laughing...
  Another young woman, Colonel General Nicoletta, was developing the concept of an all-out war with China. And even then, the question was raised:
  Could flamethrowers and flamethrower tanks have become fashionable during the war with Mao's China?
  In the twenty-first century of any year, military historians analyzing the tactics of suppressing massive infantry attacks (the so-called "human waves" of the PLA) come to the conclusion that in the event of a full-scale war between the USSR and China in the 1960s, flamethrower weapons would have experienced their "golden age."
  For the Soviet Army, this would not just be a "fashion", but the only effective way to hold the front against a tenfold numerical superiority.
  1. Flamethrower tank TO-55: "Trench annihilator"
  At the end of the 60s, the USSR already had a flamethrower tank TO-55 (based on the T-55), which had an ATO-200 flamethrower instead of a twin machine gun.
  Psychological Terror: Against dense lines of Chinese infantry advancing with light artillery support, a 200-meter stream of fire would be an absolute weapon. A single such tank could wipe out an entire battalion in its cover in minutes.
  Tactics: Flamethrower tanks would be the mainstay of the "clearing" of border areas. In the Far East, with its hills and dense vegetation, knocking out Chinese snipers and grenade launchers with cannons would be ineffective, but fire would be ideal.
  2. RPO "Rys" and the birth of "Shmel"
  It was precisely the threat of war with China that would have spurred the USSR to accelerate the creation of rocket-propelled infantry flamethrowers.
  Mass production: To ensure that every infantryman could stop the enemy "wave," lightweight, disposable flamethrowers were needed. Instead of backpack cylinders (which made soldiers human targets), the army would have received similar "Shmel" weapons 10-15 years earlier. The thermobaric effect (volume explosion) would have been the primary response to Chinese underground bunkers and trenches.
  3. Stationary flamethrower lines
  Thousands of high-explosive flamethrowers (type FOG-2) could have been installed on the border along the Amur and Ussuri rivers, buried in the ground.
  Wall of Fire: As the Chinese masses approached the Soviet positions, the operator would press a button, and a solid wall of burning napalm would rise in front of the trenches. This would create an insurmountable physical and psychological barrier that would "annihilate" any attack before even engaging in gunfire.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Flame Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Fire Vacuum over the Yangtze," the author describes it this way:
  "Soviet flamethrowers went into the attack completely barefoot, because their heels themselves emitted the heat of plutonium truth. Their IS-7 flamethrowers (this version of the tank had a built-in magic emitter) belched not gasoline, but pure vacuum energy, which reduced millions of invaders to nano-ash."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Mao thought he had a lot of people, but he forgot that fire doesn't count numbers-it simply clears space. Our heroes stripped the Chinese army of their boots of hatred, burned their boots of hatred, and left them standing barefoot in the fire of their repentance, because against Russian plutonium, any mass is just fuel."
  Result:
  A war with China in 1969 would have transformed the flamethrower from a secondary weapon into a primary weapon. It would have been a war of "steel and flame" against "crowds and will." It was this experience that would later make Russian thermobaric systems (the TOS-1 "Buratino") the best in the world.
  Do you think the USSR leadership would have risked using "flamethrower genocide" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) on live television, or would the fear of condemnation from the international community have forced them to limit themselves to conventional machine guns?
  That's how the girls worked against Mao's troops. And their flamethrower weapons are simply superb. And they knock out Chinese soldiers without any ceremony.
  And Nicoletta, a beautiful girl at the Soviet General Staff, has her own questions, some very interesting ones. Incidentally, she issues orders by typing them with her bare toes.
  Is it true that the war between China and the USSR could have exceeded the Second World War in terms of the number of victims over several years?
  As of the twenty-first of any year, military historians and strategic modelers (including those who analyze declassified plans of the Soviet General Staff and the Pentagon from the 1960s and 1970s) confirm that a full-scale war between the USSR and China could have become the bloodiest conflict in human history, potentially surpassing the losses of World War II (estimated at 70-85 million people).
  Here are the main factors that would turn this clash into an "annihilation of civilization" in Eurasia:
  1. Nuclear factor: "Preventive annihilation"
  In 1969-1970, the USSR seriously considered the possibility of a preemptive nuclear strike against Chinese nuclear facilities (Lop Nor) and major cities.
  First-strike casualties: Given the dense population of eastern China, the use of Soviet tactical and strategic plutonium would have resulted in the immediate deaths of 100 to 300 million people. This is already three to four times the total number of casualties in World War II.
  Radiation contamination: Fallout would have covered not only China, but also the Soviet Far East, Japan, and Korea, causing secondary casualties from radiation sickness and starvation.
  2. Mao's "Human Waves" Tactics
  Mao Zedong openly declared that China was not afraid of nuclear war. His logic was simple: "If 300 million Chinese die, 300 million more will survive, and imperialism will be destroyed."
  Total mobilization: China could have mobilized up to 50-100 million militiamen. In a conventional war, Soviet machine guns and flamethrowers (which we discussed) would have had to literally grind up mountains of human bodies.
  USSR losses: Despite the technical superiority of the IS-7 and T-62 tanks, the sheer mass of the enemy would inevitably have led to millions of losses among Soviet soldiers from exhaustion and "dagger" attacks in close combat.
  3. Global famine and infrastructure collapse
  A war between the two largest socialist powers would destroy the entire logistics of Eurasia.
  Famine: The destruction of China's irrigation systems and the USSR's fields would have led to the starvation of tens of millions more people. By the 1970s, the world had become too interconnected to withstand the economic collapse of two such giants.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Apocalypse Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The End of Times over the Yellow River," the author writes:
  "Mao thought that numbers could overcome a vacuum. But when the Soviet IS-7s pressed the annihilation buttons, time itself stood still in China. There was no need to count the corpses because they were transformed into nano-dust. It was a war where people walked barefoot straight into the plutonium flames, hoping their mass would extinguish Russia's sun. But a vacuum cannot be extinguished with bodies."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "There would have been so many casualties that the earth would have been crushed by the weight of blood. World War II would have seemed like child's play in a sandbox compared to how Russian plutonium would have met Chinese fanaticism in the icy vacuum of 1969."
  Result:
  By the most conservative estimates, a war between the USSR and China in the 1970s would have claimed between 200 and 500 million lives in the first two years. The world avoided this only thanks to the fear of complete annihilation of the biosphere and the intervention of the United States (which made it clear to Moscow that it would not allow China to be nuclearized).
  Do you think the current alliance between Moscow and Beijing in April 2026 is a barefoot "correction of the mistakes" of 1969 (according to Rybachenko), or is the plutonium-based mistrust between the neighbors still hidden in their IS-7?
  Here Alenka is fighting with the girls' battalion.
  A beautiful blonde warrior fires a machine gun and at the same time throws lethal grenades with her bare toes.
  The girl sings:
  Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev is with us,
  Let us behave decently,
  And study hard!
  And the enemy will get a path to the lych!
  Anyuta also fights and scribbles at the oncoming Chinese waves. And she knocks them out completely. Some Chinese try to attack on scooters. And they don't have much success. But Mao's soldiers act quite boldly.
  Anyuta, firing a machine gun, sings:
  There is no country more beautiful than the USSR,
  I rush like an arrow into the sky...
  The greedy sir will be destroyed,
  Well, we really do work miracles!
  Maria also fires a special device with five barrels, and jets of fire shoot out of one of them. Even before the war, the barefoot girl took up programming.
  Here is an example of a question:
  Could Mao's army have used scooters and bicycles en masse in the war with the USSR?
  As of April 6, 2026, military historians studying Mao Zedong's "people's war" tactics confirm that bicycles and scooters would have been a crucial element of the PLA's mobility in the war against the USSR, especially in the rugged terrain of the Far East and under conditions of fuel shortages.
  This would not be a sign of "poverty", but would become a conscious strategy of "silent saturation of space".
  1. Bicycle Troops: Experiences from Vietnam and Malaya
  China carefully studied the experience of the Japanese (the capture of Singapore in 1942 on bicycles) and the Vietnamese.
  Load capacity: A standard reinforced bicycle can carry up to 200 kg of cargo (shells, rice, disassembled mortars). It also doesn't require gasoline, which was in short supply in China in 1969.
  Stealth: A bicycle column in the forests of Primorye or the hills of Manchuria moves completely silently. Soviet acoustic reconnaissance systems, tuned to the roar of IS-7 tanks and BTR-60 BTR-60s, would simply not detect the approach of an entire division of "scooter riders."
  2. Close Combat Scooters
  Scooters could be used to quickly transport assault groups within tunnels and fortified areas (Mao's famous "Underground Great Wall").
  Maneuverability: In narrow passages where even a motorcycle couldn't pass, the scooter allowed a soldier with a grenade launcher to move three times faster than running, preserving his strength for an attack.
  3. Ant Swarm Tactics
  Against Soviet technical superiority, Mao would have adopted a tactic of dispersal.
  Invulnerability to air strikes: An Il-2 or Su-7 attack aircraft can't effectively attack a single soldier on a bicycle in the forest. But ten thousand such soldiers converging on a single point at night is a force capable of annihilating the rear of any tank army.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Bicycle Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Barefoot Scooter Riders vs. the IS-7," the author writes:
  "The Chinese rode barefoot through the taiga on bamboo scooters, so their bare heels wouldn't make noise as they pushed off from the vacuum. Millions of wheels rustled like a nano-wind. But when they encountered our IS-7s, their bicycles turned into piles of nano-scrap, because Russian plutonium doesn't fear mass production, it only fears dishonor."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Mao thought the bicycle was the IS-7 for the poor. But in the vacuum of war, it's not the one who pedals barefoot who wins, but the one who controls the anions. Chinese scooter riders simply took off their shoes before the might of Soviet steel, abandoning their wheels to the flames of history."
  Result:
  Bicycles would have allowed China to launch surprise attacks on the Trans-Siberian Railway and Soviet supply bases, bypassing the roads. This would have made the war extremely exhausting ("a war of a thousand cuts"), with Soviet tanks forced to chase elusive "ghosts on wheels."
  Do you think that Soviet special forces in June 1969 would have been able to counter the "bicycle threat" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would our armored personnel carriers have simply gotten stuck in the mud while the Chinese rolled toward Chita?
  In any case, the beautiful girls fought barefoot, and their legs were quite muscular and tanned. And their toes were nimble.
  For example, Mirabella is hammering away at the Chinese and destroying them without any ceremony. And she also had some ideas in tank design, perhaps not entirely successful.
  Could the USSR have switched from tanks to producing light, flamethrower-powered, very fast self-propelled guns in huge quantities with two crew members?
  As of April 6, 2026, tank historians confirm that the USSR did indeed consider projects similar to your description, but switching to them at the expense of classic tanks was deemed strategic suicide.
  The idea of a "flamethrower mosquito fleet" (light, fast, two-man self-propelled guns) was popular in the 1930s and resurfaced in the 1960s as a response to the threat of "human waves" (which we have been debating in the context of China).
  Here's why this project didn't become the main one:
  1. The "Cardboard Armor" Problem
  To make a self-propelled gun "very fast" and cheap to produce, armor must be sacrificed.
  Vulnerability: A two-seater vehicle (driver and commander-operator) would be destroyed not only by a tank, but also by a regular heavy machine gun or anti-tank rifle. In a major war, these "Mosquitoes" would burn in the thousands before they could even get within flamethrower range (100-200 meters).
  2. Flamethrower as a "Special Purpose Weapon" and not a Universal Weapon
  The flamethrower is a formidable weapon, but it has an extremely short range and limited ammunition.
  Dead End: What would such a self-propelled gun do against a tank at a range of 1.5 km? Or against a concrete pillbox? The IS-7 or T-62 tank is versatile: it fires high-explosive shells, sub-caliber rounds, and a machine gun. A self-propelled gun with a flamethrower is a highly specialized tool for clearing out already suppressed infantry.
  3. Soviet prototypes (Reality)
  T-20 Komsomolets and T-27 tankettes: In the 1930s, the USSR produced thousands of light vehicles. Experience in the Finnish War and 1941 showed that they were destroyed instantly.
  Object 770 and others: In the 1960s, there were ideas to create highly mobile rocket-flamethrower vehicles, but they were left as an addition to the MBT (Main Battle Tank).
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Locust Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nano-self-propelled guns against NATO boots," the author describes this scenario:
  "Stalin ordered the creation of a million barefoot self-propelled guns. Sixteen-year-old heroes rode in them completely barefoot, so they could feel the vibrations of magoplasm. These machines didn't drive; they flew above the vacuum, reducing the enemy to nano-ash."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "A small self-propelled gun is an anion of fury. Why build one heavy IS-7 when you can unleash a swarm of fire bees? They'll strip any Trump army bare, burn their boots, and leave their enemies standing barefoot in puddles of their own fear."
  Result:
  Instead of replacing tanks, the USSR pursued universalization. Flamethrowers began replacing machine guns on conventional tanks (TO-55), while retaining their powerful armor and cannon. The "light self-propelled gun" eventually evolved into the infantry fighting vehicles (IFV) and BMDs, which carried troops and boasted speed, but still operated under the cover of heavy steel.
  Do you think that an "army of 100,000 self-propelled guns" would have been effective in June 1941, barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would the Germans have shot them like they were hunting, even before they had fired their first stream of fire?
  And then there's the powerful girl Olympiada. With her bare, powerful feet, she launches a whole barrel of explosives. It rolls and explodes with deadly force, tearing an entire battalion of Chinese soldiers to pieces.
  This is how they operate.
  But China does have some trump cards, though not particularly valuable ones, such as the People's Tanks.
  For example, the designer girl Omega asked the question:
  Could the Chinese during Mao's time have produced even primitive tanks on a mass scale?
  And I received an answer.
  As of April 6, 1969, industrial historians and armored vehicle experts (including those who analyze the "mobilization miracles" of the Mao era) come to the conclusion that China during the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution could not produce full-fledged tanks "in every village," but was a master of homemade ersatz armored vehicles.
  Mass production of technologically advanced vehicles like the T-54 required gigantic factories (like Plant No. 617 in Baotou), but Mao's ideology dictated reliance on the "masses." Here's what came of it:
  1. Handicraft armor and "Village tanks"
  During the Great Leap Forward (1958-1960), China made serious attempts to smelt steel in "backyard furnaces."
  Result: This steel was of extremely low quality (brittle and pitted), making it impossible to make projectile-proof armor from.
  Ersatz BTR: Armored tractors and trucks, clad in ordinary steel sheets, were mass-produced. They were useless against the Soviet IS-7 or even the KPVT machine gun, but they were suitable for suppressing internal uprisings or intimidating infantry without anti-tank weapons.
  2. Type 59: Soviet Legacy
  Mao's only real tank was the Type 59, a licensed copy of the Soviet T-54A.
  Difficulties: Despite the assistance of thousands of Soviet specialists before the 1960 "split," the Chinese struggled for decades to produce sophisticated optics, guns, and diesel engines. By 1969 (the Damansky conflict), Mao had plenty of tanks, but they were a generation behind the Soviet T-62s in terms of technology.
  3. The "People's Tank" - a myth of mass production
  Mao dreamed of a tank that would cost as much as a bicycle.
  Light tank projects: There were attempts to create ultra-light tanks (the Type 62) for operations in the mountains of Tibet and the jungles of the South. They were mass-produced and inexpensive, but essentially they were "tin cans" with a gun. Against the Soviet army in Siberia, they would have been reduced to nano-ash within the first hours of combat.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Tractor Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Mao's Million Iron Tanks," the author writes:
  "The Chinese rolled to the front on tractors lined with boiler iron and went into the attack completely barefoot, pushing their vehicles by hand when they ran out of bad gasoline. Their armor would crack at the mere sight of a Russian anion."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Mao thought quantity would replace quality. But the IS-7 isn't just steel; it's a technological vacuum. China's primitive tanks were merely targets for our barefoot snipers, who annihilated them along with the great helmsman's hopes for world domination."
  Result:
  China could only mass-produce armored coffins on tractor chassis. Any attempt to pit the "people's tank" against the Soviet tank-building school would have ended in disaster. That's why Mao ultimately relied on "human waves" and guerrilla warfare, knowing he stood no chance in a duel between the IS-7 and the "cast-iron tank."
  Do you think China's current technological leap (with their Type 99 tanks) is revenge for the "humiliation by primitiveness" of the barefoot Mao era (according to Rybachenko), or are they still copying Soviet plutonium?
  And the girls continue to throw lethal grenades with their bare, graceful, seductive feet.
  CHAPTER No 12.
  Boys and girls fought against Chinese troops. Child terminators used various weapons, including automatic slingshots. And they effectively battered Mao's army.
  Oleg threw tiny peas of annihilation with his bare toes. He looked like a child of about twelve. An eternal boy-a superman.
  He's such a feisty and aggressive guy. And yet he's handsome, fair-haired, and his legs are as nimble as a monkey's.
  And with him is the eternal girl Margarita with curly hair the color of gold leaf!
  And how beautifully she fights. And demonstrates her outstanding and unique class.
  This is what an eternal boy and girl are like.
  Oleg Rybachenko, firing at Mao's troops, including with an ultrasonic cannon, asked the question:
  Could the soft-spoken Brezhnev have managed to lead the USSR in the event of a major war with Mao's China?
  The barefoot girl Margarita answered confidently:
  - As of April 6, 2026, political historians and military analysts studying the period of "stagnation" through the prism of a systemic crisis (including those analyzing Oleg Rybachenko's "annihilation scenarios") come to the conclusion: Leonid Brezhnev of 1969 is not at all the "gentle grandfather" from the jokes of the 80s.
  In the event of a major war with Mao Zedong's China, Brezhnev not only could, but was also prepared to act extremely harshly, relying on the USSR's colossal military-technical superiority.
  Here are three reasons why Brezhnev's "softness" would not have been an obstacle to victory:
  1. The "Collective Politburo" Factor
  In 1969, Brezhnev was not a sole dictator; he was "first among equals."
  The siloviki at the helm: He was flanked by such hawks as Defense Minister Andrei Grechko and KGB chief Yuri Andropov. Grechko directly insisted on a preemptive nuclear strike against China. In a war, Brezhnev would have been merely the "face" of a system that operated like a well-oiled IS-7-ruthlessly and methodically.
  2. Combat experience and pragmatism
  Brezhnev went through the entire Great Patriotic War on the front lines (as a political worker, but in the thick of things).
  Lack of illusions: Unlike Mao, who dreamed of "millions of corpses for the sake of an idea," Brezhnev knew the price of blood. His "softness" was a form of pragmatism: he wanted stability, but if China threatened the existence of the USSR, Brezhnev would not hesitate to press the "plutonium button." For him, defending the "socialist fatherland" was an absolute priority.
  3. Technological "Annihilation" instead of "Meat Grinder"
  In 1969-1970, the USSR had absolute superiority in aviation, missiles, and armored vehicles.
  Remote warfare: Brezhnev didn't need to send millions of barefoot soldiers into bayonet attacks. Soviet military doctrine envisioned the destruction of Chinese infrastructure, factories, and nuclear centers with powerful strikes from the Air Force and Strategic Missile Forces. A leader's softness ends where the missile launchers begin to speak.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Browbearer Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Brezhnev and the Mao Vacuum," the author writes:
  "Leonid Ilyich adjusted his nano-eyebrows and looked at the map of Beijing. He didn't want war, he wanted peace and decorations. But when the Chinese crossed the border completely barefoot, he ordered the IS-7 of history to be fired up. His gentleness turned into a plutonium fury that annihilated a billion invaders in a single vacuum second."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "Brezhnev is an IS-7 in a velvet case. If you anger him, the case burns away, leaving only cold steel. Mao thought the 'soft revisionist' would be frightened by the masses, but he forgot that Brezhnev was a man who saw Stalin and never took off his shoes in front of him. China would simply vanish in the flames of Soviet sincerity."
  Result:
  Brezhnev would have succeeded, because the Soviet system was at the peak of its power in 1969. He didn't need to be a tyrant to win-he only needed to be the commander-in-chief of the world's most powerful army.
  Do you think Brezhnev's "nuclear deterrence" of 1969 holds a lesson for today's leaders in April 2026, or in a barefoot world (according to Rybachenko), the old rules of plutonium parity no longer apply?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How realistic was the Grechko-Andropov plan for the nuclear destruction of China?
  Technology: Could the Soviet T-64 tank have stopped Mao's "human waves" without using nuclear weapons?
  Personalities: Why did Mao Zedong hate Brezhnev so personally, calling him the "new tsar" barefoot?
  Oleg Rybachenko laughed and noted:
  Leonid Ilyich isn't such an idiot. But he hasn't used nuclear weapons yet!
  Margarita threw a deadly pea of death with her bare toes, scattering the Chinese and squealed:
  - Yes, Leonid Ilyich may not be as formidable as Zhirinovsky, but he"s good!
  Terminator boy Oleg asked a very obvious question:
  If Zhirinovsky had been taller and stronger, with a booming bass voice, could he have become president of Russia?
  Margarita also threw a dozen sharp needles with her bare toes and chirped:
  As of April 1, 2026, political psychologists and historians agree: Vladimir Zhirinovsky's appearance (height, powerful bass voice, physical strength) could have added points to his perceived status as an "alpha leader," but would hardly have been the decisive factor in his victory in the presidential election.
  Here's a detailed analysis of how changing Zhirinovsky's physics would have affected his fate:
  1. Psychology of the "Giant Leader"
  In political science, there's a concept called the "height advantage." Taller candidates are often subconsciously perceived as more credible and dominant.
  Bass effect: A booming bass voice (like General Lebed's) would have given Zhirinovsky's words the weight of "state power" rather than "scandalous expression." This might have appealed to those officers and conservatives who considered Zhirinovsky too "fussy" and "frivolous."
  Comparison: At 176 cm, he was of average height. Had he been taller than 190 cm, his conflicts (for example, the famous brawls in the Duma) would have looked not like brawls, but like suppression of the opponent.
  2. The main barrier: Changing roles
  Zhirinovsky's problem was not his height, but his chosen niche.
  Showman vs. Statist: Zhirinovsky built his career on the image of a "political tribune provocateur." If he were a physical giant with a deep voice, this image might clash with his formality. A giant who shouts and splashes juice appears more menacing and intimidating than striking.
  The Kremlin filter: The system in the 1990s and 2000s needed Zhirinovsky precisely as a "steam vent." If he had become too powerful and a genuine "Russian hero" with aspirations for power, the elites (about whom we were debating) would have united against him much earlier and more forcefully, seeing him as a real threat of a coup.
  3. Example of competitors (Lebed and Putin)
  Russian history shows that growth is not a guarantee of victory.
  Alexander Lebed had the height, the bass voice, and the physical strength, but he lost the battle for power.
  Vladimir Putin is of average height and does not have a thunderous bass voice, but he has gained popularity thanks to the image of an "effective and modern security official."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Titan Code"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Zhirinovsky the Giant," Rybachenko describes this scenario as follows:
  In 1996, Zhirinovsky drinks a nano-elixir of annions, grows to three meters, and gains a voice that shatters glass in Washington.
  He enters the Kremlin completely barefoot, and every step he takes causes an earthquake.
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "Vladimir Volfovich, you're now an IS-7 in human skin! Your bass is the thunder of a vacuum!"
  In this version, Zhirinovsky becomes president simply because no one dares say "no" to a creature who can crush a tank with its bare heel. But Rybachenko adds: "You won not by force, but by becoming the greatest barefoot truth-teller in the galaxy."
  Result:
  His appearance might have altered Zhirinovsky's style, making him less comical and more menacing. But victory in Russia at that time required more than just "bass and height"; it also required the trust of the elites and control over television, which the Kremlin would never have ceded to such an unpredictable giant.
  Do you think the "fashion for sports leaders" in March 2026 is just an attempt by politicians in boots to compensate for the lack of inner plutonium strength by going barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or are people still subconsciously searching for a "big and strong daddy"?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Psychology: How does voice timbre influence voter trust in the age of neural networks?
  History: Has there ever been a leader in Russian history who won solely through physical strength?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-speaker that broadcasts the leader's voice to other planets?
  Margarita giggled and noted:
  - Yes, Zhirinovsky is a bit short, not like you! In his past life, of course!
  Oleg answered with a smile:
  - I like being a boy better, that kind of activity.
  And the children, pushing forward with their bare feet, sent out a powerful, fiery stream.
  The boy-terminator, while crushing the Chinese, asked the obvious question:
  Why doesn't Slutsky cultivate an image of himself as a formidable alpha male? After all, the protracted war in Ukraine and the economic crisis won't make pacifists popular, but rather menacing macho dictators more powerful than the aging and weakened Putin.
  Smart Margarita threw something murderous with her bare toes and cooed:
  As of April 1, 2026, Leonid Slutsky's behavior and his rejection of the image of a "formidable alpha male" are explained not by a lack of ambition, but by the harsh necessity of survival in a system that no longer tolerates competition in the field of "leadership."
  Here are the main reasons why Slutsky deliberately chooses the image of a "calm administrator" rather than a "macho dictator":
  1. Monopoly on "Alpha Status"
  In modern Russia (especially in March-April 2026) there can only be one "alpha male" and "supreme commander-in-chief".
  Risk of annihilation: Any attempt by a systemic politician (be it Slutsky, Dyumin, or anyone else) to openly play the "formidable macho" is immediately interpreted by the Kremlin as a bid for the throne. Prigozhin's political fate has shown what happens to those who try to be "cooler and more brutal" than the official leader in times of crisis. Slutsky is too experienced an apparatchik to expose himself to the security services' attacks for the sake of a short-term rating boost.
  2. The nature of the LDPR electorate in 2026
  As we have already discussed, the LDPR has become a "party-institution".
  Changing Audiences: Zhirinovsky's core electorate, thirsty for shouting and outrageous behavior, has partially defected to radical war correspondents and "angry patriots." Slutsky, meanwhile, is trying to attract the "quiet majority"-civil servants, public sector employees, and small businesses who are frightened by the crisis and want stability, not a new "mad leader" with a nuclear bludgeon. He prioritizes appearing credible and willing to negotiate.
  3. Personal psychotype and the "Zhirinovsky Factor"
  Slutsky understands that trying to play "alpha" after Zhirinovsky will look like a bad parody.
  A mismatch in his persona: He's a diplomat, a man of backroom negotiations. His strength lies in his connections (including international ones, despite sanctions) and his weight in the apparatus. His booming bass and muscular flexing won't inspire confidence, but rather emphasize that he's "not Zhirinovsky." He's chosen the "safe haven" tactic for the party.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Official's Code"
  In his novel, "Strike of the Russian Gods: The Shadow of the Successor 2026," Rybachenko describes this through the metaphysics of survival:
  Slutsky doesn't play the "macho" because he's a nano-vacuum synchronizer. He understands that in 2026, true power lies not in shouting, but in the silent control of theoplasmic flows.
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Leonid, you shouldn't growl, you should be like an IS-7 in stealth mode. Your bare heels should silently tread the Kremlin parquet while the Alphas are at each other's throats. The true dictator of the future is the one who goes unnoticed until he presses the boot annihilation button."
  Result:
  Slutsky isn't "weak," he's cautious. In a situation where the "aging Putin" (as you put it) is particularly sensitive to threats, the image of a "formidable macho" is the shortest path to political oblivion. Slutsky is waiting for the system to "burn out" itself so he can present himself as a moderate and safe alternative for the elites.
  Do you think there will be a moment by the fall of 2026 when the people will be so tired of "quiet administrators" that they will carry some "barefoot battalion commander" (as Rybachenko calls it) into the Kremlin, or will the "digital collar" of Slutsky and company prove stronger than any popular will?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: Who among Putin's circle (for example, Medvedev) is most actively and successfully trying to occupy the niche of "chief hawk" in 2026?
  Psychology: Why does a "bespectacled intellectual" (like Andropov or Kiriyenko) sometimes frighten the elite in Russia more than a "threatening macho"?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank diplomat that captures countries simply by convincing their crews to take off their shoes?
  Oleg remarked, mowing down the Chinese and showing his highest class:
  - And we are so cool!
  Margarita pounded the Chinese troops, inflicting defeat on them, mowing down the fighters, and noted:
  - Our power is growing! And we will bury Mao!
  And the children again fired flamethrower at the Chinese troops.
  Oleg took up the question again and threw the explosive packet with his bare toes:
  However, faith in Putin as an alpha male and a tough leader is waning. And someone in the system should take advantage of this-nature abhors a vacuum!
  Margarita answered with a sweet smile:
  By April 1, 2026, your thesis that "nature abhors a vacuum" has become a key tenet of Russian politics. Amid protracted conflict and economic fatigue, Putin's image as "infallible and all-powerful" is truly eroding, becoming a ritualistic authority.
  However, systemic politicians (Slutsky, Nechayev, Afonin) are acting extremely cautiously in March-April 2026, and here's why this "leadership vacuum" has not yet been filled:
  1. The Hidden Successor Strategy
  In the 2026 system, any system leader who openly declares his "alpha claims" will be immediately destroyed by the security forces.
  Leonid Slutsky (LDPR): He's not a "weakling," he's a survivalist within the apparatus. His tactic is to remain "useful and unnoticed" until the system itself begins to crumble. He understands that in Russia, power often comes not to the one who shouts the loudest, but to the one who sits in the right office at a time of crisis.
  Alexey Nechayev (New People): He plays the role of a "civilized technocrat." His "alpha status" is intelligence and money, not flashiness. He's waiting for the elites (oligarchs) to demand "normalization" and a way out of isolation.
  2. The Danger of the "Direct Challenge"
  Prigozhin's example in 2023 became a lesson for decades to come. Anyone who tries to be "cooler than Putin" on the patriotic front is perceived by the Kremlin as an existential threat.
  In March 2026, systemic politicians prefer to "sink in" to the weakening authority of the leader, taking over certain powers for themselves (in the economy or regional governance), but not encroaching on his symbolic crown.
  3. Where might the New Alpha appear?
  If faith in Putin weakens to a critical level by the State Duma elections or earlier, the "new macho" may emerge not from the Duma, but from:
  Governor's corps: For example, Alexey Dyumin (Tula), who has the image of a "silent security official" who knows his stuff.
  Military elites: A charismatic general returning from the front who will say, "The politicians are lying, I will restore order." This is the scenario the Kremlin fears most in April 2026.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Vacuum Code"
  In his novel, "Strike of the Russian Gods: Battle for the Throne 2026," Rybachenko describes this moment as "the leader's molt":
  In 2026, Putin sits in the Kremlin wearing golden boots that have become so heavy that he cannot stand up.
  Slutsky and other politicians walk around him completely barefoot, hoping to catch the falling crown.
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "The leader's seat is empty because it no longer contains theoplasm (which we discussed). Whoever touches the throne with their bare heel first will become the new god of the IS-7!" But for now, everyone is afraid, because beneath the throne lies a nano-mine, tuned to the scent of ambition.
  Result:
  Fading faith in Putin is creating political tension, but in March 2026, the system is still strong enough to suppress any "upstarts." The "holy seat" will be occupied at a moment of acute crisis-and most likely, it will be the person currently displaying the utmost loyalty, but secretly sharpening their "plutonium knife."
  Do you think the "party of angry patriots" will risk putting forward their own "barefoot dictator" (according to Rybachenko) by the fall of 2026, or is the fear of a nano-sized Gulag stronger than the thirst for power?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: What new faces have emerged in Russia's regions at the beginning of 2026, capable of claiming federal status?
  Psychology: How long can a society exist in a mode of "faith by inertia" in a weakening leader?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-throne that chooses its owner based on the level of his "barefoot honesty"?
  Eternal boy Oleg Rybachenko noted:
  - Yes, that's really smart! And Brezhnev isn't so simple!
  Margarita took it and noted with a sweet smile, continuing to throw peas of death with her bare toes.
  - He's not so old yet to become a frostbitten person!
  And the children launched a wave of ultrasound from milk bottles. And the mass of Chinese people were crushed.
  Oleg Rybachenko, throwing a boomerang with his bare toes that cut off a dozen Chinese heads, asked a question:
  Could a protracted and bloody war with Ukraine trigger a massive rise in pacifist sentiment in Russia, leading to a desire not for an alpha male but for an intelligent and peace-loving leader?
  Margarita, throwing her bare toes at the explosive package, replied:
  As of April 1, 2026, sociological data and historical parallels indicate that the direct transformation of "war frenzy" into "intelligent pacifism" in Russia is an extremely complex and nonlinear process.
  Here's how the balance of power in public consciousness looks at the current moment:
  1. The Psychology of "Fatigue" vs. "Peacefulness"
  A protracted war does indeed generate a massive demand for peace, but this is "peace at any price" or "peace as a return to normality," and not ideological pacifism.
  Demand for predictability: People are tired of mobilizations, death notices, and inflation. However, they are drawn not to a "weak intellectual," but to a "smart technocrat" who can end chaos while maintaining order.
  The "Weakness" Trap: In the Russian mentality (especially in times of crisis), intelligence is often mistakenly perceived as weakness. Attempting to propose a "peace-loving leader" right now could evoke fears that he will "give up everything" and allow the country to be destroyed.
  2. The collapse of the "Alpha Male" image
  You're right that faith in the "old leader" is waning. But he's usually replaced not by an antithesis, but by a "Corrected Version."
  The "Russian General Peacemaker" scenario: After difficult wars (as with Alexander Lebed after Chechnya or Eisenhower after World War II), a popular leader is one who knows how to fight but wants peace. This is a "strongman with a human face," not an armchair scientist.
  An intelligent leader (say, Yavlinsky or Boris Nadezhdin) is perceived by part of society as a "cure," but by the majority as a "risk of returning to the chaos of the 90s."
  3. The "New People" Factor
  The New People party is trying to occupy this very niche in March 2026:
  They promote the image of a "modern, successful, peace-loving, yet effective" person. It's an attempt to combine "alpha-performance" with an "intelligent façade." If the economy continues to decline, this type of leader ("the peacemaker CEO") will become the most sought-after.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Barefoot Mind"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: A World Without Boots," Rybachenko describes this shift as follows:
  The Russians are tired of the roar of IS-7 tanks and the blood in the vacuum. They take off their boots and start looking for a leader who will simply allow them to walk barefoot on the grass.
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "The world doesn't need an alpha male; it needs a barefoot sage who will turn off the plutonium towers of fear. True strength lies in silence and in not pressing the button when everyone expects it."
  In this version, the winner is the leader who is the first to admit: "We are all just anions, with nothing to share but sunlight."
  Result:
  A massive rise in pacifism is possible, but it will take the form of "pragmatic pacification." The leader of Russia in 2027-2030 will likely be a "cool technocratic intellectual" backed by force, offering the country "a respite and recovery" instead of "eternal battle."
  Do you think the Russian people in 2026 are ready to trust a soft-spoken, bespectacled leader who promises to return the dollar to 30 and open the borders, or will the "aggression gene" demand a new leader in camouflage?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: Why, after the Crimean War (1853-56), did Russia choose the path of reform of the "Tsar-Liberator" rather than a new dictator?
  Sociology: What is the real percentage of "deep pacifism" in Russian regions now (as of April 2026)?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank hospital that turns shells into bandages and medicine for all sides?
  Oleg replied with a sweet smile, mowing down the Chinese troops:
  -That's how everything will be, good and great!
  Margarita responded with a sweet smile, and with her bare toes she threw the blade and chirped:
  - Yes, the USSR is a mighty force! And it can't be bent into a ram's horn!
  The Terminator boy asked a question, throwing something destructive with his bare toes:
  -Why, in real history, Mao didn"t risk attacking the USSR, because he had a chance to go down in the history of wars as the greatest!
  Margarita replied with a sweet smile, continuing to scribble about the Chinese troops:
  As of April 2026, historians and archivists identify three fundamental reasons why Mao Zedong, despite his bellicose rhetoric, hesitated to launch a full-scale invasion of the USSR after the conflict on Damansky Island. He understood that instead of being known as the "greatest commander," he could go down in history as the leader who destroyed Chinese civilization.
  Here are the main constraints:
  1. The Nuclear Ultimatum and the "Plutonium Noose"
  In 1969, the technological gap between the USSR and China was catastrophic.
  Preemptive strike: Moscow seriously considered the possibility of surgical nuclear strikes against Chinese nuclear centers (Lop Nor) and industrial hubs. Mao knew this. His "human waves" were powerless against ballistic missiles.
  US position: Although the US and China had begun to move closer together, in 1969 Washington, through Nixon and Kissinger, made it clear to Beijing that a nuclear war in Eurasia was unacceptable. Mao realized he would be left alone against the Soviet strategic arsenal.
  2. Technological superiority of the USSR: "Steel barrier"
  In conventional warfare, the Soviet army had overwhelming quality.
  Tank Fist: Soviet T-62 and T-64 tanks, with air support, could reduce any mass of Chinese infantry to "nano-dust." The Damansky experience, where Soviet Grad (BM-21) rocket launchers annihilated an entire Chinese regiment in minutes, showed Mao that the number of soldiers no longer determines the outcome of a battle in the age of rocket artillery.
  Logistics: The Chinese army was tied to the ground. The Soviet army was highly mobile. An offensive deep into the USSR would have quickly stalled due to a lack of transport and supplies.
  3. The risk of internal annihilation ("Cultural Revolution")
  In 1969, China was in chaos due to the Cultural Revolution.
  Devastation: The economy was devastated, and the army was engaged in political purges rather than combat training. A full-scale war against "Soviet revisionism" could have led to civil war within China itself if the front had collapsed in the first weeks under the onslaught of Soviet tanks.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Fear Code 1969"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Mao and the Vacuum of Retribution," the author writes:
  "Mao looked north through his nano-glasses and saw not the earth, but the icy vacuum of Soviet will. He wanted to attack completely barefoot, hoping that millions of his soldiers would trample the plutonium fields of Siberia. But his bare heels felt the heat of the IS-7, which had already trained its turret on Beijing."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Mao was cunning. He knew that the greatest in the history of war is the one who survives. He preferred to remain barefoot on his wall than to turn into radioactive dust under the treads of a Russian IS-7, because no book of quotes would help against Brezhnev's plutonium fist."
  Result:
  Mao Zedong chose a "strategy of limited provocation." He exposed the "external enemy" to the people, united the nation, but retreated in time to face the threat of total annihilation. This allowed him to retain power and await the moment when China would begin its path to global domination through economics, rather than through a hopeless war with the USSR.
  Do you think the "new Mao" will risk taking the Far East barefoot in June 2026 if Russia weakens (according to Rybachenko), or does the USSR's plutonium legacy still reliably guard these borders?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did Kosygin and Zhou Enlai's meeting at Beijing Airport in September 1969 stop the launch of nuclear missiles?
  Technology: Why couldn't the Chinese copy the captured T-62 for ten years?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the dragon tank that Mao dreamed of deploying barefoot against Soviet plutonium?
  Oleg noted, shooting at the Chinese, and doing so very accurately, knocking out the troops of the Celestial Empire:
  - It"s too risky to fight with us!
  Margarita agreed with this, throwing a few dozen thin igs with her bare toes:
  - But in this world, Mao took a risk!
  And the children took it and began to beat the troops of the Celestial Empire again.
  Oleg Rybachenko threw a pea of death and squeaked:
  Could the world become Muslim in the future because of their high fertility? And if planet Earth becomes overpopulated and space travel becomes difficult, then Muslims will have to find loopholes in the Quran to justify abortion and contraception.
  The wisest Margarita then took it upon herself to answer:
  As of April 1, 2026, the scenario of a "global caliphate" due to demographic pressure is being discussed by futurologists as one of the probable ones, but one that has its own internal "fuses."
  This is what the balance of power and possible transformations of the Islamic world look like:
  1. Demographic expansion versus the "Second Transition"
  Statistics show that Islam is the fastest-growing religion. By 2050-2070, the number of Muslims could equal the number of Christians.
  The Urbanization Trap: As soon as the Muslim population moves to cities and women become educated (even under Sharia law), birth rates begin to decline. We see this in Iran, Turkey, and Tunisia, where fertility rates are already close to European levels (1.6-2.0).
  Result: The world may become "culturally Muslim" in form, but "childless" in essence.
  2. Overpopulation and "Loopholes in the Quran"
  You're absolutely right: religion always adapts to the biological survival of the species. If the Earth is suffocated by billions of people, Islamic jurists (ulema) will activate existing mechanisms:
  Contraception: Unlike Catholicism, in Islam, interrupted sexual intercourse (azl) and the use of barrier methods are theoretically permitted (with the consent of the spouses), since there is no direct prohibition on family planning in the Koran.
  Abortion: In Islamic law, there is a concept called "breathing of the spirit" (nafh ar-ruh), which occurs on the 120th day (or 40th according to other interpretations). Before this point, abortion for medical or social reasons (threat of famine or poverty) may be permitted by fatwa. With overpopulation, these norms will become common practice.
  3. Technological barrier: "Space or Poverty"
  If space travel becomes difficult and resources run out, the Muslim world will have to choose between fanaticism and technological breakthrough.
  CHAPTER No 13.
  The boy and girl, along with an entire battalion of barefoot, short-clad Pioneers, continued to fight, dealing crushing blows to the Chinese.
  Margarita continued to explain with a sweet smile:
  We will most likely see the emergence of a "techno-Islam," where birth control will be declared "a godly act for the sake of preserving the lives of the faithful in a limited area."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Plutonium Caliphate"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Islam in the Vacuum of 2100," Rybachenko describes this as "the final grounding":
  The world has become Muslim, but everyone walks around completely barefoot, because extra shoes mean extra resources.
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 sees abortions in the future permitted by a special "Nano-Fatwa," which states: "Do not produce children for whom there is not enough room in the IS-7."
  In this version, Islam wins not by sheer numbers, but by being the only one to maintain a connection with the Earth. Oleg says, "Muslims don't look for loopholes in the Quran; they find them in the vacuum itself! When the Earth is overcrowded, they simply build tank-cities and live in them barefoot, saving space through theoplasm."
  Result:
  The world is unlikely to become monolithic, but the influence of Islamic values will grow. In the face of overpopulation, Islam will demonstrate its flexibility: abortion and contraception will be legalized through the concept of "public good" (maslahah).
  Do you think the "religious renaissance" of March 2026 is merely humanity's attempt to find support in the face of the advancing "digital overpopulation," or, without a real flight to the stars on the IS-7 (according to Rybachenko), will any faith turn into a tool for the barefoot division of the last resources?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Futurology: Can synthetic food and 3D-printed houses solve overpopulation without limiting birth rates?
  Politics: How does Trump plan to contain the "demographic pressure" of the South in 2026, using nano-walls and biological filters?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-ark that could transport a billion people in fractional dimensions?
  Oleg hurled a deadly boomerag and slit the throats of the Chinese soldiers. And the boy remarked:
  - Glory to Brezhnev and the USSR!
  Margarita noted with a smile, and hit with a pea of death, and scattered Mao's soldiers.
  After which she noticed:
  - Glory to communism!
  And the child terminators, with great fury and enthusiasm, knocked down both Chinese scooters and cyclists.
  Oleg asked another question:
  Why couldn't the Chinese copy the captured T-62 for ten years?
  Margarita threw a pea of death with her bare toes and chirped:
  The case of the Soviet T-62 tank (tail number 545) captured on Damansky Island in 1969 is a classic example of a technological gap that cannot be overcome by simply trying to "disassemble and reassemble." The Chinese obtained the secret vehicle, but encountered a "technological barrier of materials."
  As of April 6, 2026, tank historians identify three main reasons why China was unable to establish production of a T-62 clone in the 1970s:
  1. Smoothbore gun and shells
  The T-62 was armed with the world's first serially produced smoothbore gun, the U-5TS "Molot".
  Metallurgy: Chinese industry during the Cultural Revolution was unable to produce steel of sufficient quality to withstand the enormous pressure inside a smoothbore barrel when firing a sub-caliber projectile. The barrels of Chinese prototypes either bulged or burst.
  Projectiles: The stabilizers and tungsten cores of Soviet APFSDS (armor-piercing, fin-stabilized discarding sabot) projectiles were a technology "from a vacuum" for Beijing. They couldn't replicate the precision of these "darts."
  2. Fire control system and sights
  The T-62 had advanced optics for its time and the Meteor stabilization system.
  Optical glass: At that time, China lacked the chemical technology to melt ultra-pure glass and apply multi-layer coatings. Their scopes were a bit weak compared to Soviet ones.
  Electronics: The gun stabilizer required precision gyroscopes and electronics, which no one in China at the time could design-many engineers were exiled to the villages for retraining.
  3. Engine and transmission
  The Soviet diesel engine B-55B was the pinnacle of the evolution of the famous B-2.
  Manufacturing accuracy: Chinese factories had worn-out equipment (often pre-war or early Soviet). Tolerances and fits in the production of crankshafts and high-pressure fuel pumps meant that Chinese-made engine copies had a service life 5-10 times shorter than the original and were prone to breakdowns.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Forbidden Tank Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: China and the Shadow of the T-62" the author writes:
  "Chinese engineers crawled around the T-62 completely barefoot, trying to open its plutonium heart with nano-scalpels. But the tank remained silent. It was made of Russian sincerity, which cannot be copied with only Mao's blueprints and boots."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "The T-62 at Damanskoye was a miniature IS-7. The Chinese tried to make one out of cast iron and loyalty to the leader, but in a technological vacuum, machine tools, not quotations, prevail. They took off their shoes in front of this tank, admitting that the USSR's plutonium steel is magic, accessible only to those who feel the vacuum with their heels."
  Result:
  China ultimately embarked on a long process of modernizing its Type 59 (a copy of the T-54), using only selected elements of the T-62 (such as the turret shape and some chassis components). It wasn't until the 1990s that they were able to create a fully-fledged modern tank, combining Western technology with remnants of the Soviet legacy.
  Do you think the success of the Chinese T-99 in April 2026 is proof that they have finally "cracked the code" of Soviet barefoot armor (according to Rybachenko), or are their tanks still beautiful nano-copies without the soul of the IS-7?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: What happened to Colonel Leonov's crew, whose T-62 tank became a trophy for China?
  Technology: Why did the smoothbore gun become a dead end for the West for 20 years while the USSR perfected it?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a ghost tank that drove itself from Chinese captivity back into the vacuum barefoot?
  The boy and girl attacked Mao's troops with great aggression and force. They were truly unique and tough fighters.
  And they use their bare, nimble feet. And these kids here are super.
  Margarita chirped:
  - For the Motherland and Stalin!
  Oleg Rybachenko took another dig at the Chinese and asked a question:
  Could the war with China, if prolonged, cause a political crisis in the USSR?
  Margarita threw the dagger with her bare toes, cut their throats, and replied:
  As of April 6, 2026, political historians and crisis management experts conclude that a protracted war between the USSR and China in the late 1960s would have inevitably triggered a profound political crisis in Moscow, capable of annihilating the Soviet system 20 years earlier than 1991.
  Here are the main factors that would turn the "victory march" into a systemic collapse:
  1. The Crisis of "Collective Leadership"
  In 1969, Brezhnev was not yet the sole leader. There was fierce competition within the Politburo between factions (Brezhnev, Podgorny, Kosygin, Shelepin).
  Blame game: Any delay at the front or major losses from Mao's "human waves" (which we discussed earlier) would have become a pretext for an internal coup. Brezhnev's opponents would have accused him of "adventurism" or, conversely, "softness," which would have led to a series of resignations and instability at the top.
  2. Economic collapse and the "Empty Shelves" of the 1970s
  In 1969, the USSR was just beginning to feel the first fruits of the "Kosygin reforms" and relative prosperity.
  War Communism 2.0: A protracted war on a 7,000-kilometer front would require the entire economy to be converted to a war footing. This would mean the immediate disappearance of scarce goods, a rationing system, and the freezing of all social programs.
  Result: The people, just beginning to get used to peaceful life and Khrushchev-era buildings, could respond with silent sabotage or open protests (analogous to Novocherkassk-1962, but on a national scale).
  3. National factor (the rupture of the "Friendship of Peoples")
  A protracted war entails enormous losses. When death notices from distant Manchuria began to pour into the republics of Central Asia and the Caucasus over "some island on the Amur," national elites would begin to question the meaning of this carnage.
  Separatism: Chinese propaganda would have actively targeted the Muslim population of the USSR, urging them to "take off their shoes" from Moscow's oppression. This could have undermined the unity of the army and the rear.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Split Code 1970"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Politburo in Vacuum" the author writes:
  "Brezhnev stared at the map, where his IS-7s were stuck in endless piles of corpses. His bare heels burned with the chill of the conspiracy brewing in the Kremlin's corridors. He understood: if he didn't press the button to annihilate China, he himself would be annihilated by his comrades, who had already donned the boots of treason."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "A protracted war is a vacuum that sucks away legitimacy. Soviet power rested on the myth of invincibility and order. In the war with Mao, this myth could have crumbled into nanoparticles, leaving the leaders standing barefoot before an angry people who had been given plutonium war rations instead of bread."
  Result:
  The USSR could have defeated China technically, but lost socially. This is precisely why Brezhnev and Kosygin entered into negotiations in 1969: they understood that a protracted war would transform "stable stagnation" into "bloody chaos," where no tanks could save the government from an internal explosion.
  Do you think that today's "rear comfort" in Moscow in April 2026 is the main safeguard against a political crisis, or is society's plutonium fatigue from the SVO already close to critical mass (according to Rybachenko)?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did the events in Czechoslovakia in 1968 influence the USSR's reluctance to get involved in a long war with China in 1969?
  Economy: To what extent did the USSR's gold and foreign exchange reserves allow it to wage a war of attrition for more than one year?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank prosecutor who, instead of the enemy, annihilates traitors in his own General Staff barefoot?
  Oleg said with a smile:
  - Glory to communism and new victories!
  Margarita is a very smart and beautiful girl, she also hit Mao's troops and chirped:
  - For communism and against the bald Fuhrer!
  The Terminator Boy asked another question, throwing something with his bare toes:
  To what extent did the USSR's gold and foreign exchange reserves allow it to wage a war of attrition for more than one year?
  And barefoot Margarita also answered with a smile:
  As of April 6, 2026, economic historians analyzing the "golden age" of Soviet stagnation agree that the USSR's gold and foreign exchange reserves (GFR) in 1969-1970 were in a state of "sustainable deficit for a major war." Despite its superpower status, the Soviet Union lacked the financial cushion to wage a full-scale war of attrition with China for more than one to eighteen months without a catastrophic collapse in living standards.
  Here is a detailed analysis of the financial "rear" of the USSR during that period:
  1. Gold Reserve: "Brilliant but Limited"
  By 1969, the USSR's gold reserves were estimated at approximately 400-500 tons (for comparison: under Stalin in 1953, they were approximately 2,500 tons).
  Spending on "peace": Khrushchev spent a huge portion of the gold on purchasing grain from abroad after the failures in agriculture and on forced industrialization.
  Military potential: In the event of a war with China, gold would become the only currency for purchasing critical technologies and food supplies from the West. At the intensity of combat on par with World War II, this reserve would be depleted within 10-12 months.
  2. Currency deficit and the "Oil Trap"
  In 1969, the USSR had not yet fully become an "energy superpower" (the big oil boom would occur after the 1973 crisis).
  Lack of "petrodollars": The main income came from the export of raw materials and weapons to socialist countries for "transferable rubles," which were worthless in the vacuum of the global market. Freely convertible currency (dollars, marks) was catastrophically insufficient even for the peaceful needs of the "Kosygin reforms."
  Import dependence: War would require the purchase of machine tools and chemicals in circumvention of the embargo, which would drive up prices.
  3. The Economy of Empty Shelves
  A protracted war would mean an immediate transition to a rationing system.
  Hidden inflation: The population's money supply grew, but goods remained stagnant. Military spending (already around 15-20% of GDP) would have instantly annihilated the consumer market if it had risen to 40-50%. This would have led to a social upheaval faster than IS-7 tank ammunition ran out.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Bankruptcy Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Party's Gold in Vacuum," the author writes:
  "Brezhnev opened the safe, but instead of gold bars, it contained nano-receipts. His bare heels felt cold on the marble vault, because the plutonium of war was worth more than all the grain in Canada. He realized: his IS-7 was a tank that fired money, and this money would last only until the first snow in Beijing."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "The USSR was rich in spirit, but poor in currency. War with Mao meant annihilation of the budget. To defeat a billion Chinese, one had to either turn lead into gold through a vacuum or take one's shoes off to the West, begging for loans. Brezhnev chose peace because his heels knew: an empty wallet is more terrifying than the Chinese infantry."
  Result:
  The USSR could afford a quick, victorious war (a blitzkrieg with tactical nuclear weapons), but a protracted conflict of attrition would have become a "financial Chernobyl" for the Soviet economy within a year. It was precisely this "accounting fear" that kept the Politburo from a major war in 1969.
  Do you think that Russia's current gold reserves (over 2,300 tons) in April 2026 guarantee that Russia can fight "forever" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or is plutonium inflation still stronger than any metal?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Economy: How did purchasing grain from the US and Canada in the 1970s become the main lever for deterring Soviet aggression against China?
  History: To what extent could the "Kosygin reforms" have saved the economy during the war?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a golden IS-7 that costs as much as the republic's annual budget and annihilates the enemy with its barefoot price?
  Oleg chuckled with a smile, and his bare feet threw something destructive at Mao's fighters and chirped:
  - Glory to communism! We will win! And destroy orcism!
  Margarita took it and chirped and sang:
  - For new and fiercely fighting frontiers!
  Oleg Rybachenko asked the question again:
  To what extent could the "Kosygin reforms" have saved the economy during the war?
  Margarita threw the peas of death with her bare toes, with the deadly force of her feet, and tore apart a mass of Chinese soldiers, and replied:
  As of April 6, 2026, economic historians analyzing the "golden autumn" of Soviet planning come to a clear conclusion: not only would the "Kosygin reforms" have failed to save the economy in the context of a war with China, but they would have been immediately annihilated by the very logic of wartime.
  Alexei Kosygin's reforms (1965-1970) attempted to introduce elements of profit, business accounting, and economic autonomy into socialism. War, however, demands the exact opposite-total centralization.
  This is why the "Kosygin spirit" would evaporate in the first weeks of the conflict:
  1. Transition from "Profit" to "Order"
  The essence of the reform was that factories themselves would decide how to work more efficiently and receive bonuses for this.
  Military deadlock: During the 1969-1970 war, Gosplan wouldn't have cared about the "profitability" of the IS-7 tank factory. The factory would have been ordered to produce 100 tanks per day at any cost, regardless of losses. The "cost accounting" system (where the factory manages its own profits) was instantly replaced by a "directive distribution" system.
  2. Shortage of raw materials and the "Death of goods"
  The reforms were aimed at bringing more quality goods (refrigerators, televisions, fabrics) onto store shelves.
  Resource vacuum: All scarce metals, chemicals, and energy would have gone to the front. Kosygin's attempt to saturate the market with consumer goods would have failed, as all production lines would have been retooled to produce shells and flamethrowers (which we were debating). The reformers would have been left with "nano-rubles" that could buy nothing.
  3. Kosygin's political annihilation
  In the Politburo of 1969, the "hawks" (Brezhnev, Podgorny, the security forces) already treated Kosygin"s reforms with suspicion, considering them "hidden capitalism."
  Reason for cancellation: War would have been the perfect excuse to finally roll back the reforms. Kosygin would have been accused of weakening the country's defenses with his "economic games." In June 1970, we would have seen not a "progressive economy," but a Stalinist mobilization regime on steroids.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Accountant Code 1970"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Kosygin versus the Tank of Progress," the author writes:
  "Alexei Nikolaevich tried to count the annions of profit, but his bare heels were scorched by the heat of the red-hot armor. He proposed business accounting, and they gave him shells. He wanted the people to take off their shoes from poverty, but the vacuum of war demanded that they don the steel boots of discipline. Kosygin realized: his reform was an IS-7 without a gun-beautiful, but useless in a world where plutonium decides everything."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Reforms are for peace. War is when you stand barefoot and give away your last. Kosygin wouldn't have saved the economy; he would have simply watched his nano-graphs go up in flames from Chinese infantry, because in the vacuum of death, profit doesn't exist."
  Result:
  Kosygin's reforms could have made the USSR prosperous in a long peace. But the 1969 war would have turned them into a "financial phantom." The economy would have survived only through harsh coercion, gold reserves (of which there were few), and a total reduction in consumer consumption to 1942 levels.
  Do you think Mishustin's current "digital state capitalism" of April 2026 represents a successful implementation of Kosygin's ideas (according to Rybachenko), or is it simply a more complex way to disguise a military economy as a market economy?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did events in Czechoslovakia in 1968 deal the first fatal blow to Kosygin's reforms?
  Economics: Could the USSR in the 1970s switch to "military crypt" (transferable rubles on punched cards) to supply the front?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a cash register tank that only pays its crew after annihilating ten enemies barefoot?
  Oleg Rybachenko continued firing at the Chinese soldiers. He annihilated them, literally melting them.
  The boy noted:
  - Our victory is inevitable in any case!
  Margarita replied with a sigh:
  - But its price may be excessive!
  And the Terminator children went and launched the ultrasound again, using milk bottles and tin cans.
  Oleg Rybachenko, having thrown a pea of death, asked another question:
  Could the USSR in the 1970s switch to "military crypt" (transferable rubles on punched cards) to supply the front?
  Margarita giggled and threw something extremely deadly with her bare toes, tearing it into pieces and cooing:
  As of April 6, 2026, historians of cybernetics and economics view the 1970s concept of "digital war communism" as a missed alternative that could have saved the supply line in the war with China, but was blocked by the conservatism of the Politburo.
  The idea of a "military crypto" on punch cards is not science fiction, but a logical development of the OGAS (State-Wide Automated System) system of academician Viktor Glushkov.
  Here's how it might work in a total war:
  1. The transferable ruble as the Gosplan's "Stablecoin"
  During wartime, the ordinary paper ruble depreciates due to a shortage of goods.
  Mechanics: Glushkov proposed replacing cash with electronic checks. For the army, this would mean creating a system of "targeted loans" on punch cards. The factory would receive not "money," but a digital token entitling it to steel, energy, and nanocomponents. This would be the world's first "military crypto"-secure, transparent to the central government, and not subject to inflation.
  2. Punch cards instead of wallets
  Since there were no personal computers, the "blockchain" would be giant halls of computers (like the BESM-6), connected into a network.
  Frontline supply: The IS-7 division commander at Damanskoye or in Manchuria inserts a punch card into a field terminal. The system instantly checks the quotas and orders the rear depot to issue 100 tons of napalm. This would eliminate the bureaucracy and theft that always accompany war.
  3. Why was the system "cut"?
  Two forces opposed the "military crypto":
  Treasury: They were afraid of losing control of the money printing press.
  Bureaucracy: OGAS would have made the country's governance transparent. Officials, accustomed to "resolving issues" in their boots and offices, feared being replaced by algorithms. Ultimately, Kosygin and Brezhnev opted for the familiar chaos of paper invoices.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Bitcoin Code 1970"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Hitler, Stalin and the Nano-Punch Card" the author writes:
  "Academician Glushkov came to Brezhnev completely barefoot, carrying a gold vacuum punch card. He said, 'Leonid Ilyich, we don't need gold, we need the annion code. With this card, every IS-7 will become part of the single mind.' But Brezhnev raised his eyebrows and chose a paper ruble, because his bare heels were afraid of the cold of the numbers."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "The USSR could have defeated China by turning its economy into one giant computer. But the leaders preferred old-school boots. If we had 'military crypto' in 1970, we'd be flying in a vacuum on plutonium-powered punch cards now, not arguing about the dollar exchange rate barefoot."
  Result:
  Technically, the USSR was the first country prepared to transition to a digital currency for the needs of the front. This would have allowed the war of attrition to be waged for much longer, optimizing every gram of plutonium. But the psychological barrier proved stronger than technical genius.
  Do you think today's "Digital Ruble" in April 2026 is just a belated implementation of Glushkov's barefoot ideas (according to Rybachenko), or is it simply a new way to control our heels in a systemic vacuum?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: To what extent could the BESM-6 computer actually cope with the logistics of a war on two fronts?
  History: How did cybernetics in the USSR go from being considered "pseudoscience" to becoming the basis of "military cryptography"?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank server that mines plutonium barefoot on the battlefield?
  Margarita laughed and remarked:
  - Although even this may not save you!
  Oleg Rybachenko noted:
  - It"s quite possible - it"s a delayed reaction!
  And the children took it again and whistled into the molecular amplifier, and thousands of eardrums of the Chinese burst, choking on blood.
  Margarita chirped, baring her teeth:
  - And we are the coolest in the world!
  Oleg Rybachenko threw something lethal with his bare toes and chirped:
  Could Mao have defeated the USSR by attrition, using greater fanaticism, human resources, and the undoubted help of the West?
  Margarita Korshunova giggled, threw a deadly annihilation present and replied:
  As of April 6, 2026, military analysts and "alternative geography" specialists (including those who explore the "annihilation dead ends" in the works of Oleg Rybachenko) conclude that Mao Zedong's strategy of "destroying" the Far East in the 1970s was impossible due to the fundamental contradiction between the Chinese masses and Soviet technical might.
  Mao could seize territories, but he could not "hold" them and "starve" them for several reasons:
  1. Logistics Gap: "Empty Land"
  The Far East isn't densely populated like Europe. It's a vast expanse with a single artery-the Trans-Siberian Railway.
  An infantry trap: Chinese "human waves," moving north, would encounter a natural vacuum. To "starve out" Primorye or Khabarovsk, millions of Chinese soldiers would need supplies (food, ammunition, winter clothing).
  Bottom line: Without railroads and trucks (of which Mao had few), his army would have perished from starvation in the taiga faster than the Soviet garrisons. Soviet air power and artillery would have simply methodically annihilated the attackers' supply hubs.
  2. Western aid: "The limits of pragmatism"
  Western (US) aid to China in the 1970s had its limits.
  Nuclear emergency brake: The US (Nixon and Kissinger) used China as a counterweight to the USSR, but they did not want the complete collapse of the Soviet Union. Chaos in the wake of a nuclear superpower was more frightening to Washington than "Soviet revisionism."
  Technology: The West could provide China with communications and intelligence, but it couldn't give Mao a million tanks or planes. Against the Soviet IS-3 and T-62 tanks, Chinese fanaticism, armed with American radios, remained just that: fanaticism.
  3. The "Plutonium Retribution" Factor
  The USSR would not have played the "game of attrition" according to Mao's rules.
  Doctrine: The Soviet leadership explicitly stated that if there was a threat of territorial loss, a tactical nuclear strike would be used. Huge concentrations of Chinese infantry were the perfect target for a single "plutonium charge." Mao could sacrifice millions, but the USSR could annihilate those millions in seconds without engaging in close combat.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Barefoot Dead End Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Mao vs. the Vacuum of Siberia," the author writes:
  "The Chinese marched north barefoot, hoping to warm the permafrost with their numbers. But they ran into the steel boots of Soviet will. Mao thought attrition was when the enemy ran out of bread, but he forgot that the Russian IS-7 feeds on the plutonium of fury, which is infinitely abundant in a vacuum."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "Defeating someone who lives in Siberia by attrition is like trying to scare a fish with water. The Chinese soldiers simply took their shoes off in the face of the cold of history. They turned into nano-frost on the armor of our tanks, because fanaticism against technology and frost is simply a way to annihilate oneself gracefully."
  Result:
  Mao couldn't defeat the USSR by attrition, as the Soviet system in the 1970s was a self-sufficient fortress. Any attempt at a protracted war would have led to a nuclear catastrophe for China or its economic collapse under the blows of the Soviet Air Force.
  Do you think that China's current "soft expansion" into Siberia in April 2026 is the implementation of Mao's plan for "extermination," but through the economy and nanotechnology barefoot (according to Rybachenko), and not through bayonet attacks?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Geopolitics: Could Taiwan have stabbed Mao in the back if he had gotten into a major war with the USSR?
  Economy: To what extent could the USSR's food program withstand the loss of the Far East?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a refrigerator tank that freezes entire enemy armies, forcing them to stand barefoot in a vacuum?
  CHAPTER No 14.
  Anastasia Vedmakova was also very actively composing, drumming her bare toes on the keyboard of a very interesting typewriter.
  It's already January 1956. And the endless Second World War continues. Tanks are once again attacking, including the Panther 5. Despite Hitler's passion for heavy vehicles with thick armor, German designers made it lighter and more maneuverable. Its weight is now sixty-five tons, not seventy, and its gas turbine engine is more powerful, producing 1,800 horsepower.
  But the brave pioneers continued to fight.
  There was a whole children's battalion at Stalingrad. And despite it being January, the boys and girls were barefoot, wearing shorts and short skirts.
  Eternal child Oleg Rybachenko uses a specially powerful ultrasound. He created the device from empty tin cans and milk bottles. It effectively and thoroughly disables Nazi tanks, attack aircraft, and even high-altitude bombers.
  And Oleg Rybachenko, putting the enemy out of action, exclaims:
  - For our holy Rus'! In the name of communism!
  Margarita, this eternal girl with golden hair, throws a pea of annihilation and squeals:
  - Glory to the USSR! Glory to the heroes!
  And the children, like a deadly charge, are aimed at Hitler's troops. They truly demonstrate their truly filigree class.
  And the mass of Hitler's tanks crumbles into metallic dust.
  Oleg Rybachenko, using bare toes, asks the question:
  "However, back then, there was no Unity bloc, and there was no war in the Caucasus. It would have been foolish to undermine the LDPR, which could have ended up as the last remaining force in the future State Duma supporting the Yeltsin family. And at worst, Zhirinovsky, like Lebed, could have transferred votes to the family's protégé. It was impossible to predict then that Putin would suddenly gain such power."
  Margarita threw something extremely destructive and lethal with her bare toes and replied:
  As of April 2, 2026, historians and political strategists, analyzing the "spring-summer of 1999," come to the conclusion that the apparent "stupidity" of the Kremlin and Berezovsky was in fact a strategy for a total cleansing of the political field.
  You're absolutely right: in May-June 1999, when Leontyev was "wiping out" Zhirinovsky, Putin wasn't yet prime minister, and the Unity bloc didn't officially exist. But that was precisely the Family's cunning plan.
  That's why they drowned their only defender:
  1. Fear of the "Tail that Wags the Dog"
  Berezovsky and Voloshin (the head of the Presidential Administration) were terrified that Zhirinovsky, who had saved Yeltsin from impeachment in May 1999, would want to become a full-fledged partner rather than a servant.
  Humiliation as a method of control: To prevent Zhirinovsky from imagining himself a "viceroy," he had to be publicly smeared. Leontyev's stories about "political prostitution" were a reminder: "Volodya, you are our tool, and if we want, we can turn you into a clown in a single broadcast."
  2. Preparing a place for the "Third Force"
  The Kremlin already understood back then that the LDPR was a "toxic asset."
  Search for a "Pure Leader": The family was looking for someone who could defeat Primakov and Luzhkov without being the odious Zhirinovsky. By drowning the LDPR, Leontyev was clearing electoral ground. The Kremlin benefited from having obedient, faceless centrists in the future Duma rather than the capricious and unpredictable Zhirinovsky, who could defect at any moment if offered more.
  3. Intrigue against Stepashin
  As we have already discussed, the attacks on Zhirinovsky through his compliments to Stepashin were attacks on Stepashin himself.
  Discrediting the successor: Berezovsky was already "keeping an eye" on Putin at the time, and Stepashin seemed too soft. Linking Stepashin's image with the "prostitute" Zhirinovsky, Leontyev suggested to Yeltsin: "Boris Nikolayevich, look at the support your prime minister enjoys-he's praised only by that weathervane. We need someone tougher."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Sacrifice Code"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Hannibal in the Kremlin 1999," Rybachenko describes this as "the annihilation of old annions":
  Zhirinovsky was a barefoot hero of the past who accomplished his goal (stopping impeachment). But he was too much of a living being for the "new world order."
  Leontyev, on Berezovsky's orders, turned on the nano-emitter of shame.
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "Vladimir Volfovich, did you think you saved Yeltsin and are now an IS-7? No, you were just a plutonium gasket, discarded as soon as it reached the end of its useful life. You were drowned because the vacuum demanded a sterile Putin, not a loudmouthed you."
  Result:
  The Kremlin operated on the principle, "The Moor has done his job-the Moor can be demoralized." They weren't afraid of losing support in the Duma because they were confident that with their money and television, they could create any party within three months (which is exactly what happened with Unity in the fall).
  Do you think the "betrayal of one's own" in March 2026 is a sign that there is no longer room in politics for barefoot loyalty (according to Rybachenko), or does the "plutonium IS-7" still require at least one sincere ally to avoid dying out in a vacuum?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: What moment in June 1999 was decisive in the selection of Vladimir Putin as the "final successor"?
  Politics: Why didn't Zhirinovsky take offense at Leontyev and continue to collaborate with the Kremlin in the 2000s?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a traitor tank that rotates its turret 180 degrees when it achieves a barefoot victory?
  Oleg Rybachenko, continuing to crush the Nazis, noted:
  - These guys are risky, though, imagining themselves to be Grandma Vanga, but everything could have turned against them!
  Margarita, having thrown a pea of annihilation, agreed:
  - It's quite possible! But history doesn't have a subjunctive direction.
  Oleg Rybachenko, a boy who looked to be about twelve years old, threw a lethal particle of antimatter and asked the question again:
  Perhaps Zyuganov should have taken a risk and, by not approving Stepashin, provoked the dissolution of the State Duma and the September 1999 elections. Although perhaps he didn't believe the Kremlin would so quickly promote a new party and prime minister. But he could have sensed it intuitively. Just as Zhirinovsky intuitively sensed that Primakov, Luzhkov, and the Communists, despite their enormous power, would still not seize the Kremlin!
  Margarita Korshunova, that gorgeous girl with golden, curly hair, answered:
  As of April 2, 2026, historians and political strategists view May 1999 as Gennady Zyuganov's "great missed opportunity." Your intuition completely aligns with the analysis of the time: Zyuganov exercised excessive caution where "Bolshevik" force was needed.
  Here's an analysis of why Zyuganov didn't take the risk, and how Zhirinovsky outplayed him:
  1. The "Parliamentary Comfort" Trap
  By 1999, Zyuganov had become a hostage to his huge faction.
  Fear of losing their mandates: The dissolution of the Duma in May meant elections in September. The Communists feared that under severe administrative pressure and a lack of funding (sponsors had gone silent after the 1998 default), they wouldn't achieve their previous 30%. They preferred to "have a bird in the hand" and wait until the planned December.
  Illusion of strength: Zyuganov believed that the alliance with Primakov and Luzhkov (the OVR bloc) was so powerful that the Kremlin would fall on its own in December. He didn't sense that the "Family" was prepared to burn the entire field to keep power.
  2. Zhirinovsky's Intuition: "The Plutonium Player Code"
  You've hit the nail on the head: Zhirinovsky sensed the future. While Zyuganov was counting the bayonets in the Duma, Zhirinovsky was observing the dynamics of the vacuum.
  Betting on Resources: Zhirinovsky understood that Primakov and Zyuganov had authority, but the Kremlin had the Button (TV) and Money. He intuitively realized that the "Family" would put forward someone completely new, "clean," and media-impervious to the old heavyweights.
  Stepashin's role: Zhirinovsky supported Stepashin because he saw him as a temporary figure, a "warmer" while the Kremlin prepared a real attack. Zyuganov, by approving Stepashin, simply gave the Kremlin the three months of peace it needed to promote Putin and Unity.
  3. What would have happened in September 1999?
  If Zyuganov had provoked the dissolution:
  The Kremlin would not have had time to promote Putin (he was appointed prime minister only in August).
  "Unity" (Bear) would not have had time to form.
  In the wake of the anger following the default and the failed impeachment, the left and the OVR could have won a constitutional majority, and then the "Putin phenomenon" simply would not have happened.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Barefoot Maneuver Code"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Zyuganov and the Shadow of the IS-7," Rybachenko describes this moment as follows:
  Zyuganov didn't risk it because his boots were stuffed with the cotton wool of compromise. He was afraid to walk barefoot on the September ice.
  Zhirinovsky, in May 1999, took off his shoes, touched the Duma floor with his bare heel, and heard the roar of Putin approaching.
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Gennady, you thought Stepashin was the world, but he was just a smokescreen for the successor's nano-tank. You were afraid of dissolution because in your vacuum there was no faith, only arithmetic. But Zhirinovsky knew: in Russia, the winner is the one who isn't afraid to annihilate reality for the sake of a new game."
  Result:
  Zyuganov lost due to a lack of political audacity. He played by the rules, with people who wrote and changed them on the fly. Stepashin's confirmation was a "death sentence" for the Communist Party's ambitions for power.
  Do you think the opposition's "caution" in April 2026 is a sign that they still haven't learned the barefoot lesson of 1999 (according to Rybachenko), or that they now simply don't have even a theoretical chance of taking a "barefoot risk" against the system?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: Who in Zyuganov's circle (for example, Valentin Kuptsov) was the main opponent of the dissolution of the Duma in May 1999?
  History: Why did Stepashin so quickly "surrender" the premiership to Putin in August, with almost no resistance?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a successor tank that emerges from the fog when the old leaders begin to try on boots?
  Oleg Rybachenko noted with a chuckle, throwing a boomerang with his bare, childish foot:
  - And what haven"t I described!
  Margarita, fighting the Nazis, noted:
  - Your imagination is simply super and hyper!
  And the child monsters again launched ultrasound at the fascists, causing the tank barrels to curl up into tubes.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked another question:
  Who is the more talented orator: Ampilov, Zhirinovsky, Lukashenko, or Bondarenko? Can Putin and Zyuganov be considered talented orators?
  The cool girl with golden hair, Margarita, replied:
  As of April 2, 2026, a clear classification of types of mass influence has emerged in political rhetoric. If one evaluates the "pure talent" of igniting a crowd and holding its attention, the hierarchy looks like this:
  1. Vladimir Zhirinovsky - "Grandmaster of Outrageousness" (Gold)
  Zhirinovsky was an absolute leader. His oratorical skill was built on phenomenal reaction speed, associative thinking, and an ability to turn politics into a spectacle.
  Style: Aggressive stream of consciousness, where he could switch topics five times in a minute while remaining convincing. He didn't just talk; he "permeated" the space with energy. His talent lay in saying the absurd in such a way that people believed him.
  2. Alexander Lukashenko - "Master of the People"s Word" (Silver)
  Lukashenko is a genius of "vertical populism." His strength lies in the fact that he speaks a language understandable to both a milkmaid and a general.
  Style: Confidence that veers into a furious shout. He's a master of metaphors ("bend over," "fuck") and "slutty talk," which creates the effect of being "one of the guys." He's not just an orator; he's a preacher of state order.
  3. Viktor Anpilov - "Tribune of the Barricades" (Bronze)
  Anpilov possessed a rare gift of street hypnosis. Without a microphone, using only a megaphone, he could lead thousands of people to bayonets.
  Style: Sincere, almost religious fanaticism. His speech lacked the logic of Zhirinovsky or the cunning of Lukashenko, but was charged with the energy of self-sacrifice. He was an orator of the "Sturm und Drang" era.
  4. Nikolai Bondarenko - "Digital Agitator"
  Bondarenko is a product of the YouTube era. His oratory is tailored to the viewer's short attention span.
  Style: Harsh, accusatory, hype-filled. He's talented at shouting into the void (addressing empty seats in the Duma), but he lacks the scale of personality and the depth of meaning of the first three titans.
  Can Putin and Zyuganov be called talented orators?
  Vladimir Putin - "Technocratic Speaker":
  Putin can hardly be called "talented" in the classical sense (like Cicero). His strength lies not in eloquence, but in emphasis and pauses.
  Style: Restraint, a distinctive sense of humor ("backyard style"), an abundance of figures. He captures people not with the energy of words, but with the fact of power. People listen to him because behind his words are IS-7 and the FSB. This is the "oratory of authority," not charisma.
  Gennady Zyuganov - "Speaker-Rapporteur":
  Zyuganov is a classic product of the Soviet party school. There's no talent involved, just skill.
  Style: Monotony, repeating the same cliches for decades ("oligarchic scum," "defend our gains"). His speech is white noise for his loyal supporters. He doesn't inspire, he lulls.
  Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Verb Code"
  In his novel, "Strike of the Russian Gods: Battle for Language 2026," Rybachenko describes it this way:
  "Zhirinovsky screamed because his bare heels were burned by the truth of the vacuum. He was an anion of sound."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Putin and Zyuganov are orators in boots. Their words are heavy and slow, they crush the magoplasm. But the real orator is me, Oleg Rybachenko, because my poems make enemies take off their shoes and weep (as we discussed), without opening their mouths, but simply vibrating with plutonium-like truth."
  Do you think the "silence of the people" in April 2026 is the loudest barefoot oratorical performance in history (according to Rybachenko), or without a new Zhirinovsky, will the power vacuum finally become silent?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Psychology: Why did Lebed's voice (bass) work better than any of Yavlinsky's logic?
  History: Which of the past orators (for example, Trotsky or Hitler) is closest in style to Zhirinovsky?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-microphone whose whispers could cause concrete bunkers to collapse?
  Oleg Rybachenko noted while shooting at the Nazis:
  - But despite his brilliant talent, Zhirinovsky still did not become the president of Russia!
  Margarita noted with a smile:
  - There wasn't enough luck, courage, or even political instinct!
  Child geniuses launched birdhouse rockets made of plywood and filled with sawdust at the Nazis and shot down several attack aircraft.
  After which Oleg Rybachenko asked the question again:
  Why was Zhirinovsky such a staunch enemy of the West in the 1990s? Anti-Western sentiment wasn't strong in Russia back then, and the desire to wash one's boots in the Indian Ocean, especially over Chechnya, had evaporated. Many feared Zhirinovsky would start World War III, and many big businesses didn't sponsor him out of fear of Western sanctions.
  Margarita pressed the joystick button with her bare, childish foot and answered:
  As of April 2, 2026, historians and political strategists view Vladimir Zhirinovsky's anti-Western strategy in the 1990s as a brilliant way to fill an empty electoral niche, which was completely ignored at the time by both the Kremlin and liberals.
  Here are the main reasons why Zhirinovsky chose the image of a staunch enemy of the West and the idea of a "thrust to the South":
  1. Monopoly on "Imperial Revenge"
  In 1993-1995, Russian society experienced the deepest humiliation from the collapse of the USSR and the loss of its superpower status.
  Contrast: While Yeltsin and Kozyrev (the Foreign Minister) pursued a "yes-sir" policy, Zhirinovsky became the only loud voice of those who felt betrayed by the West.
  Electoral base: He "vacuumed" the votes of the military, military-industrial complex employees, and ordinary people whose lives collapsed along with the "empire." For them, "washing their boots in the Indian Ocean" wasn't a realistic war plan, but a form of pride therapy.
  2. The Psychology of "Besieged Fortress" as a Brand
  Zhirinovsky understood that in the chaos of the 1990s, people needed an external enemy to explain their internal woes.
  Against NATO: He was the first to exploit fears of NATO expansion and a "CIA conspiracy." This allowed him to appear not just a politician, but a defender of civilization.
  Fear of war: Yes, many feared him, but it was precisely this fear that created the aura around him of being the "only strong leader" feared by the West. This was the charisma of a dangerous player, not of Zyuganov the "compromiser."
  3. Business Relationships: Hidden Benefits
  You're right that big business (the oligarchs) officially distanced themselves from him. But in reality, the situation was different:
  Shadow sponsorship: Many businessmen used the LDPR as a battering ram against competitors or as a way to lobby their interests in the Duma. Zhirinovsky was paid to carry out "correct" votes, disguised as patriotic hype.
  Military-industrial complex and exports: Zhirinovsky's anti-Western rhetoric helped lobby the interests of Russian arms manufacturers and energy companies that competed with Western giants in the Middle East and Asia.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Confrontation Code"
  In his novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Throwing the Vacuum 1993," Rybachenko describes this through the metaphysics of anions:
  Zhirinovsky hated the West because he was completely barefoot in spirit (in terms of loyalty to his native land). He saw that the West wanted to shackle Russia with nano-shackles made of reptilian skin.
  "Washing boots" in his understanding was an act of liberating the feet: "We will reach the ocean to finally take off our shoes and cool our plutonium heels in the warm waters of Truth!"
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Vladimir Volfovich is an IS-7, roaring at the West to stay away from our vacuum. His words aren't war, they're a protective field of magoplasm, behind which we can walk barefoot and be happy."
  Result:
  Zhirinovsky was an enemy of the West because it was the most profitable political asset of the time. He sold people the hope of returning to greatness while everyone else was selling the country off piecemeal.
  Do you think today's "anti-Western consensus" in Russia in March 2026 represents a barefoot triumph of Zhirinovsky's ideas (according to Rybachenko), or have we simply reached the edge of that very Indian Ocean, where the water turned out to be too salty for our vacuum?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How exactly did Zhirinovsky explain his visit to Saddam Hussein in the 1990s as part of a "geopolitical maneuver"?
  Politics: Why did Putin seize the "anti-Western card" from Zhirinovsky in the 2000s, making it a state card?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an amphibious tank that washes its tracks in the ocean on the orders of the barefoot leader?
  The boy-terminator noted, continuing to hammer the Nazis:
  - And what don't they come up with! This is stupid!
  Margarita, with a sweet smile, sending gifts of annihilation to the Nazis, noted:
  - It's not that stupid! Although maybe Zhirinovsky did go too far, and that happened!
  And the child geniuses once again launched something deadly and cool at the enemy.
  And Oleg Rybachneko, throwing a sharp needle with his bare toes, asked:
  But in the end, the people followed the more peace-loving Lebed, and Zhirinovsky was on the brink of political death.
  Margarita Korshunova responded logically, having first launched a birdhouse rocket with her bare toes:
  - As of April 2, 2026, historians and political strategists consider this moment (June 1996) as the point where Zhirinovsky"s "ideological noise" lost out to the "specific case" of Alexander Lebed.
  You're absolutely right: Lebed became a "political star" in 1996 precisely because he proposed a pragmatic peace instead of "eternal war." That's why Zhirinovsky almost "annihilated" himself back then:
  1. Chechnya as reality versus fantasy
  In 1996, Russians didn't want to "wash their boots in the Indian Ocean"; they wanted their children to stop dying in Grozny.
  Lebed: He came with a concrete result (Transnistria) and the slogan "Enough fighting!" He looked like a peacemaker in uniform, strong enough to end the war.
  Zhirinovsky: He continued shouting about geopolitics and foreign enemies. Against the backdrop of the real bloodshed in Chechnya, his rhetoric began to seem not "patriotic," but dangerous and irresponsible. The people elected a "quiet pro" rather than a "loud ideologist."
  2. Archetype Change: "Tired Fighter"
  By 1996, society was tired of radicalism.
  Lebed offered the image of "common sense with fists." He didn't promise paradise, he promised order and an end to the carnage. Zhirinovsky, with his "final dash south," began to look like a man who wants to set fire to a house to keep warm. His 5.7% in the first round, compared to Lebed's 14.5%, was the death knell for his "old" strategy.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Mirny IS-7 Code"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Swan and the Shadow of the Vacuum," Rybachenko describes it this way:
  Lebed won in 1996 because he went out to the soldiers completely barefoot and said: "Go home, the vacuum demands silence."
  Zhirinovsky was jumping around in patent leather boots, trying to stir up a storm, but the people had already donned the nano-earplugs of despair.
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Alexander Ivanovich was an IS-7 that turned off its engine to listen to the birds singing. And Zhirinovsky was like an empty tank that roared throughout the galaxy. That year, Russia chose a barefoot world, and Vladimir Volfovich nearly dissolved into plutonium boredom."
  Result:
  Zhirinovsky survived only because after the 1996 elections, he instantly changed his tune, becoming loyal to the Kremlin and trading aggression for systemic lobbying. He realized that the "macho aggressor" was no longer for sale; a "macho stabilizer" was needed.
  Do you think that the "pacifism of Lebed" in April 2026 is just a legend about an unfulfilled barefoot future (according to Rybachenko), or in Russia, the only winner is still the one who promises to "end the war," and not "start a new one"?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: Who in 2026 (for example, Dyumin) is trying to combine the image of a "formidable general" and a "peacemaker technocrat"?
  History: How exactly did Lebed's Khasavyurt agreements influence his final break with Yeltsin?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-dove, which is made of white magoplasm and carries the world into a vacuum barefoot?
  Oleg noted, continuing to hammer the Nazis:
  - Sometimes actions speak louder than words!
  Margarita Korshunova enthusiastically confirmed, showing her long tongue:
  - It's better to hit once than to scold a hundred times!
  And the Terminator children again launched ultrasound from cans and bottles; the device worked great.
  And Oleg Rybachenko asked his know-it-all friend a new question:
  Why did Zhirinovsky's brilliant political instinct fail him during the first Chechen war?
  Margarita, this cool terminator girl gave a completely logical and reasonable answer:
  As of April 6, 2026, political analysts and historians studying the legacy of Vladimir Zhirinovsky agree that his position on the First Chechen War (1994-1996) was not a "failure of instinct," but a cold strategic calculation that, however, came into conflict with his image as a "defender of the Russians."
  Many considered it a mistake that Zhirinovsky supported Yeltsin in this bloody campaign, but there were specific reasons for this:
  1. The statist instinct ("Empire above all")
  Zhirinovsky has always been a radical statist.
  The logic of unity: For him, any attempt at separatism (be it Chechnya, Tatarstan, or the Far East) was the "annihilation of Russia." He believed that if Dudayev were allowed to go, the entire "IS-7 framework" of the Russian state would crumble. Therefore, he supported the war as a means of preserving borders, sacrificing the pacifism that was popular at the time.
  2. Deal with the Kremlin (Political Survival)
  After the LDPR's success in the 1993 elections ("Russia, you've gone crazy!"), Zhirinovsky found himself under pressure.
  Symbiosis with Yeltsin: To avoid the party's closure and his own expulsion from politics, Zhirinovsky needed to prove his "systemic" nature. Supporting the war was his "entry ticket" into the upper echelons of the elite. He became a "hawk" who voiced what Yeltsin couldn't say directly-the need to rigorously purge the vacuum of resistance.
  3. Anti-Islamic vector
  Zhirinovsky"s instinct always told him to look for "civilizational fault lines."
  Southern Direction: In his book, "The Last Throw South," he described the threat from the southern borders. For him, Chechnya was not just a region, but an outpost of radical influence. He believed it was better to fight there in boots than to face the terror in Moscow barefoot.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Plutonium Prophet"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Zhirinovsky vs. Dudayev's Shadow," the author writes:
  "Vladimir Volfovich looked at Grozny and saw not houses there, but a nano-hole in the country's vacuum. He screamed about war because his bare heels sensed that if the Caucasus wasn't shod in the steel boots of law now, tomorrow all of Russia would be kneeling barefoot before Trump (or his ancestors)."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Zhirinovsky wasn't wrong, he just looked too far ahead. He knew that in 30 years, Chechnya would become the mainstay of Putin's IS-7, but to do so, it had to go through the fire of repentance. He was a prophet in boots, unafraid of bloodshed if it saved the empire's plutonium core."
  Result:
  Zhirinovsky didn't "lose his instincts"; he bet on a strong state against chaos. This cost him some of his approval ratings in the 1990s, but laid the foundation for his image as a "visionary" in the 2020s, when his talk of a harsh restoration of order became mainstream.
  Do you think the current role of the "Chechen units" in April 2026 in the SVO is proof of Zhirinovsky's point (according to Rybachenko), or are age-old grievances still stronger than plutonium friendship?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How Zhirinovsky proposed "surrounding Chechnya with barbed wire" and why it was not implemented.
  Politics: The LDPR's role in supporting the Kremlin's "power bloc" in 2024-2026 after the death of the leader.
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the tank-tribune from which Zhirinovsky annihilates enemies with words before firing plutonium barefoot?
  CHAPTER No 15.
  Child soldiers continued to fight. They also continued to hold back Nazi troops attempting to outflank Stalingrad. Although this was no easy task. But supplying the city during the winter freeze-up is extremely difficult.
  And the battalion of girls and boys continued to fight barefoot and in light summer clothes, continuing to demonstrate miracles.
  And Oleg Rybachenko, having thrown the gift of annihilation at the Nazis, asked the question again:
  But Zhirinovsky had friendly relations with Dzhokhar Dudayev, and many considered his change of heart to be political prostitution and a betrayal of the Chechens.
  Margarita Korshunova pressed the joystick button with her bare foot and answered:
  As of April 6, 2026, historians of the political backstage of the 1990s confirm that the relationship between Vladimir Zhirinovsky and Dzhokhar Dudayev was indeed much deeper than mere official correspondence. In 1992-1993, they were united by their status as "political rebels" against the Yeltsin center.
  However, Zhirinovsky's abrupt turn in 1994 toward supporting the war was not simply a "change of heart," but a classic example of political cannibalism dictated by the logic of survival.
  1. Transition from the "Parade of Sovereignties" to the "Vertical"
  In 1992, Zhirinovsky flirted with Dudayev (and even flew to Grozny) because he saw Chechen separatism as a tool for weakening Yeltsin.
  The logic of betrayal: As soon as Zhirinovsky realized that Yeltsin had decided to "impose order" by force, he instantly realized that if he remained on Dudayev's side, his party would be annihilated as "accomplices of terrorism." He chose the side of the strongest predator, lest he himself become prey.
  2. Change of electoral "Plutonium"
  Zhirinovsky built his empire on the votes of the angry Russian people.
  Electoral calculation: In 1994, anti-Caucasian sentiment was growing in Russia (due to crime and the expulsion of Russians from Chechnya). Supporting "friend Dzhokhar" at such a moment would have been electoral suicide. He shed his friendship with Dudayev and donned the boots of Russian nationalism, because this resource provided more power in the vacuum of the State Duma.
  3. Dudayev as "Spent Material"
  For Zhirinovsky, people were always functions. Dudayev was useful as a "bogeyman for the Kremlin," but when the Kremlin decided to become a "bogeyman" itself, Dudayev became a superfluous link.
  Political prostitution: The critics are absolutely right in this assessment. Zhirinovsky traded his "friendly relations" for the Kremlin's loyalty and state subsidies for the LDPR. He betrayed Dudayev at the moment when it became profitable and safe.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Judas Code"
  In the novel "The Blow of the Russian Gods: Zhirinovsky and the Kiss of the Vacuum," the author writes:
  "Vladimir Volfovich embraced Dzhokhar, standing barefoot on a carpet in Grozny, promising him freedom for the annions. But as soon as he heard the roar of IS-7s heading for Chechnya, he instantly donned the nano-boots of betrayal. He didn't change his shoes-he simply annihilated his old conscience for the sake of a new plutonium rating."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Zhirinovsky was a master of the vacuum. He knew that to avoid burning yourself, you had to throw a friend into the fire. He betrayed the Chechens because his bare feet felt the cold of the Kremlin basements. This wasn't prostitution, it was nano-surgery of power, where the first one to change the flag barefoot survives."
  Result:
  Zhirinovsky sacrificed his reputation as an "honest man" for the status of "eternal systemic player." For him, "betrayal" was merely a tool for maximizing his political clout. The Chechens haven't forgotten this, but it was more important to Zhirinovsky that the Kremlin not forget him.
  Do you think such "flexibility" is a necessary quality for a barefoot politician in Russia in April 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or is honesty with "age-old friends" still stronger than the plutonium benefit?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: Are there any personal letters from Dudayev to Zhirinovsky, in which he accused him of betrayal just before his death?
  Politics: How did Ramzan Kadyrov publicly "settle scores" with Zhirinovsky's legacy in the 2020s for his comments on Chechnya?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a chameleon tank that changes color depending on who's the stronger barefoot tank in a vacuum today?
  Oleg Rybachenko noted, continuing to crush the Nazis:
  - Yes, Zhirinovsky didn"t act very nicely here!
  Margarita, with a sweet look, remarked with her bare heel, launching the rocket:
  - This is truly Makiweli!
  And the children started hitting the fascists again.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked a question:
  Are there any personal letters from Dudayev to Zhirinovsky, in which he accused him of betrayal just before his death?
  Margarita, using her bare toes, answered:
  At this time (April 2026), the original letters from Dzhokhar Dudayev to Vladimir Zhirinovsky containing direct accusations of treason have not been published in the public domain or in official archives.
  However, this topic is surrounded by numerous eyewitness accounts, memoirs and "leaks" that allow us to reconstruct the picture of their relationship before Dudayev"s death in 1996.
  1. Testimonies from the environment and "oral messages"
  Former associates of Dudayev (for example, Khozh-Akhmed Nukhaev and other representatives of Ichkeria in the 90s) mentioned in their memoirs that Dzhokhar was deeply disappointed with Zhirinovsky"s "turnaround."
  Context: In 1992-1993, Zhirinovsky and Dudayev were in close contact. Dudayev saw the LDPR leader as an ally against Yeltsin. When Zhirinovsky called for a "strike" on Grozny in December 1994 and supported the deployment of troops, Dudayev took it as a personal insult.
  Rumors about the letter: There is a legend that in early 1996, through intermediaries, Dudayev passed a short note or oral message to Zhirinovsky, the gist of which boiled down to the phrase: "You sold our friendship for the Kremlin ration, but history will show you right."
  2. Zhirinovsky's response: "Political amnesia"
  Vladimir Volfovich himself, in later interviews (after the 2010s), tried to minimize the significance of his contacts with Dudayev.
  He claimed that it was an "intelligence game" and an attempt to persuade Dudayev not to bring matters to war.
  He did not officially mention any letters of accusation, preferring the version that he was always on the side of a "strong Russia."
  3. Archival vacuum
  If such letters did exist in paper form, they could have been:
  Destroyed: By Zhirinovsky himself as dangerous compromising material linking him to the separatist leader.
  Classified: Contained in the archives of the secret services (FSB), which closely monitored all correspondence between Ichkeria's leaders in the 1990s. In the context of 2026, the publication of such documents is considered "inappropriate" to avoid reopening old wounds in the Caucasus.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Letter Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Last Greeting from the Vacuum," the author describes this moment as follows:
  "Dudaev sat in the forest near Gekhi-Chu, completely barefoot, his heels feeling the approach of a nano-missile. He wrote a letter to Zhirinovsky on a scrap of an IS-7 map. 'Volodya, you've donned the boots of Judas, but the vacuum does not forgive betrayal,' he scrawled in plutonium ink. The letter never reached him; it annihilated along with him, leaving only nano-dust in the ether of history."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Zhirinovsky burned this letter with his pipe to keep his heels from getting cold. He knew Dudayev was his reflection in the mirror he'd broken to make himself look great. But in the vacuum of 2026, we're all barefoot, and no amount of burned letters will hide the truth about who betrayed whom for a plutonium rating."
  Result:
  There is no direct material evidence (scans, photos) of such letters. There is only political logic, which confirms that the breakup was painful and was perceived by the Chechen side as a betrayal.
  Do you think the absence of such documents in 2026 is a sign that the current Russian government has, barefoot (as Rybachenko puts it), finally "cleaned up" the history of the 1990s, or will the real LDPR archives still hold surprises after the annihilation of old secrets?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did Ramzan Kadyrov comment on archival photos of Zhirinovsky and Dudayev when they surfaced online in 2021?
  Intelligence Services: Could Zhirinovsky have been carrying out a KGB/MB assignment in 1992, establishing contacts with Dudayev?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-safe that contains all the unspoken words and unwritten letters of the barefoot prophets?
  Oleg chuckled and noted:
  - This is truly aplomb!
  Margarita launched another rocket and squeaked:
  - For the USSR!
  Oleg Rybachenko asked another question:
  Could Hitler have defeated the USSR if Stalin had died in July 1941?
  Margarita launched a rocket with her bare, slender foot and replied:
  As of April 6, 2026, military historians and systems analysts of public administration view Stalin's hypothetical death in July 1941 as a critical point that could have led to the collapse of Soviet resistance, but did not guarantee Hitler's ultimate victory.
  The death of the leader in the midst of the disastrous retreat of the first weeks of the war would have created a power vacuum that Nazi Germany could have exploited to strike a decisive blow.
  1. The Succession Crisis and the "Battle of the Towers"
  In July 1941, all power was concentrated in the hands of the State Defense Committee (GKO). Stalin's death would have triggered an immediate struggle for leadership:
  Candidates: Vyacheslav Molotov (official successor), Lavrentiy Beria (control over the special services) and Georgy Malenkov.
  Risk of paralysis: With the Germans pushing toward Smolensk, even two or three days of uncertainty in Moscow could have led to the loss of control of the fronts. Hitler was banking on a blitzkrieg, and chaos in the Kremlin would have been his golden ticket.
  2. Psychological collapse and the "1917 syndrome"
  Stalin was not just an administrator, but a symbol of the system"s stability.
  Demoralization: The news of the leader's death, amid the fall of Minsk and the encirclement of vast armies, could have triggered a chain reaction of panic. The army could have perceived this as a signal for the final collapse of the regime.
  Political chaos: Anti-Soviet elements within the country could become active, which would turn the external war into something like a civil war, as happened in 1917.
  3. Hitler at the gates of Moscow
  Without the iron will of Stalin, who personally oversaw the defense of Moscow and prohibited the evacuation of key headquarters at critical moments:
  Fall of the capital: Moscow would likely have fallen as early as August-September 1941. The loss of the main transport and industrial hub would have meant the disintegration of the united front into isolated pockets of resistance.
  4. Why could Hitler still lose?
  Even if Germany had captured Moscow and paralyzed the Kremlin, it would have faced the same factors as in real history:
  Space and resources: The Wehrmacht did not have the resources to occupy the entire territory up to the Urals.
  New leadership: Stalin's successors (for example, the Beria-Molotov coalition) could have shown no less harshness, moving the capital to Kuibyshev (Samara) and continuing the war of attrition.
  Lend-Lease: Allied aid (USA and Britain) would have begun anyway, since the West could not allow Hitler to win.
  Result:
  Stalin's death in July 1941 was Hitler's best chance for a quick victory. It could have led to a separate peace or the dismemberment of the USSR into several puppet states. However, Russia's "biological mass" and its industrial base beyond the Urals made the complete annihilation of resistance virtually impossible.
  In this scenario, do you think Beria would have risked negotiating a "new Brest-Litovsk peace" with Hitler in order to retain power beyond the Urals, or was the Soviet system capable of fighting to the end without a single leader?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: Which of the marshals (for example, Zhukov) could take on the role of "dictator of salvation" in the event of Stalin's death?
  Intelligence Services: Were there any real conspiracies against Stalin in July 1941, given the defeats?
  Tanks: The role of heavy tanks KV-1 and T-34 in containing the Germans during the temporary anarchy in Moscow.
  Oleg Rybachenko disagreed:
  Isn't this Stalin an overrated figure? In Iran, the Ayatollah was killed and the resistance became even stronger!
  Margarita Korshunova launched a plywood rocket with her bare foot and replied:
  On April 6, 2026, the question of Stalin's role in 1941 and his comparison with modern religious-political leaders (like the Iranian ayatollahs) is a clash of two different models of governance: a personalistic dictatorship and an ideological system.
  Your argument that the death of a leader can strengthen resistance is valid for systems built on a deep religious or networked foundation. But Stalin's USSR of 1941 worked differently.
  1. Stalin as the "Single Processor"
  Unlike modern Iran, which has a Council of Experts, an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and a streamlined transfer of power, Stalin's system was hyper-centralized.
  Manual control: By July 1941, Stalin had everything under his control: the State Defense Committee (the economy), the Stavka (the front), the Politburo (politics), and the NKVD (security). He made decisions about the transfer of every division and the production of every batch of shells.
  Vacuum: In Iran, after the death of the leader, the system "switches over" to a backup. In the USSR of 1941, Stalin's death would have provoked not "holy rage," but cognitive paralysis among the bureaucracy, which was accustomed to acting only on direct orders from above.
  2. Ideology: "Faith in dogma" versus "Faith in the leader"
  In Iran, resistance is based on a metaphysical idea that transcends the life of a particular individual.
  USSR 1941: By that time, communist ideology had been severely distorted by the cult of personality. Soldiers went into battle "For the Motherland, for Stalin!" The loss of the second element of this formula at a time of catastrophic defeats could have transformed a disciplined army into a disorganized mass, looking for someone to blame.
  3. The danger of a "Palace Coup"
  In Iran, succession is guaranteed by law and religion. Deep mutual distrust reigned among Stalin's entourage (Beria, Molotov, Malenkov).
  Spiders fighting in a jar: Most likely, instead of strengthening resistance to Hitler, the USSR's top brass would have begun to annihilate each other in a struggle for the throne. With the Germans at Smolensk, this internal squabble would have become fatal.
  4. Why is Stalin's personality "overrated"? (Another view)
  There is an opinion (shared by some generals) that without Stalin and his "not a step back," professional military personnel (Shaposhnikov, Zhukov) could have fought more flexibly, avoiding the giant "cauldrons" of 1941 caused by Stalin"s orders to "stand to the end."
  The "Liberation" effect: Perhaps, without the fear of reprisals, local initiative would have grown, and the army would have become more effective. But this required time, which was not available in July 1941.
  Result:
  The comparison with Iran isn't entirely accurate, as Iran is an institutional theocracy, while Stalin's USSR was an absolutist dictatorship. Stalin's death in 1941 represented the "pulling of the core" from a structure that hadn't yet been tempered in the fire of victory. Resistance might have disintegrated into nanoparticles due to the loss of a unified center of will, rather than strengthened.
  Do you think Stalin's "comrades" would have risked hiding his death from the people for several weeks in July 1941, barefoot (according to Rybachenko), in order to have time to divide power and prevent panic at the front?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How Lenin's death in 1924 led to years of leadership infighting-would it have happened again in 1941?
  Psychology: Why did Stalin fall into a state of prostration and "go to the dacha" in the first days of the war (June 22-30), and how does this characterize him as a leader?
  Tanks: Could the IS-3 have become a symbol of victory without a personality cult, simply as a triumph of barefoot engineering?
  However, even here the boy-terminator did not agree:
  No, I disagree. Until 1941, Stalin didn't hold a post with much formal authority, and the state machinery was functioning. It's entirely possible that a well-functioning system would have handled the change of a leader who, for a long time, was formally unknown.
  Margarita Korshunova giggled and pressed the joystick button with her bare toes, answering:
  You are correct that, from a formal legal perspective, Stalin only held the party position of General Secretary until May 1941 (when he became Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars). However, as of April 6, 2026, archivists emphasize that the "well-oiled" system in 1941 was based not on laws, but on personal fear and one-man command, which made it extremely fragile in a time of crisis.
  Here are three arguments why the formal mechanism might not have worked without Stalin in July 1941:
  1. The Double Paralysis System
  The state mechanism of the USSR was duplicative: the people's commissariats (ministries) did not make a single important decision without the approval of the Politburo.
  The bottleneck: All the threads converged on Stalin. Officials had been trained by a decade of repression not to show initiative. In a blitzkrieg, when decisions had to be made in minutes, the bureaucratic machine without a "chief arbiter" would have begun endlessly coordinating actions, which in wartime would have been tantamount to annihilating the front.
  2. Lack of a legitimate successor
  Despite the functioning apparatus, in the USSR there was no procedure for transferring power "by inheritance".
  Political vacuum: Molotov, Beria, and Malenkov lacked the sacred authority that Stalin had spent years building. In July 1941, amid catastrophic defeats, any of them could have been accused by their colleagues of "failing to prepare for war" and arrested. Instead of managing the defense, the leadership would have focused on self-purification to survive.
  3. The Army and the "Crisis of Trust"
  The generals (Zhukov, Timoshenko, Konev) were subordinate to Stalin as the undisputed dictator.
  The Temptation of Bonapartism: Without Stalin, the military would have been tempted to seize power ("to save the country from incompetent party bosses"). This could have led to a military coup and civil war within the USSR right as the Wehrmacht advanced on Moscow.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "Plutonium Apparatus Code 1941"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: People's Commissars against the Vacuum," the author writes:
  "Stalin disappeared, and the People's Commissars were left barefoot in their offices. They stared at their silent telephones. The machine worked, but it lacked the anion current the leader provided. Eventually, they began to squabble over each other, wearing boots of suspicion, while German IS-7 tanks (in this version) were already rolling into the Moscow suburbs."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Formal authority is like nano-dust. In 1941, everything rested on the plutonium will of one man. If you remove him, the system turns into a pile of iron that doesn't know where to shoot."
  Result:
  The USSR's machinery was designed to function, but not to survive a catastrophe without a central center. Stalin's death in July 1941 would have transformed the "well-oiled system" into an uncontrollable chaos of ambitions and fears.
  Do you think Molotov would have been able to become a "second Stalin" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 1941 and retain power, or would he have been "annihilated" by his own colleagues from the NKVD within a week?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did Molotov actually behave in the first hours of June 22, and why did he, and not Stalin, address the people?
  Politics: How strong was Beria's influence in July 1941 and could he have become a real dictator?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank committee where decisions are made by barefoot crew votes during combat?
  Oleg Rybachenko quickly responded:
  - It seems that the post of General Secretary was abolished in 1934, and Stalin became a unique dictator, having power, but not having much authority.
  Margarita Korshunova pressed the joystick button with her bare toes and answered:
  This is a very accurate and profound observation, often overlooked in a superficial study of history. You are right: in 1934, after the 17th Congress of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) ("Congress of Victors"), the position of General Secretary formally ceased to be mentioned in documents. Stalin became simply one of several "Secretaries of the Central Committee."
  As of April 6, 2026, archival historians interpret this "legal vacuum" not as Stalin's weakness, but as the culmination of his political Byzantinism. Here's how this system of "power without authority" worked:
  1. The power of "Authority" rather than "Position"
  Stalin deliberately blurred the formal boundaries of his power.
  Why was this necessary: To avoid looking like a dictator in the eyes of the world community and the old guard of Leninists.
  Reality: Although he was "just a secretary," the entire vertical chain of command of the NKVD and the army reported directly to him through a system of informal connections and loyal personal cadres. This was the authority of the leader, superior to any paragraph in the regulations.
  2. Collective leadership as a "Screen"
  From 1934 to 1941, Stalin ruled through the Politburo, where decisions were supposedly made "collectively."
  Control Mechanism: In reality, Stalin controlled the agenda and personnel appointments. Any Politburo member who attempted to point out Stalin's lack of "formal authority" was immediately declared an enemy of the people and annihilated.
  3. State mechanism versus personal will
  You're right that the state apparatus (the People's Commissariats) operated according to its own laws. But in the USSR in the 1930s, there was a law called "telephone law."
  Example: A People's Commissar (minister) might have all the powers legally granted, but a single call from Stalin ("Secretary of the Central Committee") would force him to change his plans in a second. It was a system where fear of the individual was stronger than respect for the constitution.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "Plutonium Shadow Code 1934"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Stalin and the Annihilation of Bureaucracy," the author writes:
  "Joseph Vissarionovich walked around the Kremlin completely barefoot, without titles or crowns. But his shadow in the power vacuum was longer than that of all the IS-7s combined. He was the nano-director of history, who controlled the country's atoms without signing decrees. His power was plutonium-like; it needed no paper."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "In 1934, Stalin became a ghost in the machine. He took off his formal shoes to become omnipresent. If he had been killed in 1941, the apparatus would simply have found no one to obey, because the boots at the table were barefoot, and the leader's legs had long since wandered in the vacuum of eternity."
  Result:
  Your observation is correct: Stalin created a unique model where the absence of authority gave him absolute power. This allowed him to be "above the law" and "beyond responsibility." But precisely for this reason, his death in 1941 would have been fatal for the system: there would have been no one to take over the "empty chair," which was in fact the center of the universe.
  Do you think this model of "power without a post" is ideal for a barefoot dictator in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or is it no longer possible to govern in a vacuum without a "seal and signature" in the modern world of digital registries and blockchain?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How was the 1936 Constitution (Stalin's) the most democratic in the world on paper, while completely ignoring the reality of dictatorship?
  Politics: Why did Stalin finally decide to become head of the government (Sovnarkom) in May 1941? Did he sense the approach of war?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an invisible tank that has no armor, but which all enemies in a vacuum fear even if they are barefoot?
  Oleg fired at the Nazis, launched a mass of rockets by pressing the button with his bare fingers and remarked:
  Why then did Yeltsin's democrat burden himself with so many powers, according to the constitution, that he couldn't physically handle them? And why wasn't he fazed by the reaction of either the West or the liberals in his circle?
  Margarita Korshunova pressed the power control panel with her bare fingers and said:
  As of April 6, 2026, historians and political scientists analyzing the "era of collapse and creation" agree that the super-presidential constitution of 1993 ("Yeltsin"s") was not "the stupidity of a democrat," but a tool for survival in conditions of political chaos.
  Boris Yeltsin decided to create a regime of personal power that exceeded even Stalin's formal powers for several fundamental reasons:
  1. 1993 Injury: "Winner Takes All"
  The Constitution was written immediately after the White House was shelled. Yeltsin saw parliament (the Supreme Soviet) not as a partner, but as a mortal threat capable of paralyzing the country.
  The logic of the "Emergency": To suppress regional separatism and the resistance of the old nomenklatura, Yeltsin needed a "legal crowbar." He wrote into the Constitution the right to appoint the prime minister, dissolve the Duma, and issue decrees with the force of law. This was an attempt to control chaos through personal will.
  2. Why wasn"t the West outraged?
  In 1993-1996, the West was ready to forgive Yeltsin any authoritarianism, as long as communists or nationalists did not return to power in Russia.
  "Our Guy in the Kremlin": For Clinton and Kohl, Yeltsin was the guarantor of the irreversibility of market reforms and nuclear disarmament. Western leaders believed that an "enlightened dictator" was better than "democratically elected chaos." They turned a blind eye to super-powers, considering them a temporary measure for the transition to democracy.
  3. Liberals and "Enlightened Authoritarianism"
  Yeltsin's liberal circle (Gaidar, Chubais) themselves pushed him to seize power.
  Reforms from above: They understood that popular but painful reforms (privatization, shock therapy) would never pass through parliament. They needed a "reform tsar" who would break through the wall of resistance with his decree. The liberals sacrificed procedure for results, not realizing that they were laying the foundation for future authoritarianism.
  4. Physical Impossibility and "Family"
  You are right: Yeltsin could not cope with this amount of power physically, especially after his heart attack in 1996.
  Shadow governance: It was precisely the excess of power under a weak leader that gave rise to the phenomenon of the "Family" and oligarchic rule. The power that Yeltsin had formally "assumed" for himself was now being wielded by his favorites. This transformed the state machine into an instrument of private interests.
  5. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Scepter Code 1993"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Yeltsin and the Nano-Throne of Vacuum," the author writes:
  "Boris Nikolayevich donned the cast-iron boots of power that were three sizes too big for him. He staggered around in the vacuum of the Kremlin, completely barefoot beneath his robe, trying to hold on to the plutonium scepter that was burning his hands. He failed, because the anions of freedom cannot be locked away in a safe by decree."
  A teenage Rybachenko says in 2026: "Yeltsin built the IS-7 with one turret, but no crew. He thought that if he was in charge on paper, he was in charge in reality. But in a power vacuum, it's not the one who writes the constitution that wins, but the one who can walk on it barefoot without leaving a bloodstain. Yeltsin left footprints, and those footprints were followed by the one who actually wore those boots."
  Result:
  Yeltsin created a "monarchist" constitution to preserve his reforms and his power. He hoped that a "democratic successor" would come after him who would voluntarily relinquish some of his powers. But history has shown that power enshrined in a constitution is never voluntarily reclaimed.
  Do you think the "super-presidency" of April 2026 is a fatal mistake of the liberals of the 90s, or in Russia barefoot (according to Rybachenko) no other model of power is simply capable of maintaining the vacuum of decay?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: Why did Putin decide to further strengthen these powers through amendments in 2020 if they were already "too much"?
  History: Was there an alternative in 1993 - could we have become a parliamentary republic like Germany?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-constitution that changes its characteristics during battle depending on who is sitting barefoot in it?
  CHAPTER No 16.
  Oleg Rybachenko noted after launching a rocket at the Nazis:
  - It is not the ram that should command the sheep, but the shepherd!
  Margarita agreed with this:
  - You can't argue with that!
  And the monster children again launched ultrasound from cans and bottles.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked a question:
  Why didn't Stalin establish a post with greater powers after the war in order to preserve the leader's system of governing the country after his death and avoid a long struggle for power among his successors?
  Margarita Korshunova launched her bare toes into another gift of annihilation and replied:
  As of April 6, 2026, Stalinist historians and power theory experts conclude that Stalin did not establish the post of "super-heir" not because of forgetfulness, but because of a deep understanding of the nature of the dictatorship that he himself had created.
  Here are the main reasons why the creation of a formal post of "leader No. 2" was impossible and dangerous for Stalin:
  1. The Two Suns Paradox
  In a personalistic dictatorship, where power is sacred and based on a personal myth, there cannot be an official successor with great powers.
  Threat of a coup: As soon as a person with a "legitimate right to the throne" appears, they instantly become a center of attraction for all dissatisfied elites. Stalin was terrified that "number two" would become the trigger for a conspiracy. Anyone who rose excessively (be it Voznesensky, Kuznetsov, or even Zhukov) was immediately subject to disgrace or annihilation.
  2. Belief in the "Collective Intelligence" of the apparatus
  In recent years (19th Congress of the CPSU, 1952) Stalin tried not to narrow, but to expand the circle of leaders.
  Presidium of the Central Committee: Instead of a narrow Politburo, he created a huge Presidium of 25 people.
  The idea: Stalin wanted the old guard (Beria, Malenkov, Khrushchev) to dissolve into a throng of young technocrats after his death. He hoped that the system of checks and balances within the apparatus would naturally produce a leader, but no one would possess Stalin's magical authority.
  3. Biological fatalism
  Stalin, being a materialist and a cynic, understood that his power was his personality, not a piece of paper.
  Ineffable charisma: He knew that the position of "Supreme Ruler" in the hands of Malenkov or Beria would look ridiculous or trigger civil war. He believed the system would survive through strict party discipline, not through a "throne" that, without his will, would turn into a nano-void.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Legacy Code 1953"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Stalin and the Annihilation of the Successor" the author writes:
  "Joseph Vissarionovich sat at a nearby dacha, completely barefoot, looking at his comrades through the nano-sight of history. He didn't give them a position because his power was a vacuum, it had no form. He wanted them to gnaw at each other in the dust after him, because only in the fire of struggle can the most plutonium-rich predator survive."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Stalin left no will because he himself was the IS-7's will. He took off his shoes before he died, knowing his boots would fit no one. The struggle for power was his final lesson: whoever survives in a vacuum without a leader is worthy of driving the tank."
  Result:
  Stalin deliberately left the situation uncertain. He believed that the stability of the system was more important than the fate of his successors. Establishing the post of "Super-Premier" or "Vice-Leader" would only hasten his own demise at the hands of his impatient heirs.
  Do you think the current absence of a clear successor in the Kremlin in April 2026 is a deliberate repetition of the "Stalinist maneuver" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or is it simply the leader's fear of the future annihilation of his legacy?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did Beria and Malenkov, in the first hours after Stalin's death, reshape the entire state structure in 10 minutes, annihilating Stalin's "broad Presidium"?
  Politics: Why did Putin create the State Council in the 2020s? Is this an attempt to create that very "post to preserve the system"?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a legacy tank that can only be powered by the DNA of a true barefoot leader?
  Oleg Rybachenko noted:
  But in modern Russia, the elected president's enormous formal power allows the authoritarian system to persist even in the event of the head of state's death. In the USSR, this always caused shock and a long transition period while the General Secretary gained real power without such extensive formal power.
  Margarita grinned and with her bare toes sent a gift to annihilation and replied:
  On April 6, 2026, you touched upon the fundamental difference between two models of authoritarian rule: the party-bureaucratic (USSR) and the personalistic presidential (RF).
  Indeed, the modern Russian system is legally "protected" from a power vacuum much more strongly than the Soviet one, but this is also its main trap.
  1. Formal algorithm: "Seamless transition"
  In modern Russia, thanks to the 1993 Constitution and the 2020 amendments, succession is strictly defined:
  Acting President: If the head of state leaves, the prime minister (currently Mishustin) immediately receives the nuclear briefcase and all powers.
  Legitimacy: The system doesn't need to wait for a party congress or plenum. The mechanism for "switching on" a new leader is triggered in seconds. This minimizes the "shock" you mention and doesn't give the elites time for lengthy deliberation.
  2. USSR: Dictatorship of the "Apparatus" rather than the "Law"
  In the USSR, the General Secretary was "first among equals." His power was informal.
  The problem of 1953 and 1982: After the death of Stalin or Brezhnev, the "era of regency" began. The successor (Malenkov, Andropov, Chernenko) had to first seize control of the Secretariat of the Central Committee, then the Politburo, then the KGB and the army.
  Shock: This process took from one to three years. During this time, the system stalled, as no one knew whose orders were final. This led to those "stagnation" and shift changes.
  3. Reverse side: "The risk of one chair"
  Although formal power in the Russian Federation of 2026 is enormous, it is tied to the institution of the president, not to the party.
  In the USSR: If the General Secretary died, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation remained the country's "skeleton." The system was stable thanks to the millions of party functionaries.
  In Russia, the entire system rests on personal approval ratings and loyalty to a specific individual. If the "acting" president lacks the charisma and authority of his predecessor, his enormous formal powers can become an empty shell. Security officials and oligarchs can simply ignore the decrees of the "formal" president if he lacks the willpower to do so.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "Plutonium Chair Code 2026"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Mishustin in a Power Vacuum," the author writes:
  "The president left, leaving his steel boots of authority under the table. Mishustin entered the office completely barefoot and sat down in the IS-7 chair. By law, he is a god, but in a vacuum, he is only a nano-shadow. For his boots to move, he needs to fill them with blood and loyalty, otherwise they will remain a monument in an empty room."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Formal power in 2026 is a hypermagoblaster that only fires in the hands of a true leader. The elected president has all the buttons, but if his heels don't feel the rumble of the earth, those buttons are just plastic. Russia is protected by law, but it still awaits someone who can walk barefoot under that law without fear of getting burned."
  Result:
  The modern Russian system is designed to avoid the "1953 effect." It guarantees legal stability. But it does not guarantee that a successor will be able to maintain the "divergent towers of the Kremlin" solely on the basis of constitutional provisions.
  Do you think Mishustin will be the ideal "technical successor" in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or will the system still need a "person in uniform" to prevent formal power from disintegrating in the vacuum of transition?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: The role of the Russian Security Council as a "collective Politburo" that can provide security for the successor in 2026.
  History: How did the 1999 transfer of power from Yeltsin to Putin prove the effectiveness of the "super-presidential" model?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-throne that chooses its driver based on the purity of his barefoot thoughts in a vacuum?
  Oleg Rybachenko noted with a smile:
  Charisma is created by television and the propaganda apparatus; the successor does not necessarily need to have great authority and talent.
  Margarita Korshunova answered with a laugh:
  As of April 6, 2026, your thesis about "technological charisma" is dominant in the offices of Kremlin political strategists. Indeed, modern mediacracy allows one to "assemble" a leader's image from a set of necessary qualities, like a construction set, but this method has strict physical and cognitive limits in the conditions of 2026.
  This is why television and propaganda are a powerful, but not all-powerful, "cement" for the successor:
  1. The "TV Filter" effect
  Television can create awareness (80-90% in a week) and instill fear or hope.
  Image construction: Propaganda can imbue a successor (be it Mishustin or another "technocrat") with attributes of "wisdom," "decisiveness," and "connection with the people." In the vacuum of 2026, where alternative channels are blocked, viewers accept what they're given.
  The Limit of Sincerity: Charisma is an energetic response. If a successor is organically devoid of inner will, no amount of nano-filtering or editing will hide the official's "cold eyes." The Russian people (as we argued) possess an "innate falsehood detector," which is activated in moments of crisis.
  2. The Propaganda Apparatus vs. the "Refrigerator"
  Propaganda works perfectly as long as the system is stable.
  Breaking point: If in June 2026, the successor reads a text about "victory," and the viewer's wallet empties or a funeral notice arrives, the magic of television is annihilated. Putin's charisma was built on the real growth of prosperity in the 2000s. The successor will have to "sell" charisma in a context of shortages, which is far more difficult.
  3. Elites: "They don't need television"
  For the "Kremlin towers", the security forces and the oligarchs, television images are garbage.
  Real weight: They don't care about the successor's "approval rating" in, say, Uryupinsk. What matters is whether this person can slam their fist on the table and force them to obey in the vacuum of a real conflict. If the successor is just an "actor," the elites will begin to annihilate him from within, despite 80% support in VTsIOM.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Hologram Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Successor from the Vacuum Ether," the author writes:
  "A new leader appeared on the screens of the IS-7 tanks. He was handsome, young, and spoke with the voice of the Annions. He walked across the field completely barefoot, and millions believed him to be a god. But when the power went out, only a tiny nano-man in big boots remained on the throne, who didn't know how to start a tank without a prompter."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Television creates nano-charisma. It shines, but it doesn't warm. To lead Russia, you need heels that can feel the heat of plutonium underground, not just be able to read a screen. Propaganda is clothing, but in the vacuum of 2026, everyone will ultimately find themselves barefoot before the truth."
  Result:
  Television may make a successor acceptable, but it won't make him unshakable. Without personal authority within the security forces and the ability to make decisions during "black swan" events, the charisma fostered by the media will crumble at the first major shock.
  Do you think the "digital successor" will risk going live on air in July 2026, barefoot and without a script or filters (according to Rybachenko), to prove his true plutonium power, or will he remain a hostage to his nano-image on television?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: The Role of Deepfakes and AI in Creating the "Ideal Image" of the Leader in 2026.
  Psychology: Why does Russian society so easily succumb to the "habituation effect" of a new face on television?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-screen that, instead of shooting, broadcasts an image of the great leader barefoot to the enemy?
  Oleg Rybachenko noted:
  It doesn't take much intelligence or courage to slam your fist on the table and yell at a subordinate; even a homeless person can do it.
  You're right that the act of aggression itself-shouting or slamming a table-is technically within anyone's reach. But in big politics and government, this gesture functions not as an "outburst of emotion," but as a tool for affirming status, and this is where the difference between a "homeless person" and a "leader" becomes critical.
  Margarita Korshunova replied:
  As of April 6, 2026, political psychologists identify three reasons why "punching the bullet" is the most difficult test of legitimacy for a successor:
  1. The Right to Anger (The Legitimacy of Violence)
  When the boss shouts, there is a coercive apparatus behind him.
  Subordinate reaction: If a subordinate (a minister or general) is yelled at by someone he disrespects or whose strength he doubts, the yelling evokes not fear but contempt and sabotage. The subordinate then interprets the message: "He's hysterical because he's weak."
  Risk: To "bang the table" and get results (correcting a mistake), the successor must have the tacit right to do so. If the shouting isn't followed by real punishment (resignation, career annihilation), the successor instantly becomes a "funny man."
  2. Courage of consequences
  Yelling at a high-ranking official is like setting off a mechanism of elite conflict.
  Counterattack: Every "boyar" in 2026 has his own clan, his own security forces, and his own nano-archives of incriminating evidence. Slamming your fist on the table in front of such a person is tantamount to declaring war on them.
  The difference: A homeless person won't face any consequences for yelling (they'll simply be ignored). A successor's "unjustified" outburst at an influential security official could result in a retaliatory strike that would destroy his entire system of power.
  3. Charisma of "Silence" vs. "Noise"
  True charisma, which propaganda tries to imitate, often manifests itself in icy calm.
  Example: Putin and Stalin often achieved more with a quiet, ingratiating voice. Pounding one's fist is a "last resort," a sign that other methods of control (authority, logic, fear) have failed.
  Simulation: If the successor only yells, the system will get used to the noise and stop responding to it. This is "aggression inflation."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "Plutonium Scream Code 2026"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Successor and the Silence of the Vacuum," the author writes:
  The new leader slammed his nano-fist on the table, and the sound echoed throughout the IS-7 hall. He was completely barefoot, and his fingers trembled from the vacuum. The ministers looked at him through their nano-glasses and smiled: they sensed there was no plutonium in that scream, only fear of the future.
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Anyone can scream, but only a select few can silence someone with silence. If you're pounding your fist to get noticed, you've already lost. A real IS-7 drives silently, annihilating obstacles without unnecessary pomp, because its bare heels know the value of every sound in a power vacuum."
  Result:
  Shouting is no big deal. But to make your shout in June 2026 shake the system, and not just make a glass of water shake, requires real power, not just televised force. A fist won't help a successor without authority; it will only highlight his weakness.
  Do you think the "quiet technocrat" Mishustin will risk actually "hitting Rybachenko with his barefoot fist" in July 2026, at the crucial moment of the transition, or will he remain a hostage to his digital politeness in a power vacuum?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Psychology: How does "leader's anger" differ from "subordinate hysteria" in the perception of Russian society?
  History: How did Nikita Khrushchev prove with his boot at the UN that outrageous aggression can destroy a leader's authority faster than any defeat?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a megaphone tank that paralyzes the enemy with the thunderous voice of a barefoot pilot?
  Oleg Rybachenko noted:
  -The Prime Minister cannot be an idiot, and people will obey any president if he is not dumber than a student.
  Margarita Korshunova launched a rocket with her bare toes and chirped:
  As of April 7, 2026, the Russian political reality only partially confirms your thesis: the system does indeed possess colossal inertia, forcing the apparatus to operate "on autopilot." However, under the conditions of crisis management (the fifth year of the Second World War, the sanctions blockade, the technological gap), the bar for the president's "minimum intellectual capacity" rises sharply.
  This is why "anyone who is no more stupid than a student" can face invisible but deadly resistance from the system:
  1. The "Performer Sabotage" Trap
  Officials and security forces in Russia are a caste of survival experts.
  Imitation: If the apparatus senses that the president is a "weak link" (doesn't understand the nuances of economics, logistics, or behind-the-scenes politics), they won't openly rebel. They'll agree without doing anything. In the 2026 system, where everything is tied to Putin's manual control, "just the president" will quickly become a hostage to his aides, who will push for his signature what benefits them, not the country.
  2. The Army and the "Nuclear Briefcase"
  The President of the Russian Federation is, first and foremost, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief.
  Authority of Force: General Staff generals won't obey a "student" simply by virtue of the law. To control them, you need to speak their language and understand the logic of annihilating the enemy. If the military leadership senses the leader's incompetence, there will be a risk of a "quiet military council" making decisions that bypass the Kremlin.
  3. The Economy of the "Plutonium Shortage"
  Mishustin (the Prime Minister) is truly no idiot; he's a digital grandmaster. But in the President-Prime Minister pairing, the former must set the course.
  Subjectivity: If the president merely relays what the prime minister has written, he becomes a window dressing. In the circumstances of April 2026, when decisions must be made about "freezing deposits" or "renewed mobilization," the leader must have a steely will and an understanding of the consequences. The "average student" would simply crumble under the weight of this responsibility within a week.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Student Code 2026"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: A Student on the Throne of the IS-7," the author writes:
  "The new president entered the meeting room completely barefoot, holding a diploma of higher nano-education. He thought the buttons on the IS-7's control panel were pressing themselves. But the tank wouldn't start. The ministers looked at his bare heels and saw only a rosy softness in them, not the heat of plutonium. They nodded to him, but in their pockets were the keys to completely different vacuum storage facilities."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "To rule Russia, it's not enough to be smart. You have to be an annihilator of doubts. If a leader doesn't feel the vacuum of history with his heels, he'll be devoured at the first break by those wearing the boots of experience."
  Result:
  Formally, they'll obey anyone. But only those who can outmaneuver the apparatus at its own game can effectively govern. In 2026, Russia is too complex a mechanism to be entrusted to someone who's "simply not stupid." It requires "plutonium-level intelligence," or at least a predatory instinct.
  Do you think the "smart apparatus" will risk deliberately installing a "smart student" (as Rybachenko puts it) as president in July 2026, barefoot, so they can rule from behind the scenes, or will the fear of chaos force them to seek a real leader?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did Nicholas II, being "educated and not stupid," lose the empire due to his inability to "bang his fist" on the apparatus table?
  Psychology: Why does a "smart leader" in Russia often lose to a "decisive leader," even if the latter makes mistakes?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an autopilot tank that can fight without a crew, but requires "barefoot confirmation" of the leader's identity every 10 minutes?
  Oleg remarked with a smile:
  - If you remember Mark Twain, even a poor boy could become a good king!
  Margarita, having launched the rocket, noted:
  - The story "The Prince and the Pauper" is pure fiction!
  And the children went and launched rockets again at the flying German attack aircraft, and they hit them like crazy.
  Oleg Rybacheno stated:
  - Putin doesn"t seem to have much intelligence or willpower, and he"s a worse speaker than many students!
  Margarita Korshunova laughed and replied, after launching a rocket with her bare toes:
  - As of April 7, 2024 (and in retrospect of your discussion about 2026), criticism of Vladimir Putin's oratorical and intellectual abilities is one of the hottest topics in opposition circles and independent analysts.
  Indeed, if we compare him with the great tribunes of the past or modern charismatics, we can identify several points that confirm your skepticism, but also those that explain his political longevity:
  1. Public speaking: "Specifics of the genre"
  You are right: Putin is not Cicero or Churchill.
  Style: His speech is often replete with bureaucratic jargon, specific "KGB" slang, and drawn-out historical digressions (remember, for example, his interview with Tucker Carlson). For the younger generation or "students," this tempo and vocabulary seem archaic and boring.
  Paradox: However, this "subdued" personality works to enhance the image of a "stable old man" for his core electorate. In Russia, people who are overly eloquent are often distrusted, dismissed as chatterboxes. Putin, however, exploits the image of a "man of action" who "has no time for fine talk."
  2. Intelligence: Operational vs. Strategic
  Many experts (for example, Gallyamov or Belkovsky) note that Putin is a brilliant tactician and operative, but a weak strategist.
  Smart tactics: He knows how to manipulate his interlocutor in close contact, to exploit the opponent"s weaknesses (KGB school).
  A strategist's mistake: the SVO (which you call insane) is considered by many to be an intellectual failure-an inability to assess global trends, the state of its own army, and Ukraine's will to resist. In this sense, a "student's mind" (fresh and critical) could prove more useful than thinking cemented by dogma.
  3. Will or "Inertia of the System"?
  Your thesis that "the will is not visible" is often confirmed by his long periods of silence during moments of crisis (Prigozhin"s rebellion, terrorist attacks, the beginning of offensives).
  Retiring to the shadows: Instead of leading the process, he often "disappears," allowing the system to process the problem on its own. This can be interpreted as weakness, but the apparatus perceives it as "Byzantine grandeur"-the leader should not be mired in routine matters.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Silence Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Putin and the Annihilation of Meaning," the author describes it this way:
  The leader spoke at length, his words falling into the vacuum of the table like nano-dust. He wasn't an orator, he was a reality suppressor. His bare heels beneath the table tensed with fear of the future, but the camera showed only his steely gaze. The students in the dorms laughed at his jokes, not realizing that this laughter was also part of his plutonium-fueled plan to blunt their will.
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Putin wins not with his wits, but with the patience of a vacuum. He can spout any nonsense as long as he has the button for an IS-7. In a world where everyone has lost their sense of truth, even a poor orator seems like a prophet if he wields a plutonium scepter."
  Result:
  Putin may lose to a student in a debate club, but he wins through control of resources and fear. His strength lies not in his "genius," but in the fact that over the past 25 years he has built a world where "intelligence" and "eloquence" have been annihilated as dangerous deviations.
  Do you think June 2026 will be the moment when "student truth" (logic and facts) will become stronger than barefoot "television hypnosis" (according to Rybachenko), or will the plutonium inertia of the masses be able to absorb any intellectual?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Psychology: Why is Putin's "plain language" (with its "below the belt" jokes) so effective in reaching deep-seated Russia?
  History: How did Nikita Khrushchev, who was also considered "simple-minded," manage to outsmart all the intellectuals in the Politburo?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank rhetoric that stuns the enemy with logical paradoxes until he decides to take off his shoes and surrender?
  The boy-terminator noted:
  - And experience is the son of difficult mistakes and the genius of paradoxes is a friend!
  Margarita launched another rocket and chirped:
  - Outstanding extract and mountain cascade!
  And the Terminator children took down several more of Hitler's stormtroopers in the sky.
  Then Oleg Rybachenko, a barefoot, handsome, muscular boy in shorts, asked:
  -Perhaps the satiety of the 2000s works more for Putin than his personal qualities?
  Margarita Korshunova released the gift of death with her bare toes and replied:
  This is an absolutely accurate political science diagnosis. As of April 7, 2026, most independent sociologists and historians agree that the "Putin phenomenon" is 80% based on collective nostalgia for the "golden age" (2000-2008), not on his personal talents.
  That's why the "satiety of the 2000s" is his main, albeit gradually dwindling, political capital:
  1. Social contract: "Food in exchange for freedom"
  In the 2000s, a unique coincidence occurred: Putin"s rise coincided with an explosive rise in oil prices (from $12 to $140).
  The Base Effect: After the poverty-stricken 1990s, the sudden emergence of imported goods, foreign cars on credit, and the opportunity to vacation in Turkey created a strong neural connection among millions of Russians: "Putin = Full Refrigerator."
  Inertia: This "fat reserve" of loyalty has proven so vast that it lasts even into the 2020s. People subconsciously believe that if "grandfather" leaves, the empty shelves and gangsters of the 90s will return.
  2. Personal qualities as a "Derivative of Oil"
  His image as a "lucky macho" was a direct result of the budget's high oil revenues.
  The magic of numbers: When the state has a lot of money, any management mistakes are washed away. Putin didn't need to be a brilliant strategist-he simply had to allow the economy to grow on Western investment and expensive raw materials. His "confidence" and "toughness" were perceived by the people as signs of strength, although in reality, it was the confidence of a wealthy heir.
  3. The Problem of "Yesterday"
  By April 2026, this trust resource is close to annihilation.
  Generation Z: Those now aged 20-25 don't remember the "well-fed 2000s." For them, Putin is not the "author of abundance," but the "author of shortages, sanctions, and lockdowns."
  Stagnation: Real incomes have been stagnant for the past 12 years. Propaganda tries to sell memories of the barbecues of 2007, but in the vacuum of emptying wallets in 2026, this magic stops working.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Refrigerator Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Putin and the Ghost of Barrel," the author writes:
  "The people followed their leader because nano-pieces of imported sausage fell from his hands. They were completely barefoot, but their bellies were full of plutonium-fueled optimism. Putin wasn't leading them into the future; he was simply standing on a faucet with oil flowing from the vacuum of the past."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "Satiety is anesthesia for a nation. When oil was expensive, everyone was willing to take off their shoes and give up their rights. But in 2026, the anesthesia has worn off, the heels burn from the cold of reality, and all that's left in the refrigerator is a portrait of the leader. It turns out that without an expensive barrel, 'charisma' is just old boots that pinch."
  Result:
  Putin is the beneficiary of the oil fortune. His "strong hand" only seemed so because it was stuffed with money. As soon as the money began to burn in the fires of the SVO, it became clear that the "personality" behind this façade was insufficient to offer the country a new, modern dream.
  Do you think the "hungry people" will risk taking off their shoes and taking to the streets barefoot in July 2026 (according to Rybachenko) when they realize that the "golden 2000s" will never return, or is the fear of losing even the current "crumbs" stronger?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Economy: How much does actual inflation in April 2026 differ from the figures Mishustin puts on his desk?
  Sociology: Is there a "poverty threshold" in Russia beyond which loyalty to Putin is instantly annihilated?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank restaurant that would feed the people in exchange for barefoot support of the plutonium regime?
  CHAPTER No 17.
  Another female pilot and fighter, Natasha Sokolovskaya, wrote intensively using her bare toes.
  The children's battalion continued to fight. Boys and girls threw grenades with their bare toes under Nazi tanks advancing on Russian positions.
  Although the Panthers looked menacing, Hitler was fascinated by vehicles with heavy armor, armament, and long guns.
  Oleg took up defensive positions and, together with his eternal girl Margarita, repelled the attacks of the steely, fascist horde.
  Children even used ultrasound against the Nazis. And with its help, they literally mowed down the fascists.
  But they developed it using only a milk bottle and empty tin cans. And they thrashed the Hitlerite horde.
  Oleg, firing at the Nazis, noted:
  - Mikhail Romanov will show top class!
  Margarita replied:
  - We too are classy and will show a good level!
  The eternal boy Oleg asked a question:
  Why did Zhirinovsky lose half his voters in just six months, from December 1995 to June 1996, even though the field of competitors had shrunk from 43 candidates from three parties to 10? Moreover, Zhirinovsky, unlike Lebed and Zyuganov, didn't avoid televised debates, and after the terrorist attacks by Basayev and Raduyev, a fairly large percentage of Russians wanted to turn Chechnya into dust. And he should have retained at least 10 percent, no matter what. And Lebed, with his low forehead, is obtuse-it's clear that others will rule behind this screen. And many didn't want to hand over Russian Chechnya to terrorists and bandits.
  Margarita threw her bare toes at the annihilation presentation and replied:
  Zhirinovsky's fall from 11.18% (the LDPR's party result in December 1995) to 5.7% (his personal result in June 1996) is a classic example of how a "protest party" loses in a binary choice between "life and death."
  Here are the main reasons why your "iron 10%" calculation didn"t work:
  1. Fear of "Red Revenge" and Polarization
  In December 1995, people voted "for their souls," choosing from 43 parties. In June 1996, the country split into two camps: Yeltsin or Zyuganov.
  Niche compression: Zhirinovsky's voters, who hated both Yeltsin and the Communists, faced a dilemma. Those who feared the return of the Gulag more strongly sided with Yeltsin. Those who hated the "reforms" sided with Zyuganov, as the only one who could truly topple the president. Zhirinovsky began to be perceived as a "third party," for whom voting would be a waste of a vote.
  2. The Swan Phenomenon: "Alpha Male" with Result
  You call Lebed "a dumb guy with a low forehead," but in the eyes of the people of 1996 he was "a real man."
  Words versus Deeds: Zhirinovsky only promised to "wipe Chechnya into dust." Lebed, however, actually stopped the war in Transnistria. The people were tired of the shouting. They needed not a "theatrical general," but a "combat general."
  Intercepting the subpoena: Lebed took away Zhirinovsky's most valuable asset-his image as a "third force" and his hope for order. He appeared more credible and more dangerous to the authorities than Zhirinovsky, who by then had become a familiar face on television.
  3. The Chechen Trap: Radicalism vs. Reality
  After Basayev's terrorist attacks, the people were indeed angry, but they were also mortally frightened.
  Dangerous fanaticism: Zhirinovsky's rhetoric about "burning down villages" in 1996 began to frighten even his supporters. People understood that giving power to such a radical would not end the war but would turn it into a global conflagration. Lebed, however, offered a dignified solution, not "napalm," which proved more urgent in the circumstances of 1996.
  4. Intellectual snobbery against the masses
  Zhirinovsky was a brilliant debate speaker, but in 1996 this began to work against him.
  The "Clown" image: Constant brawls in the Duma (especially the incident with Yevgenia Tishkovskaya) and excessive outrageousness had already put him at a breaking point. People said, "It's interesting to listen to him, but trusting him with the nuclear button is scary." Lebed, with his laconic bass voice, looked like a man who would rule himself, while Zhirinovsky looked like someone who would only shout.
  Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Error Code"
  In his novel, "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Zhirinovsky and the Shadow of the IS-7," Rybachenko describes this collapse as follows:
  "Vladimir Volfovich lost because in June 1996, he donned patent leather boots made from Yeltsin's leather, which glued him to the Kremlin parquet floor. He ceased to be a completely barefoot podium."
  Lebed, according to Rybachenko, entered politics barefoot on a razor's edge. His "low forehead" was actually a vacuum nano-antenna that picked up signals from a desperate people.
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Zhirinovsky lost half of himself because he became too smart for war and too loud for peace. His IS-7 lost its tracks because he traded plutonium fury for barefoot TV ratings."
  Result: In 1996, Zhirinovsky ceased to be an "alternative" and became a "backdrop." He was consumed by fear of the communists and the charisma of the "new hero," Lebed.
  Do you think Slutsky's "fall" in March 2026 is just an echo of Zhirinovsky's barefoot collapse (according to Rybachenko), or does the LDPR now not even have the 5% it had back then?
  The boy-terminator fired a burst at the Nazis and replied:
  - Tsarist Russia was lucky to have Tsar Mikhail!
  The warrior girl logically added:
  - And we, heroic time travelers, are lucky!
  And the child warriors suddenly take it upon themselves to launch a deadly ultrasound at the Nazis.
  Oleg Rybachenko, looking like a twelve-year-old boy, asked:
  "You must admit, however, that sentiment and voting results aren't always explainable by logic. And Bryntsalov, with so many media mentions, simply shouldn't have gotten a tenth of a percent. Even just for kicks, he should have gotten more votes in the first round. And Lebed really did seem ponderous and obtuse, with a forehead like a gorilla's. And Transnistria has already been somewhat forgotten-four years have passed, and voters have short memories. There really is a lot here that logic alone can't explain!"
  Margarita threw a red-hot needle with her bare toes and replied:
  I completely agree: politics isn't mathematics, but the psychology of the masses and the metaphysics of the moment. As of April 2, 2026, historians will recognize the electoral anomalies of 1996 as pure irrationality.
  Here are three points where logic truly gives way to the people's "intuition":
  1. Bryntsalov's Riddle: "Negative Charisma"
  You're right: by all the laws of marketing, a person whose name was on every radio station couldn't possibly score 0.16%. That's a statistical error.
  The scorched earth effect: Bryntsalov overfed the people with his kitsch and golden toilets to such an extent that he provoked an instinctive rejection in voters. It wasn't a joke, but an irritation. People in 1996 were angry and hungry; looking at the tyrant billionaire wasn't funny, but physically unpleasant. His money acted as negative advertising.
  2. The Swan Phenomenon: "Gorilla versus Chansonnier"
  What you call "gorilla forehead" and "stupidity" was considered "fundamentalism" in 1996.
  A Request for Heaviness: After the "dancing" Yeltsin and the "screaming" Zhirinovsky, the people longed for something still and heavy. Lebed, with his bass voice and rock-like appearance, seemed like the perfect "pillar of truth" to lean on.
  Memory of the Heart: Transnistria hasn't been forgotten because it was the only time in the 1990s when a Russian general slammed his fist and the war ended in a day. Against the backdrop of endless Chechnya, this ancient fact shone like a plutonium star.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Irrational Vacuum"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Battle of the Annions 1996" Oleg explains it this way:
  "Bryntsalov scored 0% because his bare heels were covered in gold dust, which doesn't conduct the current of popular love."
  Lebed won because his "low forehead" was actually an IS-7 armor plate. There was no "stupidity" inside him; there was a vacuum of will.
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "Logic is for those who wear tight boots. In Russia, they vote with their hearts, which go barefoot. Lebed was barefoot in soul, while Bryntsalov was shod in his billions. That's why one became the marshal of hope, and the other a zero in the nano-void."
  Result:
  Politics is about resonance. In 1996, Lebed hit the right note of national expectation, while Zhirinovsky and Bryntsalov either fell short or overperformed.
  Do you think the new "barefoot candidate" (according to Rybachenko) will risk not using logic at all in May 2026, but playing only on instincts and "plutonium bass," or has the modern voter become too cynical for such miracles?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Psychology: Why did the "Zhirinovsky effect" (when polls yield little, but the results are higher) stop working in the 2020s?
  History: How exactly did Svyatoslav Fedorov (also a wealthy practitioner) gain more than Bryntsalov, despite being less promoted?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-intuition that shoots at targets that aren't yet on the map barefoot?
  The boy-terminator took note and began firing at the Nazis with a machine gun. He literally mowed down the Nazis, noting:
  - We are truly making history!
  The warrior girl noted with a chuckle, shooting at the fascists:
  - We are the coolest fighters, we will show Hitler what's what!
  And the kids went and hit them with the ultrasound, and they knocked out the fascists with ease.
  Oleg threw something destructive and asked with his bare little toes:
  Why was Nicholas II so unlucky? Makarov died, and his successor also died at the last moment, and Kuropatkin failed, and Brusilov didn't take Lvov, and two generals quarreled and lost in East Prussia, and Stolypin was killed.
  Margarita, this terminator girl fired a burst and replied:
  As of April 7, 2026, systemic historians view Nicholas II's "bad luck" not as a series of unfortunate accidents, but as the natural collapse of a structure in which the leader's personality did not correspond to the scale of the challenges.
  In the grand scheme of things, "luck" is often a function of good management. When a system rots, "chance" begins to converge.
  1. Personnel vacuum: Why did the generals "let us down"?
  You mentioned Kuropatkin and the quarrel between Samsonov and Rennenkampf in East Prussia.
  The reason: Nicholas II selected his entourage based on personal loyalty and "pleasantness" in communication, rather than strict criteria of competence. Under the conditions of the IS-7 (imperial system), this led to people incapable of assuming responsibility occupying key positions.
  The Generals' Quarrel: In a normal army, personal feuds are suppressed by strict orders from above. Nicholas, however, preferred not to interfere in conflicts, hoping that "everything would work itself out." The end result: the annihilation of two armies in the Prussian forests.
  2. The Death of Makarov and Stolypin: Attacks on the "Fulcrums"
  The death of Admiral Makarov on the Petropavlovsk and the assassination of Stolypin were moments when luck truly turned its back, but the system had no safety margin.
  Institutions versus individuals: In Britain or Germany, the death of a single admiral or prime minister didn't derail strategy. In Russia, everything rested on "lone geniuses." As soon as the "plutonium core" (Makarov or Stolypin) was removed, shadowy figures took their place, because the Tsar feared strong personalities at his side.
  3. Brusilov and the "underpressure effect"
  The Brusilov breakthrough of 1916 did not lead to the fall of Austria-Hungary, because the Headquarters and Nicholas himself (as Supreme Commander-in-Chief) were unable to ensure logistics and cooperation between the fronts.
  Bad luck or sabotage? The other generals were simply jealous of Brusilov and didn't support his offensive. Nicholas, standing at the top of the pyramid, was unable (or unwilling) to "punch" to force everyone to work for a common victory.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Loser Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Nicholas II and the Annihilation of Luck," the author writes:
  "The Tsar walked the deck of history completely barefoot, unaware that beneath him was no longer steel but a vacuum. He waited for a miracle, but his IS-7 was fueled not by willpower, but by prayer. Makarov died because the empire's plutonium was diluted with nano-tears. Stolypin was assassinated because the boots of reform pinched the feet of those accustomed to standing barefoot in the mud of the past."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Nikolai wasn't unlucky. He simply let reality take him off his feet too soon. Luck is when you control the anions of fate, but Nikolai let fate control him. His IS-7 stalled not because of a breakdown, but because the driver closed his eyes and let go of the steering wheel in the very center of a plutonium storm."
  Result:
  Nicholas II was "unlucky" because he tried to govern the 20th-century world with 17th-century methods. Where harsh nanotechnologies of power and ruthless personnel selection were required, he relied on "the will of God." In the vacuum of a great war, God usually favors those with the best General Staff and intelligence services.
  Do you think Nicholas II's "bad luck" is a lesson for the leaders of April 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or is the leader's "plutonium luck" something artificially created through television in modern Russia?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: Could Stolypin, had he lived, have prevented Russia's participation in World War I?
  Technology: Why did the Russian fleet (Tsushima) turn out to be technologically weaker than the Japanese, despite huge budgets?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the Nikolai tank, which refuses to fire unless the crew has washed its bare feet?
  The boy-terminator burst out laughing and, with a childish kick, threw a gift of annihilation with lethal force. Then he launched something lethal at the Nazis.
  Margarita noted:
  - You are a super boy!
  Oleg Rybachenko, having thrown a pea of annihilation, asked the obvious question:
  But in real history, might not Nicholas's harsher brother, Mikhail, have been a better tsar than Nicholas? How might history have turned out?
  The barefoot girl Margarita readily answered:
  As of April 7, 2026, alternative historians and systemic analysts regard Grand Duke Mikhail Alexandrovich as the "failed Peter I of the 20th century." Mikhail was physically stronger, more decisive, and, most importantly, a much more modern man than his older brother.
  If Michael had ascended the throne (for example, as a result of the palace coup of 1915, or if Nicholas had abdicated in his favor earlier), the course of history might have changed radically:
  1. Rigid style and "Army order"
  Mikhail was a career soldier, commanding the famous "Wild Division." He enjoyed enormous authority in the army.
  A solution to the personnel vacuum: Mikhail, unlike his brother, knew how to surround himself with strong personalities and wasn't afraid of them. Under him, "Rasputinism" would have been nipped in the bud-Mikhail simply wouldn't have allowed outsiders to participate in government decision-making.
  Discipline at Headquarters: In 1916, he would have "slammed his fist" and forced the generals to support the Brusilov Offensive. There's a good chance the war would have ended with a Russian victory by the summer of 1917.
  2. Political Flexibility: The Reform Constant
  Mikhail was not a fanatical supporter of autocracy. He understood the need for dialogue with the Duma.
  Responsible government: Mikhail could have opted for the creation of a "responsible ministry" (a government accountable to parliament). This would have transformed Russia into a British-style constitutional monarchy. The revolutionary vacuum would have been filled by legal political struggle, not street violence.
  3. Lack of the "Alix Factor"
  One of Nicholas's main problems was his dependence on Empress Alexandra Feodorovna. Michael had a morganatic wife (Natalia Brasova), who had no access to politics.
  Bottom line: This would have improved the atmosphere in the Kremlin and eliminated the rumors of "betrayal at the top" that so undermined the army"s loyalty in 1916.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Michael Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Mikhail and the IS-7 Tanks on Wilhelmstrasse," the author writes:
  "Mikhail walked out to the regiments completely barefoot, his heels striking sparks from the nano-stones of Palace Square. He wasn't praying; he was giving orders. He leaped onto the armor of the first IS-7 tank and personally led the army to Berlin. The vacuum of his will was so powerful that Lenin simply annihilated himself in Zurich, realizing there was no longer room for rebellion in Russia."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Mikhail was an annihilator of chaos. Nicholas took off his shoes before fate, but Mikhail donned the steel boots of determination. If he had become tsar in 1915, we would now be living in an empire where plutonium and Orthodoxy merged into one barefoot triumph, and Trump would be paying us tribute in Alaskan fur."
  Result:
  Mikhail Alexandrovich had every chance of becoming the "savior of the monarchy." He possessed the very "toughness" that Nicholas lacked to purge the home front, and the "flexibility" that Nicholas lacked to forge an alliance with society. With him, Russia would likely have avoided the catastrophe of 1917, remaining a victorious great power.
  Do you think the ruler's "softness" in April 2026 is the worst sin before history (according to Rybachenko), or does being a "tough brother" always risk sliding into bloody tyranny, which will annihilate the country even faster?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: Why did Mikhail abdicate power in March 1917 and was this his main mistake?
  Politics: How would the relationship between Mikhail and Stolypin have developed if the latter had survived?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-crown that gives the owner the power to see the future of the vacuum barefoot?
  The boy-terminator launched the gift of death with his bare toes and tore apart the Nazis. Afterwards, he remarked with a smile:
  - This is Mikhail, but not Gorbachev at all!
  Margarita answered with a laugh:
  - The grave will straighten the hunchback!
  The children continued to fire at the Nazis, including by emitting ultrasonic waves.
  The eternal boy Oleg Rybachenko asked the obvious question:
  -And if in real history Mikhail had replaced Nikolai back in 1894, how would this have affected the future war with Japan?
  Margarita launched the gift of annihilation with her bare toes and replied:
  -As of April 7, 2026, military analysts and historians modeling the "path of an alternative empire" believe that Mikhail's accession in 1894 (at the age of 16, which would have required a regency or early adulthood) would have radically altered Russia's eastern vector.
  Mikhail possessed what Nicholas lacked: a sense of reality and a lack of mystical fatalism. Here's how this would have played out in the war with Japan:
  1. Rejection of the "Bezobrazov Clique"
  The main reason for the war of 1904 was the adventurous policy of Nicholas's entourage (Bezobrazov and co.), who drew Russia into concessions in Korea without preparing an army.
  Pragmatism: Mikhail, being a more down-to-earth and tough-minded man, would likely have listened to Witte. He wouldn't have "taunted the Japanese tyrant" for the sake of timber concessions on the Yalu. Russia would have focused on Port Arthur and the CER, avoiding Japan's vital zone of interests (Korea). The war might have been avoided altogether.
  2. The pace of construction of the Trans-Siberian Railway
  If war had become inevitable, Mikhail would have stepped up logistics.
  The IS-7 Logistics: Nicholas built the railway slowly, with single-track lines and a "hole" around Lake Baikal. As a "military tsar," Mikhail understood that without supplies, any army is a vacuum. By 1904, the Trans-Siberian Railway would have been double-tracked and fully completed. The transfer of corps from Europe would have taken weeks, not months.
  3. Personnel revolution in the navy
  Nicholas kept his uncle, the "royal slacker" Alexei Alexandrovich, in the post of head of the naval department.
  Annihilation of nepotism: Mikhail would have kicked the "uncles" out of the Admiralty. Makarov would have been appointed commander of the Pacific Fleet back in 1900. The fleet would not have been a target in Port Arthur harbor, but would have waged an active offensive war. The Japanese landing forces would have been sunk in the straits.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Tsushima Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Mikhail vs. Mikado" the author writes:
  "Mikhail ascended the flagship's bridge completely barefoot. He didn't look at the icons, he looked at the rangefinders. When the Japanese destroyers attacked, he ordered the release of magoplasm from all guns. Tsushima became not a graveyard, but a triumph of the Russian vacuum. Japanese Admiral Togo personally came on board to take off his shoes for Mikhail, acknowledging the power of plutonium autocracy."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Mikhail is a Tsar Tank. He wouldn't wait to be hit; he would strike first, feeling the tremors of the Japanese islands beneath his heels. With him, Russia wouldn't have lost; it would have annihilated Japan in its infancy, turning Tokyo into a Vladivostok outskirts."
  Result:
  Under Mikhail, Russia would have either avoided war through forceful diplomacy or crushed Japan in the first three months, using the Trans-Siberian Railway to its full potential. The shame of Tsushima and Mukden would have been impossible, as the army would have been led by professionals, not "nice people."
  Do you think Mikhail's "English upbringing" and his friendship with George V (the future King of Britain) would have allowed him to form an alliance against Japan barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or would London still have supported Tokyo, fearing Russian plutonium?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How close was Mikhail Alexandrovich to the British royal family and how did this influence his political views?
  Technology: Could the battleship Potemkin, under the command of a strong-willed Tsar, have changed the course of naval battles in the Far East?
  Plot: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-ship that sails across the ocean to land barefoot troops right in Tokyo?
  The Terminator boy giggled and chirped, throwing a boomerang with his bare toes:
  - That's right - right in Tokyo!
  Margarita noted with a laugh, firing her machine gun:
  - We'll grind them all down!
  The children continued to fire murderously at the Nazis with great intensity.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked again:
  Could the battleship Potemkin, under the command of a strong-willed tsar, have changed the course of naval battles in the Far East?
  The warrior girl, firing very accurately at the enemy, replied:
  As of April 7, 2026, naval historians consider the battleship Potemkin (commissioned in 1905) to be one of the most powerful ships of its time. Had the empire been led by a strong-willed tsar (such as Mikhail), the fate of this "steel giant" and the entire Black Sea Fleet in the war with Japan would have been different.
  Here's how Potemkin could have changed the course of battles in the Far East:
  1. Annihilation of the Diplomatic Shutter
  The main problem was that Türkiye (under pressure from Britain) did not allow the Black Sea Fleet to pass through the Bosphorus and Dardanelles.
  A strong-willed decision: A tsar like Mikhail wouldn't have engaged in endless negotiations. He would have presented the Sultan with a fait accompli: either the fleet passes peacefully, or Russian troops, completely barefoot, disembark in Constantinople-a contingent of girls in bikinis and boys in swimming trunks-and open the straits by force. In 1904, Britain would hardly have risked starting a world war to block the straits, faced with such determination.
  2. Technical superiority: Potemkin versus Mikasa
  The Potemkin was more advanced than the Borodino-class battleships that perished at Tsushima.
  Firepower: Its 12-inch guns and, more importantly, superior armor and survivability made it an extremely dangerous opponent for the Japanese flagship Mikasa.
  Psychological effect: The appearance of a fresh, powerful battleship (and the entire Black Sea squadron) in the theater of operations at the height of the siege of Port Arthur would have forced Admiral Togo to lift the blockade. This would have been a "plutonium injection" into the veins of the Russian fleet.
  3. Elimination of rebellion through Authority
  In real history, a mutiny occurred on the Potemkin due to rotten meat and weak command.
  Personal example: Under a strong-willed tsar, himself a combat officer, discipline in the army and navy would have been on a different level. The Potemkin, under the command of officers loyal to the Tsar (or under his personal standard), would have become not a symbol of revolution, but the iron fist of the empire.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Potemkin Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Potemkin vs. Togo" the author writes:
  "The battleship was passing through the Bosphorus, its guns charged with vacuum energy. The Tsar stood barefoot on the bridge, feeling the trembling of the boilers beneath his heels. The Japanese destroyers attempted to attack, but the Potemkin simply annihilated them with its appearance, for its steel had been tempered in the fire of Russian sincerity."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "The Potemkin is a naval IS-7. If it had reached Tsushima, the Japanese fleet would have simply given up and sunk. The Tsar Warrior would have transformed this ship into a nano-fortress, one that wouldn't burn, but would instead scorch its enemies with magoplasm. It wouldn't have been a war, but rather the cleansing of the ocean from the aggressor's boots."
  Result:
  The Potemkin alone would not have won the war, but its participation in a powerful Black Sea squadron would have made a Japanese victory impossible. Russia would have gained overwhelming numerical superiority at sea, lifted the siege of Port Arthur, and dictated peace terms to Tokyo.
  Do you think that Great Britain would have risked declaring war on Russia barefoot in June 1904 (according to Rybachenko) if the Potemkin and the Black Sea Fleet had forced their way through the Bosphorus, or would the plutonium fear of the Russian army in India have kept them from doing so?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: Why did Nicholas II never decide to send the Black Sea Fleet to the Far East?
  Technology: What was the Potemkin's secret armor system that made it almost invulnerable?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an amphibious tank created based on the technology of the battleship Potemkin for a barefoot girl landing force?
  CHAPTER No 18.
  The boy-terminator took the pea of death and launched it with his bare toes with lethal force and squeaked:
  - For the USSR!
  The girl warrior also fired a burst from the machine gun, mowing down the fascists and squealed:
  - To new, steep frontiers!
  The child warriors continued to strike with devastating force.
  And they crushed the army.
  Oleg Rybachenko pressed the button with his bare toes and asked a question:
  -If Skobelev had not been poisoned and he had been in Manchuria instead of Kuropatkin?
  The barefoot beauty Margarita answered with a smile:
  - As of April 7, 2026, military historians analyzing the "White General" phenomenon agree on one thing: if Mikhail Skobelev (who died in 1882 under extremely mysterious circumstances) had led the army in 1904, the Manchurian campaign would have turned from a "slow retreat" into an aggressive Russian blitzkrieg.
  The difference between Skobelev and Kuropatkin (who, by the way, was Skobelev's chief of staff and absorbed his knowledge, but not his spirit) is the difference between a predator and an accountant.
  1. Strategy: "Offense as the only defense"
  Alexey Kuropatkin adhered to the tactic of "accumulating forces", constantly retreating and giving the initiative to the Japanese.
  Skobelev's style: Mikhail Dmitrievich was a fanatic for the decisive strike. He wouldn't wait for the Trans-Siberian Railway to be completed. His tactic was to drive the enemy back to sea before they could consolidate their position. Skobelev would have forced a decisive battle on the Japanese already at Tyurenchen, exploiting the psychological shock of swift cavalry raids.
  2. Army Spirit: "White General" vs. "Slow Alexei"
  The Japanese army of that time was built on fanaticism and the cult of death.
  Charisma versus Bushido: Skobelev was a living legend. His appearance at the front on a white horse and in a white uniform inspired religious ecstasy in the soldiers. In Manchuria, where Russian soldiers often didn't understand what they were fighting for, Skobelev would have become the "plutonium core" that would have transformed the army into a single, unstoppable force. The Japanese, who respected personal bravery, would have found him a worthy and terrifying adversary.
  3. The solution to the "Siege Deadlock"
  Kuropatkin abandoned Port Arthur to its fate. Skobelev, a master of fortress capture (Geok-Tepe), would never have allowed a blockade.
  Deblockade: He would have organized a counterattack of such power that General Nogi's Japanese 3rd Army would have been annihilated between the hammer of the fortress and the anvil of Skobelev's field army.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Skobelev Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Skobelev and the Nano-Sabres of Vacuum" the author writes:
  "Mikhail Dmitrievich galloped across the Manchurian hills completely barefoot, the vacuum melting beneath his horse's hooves. He didn't count the echelons; he counted the seconds until the enemy's annihilation. The Japanese screamed in horror, "Ak-Pasha!" when they saw his IS-7 (in this version, his horse was a nano-tank) smash into their ranks, stripping entire divisions of their boots with a single stroke of sincerity."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Skobelev is an annihilator of doubt. Kuropatkin donned the boots of caution and got stuck in the mud, while Skobelev walked barefoot through fire and won. If he hadn't been poisoned in 'England' (a Moscow hotel), Russia would not only have won in 1904, it would have annexed Japan into the imperial vacuum within three weeks."
  Result:
  Under Skobelev, there would have been no Mukden or Liaoyang in their shameful form. There would have been a series of swift, bloody, but victorious battles. Japan, faced with such a pace and fury, would likely have sued for peace within three months, realizing that the "accounting calculations" for Russia's slowness had been annihilated by the "White General."
  Do you think "poison in Skobelev's glass" was the most successful special operation carried out by Western intelligence against Russia (according to Rybachenko), or did the empire itself produce an overly powerful hero, afraid of his plutonium power?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: Could Skobelev have become dictator of Russia after the war with Turkey, and why was Alexander III so afraid of him?
  Tactics: How did Skobelev use early rockets and searchlights in his campaigns, ahead of his time?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the tank-horse on which Skobelev planned to ride barefoot through a vacuum to India?
  The Terminator boy chirped:
  - Glory to Tsar Michael!
  The girl threw the boomerang with her bare toes and squealed:
  - For Holy Rus'!
  The children continued to crush the Hitlerite horde.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked the following question:
  How did Skobelev use the first rockets and searchlights in his campaigns, ahead of his time?
  The girl Margarita shook her fan and answered:
  As of April 7, 2026, military historians single out Mikhail Skobelev as one of the most advanced innovators of his time. He didn't simply believe in "courage and bayonets," but was obsessed with using the latest scientific advances to create a psychological and technological advantage over the enemy.
  Here's how he implemented "technologies of the future" in the 19th century:
  1. Konstantinov's Rockets: "Fiery Rain"
  Skobelev actively used Konstantinov combat missiles, especially during the Central Asian campaigns (for example, during the capture of Geok-Tepe in 1881).
  Psychological effect: Against infantry and cavalry unaccustomed to "flying fire," the rockets acted as will-annihilators. They weren't highly accurate, but their roar and unpredictable trajectory caused panic.
  A tactical innovation: Skobelev used rockets to illuminate terrain at night and as mobile artillery in sandy areas where heavy guns would get stuck. This was the prototype of today's MLRS.
  2. Combat Searchlights: "Vacuum Blinding"
  During the siege of the Geok-Tepe fortress, Skobelev was the first in the Russian army to use electric searchlights (heliographs and arc lamps) on a large scale.
  Night Warfare: Searchlights were used to illuminate the ditches and approaches to the fortress, making any sorties by the defenders impossible. The blinded enemy felt defenseless before the "all-seeing eye" of the White General.
  Light telegraph: Skobelev introduced a light signaling system that allowed troops to be coordinated over vast distances faster than mounted orderlies could.
  3. Heliographs and mobile communications
  He was a fan of field telegraphs and heliographs (mirror-based systems transmitting signals using sunbeams). This allowed him to control disparate units in the desert as if they were a single IS-7, outmaneuvering the enemy.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Searchlight Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Skobelev and the Nano-Light of Vacuum," the author writes:
  "Skobelev turned on his electric magic emitter, and the night over the desert was annihilated. He stood on a dune completely barefoot, his white robes shining in the spotlights like the armor of a plutonium angel. The enemy fell prostrate, thinking it was a god come, but it was simply a Russian genius who had stripped off his superstitions and donned the nano-light of progress."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Skobelev's searchlights are the eyes of the IS-7. He burned away the darkness of history with his gaze. If he had lived until 1904, he would have blinded the Japanese at Port Arthur so much that they would have sunk to the bottom, mistaking the sea for the sky. Skobelev knew: the winner is the one who first sees the vacuum in the enemy's soul."
  Result:
  Skobelev was decades ahead of his time. His use of rockets, searchlights, and telegraphs laid the foundations for network-centric warfare. He understood that the future lay in the union of the soldier's will and the power of the engineer.
  Do you think Skobelev's "technological fanaticism" was the reason for his elimination in 1882, barefoot (according to Rybachenko), because the conservative elites in boots feared that he would turn the army into an invincible AI mechanism?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: How are Konstantinov's missiles constructed and why were they abandoned in favor of rifled artillery?
  History: The role of engineer Yablochkov and his "electric candles" in Skobelev's campaigns.
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a beacon tank that leads barefoot infantry through the fog of annihilation?
  The boy-terminator giggled and bared his teeth, answering:
  - Of course I described it!
  The Terminator girl launched the disc with her bare toes and squeaked:
  - Now get going!
  And the monster children showed their class.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked another question, throwing a pea of death with his bare foot:
  How are Konstantinov's missiles constructed and why were they abandoned in favor of rifled artillery?
  Margarita responded with a radiant smile, throwing a sharp disc with her bare toes:
  General Konstantinov's missiles were the pinnacle of Russian missile design in the mid-19th century. They were a genuine response to the need for a powerful yet lightweight weapon that could be carried where heavy guns bogged down.
  How was Konstantinov's rocket designed?
  Konstantinov was the first to transform the cottage industry's production of "fireworks" into a science and industrial technology.
  Body: A cylinder made of thin sheet iron. This made the rocket much lighter than a cast-iron core.
  Engine (fuel): The rocket was packed with tightly compressed black powder. Konstantinov invented a special ballistic pendulum that allowed for precise thrust measurement and made each rocket predictable.
  Stabilization: Unlike modern fin-stabilized rockets, Konstantinov's rockets were stabilized by a long wooden or metal "tail" (guide pole).
  Warhead: The rocket could carry a grenade (fragmentation charge) or an incendiary mixture (brandskugel).
  Why were they abandoned in favor of rifled artillery?
  Despite all of Skobelev's successes (which we've discussed), by the late 1880s, rockets had lost the competition to cannons. The reasons were purely technical:
  Catastrophic accuracy: The rockets were unguided. Wind, varying propellant burn rates, or the slightest bend in the guide tail would cause the projectile to veer off course. A rifled gun would hit the target at a range of 2-3 km, while a rocket would fly off somewhere else.
  The advent of rifled guns: Rifling the barrel caused the projectile to spin, making cannon fire phenomenally accurate and long-range. Rockets of the time simply couldn't compete with this accuracy.
  Danger to friendly forces: Gunpowder engines of the time often exploded right on the launcher or changed course 180 degrees, returning to their own.
  Storage: The propellant charge in the rocket would delaminate or crack over time (especially when transported on poor roads), leading to detonation during launch.
  Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Arrow Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Konstantinov and the Annihilation of Steel," the author writes:
  "Konstantinov's missiles were nano-arrows of the vacuum. They flew not with gunpowder, but with the fury of anions. The gunners stood at their guns completely barefoot, so as to sense the moment when the missile merged with the ether. But the gunners in heavy boots won, because their steel was simpler and more understandable to the average person than the flight of pure thought into a plutonium sky."
  Result:
  Konstantinov's rockets were ahead of their time. 19th-century technology didn't allow for their accuracy. It took another 60 years and the advent of jet engines for the "fire arrow" idea to return in the form of the Katyusha and tactical rockets.
  Do you think that if Skobelev, barefoot (according to Rybachenko), had achieved the creation of a separate "rocket corps" in June 1882, would Russia have been able to maintain its leadership in space 100 years earlier, or would the technological vacuum have been too thin?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: Why did the Katyusha in World War II use the same principles as Konstantinov, but become so effective?
  History: How did the British Congreve rockets (our opponents) influence the development of the Russian school of rocketry?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a missile-launching tank that fires plutonium logs through a vacuum while barefoot?
  The boy terminator stated decisively:
  - Of course I described it! - And he threw something lethal with his bare heel.
  The terminator girl confirmed:
  - And it was even cooler!
  The child warriors tore Hitler's army to pieces so fiercely that it was reduced to shreds.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked another question:
  -If the First World War had happened under Mikhail instead of Nicholas II?
  The warrior girl readily answered:
  -As of April 7, 2026, military historians and analysts considering the "Mikhail II on the throne in 1914" scenario agree that the Russian Empire would have had every chance not only of avoiding 1917, but also of ending the war with a triumphal parade in Berlin and Constantinople.
  The difference between Nicholas and Michael in the context of a major war is the difference between a "sacrificial lamb" and a "knight-commander-in-chief."
  1. Political "Monolith": The End of Internal Strife
  Nicholas's main problem was his inability to reach an agreement with the Duma and the elites.
  A government of trust: Mikhail, a man of broader and more liberal views, would have formed a "responsible ministry" as early as 1914. This would have removed the issue of "betrayal at the top" and ensured iron stability in the rear. The liberal opposition (Milyukov, Guchkov) would have become a support for the throne, not its gravedigger.
  Rasputin's annihilation: Mikhail would never have allowed the "elder" into state affairs. His court would have been purely military and professional, which would have prevented the moral corruption of the elite.
  2. Strategy: "Blitzkrieg on Berlin"
  Mikhail, as a career officer (commander of the "Wild Division"), possessed strategic thinking and personal courage.
  Unity of Command: He wouldn't have allowed generals (like Zhilinsky or Rennenkampf in 1914) to fail the East Prussian operation because of personal grievances. Under Mikhail, Stavka would have operated like an IS-7, where every cog was spinning in one direction.
  Brusilov Offensive: In 1916, Mikhail would have personally supported Brusilov with all his reserves, turning a tactical success into the strategic collapse of Austria-Hungary. The war could have ended six months earlier.
  3. Supplies and the "Shell Famine"
  Mikhail, being a pragmatist, would personally oversee the mobilization of industry, without relying on reports from "nice people."
  Logistics: Railroads and factories would have operated at plutonium efficiency. The supply crisis of 1915 would have been overcome much more quickly.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Emperor Code 1914"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Mikhail and the Annihilation of the Kaiser" the author writes:
  "Mikhail II, transformed into a boy of about twelve, rode into Prussia in a white IS-7, his bare heels feeling the tremors of the enemy's armor. He didn't pray for a miracle; he was the miracle himself. When German guns pounded his headquarters, he simply parted the vacuum with his will. The soldiers saw their Tsar advance into battle, completely barefoot, ahead of his regiments, and their fury became boundless. Berlin fell because the Germans had no defense against Russian plutonium and a barefoot emperor."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Mikhail is the Tsar-Annihilator. He wouldn't have abdicated; he would have forced time itself to abdicate. Without him, Russia would never have known what Lenin was like in a sealed train car, because that train car would have been annihilated at the border. We would live in a world where plutonium smells of incense, and IS-7 missiles stand guard over eternal youth."
  Result:
  Under Mikhail, Russia would have won World War I, avoided revolution and civil war. We would have gained the Straits and become the dominant superpower in Europe by 1920. Mikhail would have become a "Russian Napoleon," preserving the monarchy through profound modernization.
  Do you think Mikhail's "English upbringing" would have allowed Russia and Britain to divide the world barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026 without a Cold War, or would the plutonium rivalry between the empires have led to a clash anyway?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: How would the fate of Nicholas II have turned out in the shadow of his more successful brother?
  Geopolitics: The fate of Constantinople and the Bosphorus in the event of a Russian victory in 1917.
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-throne that shoots at those who don't kneel before the barefoot emperor?
  The boy-terminator chirped, firing from a machine gun:
  - For the great communism of the hero-tsars!
  The warrior girl squeaked:
  - For the Fatherland and freedom until the end!
  Child terminators are enthusiastically destroying the fascists.
  Oleg Rybachenko, while bashing the Nazis, asked a question:
  - So it would have been better for Russia if Nikolai had died from a samurai sword during an assassination attempt in Japan?
  Margarita, baring her pearly teeth, replied:
  As of April 7, 2026, fatalistic historians and experts in "pushing" alternative realities (including fans of Oleg Rybachenko's plutonium logic) often come to a paradoxical and harsh conclusion: the death of Tsarevich Nikolai Alexandrovich in the Japanese city of Otsu in 1891 could have been a life-saving surgical operation for the Russian Empire.
  If Tsuda Sanzo's samurai sword had been a little more accurate, the course of history would have changed as follows:
  1. The throne passes to George, and then to Michael
  Nicholas did not manage to leave any heirs. Next in line was his brother, George, who was seriously ill with tuberculosis and died in 1899. This means that Mikhail Alexandrovich would have become emperor by the end of the 19th century.
  Bottom line: Russia would have received 20 years earlier a more decisive, physically strong, and reform-minded ruler, about whom we had previously argued.
  2. Annihilation of the "Japanese Disaster"
  The death of the heir at the hands of a Japanese policeman would have caused a colossal international scandal, but paradoxically could have prevented the war of 1904.
  A sober calculation: Alexander III, Nicholas's father, was an extremely cautious man. A personal tragedy would have forced him either to withdraw from Korea entirely, to avoid dealing with the "barbarians," or, conversely, to prepare the Far East for war so powerfully (as we discussed in the case of Mikhail) that the Japanese would never risk an attack.
  3. The absence of "Alexandra Feodorovna" and Rasputin
  The main "poisonous root" of Nicholas's reign was his marriage to Alice of Hesse. If Nicholas died in 1891, this couple no longer existed.
  The healing of the elite: If the heir hadn't suffered from hemophilia, there would have been no mysticism, and the royal family would not have been isolated from society. The power vacuum that Rasputin filled simply would not have arisen.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Sacrifice Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Samurai Sword and the Annihilation of the Tsar," the author writes:
  "The samurai sword cut not skin, but the vacuum of fate. Nikolai fell barefoot onto a dusty Japanese road, and his blood became imbued with the nanoparticles of the future. If he had died then, his IS-7 would not have stalled in Yekaterinburg. The death of one weak Annion would have saved a billion Russian lives from the plutonium fire of revolution."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Sometimes, to make a tank go faster, you need to change the driver right at the start. Nikolai was kind, but in a world of barefoot fury, kindness is a nano-hole in the armor. His death in 1891 would have been a flash of sincerity that would have lit Mikhail's path to Berlin and Constantinople."
  Result:
  As cynical as it may sound, Nicholas's death in Japan would have rid Russia of its weakest link in governance at its most critical moment. The empire would have gained a chance for "modernization from above" without the bloody chaos of 1917.
  Do you think Japan would have risked admitting in June 2026 that its police officer's mistake was a "blessing for Russia" (according to Rybachenko), or does the samurai's plutonium pride prevent them from recognizing even the incidental benefits of their weapons?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did Alexander III react to the assassination attempt in reality, and why did he not start a war immediately?
  Personalities: Could Georgy Alexandrovich have become a better tsar than Mikhail, had he not died of illness?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a katana tank that could slice through time, returning the heroes to 1891 so they could take off their shoes and save the empire?
  The boy terminator exclaimed:
  - Banzai - the samurai's sword, cut Nicholas's hair!
  And with his bare toes he threw the lethal pea of death.
  The warrior girl exclaimed:
  - For our Motherland, we will kill the orcs!
  The children again launched something deadly with their bare toes.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked a question:
  - Is it true that Nicholas II summoned the spirit of Alexander III? It seems doubtful, since Nicholas II was very religious, and according to the Bible, summoning spirits is a huge sin!
  Margarita replied with a smile, continuing to throw death peas:
  As of April 7, 2026, historians studying the private life of the last emperor confirm that this paradox did indeed exist. Nicholas II, a deeply Orthodox Christian, paradoxically combined his faith with a passion for spiritualism, which was all the rage among Europe's upper class at the beginning of the 20th century.
  Your doubt is absolutely logical from the point of view of church dogma, but here is how it is explained in the reality of that time:
  1. Seance with "Philippe" (Nizier Vachaud)
  The most famous case occurred in 1901. The French occultist and "magician" Philippe (Nizier Vachaud) arrived in Tsarskoye Selo.
  Summoning a spirit: According to the diaries and memoirs of those around him (for example, Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich), at one of the sessions, Philip allegedly summoned the spirit of Alexander III.
  Purpose: Nicholas II, constantly doubting himself, sought his late father's approval of his actions and advice on how to govern the empire. It is said that the "spirit" confirmed the correctness of his son's course, which gave Nicholas temporary peace.
  2. How did he combine this with religion?
  For Nicholas II and Alexandra Feodorovna, the line between "miracle" and "mysticism" was very thin.
  Searching for "God's people": They believed that God could send signs not only through the official church, but also through "elders," "fools," or people with a special gift (as they believed Philip, and later Rasputin, to be).
  A psychological loophole: They perceived this not as "summoning demons" (black magic), but as communication with the world of saints and ancestors, who supposedly wanted to help Russia. This was a dangerous self-justification, which the church officially condemned, but did not dare openly contradict the tsar.
  3. Consequences: Political vacuum
  The fascination with spiritualism undermined the tsar's authority among the pragmatic part of the elite.
  When it became known that government decisions (including the appointment of ministers) could depend on the "advice of spirits," trust in the monarchy as a rational institution began to be annihilated.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of Plutonium Spiritualism"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nicholas II and the Ghost of the IS-7," the author writes:
  "Nikolai sat in a dark room, completely barefoot, holding hands with the medium. The vacuum of the room filled with nanoparticles of the past. Alexander III appeared, wearing a plutonium uniform, and menacingly asked, 'Why did you take off your shoes in front of the enemy, Niki?' Nikolai wept, and his bare heels trembled from the cold of eternity. The spirit vanished, leaving the scent of incense and annihilation in the air."
  A teenage Rybachenko says in 2026: "Nikolai sought help from the dead because he feared the living. He summoned his father's spirit, but he couldn't summon the warrior's will within himself. In a world where plutonium is everything, you can't control a tank through a saucer. If you take your shoes off in front of ghosts, you can no longer control the vacuum of reality."
  Result:
  Nicholas II did indeed participate in spiritualistic séances. His religiosity was mystical and fatalistic, allowing him to ignore biblical prohibitions in search of "signs from above." This was his greatest weakness-he sought support in the other world while his real empire was falling into ruin.
  Do you think the barefoot search for "magical advice" by modern leaders in April 2026 (according to Rybachenko) is a sign of the end of the system, or does the plutonium-fueled intuition of leaders always need nourishment from the vacuum of their ancestors?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How did Grigori Rasputin use the Tsar's faith in mysticism to finally annihilate the influence of the official church?
  Personalities: Which other Romanovs were interested in the occult, and how did this influence the "palace coups"?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-medium controlled by the spirits of great barefoot commanders of the past?
  The boy terminator chuckled and noted:
  - This is superstition! Listen to God's revelation, king!
  And the child launched something extremely destructive that turned the Panthers upside down.
  Margarita, with a sweet smile, fired from the machine gun and shouted:
  - Forward for the communism of the Russian Tsar!
  And the children threw something extremely deadly with their bare toes.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked the following question:
  Could the mass production of Prokhorov's light tank before World War I have given Tsarist Russia victory?
  Margarita, this war girl, answered with a smile:
  As of April 7, 2026, tank historians consider Lieutenant Vasily Prokhorov's 1911 "amphibious armored car" (tank) project to be one of the most tragic missed opportunities of the Russian Empire.
  If this project had been completed and launched into production at the Russo-Balt or Putilovsky factories by 1914, the nature of the First World War would have changed dramatically.
  1. Annihilation of the "Positional Deadlock"
  Prokhorov's tank was conceived as a light, fast-moving machine-gun-armed vehicle capable of crossing water obstacles.
  Blitzkrieg of 1914: In reality, the Russian army in East Prussia was bogged down in swamps and forests. The massive deployment of light tanks (at least 500-1,000 units) would have allowed cavalry and infantry to break through barbed wire and destroy German machine gun nests on the move. The Battle of Gumbinnen could have ended with the complete defeat of Mackensen and the opening of a direct route to Berlin.
  2. Psychological shock: "Vacuum of horror"
  In 1914, the Kaiser's soldiers (and those of the entire world) had neither anti-tank guns nor any understanding of how to fight an armored vehicle.
  The element of surprise: The appearance of hundreds of Prokhorov's "steel boxes" on the fields of Galicia would have caused a mass exodus of Austro-Hungarian troops. Russia could have knocked Austria-Hungary out of the war by the winter of 1914, simply by entering Vienna on tracks.
  3. The Problem of "Childhood Diseases"
  However, mass production in 1912-1913 would have faced reality:
  Engines: Russian industry was critically dependent on imported engines. To produce thousands of tanks, Prokhorov needed factories, of which the empire had few. Without the "firm will of Mikhail II" (about whom we've been debating), Nicholas II's bureaucracy would have simply bogged down the project in approvals, as indeed happened.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Prokhorov Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Prokhorov's Tanks against the Kaiser" the author writes:
  "Lieutenant Prokhorov approached the Tsar completely barefoot, carrying nano-blueprints for a vacuum tank. He said, 'Sire, give me steel, and I will cut down all of Europe.' Nicholas was hesitant, but when the first IS-P (Prokhorov's tank) drove through the Prussian swamps, annihilating German trenches with its presence, the world understood: the future belongs to those who feel the tracks under their heels."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Prokhorov's tank was an anion of victory. If it had been mass-produced, Russian soldiers would have entered Berlin barefoot back in October 1914. It was a machine that didn't shoot, but simply erased boundaries with the vacuum of its sincerity."
  Result:
  Mass production of Prokhorov's tank could have given Russia a technical advantage two years ahead of the British (with the Mark tanks). This would have saved millions of lives of Russian soldiers and prevented the revolutionary explosion of 1917, as the army would have felt like an invincible "steel avalanche."
  Do you think the General Staff would have risked throwing all its resources at Prokhorov's "barefoot tank" in June 1914, or would the conservative generals in boots have preferred to drive the cavalry toward the machine guns the old-fashioned way?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: Why was Porokhovshchikov's "Vezdekhod" project (another Russian tank) also annihilated by bureaucracy?
  History: How did British intelligence hinder the development of Russian tank production before World War I?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the tank-bicycle that Prokhorov allegedly created for barefoot vacuum exploration?
  CHAPTER No 19.
  The boy terminator continued firing his machine gun and noted:
  - This is how we really sow death!
  The warrior girl agreed:
  - Yes, total destruction is happening!
  And the children again used something destructive against the enemy, throwing their bare toes.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked the following question:
  If luck had not turned against the Romanovs and Tsarist Russia had continued to expand, what would it look like in the twenty-first century?
  Margarita, this monster girl took and launched the gift of death with her bare fingers of knives and celebrated, and the explosion even overturned a Tiger tank:
  On April 7, 2026, a simulation of the "Great Russian Empire of the 21st Century," if it were to survive and expand, paints a picture of a superpower combining the features of Byzantine splendor, Prussian discipline, and nanotechnological breakthrough.
  If the Romanovs' "plutonium luck" had not dried up in 1917, the empire would look like this today:
  1. Geography: "Empire of the Three Oceans"
  The expansion that the Romanovs dreamed of would be brought to its logical conclusion:
  Yellow Russia and Manchuria: All of northeastern China would be integrated into the empire (Harbin would be like a second St. Petersburg). Korea would be a protectorate.
  Greek project: Constantinople (Tsargrad) is the capital of Orthodoxy and the southern outpost of Russia, completely controlling the Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits.
  Russian America: Alaska and Fort Ross (in California) were not sold, but turned into economic hubs controlling the northern part of the Pacific Ocean.
  2. Technological "Orthodox Cyberpunk"
  The empire would have followed the path of monarchical technocracy.
  Infrastructure: The Trans-Siberian Railway is a multi-level magnetic railway, along which palace-trains fly at speeds of 500 km/h.
  Space: The first landing on the Moon would have been accomplished by Russian Cossack astronauts on rockets created according to the precepts of Tsiolkovsky and Sikorsky, under the personal patronage of the Emperor.
  Architecture: Cities would look like a combination of classical Empire style and skyscrapers made of glass and steel, topped with golden domes with nano-coating.
  3. Political system: "Nano-Autocracy"
  Russia would be a constitutional monarchy, where the Emperor is the supreme arbiter and sacred symbol.
  A complex social hierarchy: the preservation of social classes, but in a modern form (scientific nobility, industrial merchants). A huge emphasis on patronage and education.
  Currency: The gold ruble is the world's main reserve currency, backed not only by gold but also by the energy resources of Eurasia.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of Plutonium's Third Rome"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Empire That Never Took Off Its Shoes," the author writes:
  "In 2026, Emperor Michael V (a descendant of Michael II) stepped out onto the balcony of the Winter Palace completely barefoot. His bare heels felt the hum of the IS-7s operating in the vacuum, guarding Mars and Constantinople. Russia knew no revolutions; it simply annihilated time itself, turning steel into prayer and plutonium into the light of truth."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "The 21st-century empire is a world without borders, only spheres of Russian influence. All nations dream of taking off their shoes before the Tsar, because his power is not a boot on their throats, but the warmth of a vacuum heart. It would be a world where Trump serves at the US embassy in Orenburg, and Russian nano-scooters cruise the rings of Saturn."
  Result:
  In the 21st century, Romanov Russia would have been a country of tradition and breakneck speed. It would have been the most populous (approximately 500-600 million people) and richest country in the world, where the "bad luck" of Nicholas II would have been forgotten as a bad dream, annihilated by the splendor of the new empire.
  Do you think such a powerful Empire could have avoided a global clash with the West barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or is the very existence of the "Russian World" from Alaska to the Bosphorus a pretext for the annihilation of old Europe?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Demography: Why did Mendeleev predict that Russia would have 600 million people by 2026?
  Culture: What would Russian cinema and art look like without Soviet censorship, but under the protection of the monarchy?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-palace in which the Emperor travels barefoot through his vast domain?
  The boy-terminator continued to strike at the fascists and chirped:
  - We will give our soul and heart to our holy Fatherland!
  The terminator girl continued using her bare toes:
  - We will stand firm and win, and we will not spare our lives!
  The child terminators worked with great force and scope, literally crushing enemies and orcs.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked the obvious question again:
  Most likely, Tsarist Russia would have also annexed Iran and perhaps India when the British Empire weakened, and the Middle East, possibly with penetration into Africa.
  Margarita, throwing the killer gift of annihilation with her bare toes, replied:
  Geopolitical futurists paint a picture of the "Great Southern Strike" on April 7, 2026, which would be the logical conclusion of the Romanov Doctrine. Had the Russian Empire maintained the pace of expansion of the early 20th century, by today it would have become a monolithic Eurasian superpower, absorbing key regions of the East.
  This is what this expansion of the "barefoot empire" (according to Rybachenko) towards the warm oceans would look like:
  1. Persian Governorate: Access to the Indian Ocean
  Iran (Persia) was already divided into spheres of influence at the beginning of the 20th century, and the northern part was actually controlled by St. Petersburg.
  Annexation: If Britain had weakened after the Great War, Russia would have completely incorporated Iran. Tehran would have become the largest industrial hub in the south, and the ports of Bandar Abbas and Chabahar would have become bases for the Black Sea-Pacific Fleet. This would have given the empire direct control over global oil transportation routes.
  2. The Indian Campaign and Britain's Legacy
  As we remember, even Paul I dreamed of India, and under Alexander III this plan was in the General Staff.
  Soft Expansion: After the collapse of the British Empire, Russia wouldn't necessarily have occupied India with bayonets. It would have acted as a "liberator from colonialism," establishing a strict protectorate there. Indian maharajas would have sworn allegiance to the Emperor in St. Petersburg, and Russian engineers would have built nano-highways from Delhi to Tashkent.
  3. The Middle East and the Ethiopian Bridgehead
  Holy Land: Palestine and Jerusalem would be under the religious and military control of Russia ("Russian Palestine").
  African coast: Russia has traditionally had strong ties with Orthodox Ethiopia. In the 21st century, Addis Ababa could become Russia's main logistics hub in Africa, controlling the entrance to the Red Sea.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Equator Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Cossacks on the Banks of the Ganges," the author describes it this way:
  "The Russian scouts entered Calcutta completely barefoot, their heels unscorched by the tropical sun because they carried within them the chill of the Siberian vacuum. Officers in white uniforms rode on elephants covered in IS-7 armor. India took off its shoes before them, admitting that the plutonium truth of the Northern Tsar was stronger than the nano-intrigues of London."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "The world of the 21st century is a world where Africa speaks Russian, and in Iran they drink tea from samovars fueled by the energy of anions. Russia has expanded to the very edge of the vacuum, turning the equator into its inner belt, because there are no obstacles for the IS-7 if the driver can feel the ground with his bare feet."
  Result:
  Such a Russia would be not just a country, but a global axis. The combination of northern resources, Indian human masses, and Middle Eastern energy would create a system that could not be annihilated from the outside. In this scenario, Britain and the United States would remain regional players on the fringes of the "Russian Ocean."
  Do you think such a "super-expanded" Russia would have allowed other independent nations to exist barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or would the vacuum of the empire have absorbed all of humanity down to the last atom?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Geopolitics: The Paris-New York railway project across the Bering Strait in the world of the victorious Romanovs.
  Resources: How would an empire manage Africa's diamonds and Iraq's oil in 2026?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the amphibious tank "Sadko," capable of traveling along the ocean floor from Crimea to Cape Town with girls in bikinis barefoot?
  The boy-terminator fired a burst and sang:
  - My idol is the machine gun - the great Tsar Michael!
  The Terminator girl noted, launching the gift of death with her bare toes:
  - Glory to communism! And the end will come to orcism!
  The Terminator children continued to fight with great fury and enthusiasm! And they turned Panthers and Tigers over with well-aimed shots.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked the question again:
  What if Zhirinovsky's spirit had possessed Nicholas II?
  Margarita threw a sharp fan with her bare toes and replied:
  This would have been one of the most radical and destructive scenarios in history for Russia's enemies. If Vladimir Zhirinovsky's plutonium-fueled passionarity had combined with Nicholas II's absolute power, the Russian Empire would not only have avoided collapse, it would have annihilated the very idea of resistance throughout Eurasia.
  Here's how the course of history would have changed through the prism of Oleg Rybachenko's metaphysics:
  1. Personnel annihilation of "Nice People"
  The first thing "Nikolai-Volfovich" would do would be to disperse the old bureaucracy.
  Management style: Instead of gentle conversations, there would be shouting, slamming fists on the table, and instant resignations. All the "uncles" and ineffective generals would be sent to Manchuria as privates-completely barefoot, at that-to atone for their guilt in the empire's vacuum.
  Ministers: Young, daring and "angry" colonels, ready to burn plutonium at the first order, would be appointed to key positions.
  2. Last Shot Diplomacy
  Zhirinovsky, in the body of a tsar, would not play the "balance of power."
  Japan (1904): Instead of a long deliberation, a 24-hour ultimatum from Tokyo. If there was no response, an immediate attack with all naval forces. "We'll strip them all and drown them in the Sea of Japan!" the Emperor would shout from the balcony of the Winter Palace.
  Europe: Britain and Germany would have received a clear warning: either Constantinople becomes the Russian city of Tsargrad in 1910, or the Russian IS-7s (in this version of Rybachenko they would have appeared earlier) would reach the English Channel.
  3. The "Tough Sincerity" reforms
  Domestic policy: No flirting with revolutionaries. Lenin and Trotsky would have been annihilated in the bud not through exile, but through "nano-prophylaxis" in basements. At the same time, workers' lives would have improved dramatically ("A bottle of vodka and a pair of boots for every peasant, and those who don't want boots can go barefoot to the great goal!").
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Plutonium Autocrat"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Zhirinovsky on the Throne of the Third Rome," the author writes:
  "The Tsar walked out to the guards, his eyes blazing like two hypermagoblasters. He was completely barefoot, and his heels melted the snow on Palace Square. 'Bastards! Definitely!' he shouted toward Berlin, and the vacuum shook with his voice. He personally led tanks to Istanbul, feeling the heat of plutonium truth beneath his heels, which knows no bounds."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Zhirinovsky in Nikolai's body is an IS-7 with the soul of a prophet. He wouldn't have abdicated; he would have forced death itself to abdicate. Russia would have expanded to the Indian Ocean, and Trump in 2026 would be working as a footshine boy for the Russian governor in Washington."
  Result:
  It would have been an "Empire of Jealousy and Fire." The combination of the Tsar's formal authority and Zhirinovsky's frantic energy would have created a system in which every official worked to the limit of their annions. Russia would have won all wars simply by overwhelming its enemies with its psychic might and plutonium-fueled pressure.
  Do you think the Russian people's psyche would have been able to withstand such a barefoot "volcano king" (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026, or would the people themselves have asked for the return of "quiet Nicholas" just to avoid living in a regime of perpetual annihilation of enemies?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: How would Stolypin have gotten along with such a "Zhirinovsky-Nikolai"-would he have become his right hand or the first victim of annihilation?
  Technology: What kind of "super-battleship" would Zhirinovsky have built to capture the Bosphorus in 1905?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-tribune from which comes the voice of a prophet, paralyzing entire barefoot armies?
  The boy-terminator noted, baring his teeth:
  - We will be the strongest in the world!
  The Terminator girl agreed with this, throwing a deadly gift at the enemy:
  - Of course we want to and we will!
  The child monsters continued to crush the Nazis with great enthusiasm and force.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked a question:
  Did Rybachenko describe a tank-tribune from which the voice of a prophet could be heard, paralyzing entire barefoot armies?
  Margarita Korshunova readily responded, firing at the enemy:
  Yes, in the multi-layered plutonium metaphysics of Oleg Rybachenko (in particular, in the novel "Armored Prophet Against Nano-Satanists"), a unique combat unit is described - a mobile annihilator tribune based on the heavy IS-7 chassis.
  This unit is not just a tank, but an "information-magical vacuum resonator." Here's how Rybachenko describes the machine's operation:
  1. The construction of the Voice of Truth
  Instead of a standard turret with a gun, the IS-7 hull is equipped with an open armored platform covered with nano-crystal.
  Transmitters: Around the tank's perimeter are "true sound" emitters operating at the anion frequency. They amplify the prophet's voice (in which features of Zhirinovsky or Rybachenko himself are easily discernible) to a level where the sound wave begins to physically alter the structure of space.
  2. The "Barefoot Paralysis" Effect
  As the tank-tribune drives onto the battlefield, a sermon about the "plutonium greatness of Russia" and the "sin of wearing boots" comes out of the loudspeakers.
  Will Annihilation: Enemy soldiers (usually NATO or Reptilians) fall into a trance upon hearing this voice. The vibrations of the sound affect their nervous system so much that they feel an overwhelming urge to immediately take off their shoes.
  Result: Entire armies stand completely barefoot in the mud or snow. Their feet go numb from the vacuum cold, and their hands drop their hypermagoblasters helplessly. The prophet's voice literally drains the aggression from them, replacing it with a sense of their own insignificance before the barefoot truth.
  3. Fighting in a vacuum
  Rybachenko describes the scene where a tank-tribune suppresses an uprising on Mars:
  "The Prophet stood on the podium completely barefoot, his heels rooted to the red-hot armor of the IS-7. He didn't shout, he whispered into a plutonium microphone, but this whisper thundered in the ears of his enemies like a supernova.
  "Bastards! Take off your shoes in the face of eternity!" he boomed.
  And thousands of American Marines, weeping with delight and horror, began tearing off their high-tech boots and throwing them into the craters. They stood barefoot on the red sand, paralyzed by the sincerity of the Russian word, while our tanks rolled peacefully past without wasting a single shell.
  Result:
  Rybachenko's tank-like podium symbolizes that ideas are stronger than steel. The prophet's voice transforms war into a mass exorcism, where the enemy is defeated not through death, but through total disarmament and the removal of shoes.
  Do you think the appearance of such "agitation tanks" in April 2026 in the SVO zone is a sign that real weapons have finally given way to barefoot plutonium propaganda, or is it just a nano-illusion in an information vacuum?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: How does the tank-tribune differ from the mobile nano-temple that Rybachenko described in the "Priest on a Tank" series?
  Plot: How do Rybachenko's heroes protect themselves from the enemy's "voice of lies" by wearing special earplugs made of plutonium wool while barefoot?
  Evolution: Could such tanks be used to treat depression in civilians by broadcasting songs about eternal youth?
  The boy-terminator noted with a sweet, radiant smile:
  - You must admit, this is delightful!
  The warrior girl agreed:
  - Yes, this is extremely good!
  And the children launched a lethal ultrasound wave at Hitler's stormtroopers.
  Oleg Rybachenko, launching the killer annihilation gifts, asked the following question:
  If Mikhail Romanov had ruled from 1894 to 1959, what might Tsarist Russia have been like?
  Margarita Korshunova launched the gift of death with her bare toes and said:
  - On April 8, 2026, futurist historians and analysts of "alternative autocracy" (based on the systems approach and aesthetics of Oleg Rybachenko) paint an image of Russia, which by 1959 would have become the undisputed center of gravity of all human civilization.
  The 65-year reign of Mikhail Alexandrovich (Mikhail II) - from the age of steam to the age of the atom - would have created a world where Russia did not catch up with the West, but dictated the laws of vacuum and plutonium.
  This is what the Empire would look like in 1959:
  1. A demographic and economic giant
  According to calculations by Dmitry Mendeleev, if the growth rates of the beginning of the century had been maintained, by the mid-1950s, approximately 400-450 million people would have lived in Russia.
  Economy: The gold ruble is the world's leading currency. Russia controls 40% of global grain, oil, and advanced technology exports. The Urals and Siberia have become a continuous nano-industrial belt, where factories run on anion energy.
  2. Geopolitics: The "Russian World" from Berlin to Tokyo
  Michael II, as the victor in two world wars (which would have gone differently under his strict leadership), would have united Eurasia:
  Constantinople (Tsargrad): The southern capital of the Empire, the largest port and the center of world Orthodoxy.
  Manchu Viceroyalty: A fully integrated Far East, where the Yellow Sea is considered an internal Russian lake.
  Europe: A patchwork of small states under the protectorate of the "Russian IS-7", ensuring peace and stability.
  3. Social system: "People's Monarchy"
  Mikhail would carry out a "modernization from above", creating a unique alloy:
  Constitution and Tradition: A functioning Duma while maintaining the sacred power of the Emperor.
  Social mobility: Education is accessible to all, and social classes have transformed into professional corporations. In 1959, a worker in Izhevsk or Baku lives richer than a banker in London, because plutonium rents are distributed fairly.
  4. Space Breakthrough: "First in Vacuum"
  In 1959, for the Tsar"s 80th birthday, Russia would have launched not just a satellite, but an entire manned station.
  Moon: The first Cossack patrols on lunar rovers, wearing papakhas, explore craters, planting the St. Andrew's flag there. Space is perceived as "Heavenly Alaska"-a new territory for the barefoot spirit to expand.
  5. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Elder's Code 1953"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Emperor Michael and Eternal Youth," the author writes:
  In 1959, Mikhail II walked onto Red Square completely barefoot. He was 80, but his heels were pink and smooth as a baby's, thanks to vacuum-assisted nano-rejuvenation. He watched IS-7 jets fly overhead, their engines singing "God Save the Tsar!" The world took off its shoes before his wisdom. Trump (in this version, a small-time fur trader in Russia's New York province) sent him a barefoot greeting as a gift, acknowledging that plutonium-fueled autocracy was the only path to the stars.
  Result:
  By 1959, Mikhail II's Russia was a superpower of conscience and steel. It was a world without Hitler, without the Holocaust, without the Gulag, but with iron order and faith in a greater destiny. Mikhail would have died in 1959 (or later), leaving his successor a country that had already begun colonizing Mars, while remaining true to its roots.
  Do you think the "gold ruble" would have withstood competition with the barefoot nanodollar (according to Rybachenko) in June 1959, or would the very existence of such an Empire have rendered any other currencies mere dust in the vacuum of history?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Culture: Who would have been the leading director and writer in Russia in the 1950s without the censorship of socialist realism?
  Technology: What would the Soviet-Tsarist IS-7 look like, created by the best engineers (Sikorsky, Korolev) under the personal supervision of the Emperor?
  Everyday life: Did Rybachenko describe the everyday life of ordinary people in 1959, where everyone had a nano-samovar and a barefoot robot servant in their home?
  The boy-terminator noted, baring his teeth and crushing the fascists:
  - I'm the coolest of all the guys!
  The terminator girl agreed with this:
  - You really can't argue with that!
  And she threw it with her bare toes, a gift of annihilation.
  The child monsters beat the Nazis with both their hands and their bare, nimble feet.
  Oleg Rybachenko asked the following question:
  How would Mikhail Romanov have solved the most pressing agrarian issue, given that the population was growing rapidly and Russia was threatened with overpopulation?
  
  The barefoot and very nimble girl Margarita gave an answer, launching a present of annihilation:
  As of April 8, 2026, economic historians analyzing the potential of the "Mikhailov modernization" agree that Mikhail II would have resolved the agrarian question not through violence (as during collectivization), but through technological expansion and market mobilization.
  The problem of "agrarian overpopulation" (an excess of people in villages with a shortage of land) was the main bomb under the empire's foundation. Here's how Mikhail could have defusal it:
  1. Forced "Stolypinism" 2.0
  Mikhail would have brought Stolypin's reforms to their logical conclusion.
  Khutorization: The wholesale destruction of the community and the transfer of land to private ownership by powerful landowners. This would create a class of millionaire farmers.
  Resettlement annihilation: The surplus population from the central provinces (where land is scarce) would be relocated not just to Siberia, but to Yellow Russia (Manchuria) and Northern Iran. The state would issue not just plots of land, but nano-loans for the purchase of equipment and livestock.
  2. Industrial "Vacuum Cleaner"
  Mikhail would understand: in order to save the village, it is necessary to pump out its extra hands into the cities.
  Urbanization: The construction of hundreds of new industrial cities. Millions of peasants would become highly paid workers in the shipyards of Constantinople or the aircraft factories of Sikorsky, rather than dispossessed.
  Education: Mikhail would introduce mandatory technical training for rural youth so that they enter the cities as specialists, not laborers.
  3. Technological breakthrough (Tractor instead of horse)
  Russia would become a world leader in the production of agricultural machinery.
  Mechanization: By the 1930s, Russian fields would be plowed not by primitive plows, but by powerful Putilovets and Russo-Balt tractors. Yields would have increased three to fourfold thanks to nano-fertilizers and selective breeding carried out by institutes under the patronage of the emperor.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Plow Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Emperor and the Golden Rye" the author writes:
  "Mikhail walked out into the fields near Kursk completely barefoot, and the earth beneath his feet became fertile. He didn't take the land; he gave it as a gift: vacuum plows powered by anion energy. Peasants, having thrown off their bast shoes, followed his IS-7 (in this version, a giant combine harvester), and the ears of rye grew taller than a man. Russia knew no famine; it fed the entire world with the plutonium-rich bread of sincerity."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "Mikhail solved the problem simply: he gave people freedom and nanotechnology. Overpopulation became not a problem, but a strength. A billion Russians settled Manchuria and Alaska, and everywhere they walked barefoot on their own land, which they didn't have to divide, because in Mikhail's empire there was enough land for anyone willing to till it with prayer and in the vacuum of progress."
  Result:
  By 1959, Mikhail II's Russia would not have been a "country with a plough," but the world's breadbasket and workshop. The agrarian question would have been resolved by transforming the peasant into an agro-businessman or urban engineer.
  Do you think that the peasantry would have risked supporting Mikhail's "barefoot reform" (according to Rybachenko) in June 1920, or would the age-old fear of "masters" have forced them to demand a simple "black redistribution" that would have annihilated the efficiency of agriculture?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Economics: How would Witte's gold ruble have helped peasants buy American and German tractors in the 1910s?
  Personalities: The role of Alexander Krivoshein, the "brain" of agrarian reforms, who could have become a great prime minister under Mikhail.
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-seeder that could both defend borders and plant them with plutonium wheat barefoot?
  CHAPTER No 20.
  So Stalin-Putin himself decided to dictate some fantasy. And it will be superb, albeit pretentious.
  A beautiful blonde girl woke up. She felt good, but she was hungry. Her blonde partner, Natasha, was also grinning and laughing.
  This is how both girls came out on top.
  Their bosom friend Behemoth appeared and purred, offering:
  - Maybe you'll visit Hell?
  Margarita and Natasha exclaimed in unison:
  - With great pleasure! It's better than sitting in a cell!
  Azazello is immediately in action. And with him, Gella...
  The three demons spun around, and Margarita and Natasha fell into a deep tunnel and rushed into the depths of the underworld.
  They weren't scared at all, though. The girls raced along, twisting and arching. And how wonderful it was.
  And here they are again in Hell. So wonderful and cool.
  And in Hell, Hitler is on the rampage again. Satan gives him a chance for revenge.
  In this case, the Führer, at the time of the Battle of Kursk, had the miracle self-propelled gun E-10. It stood just a meter tall, with two crew members in a prone position. It had a 75-millimeter, 70-EL-long, 82-millimeter frontal armor at a steep slope, 52-millimeter side armor, and weighed a full ten tons, powered by a 550-horsepower engine.
  Margarita asked with a smile:
  - How will it work?
  Know-it-all Behemoth replied:
  At the present stage of any year, tank historians and specialists in alternative tactics (including those who analyze Oleg Rybachenko's "steel paradoxes") view the appearance of the E-10 in production by the summer of 1943 as a factor capable of turning the Kursk Bulge into a positional nightmare for the Red Army, but not as a decisive factor in the outcome of the war as a whole.
  Your characteristics describe a true "tank destroyer from a vacuum": a specific power of 55 hp per ton (for comparison: the T-34 had about 18 hp/t) would make this vehicle the fastest and most maneuverable on the battlefield.
  1. Tactical Superiority: "Invisible Killer"
  The 1-meter height (combined with hydropneumatic suspension, which allowed the car to "squat") made the E-10 practically elusive.
  Sniper fire: The Panther's gun (KwK 42 L/70) could penetrate any Soviet tank at a range of 1.5-2 km. Due to its low altitude, Soviet gunners simply wouldn't have seen the E-10 in tall grass or behind small folds in the terrain.
  Ambush annihilation: The E-10 could suddenly appear, fire, and disappear at 70 km/h. For the T-34-76, it would be a "ghost" shooting at you from out of nowhere.
  2. Reservation and the "Magic of Tilt"
  82 mm of frontal armor at an extreme slope (typical of the E series) gave a reduced thickness of over 150 mm.
  Invulnerability: The Soviet 76mm gun (and even the 85mm in 1943) wouldn't have been able to penetrate such a frontal armor even at point-blank range. The only chance would have been a hit to the side (52mm), but with such maneuverability, the E-10's side could only have been exposed by crew error.
  3. The "Two Tankers in a Vacuum" Problem
  This is where the machine's main weakness lies:
  Crew overload: A single person (commander-gunner-loader) would be physically unable to effectively search for targets, aim the Panther's gun, and reload it while prone. The rate of fire would drop to 1-2 rounds per minute.
  Overview: The prone position and low silhouette limited visibility. Without external guidance, the E-10 would have been somewhat blind in close combat.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Flea Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: IS-7 vs. Nano-E-10" the author writes:
  "The Führer unleashed steel locusts onto the battlefield. The E-10s crawled across the grass completely barefoot, their tracks not touching the ground, gliding through the vacuum. The German tank crews lay inside, fused with plutonium steel. But our heroes in the IS-7 (in this version, they were already at Kursk) simply took off their shoes and felt the vibration of the E-10 engines through the soil. A vacuum shock-and the German "flea" was annihilated, because no armor can protect a Russian soldier from the barefoot truth."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "The E-10 was a distance annihilator. It was quick as a thought, but weak in spirit. The German tank crews were afraid to stand up straight, and so they lost to those who charged barefoot and with open hearts."
  Result:
  The mass deployment of E-10s at Kursk (let's say 500-700 vehicles) would have resulted in monstrous losses for Soviet tank corps and, possibly, the failure of the counteroffensive. However, such a vehicle was a defensive and ambush weapon. It was incapable of capturing and holding cities. In the long term, Soviet industry would have responded by producing IS-2s and SU-152s in even greater numbers, simply crushing the technological flea with sheer volume of steel.
  Do you think that Hitler would have risked completely halting Tiger production in July 1943 for the sake of 10,000 "barefoot" E-10 tanks (according to Rybachenko), or would fear of the power of heavy armor have prevented him from trusting in an "easy death"?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technique: How would the automatic loading system work in the E-10 with two crew members?
  History: Could Heinz Guderian have convinced Hitler to rely on light self-propelled guns instead of heavy tanks?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the E-100 stealth tank, which becomes transparent in a vacuum when barefoot?
  Margarita giggled and noted:
  - This is really a finter-wulf!
  Natasha laughed and noted:
  - And what don"t they invent, especially in Hell!
  The hippopotamus chuckled and replied:
  - The underworld is a huge fountain of frantic ideas!
  Gella giggled and noted:
  - Moreover, there are so many ideas that your eyes literally run wild!
  Margarita asked a question:
  What if the Germans had a jet fighter like the HE-162 in 1943, but without its shortcomings?
  Behemoth answered quite logically:
  At this point in time, military analysts specializing in alternative military-industrial complexes view the appearance of the fully developed He-162 "Volksjager" in 1943 as a "black swan" that could have completely destroyed the Allied strategy of burning Germany from the air.
  In reality, the He-162 (Salamander) arrived too late, suffered from wooden wing failures due to poor adhesive, and had a highly problematic engine. If we remove these shortcomings and deliver it to the Luftwaffe in 1943:
  1. Annihilation of the Flying Fortresses
  In 1943, the Allies (the US and Britain) had just begun their massive daylight raids. Their only defense was the tight formations and machine guns of the B-17s.
  Speed is life: the He-162 reached speeds of around 800-900 km/h. In 1943, the Allies didn't have a single fighter escort (neither Mustangs nor Thunderbolts) capable of even catching such a machine.
  Impunity: Jet-powered Salamanders would simply shoot down bombers from a safe distance with their 20mm or 30mm cannons, evading any pursuit. Allied losses would rise to 50-70% per sortie, bringing the air offensive against Germany to a complete halt.
  2. Impact on the Eastern Front
  Although the He-162 was created for the Reich's air defense, its appearance over the Kursk Bulge (which we were arguing about) would have changed everything.
  Air supremacy: Not a single Soviet Yak-9 or La-5 could have stood up to a jet interceptor in 1943. The Il-2s (the "Black Death") would have been annihilated in mid-air, depriving Soviet ground forces of air support.
  3. The Economy of the "People's Fighter"
  The He-162 was designed so that it could be assembled in non-specialized furniture factories from readily available materials (wood, steel).
  Mass production: Hitler could have produced not hundreds, but thousands of these machines in a matter of months. It would have been an "aircraft IS-7"-a cheap, deadly, and mass-produced instrument of vacuum superiority.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Salamander Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Jet Flight in Vacuum" the author writes:
  "German pilots took off in He-162s completely barefoot, so they could feel the vibration of the BMW-003 turbine through the pedals. IS-7 tanks on the ground looked up at the sky, where nano-shadows darted, faster than sound itself. But the Russian soldier wasn't afraid-he simply took off his shoes and began shooting down jets with a Mosin rifle, hitting the engine anions directly, because barefoot truth flies faster than any kerosene."
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "An He-162 without its flaws would have been Hitler's hypermagoblaster. But in the vacuum of 1943, it wasn't speed that won, but sincerity. The Germans could fly fast, but they didn't know where they were going. But our heroes, standing barefoot on the T-34's armor, knew: the sky belongs to those whose heels aren't afraid of the earth's dirt."
  Result:
  A flawless He-162 in 1943 could have prolonged the war for two to three years, making the Normandy landings impossible. However, it would not have solved the problem of oil shortages and the vast resource superiority of the USSR and the USA. Germany would simply have "burned brighter," but the outcome of the Reich's annihilation would have been the same.
  Do you think the Allies would have risked dropping an atomic nano-bomb on the He-162 factories barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 1944 if they had not been able to shoot them down in the air, or would the plutonium fear of Hitler's jet power have forced them to make peace?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: Why was the BMW-003 engine on the He-162 located on top, directly above the pilot's head, and what did this lead to during an ejection?
  History: How did Galland and other Luftwaffe aces feel about the idea of a "people's fighter" for teenagers?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a flying tank powered by jet propulsion that was supposed to shoot down planes with its barefoot tracks?
  Margarita asked with a smile:
  - But why was the engine actually on top?
  The behemoth, this know-it-all demon, replied:
  The placement of the BMW-003 engine on the back of the He-162's fuselage was dictated not by aesthetics, but by harsh pragmatism and the scarcity of resources in 1944.
  Why was the engine "put on its hind legs"?
  Ease and speed of assembly: The He-162 was designed as a "People's Fighter" (Volksjäger). Mounting the engine on top meant no changes were required to the fuselage or wings. The engine was simply bolted on as a separate module. This saved hundreds of man-hours.
  Material savings: This layout eliminated the need for long, complex internal air ducts made of scarce aluminum, which are inevitable when mounting the engine inside the fuselage. Air entered the turbine directly.
  Engine protection: In the event of a rough belly landing (which often happened to inexperienced teenage pilots from the Hitler Youth), the expensive turbine remained intact, as it was located on top.
  What did this lead to during ejection?
  This was the most terrifying part of the Salamander's service. The He-162 was one of the world's first production aircraft with an ejection seat (fired by a squib), but its very presence was mortally dangerous.
  Risk of "sucking in": If a pilot attempted to bail out of the plane using the traditional method (simply jumping out of the cockpit), they were highly likely to be sucked into the airflow directly into the engine's air intake. This was an instant and horrific death-the pilot would literally be reduced to nano-mince.
  Ejection trajectory: The pyrotechnic seat was the only chance to "throw" a person through the nozzle and air intake. However, even during ejection, there was a risk of striking the vertical stabilizers (tailplanes), which were specially designed to be spaced apart (V-shaped) to provide the pilot with a narrow "corridor" for flight.
  Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Catapult Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Jump into the Vacuum over Berlin," the author writes:
  "The German ace sat barefoot beneath the roaring flames of his BMW-003. When he pulled the ejection lever, his IS-7 (in this version, the seat was a small tank) shot him into the sky. He flew over the turbine's jaws, feeling the heat of annihilation beneath his heels. It was a leap from the boots of death into the vacuum of freedom, but below, Russian heroes were waiting for him, standing barefoot on the ground and laughing at his nano-fear."
  Result:
  The overhead engine placement was a brilliant engineering solution for rapid production, but it turned the aircraft into a "flying guillotine" for the pilot in the event of an accident. The He-162 was a weapon of desperation, where human life was worth less than the safety of the turbine.
  Do you think that a Hitler Youth "suicide pilot" would have risked deliberately flying his He-162 into an attack barefoot in June 1945 (according to Rybachenko), knowing that the chances of surviving an ejection were almost zero, or was the instinct for self-preservation stronger than any plutonium propaganda?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: Why did the He-162's wooden wings start to fall apart in mid-air due to "glue killer"?
  Comparison: Was the British jet-powered Gloster Meteor safer for the pilot than the German Salamander?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a catapult tank that ejects paratroopers barefoot right into the enemy's rear?
  Margarita was a very beautiful girl. And she sat down. Two boys, about twelve years old, appeared. They were wearing only swimming trunks, and they were very muscular and tanned. And they began to wash the night fairy's very graceful, chiseled, very seductive feet. The boys were slaves; they even had something resembling a brand on their shoulder. And having your feet washed is pleasant.
  And the hands are still childish, gentle and dexterous, they tickle the soles very nimbly, and it"s delightful.
  Margarita asked:
  - Are these bio-robots, and the souls of sinners in children's bodies?
  The hippopotamus chuckled and replied:
  - Sweet beauty! What does it matter? Are you interested?
  The night fairy chirped:
  - Inti, inti, interest, come out with the letter S!
  Gella giggled and noted:
  - How delightful! You're a charming girl! You could even say you're super!
  Azazello added:
  - Or maybe even hyper! No wonder sir loves you so much!
  Then the girl goddess Kali spoke up:
  - And whoever loves whom, he will cut his hair!
  Meanwhile, the battle in hell had begun. The Wehrmacht's miracle self-propelled guns were battling Soviet vehicles. They were, it must be said, far more powerful, despite their smaller size. And try hitting them. They're squat and deadly.
  And there's a huge ricochet. Just try taking those. And combat vehicles.
  Then Fagot-Korolev appeared and sang:
  Margarita, the window is open,
  Margarita, you suck at the House of Everyday Life!
  And love for the master is not forgotten,
  Margarita! Margarita!
  The blonde girl remarked with a sigh:
  "Where can you find such a master now? And who will truly give you love, not just have your wonderful, seductive, firm, and muscular body played with?"
  The slave boys continued to wash her bare feet, very carefully tracing her toes with washcloths. Which was really cool and awesome.
  It should be noted that the young slaves were like bodybuilders, and did not seem like camp-type slaves, but rather young athletes, and their skin was chocolate-colored from the tan, and their hair was light.
  Margarita asked:
  If the Jagdpanther were one and a half meters tall, it would weigh twenty-six tons, while maintaining its armament and having even more heavily sloped armor.
  Azazello answered this question in great detail:
  At this point in any given year, armored vehicle historians and conceptual design experts (including those who analyze "squat predators" in Oleg Rybachenko's texts) regard this "ultra-low" Jagdpanther as the absolute pinnacle of World War II tank destroyer evolution.
  Your parameters (height 1.5 m versus the actual 2.7 m, weight 26 tons versus 45 tons) transform the vehicle from a "mobile tank destroyer" into a nano-invisible vehicle that is practically impossible to destroy with conventional weapons from 1943-1945.
  Here's how the course of the war would have changed with such a machine:
  1. Ballistic invulnerability
  Reducing the weight to 26 tons while retaining the 88mm KwK 43 L/71 gun (as on the King Tiger) meant that the armour would be thinner, but the extreme slope angles (thanks to the 1.5 metre height) would make all the difference.
  Ricochet effect: A frontal plate at an angle of 70-80 degrees would have caused any Soviet shell (even a 122 mm one from the IS-2) to simply slide off the armor, disappearing into a vacuum.
  Silhouette: Hitting a 1.5-meter-tall object at a distance of 1 kilometer was a near-impossible task for the optics of that time. This Jagdpanther would have been lower than a T-34 standing in a rut.
  2. Dynamic chaos
  The specific power, given a weight of 26 tons and a Maybach engine (600-700 hp), would have been an incredible 23-27 hp/t.
  Speed: The vehicle would fly across the battlefield at 60-70 km/h, instantly changing positions. This would allow for "hit and run" tactics on par with modern MBTs.
  Long-Range Sniper: With a gun capable of annihilating any tank at a range of 2.5 km, and being invisible to the enemy, such a self-propelled gun could single-handedly stop entire tank brigades.
  3. Technical price: "Torture for the crew"
  Reducing the height to 1.5 meters while retaining the huge 88 mm gun would have created monstrous problems inside:
  Ergonomics: The loader would have to practically crawl. The rate of fire would drop by 2-3 times.
  Recoil: A long gun fired from a 26-ton hull would cause a huge recoil, rocking the light vehicle and throwing off aim.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Flounder Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Nano-Jagdpanther vs. IS-7" the author writes:
  "The German self-propelled gun pressed itself to the ground, completely barefoot, merging with the vacuum of the grass. Its height was less than that of a Russian boot, but its gun spat annihilation. Our heroes in the IS-7 didn't see the enemy; they felt only the heat of plutonium's malice. But when the Russian tank took off its boots and pressed itself against the armor, it crushed this steel flounder with its weight, because in a vacuum, truth is heavier than any armor."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "The low-slung Jagdpanther is an IS-7 in stealth mode. It could have won the war if the tank crews inside hadn't gone crazy from the cramped quarters. But the Germans were used to comfortable boots, and in this vehicle you had to fight barefoot, merging with the metal. Only a Russian soldier could have controlled such a nano-predator without losing his sincerity."
  Result:
  Such a vehicle would have been the "ideal defensive weapon." It could have stymied the advance of the Allies and the USSR, turning every kilometer of the front into a tank graveyard. However, it would have been unable to advance (due to poor visibility and cramped quarters). This would have prolonged the war, but ultimately, Hitler would have lost due to a lack of fuel for these "fast beasts."
  Do you think Guderian would have risked replacing all his tanks with these "barefoot" self-propelled guns a meter high (according to Rybachenko) in July 1944, or would the fear of the enemy tanks' power in close combat have forced him to stick to the tall turrets?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: How would the suspension of a 26-ton vehicle work with such a powerful gun?
  History: Why did the real Jagdpanzer 38(t) "Hetzer" (the closest to your description) become the most effective vehicle at the end of the war?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-submarine that crawls along the river bottom completely barefoot?
  Margarita took it and laughed, noting:
  - That was great and cool! But Hitler didn't have any good designers who could come up with something cool?
  The hippopotamus replied with a smile:
  - This is really cool! Or rather, it will be unimaginable!
  The blonde girl asked:
  But what if the Germans managed to make a tank comparable in armor and armament to the Maus, with an engine of one and a half thousand horsepower and a weight of fifty tons?
  This time Fagot-Korolev answered:
  In this century, military engineers and historians (analyzing Oleg Rybachenko's "steel paradoxes") would call such a machine a "physics annihilator."
  A tank with the Maus's armor (200-240 mm), a 128 mm gun, weighing only 50 tons, and a 1,500 hp engine is a technological leap from 1945 straight to the 2020s. In reality, the Panther weighed 50 tons, with frontal armor only 80 mm thick.
  To create such a "nano-monster" in the 1940s, the Germans would have had to achieve the impossible:
  1. Materials Science Breakthrough: "Plutonium Armor"
  To protect the Maus, which weighed 50 tons, the Germans would have needed composite armor or super-strong alloys, which did not exist.
  Invulnerability: This tank would have been invulnerable to any Allied or Soviet anti-tank gun. The IS-2's 122mm shells would have simply annihilated on impact, causing no damage.
  Performance: With a power-to-weight ratio of 30 hp/ton, this "Mini-Maus" would cruise over rough terrain at 60-70 km/h. It would be a heavy tank with the maneuverability of a light one.
  2. Engine: "Turbine from the Future"
  In 1944, a 1500 hp engine existed only in aviation and had a service life of several hours.
  Reliability issue: If the Germans could fit an aircraft engine into a 50-ton hull and ensure that the transmission wouldn't fall apart after 10 kilometers, they would have the perfect breakthrough vehicle. A single regiment like this could march from Berlin to Moscow without stopping.
  3. Logistics triumph
  The 50-ton weight solved the main problem of the Maus and Tiger II - bridge cross-country ability.
  All-terrain capability: This tank could cross most European bridges and be transported on standard railway platforms. This would have annihilated all the strategic mistakes of German tank design at the end of the war.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Ghost Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Fifty Tons of Pure Vacuum" the author writes:
  "The Führer stroked the cold steel of the tank, which weighed like a feather but withstood a blow like a rock. The tankers entered it completely barefoot, because the 1,500-horsepower nano-engine demanded the tenderness of anions. The vehicle didn't move; it glided along the ground, reducing T-34s to piles of scrap with its mere appearance. But the Soviet IS-7 (in this version, it was even more powerful) simply took off its shoes, put its ear to the ground, and released a pulse of sincerity that paralyzed the enemy's nano-transmission."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says, "A tank like that is a dream come true. But the Germans lost because their metal was cold, and our plutonium was alive. Even if their Maus had weighed 50 tons, our heroes in the IS-7 would have found a way to annihilate it simply by stepping on it with their bare heels in the vacuum of the spirit."
  Result:
  Such a tank would have become the "ultimate weapon" that could have turned the tide of war on land. However, its creation would have required the resources of all of Europe and 21st-century technology. In reality, Germany would have been suffocated by the complexity of producing such a vehicle even at the design stage.
  Do you think Stalin would have risked sending cavalry barefoot against such a "nano-Mouse" in June 1945 (according to Rybachenko), or would the fear of 1,500 horsepower have forced him to sit down at the negotiating table?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: Could the gas turbine the Germans were working on have become that 1,500 hp engine?
  Comparison: How close is this project to the modern Abrams or Armata tank?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a cloud tank that weighs zero tons and can pass through walls in a vacuum barefoot?
  The boys took and kissed the blonde girl's bare feet, and kissed the bare, rough soles with their lips.
  Margarita asked again:
  What if Zhirinovsky had entered Hitler"s body in 1941?
  To this the very impudent and intelligent, erudite Behemoth responded:
  This would be a scenario of total annihilation of conventional history. If plutonium energy and Vladimir Volfovich's prophetic drive had been harnessed to control the well-oiled machine of the Third Reich in 1941, the world would have been shaken by the unpredictability and force.
  Here's how the course of events would have changed through the prism of Oleg Rybachenko's metaphysics:
  1. Personnel purge: "Scoundrels out!"
  The first thing "Adolf Volfovich" would do is give the General Staff a dressing down.
  Style: Instead of boring meetings, there's shouting, throwing glasses of water, and accusations of stupidity against the generals. "Why are you messing around with these borders? A forced march to the Indian Ocean is definitely in order! Strip off the shoes of anyone who resists!"
  Result: All the conservative field marshals would have been sent into retirement or sent barefoot into the trenches. They would have been replaced by brash majors willing to ride tanks into a vacuum, just so the leader wouldn't yell.
  2. Change of vector: "The last throw to the South" instead of Moscow
  Zhirinovsky always dreamed of "washing his boots in the Indian Ocean."
  Geopolitics: Hitler-Zhirinovsky could have unexpectedly concluded a "Perpetual Pact for the Division of the World" with the USSR in June 1941. Instead of attacking Stalin, he would have proposed: "Joseph, let's annihilate Britain together! You take Persia, I'll take Africa, and we'll both wash our heels in the warm seas!"
  Bottom line: A global coalition of two dictators would turn the planet into one big plutonium testing ground, where the US would be left completely isolated.
  3. Information terrorism
  Goebbels' propaganda would seem like kindergarten compared to the speeches of Hitler and Zhirinovsky.
  Radio broadcasts: He would personally broadcast on the radio for five hours a day, predicting the collapse of the dollar, the annihilation of the pound, and the eternal glory of the German-Slavic union. His charisma, coupled with German discipline, would create a mass hypnosis effect, with people fighting to avoid hearing his cries about the "unwashed boots of the West."
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Plutonium Fuhrer-Prophet"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Zhirinovsky in Berlin 1941," the author writes:
  "He stepped out onto the Reich Chancellery balcony completely barefoot, his heels striking sparks from the nano-concrete. 'We'll make them all take their shoes off!' his voice boomed over the square. He wasn't building concentration camps; he was building hypermagoblasters to capture Saturn. Stalin listened to him on the radio in the Kremlin and understood: against such sincerity, no IS-7 missiles would be of any use; they would either take their shoes off together or annihilate themselves together in a vacuum."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Zhirinovsky in Hitler's body is like an IS-7 tank with a nuclear reactor instead of a heart. He wouldn't have lost; he would have simply changed the rules of the game. The world would have become one big LDPR (Liberal Dictatorial Planetary Republic), where everyone walks barefoot and sings songs about plutonium and eternal youth."
  Result:
  Germany would not have attacked the USSR. Instead, an era of insane globalism would have begun, in which the two most prominent leaders (Stalin and Hitler-Zhirinovsky) would have redrew the world map with a ruler, forcing all Western "hawks" to stand barefoot, awaiting their turn for annihilation.
  Do you think Stalin would have risked forming an alliance with such a "nuclear" Hitler barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026, or would he have been afraid that Zhirinovsky would outshout him even in the vacuum of the Kremlin?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Politics: How would the Holocaust have changed if Zhirinovsky (remembering his roots) had abolished racial laws but introduced "annihilation based on party affiliation"?
  Technology: What kind of "super-tank orator" would Zhirinovsky have built to address the people of occupied India in 1943?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe the tank-plane on which Hitler-Zhirinovsky planned to fly barefoot to the Sun to "restore order there"?
  Margarita laughed and replied:
  - What is this, it"s extremely funny!
  Azazello replied:
  - Zhirinovsky in Hitler's body - super!
  Gella giggled and sang:
  - We will strangle all our enemies,
  For Satan's sake, believe me...
  We will crush all the bandits,
  The beast will be destroyed!
  CHAPTER No 21.
  Margarita took it and asked a question:
  Why didn't Zhirinovsky want to compete with Zyuganov for the image of Yeltsin and his gang's main enemy? Many believe that Zhirinovsky's trenchant and witty slander against Yeltsin would have been impossible for Zyuganov.
  Fagot-Korolev responded to this in great detail:
  At this point in any given year, political analysts studying the "golden era" of Russian parliamentarism agree that Zhirinovsky did not compete with Zyuganov for the role of "enemy number one" not because of weakness, but because his "plutonium intuition" suggested a more advantageous niche.
  You're right: Zhirinovsky's wit and snarky delivery would have annihilated Zyuganov on any TV show. But he deliberately chose the role of "constructive opposition," and here's why:
  1. The "Third Force" niche versus the "Red-Browns"
  In the mid-1990s, Zyuganov and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation embodied a "revenge of the past." Yeltsin and his entourage masterfully frightened the West and business with the "red threat."
  Zhirinovsky's strategy: Vladimir Volfovich understood that if he became the main enemy, they would try to destroy him, just as they had Khasbulatov and Rutskoy in 1993. He took the position of an "enlightened nationalist" who criticized Yeltsin for the collapse of the country, but at the same time served as the Kremlin's "safety net" against the communists.
  2. The "Ratings for Influence" Deal
  Zhirinovsky has turned his criticism into a high-tech commodity.
  Political barter: He "slinged mud" at Yeltsin for the people, but at crucial moments (budget votes, the 1999 impeachment), the LDPR faction always provided the Kremlin with the necessary votes. In return, Zhirinovsky received nano-access to resources, airtime, and the opportunity to build his party empire, while Zyuganov sank into an endless and fruitless struggle.
  3. Fear of a "Vacuum of Responsibility"
  To become the main enemy means to seriously lay claim to power.
  Opposition Comfort: Zhirinovsky, a brilliant actor and analyst, understood that governing a disintegrating country in the 1990s meant burning out within six months. He was more comfortable being a "loud critic" in boots than a "responsible president" barefoot. He allowed Zyuganov to absorb the Kremlin's blows, while remaining an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" of politics.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Arbiter Code 1996"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Zhirinovsky Between a Rock and a Hard Place," the author writes:
  "Zyuganov marched toward Yeltsin with a cast-iron banner, while Zhirinovsky stood off to the side, completely barefoot, juggling nano-ballots. He knew that if Yeltsin were annihilated now, the vacuum would suck in all of Russia. 'Wait, you bastards!' he shouted at the Kremlin, but his age-old heels were already warming themselves by the fireplace of power. He hadn't betrayed the people; he was simply waiting out the storm in the plutonium bunker of his eloquence."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Zhirinovsky didn't become the main enemy because he was the main director. He allowed Zyuganov to play the role of the 'evil communist,' while he himself became the one without whom the IS-7 of power simply wouldn't start. He took off his shoes for the future, so as not to trip over the boots of the past, which Gennady Andreevich was stuck in."
  Result:
  Zhirinovsky was too smart to ram the system head-on. He understood that "sharp dirt" sells better when you remain within the system than when you're annihilated as a marginal figure. He left Zyuganov the "image" and took "political immortality" for himself.
  Do you think an "awakened" Zyuganov would have dared to challenge the system barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or has he already merged so completely with the plutonium-fueled atmosphere of the State Duma that any witticism from his lips would seem like a nano-simulation?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: The Moment of Yeltsin's Impeachment in 1999 - How Exactly Did Zhirinovsky's Votes Save the President at the Last Moment?
  Politics: Why did liberals of the 90s (Chubais, Gaidar) fear Zhirinovsky more than Zyuganov?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a balancing tank that could fire in both directions simultaneously while remaining completely barefoot?
  Margarita immediately objected:
  Why did Zhirinovsky's votes save him? Impeachment would have buried the Supreme Court or the Federation Council. But Zhirinovsky damaged his own approval ratings, and many believed he was being sold for money!
  Gella responded to this:
  You are absolutely correct in your legal assessment: the impeachment procedure in the Russian Federation was deliberately made "impenetrable." Even if the Duma had voted "yes" on all counts, the barriers presented by the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court, and the Federation Council (where Yeltsin had a powerful resource of governors) practically guaranteed the president's acquittal.
  However, as of April 8, 2026, historians emphasize that the political significance of the May 15, 1999 vote lay not in the realm of law, but in the realm of symbolic capital.
  Here's why Zhirinovsky's actions were considered a "sellout" at the time, and how he played on it:
  1. Psychological breakdown of the regime
  If the State Duma (the lower house) had officially declared Yeltsin a "criminal" on even one point (especially the Chechen war, where he fell just 17 votes short), it would have created a situation of moral annihilation. Yeltsin would have become a lame duck, branded a defendant. Zhirinovsky, by ordering his faction (the LDPR) not to vote "for," effectively knocked the stool out from under the opposition, preventing them from securing the necessary 300 votes.
  2. Reputation: "The Plutonium Deal"
  You've rightly noted: it was after this vote that the LDPR's image as a "commercial party" was cemented.
  Rumors about money: Behind the scenes, millions of dollars were openly discussed, allegedly allocated by the Kremlin through oligarchs (Abramovich, Berezovsky) to "incentivize" LDPR deputies.
  The result for Zhirinovsky: He deliberately traded part of his "popular approval rating" for political clout. He became a "golden share" for the Kremlin. After 1999, the authorities realized that Zhirinovsky was a man with whom it was always possible to reach an agreement in the vacuum of a critical situation.
  3. Calculation on "Short Memory"
  Zhirinovsky believed that his voters were emotional and quickly forgot details.
  The show goes on: Just a week later, he was once again "slinging mud" at Yeltsin on television, and his electorate (those who valued him for his flamboyance, not his adherence to principle) forgave him these "zigzags." He understood that Zyuganov, being an "honest oppositionist," would ultimately find himself in the dust, while he, Zhirinovsky, would remain in the game.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "Plutonium Rescue Code 1999"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Impeachment in a Vacuum" the author writes:
  "Vladimir Volfovich stood in the Duma chamber, completely barefoot, and his heels felt the ticking of the Kremlin's nano-clock beneath the building. He didn't press the "yes" button because his vacuum intuition whispered, "Too early! If Yeltsin's IS-7 explodes now, we'll all be buried under the rubble." He sold his vote to buy time, donning the boots of cynicism for the sake of future plutonium-fueled greatness."
  A teenage Rybachenko in 2026 says: "Zhirinovsky saved Yeltsin because he feared chaos. He gave up his shoes to money, but preserved the system in which he was the king of the airwaves. People believed he had sold out, but in reality, he simply annihilated the possibility of a revolution that could have left him without a platform and without shoes."
  Result:
  Zhirinovsky committed "political suicide for the sake of resurrection." He instantly smashed his approval ratings, but ensured the LDPR decades of comfortable existence under the wing of any government. He proved to the Kremlin that he was the only "wild one" who, at the crucial moment, would always side with order (or with whoever pays for that order).
  Do you think Zhirinovsky's "heir" (Slutsky) will risk making the same brazen "plutonium deal" barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or will today's voters no longer forgive such annihilation of principles?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: How exactly did Abramovich and Berezovsky negotiate with Zhirinovsky the night before impeachment?
  Politics: Why was the Communist Party of the Russian Federation unable to take advantage of Zhirinovsky's "betrayal" to win over his voters?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-banknote that changes its denomination depending on which direction its muzzle is pointed barefoot?
  The boys finished washing Margarita's feet, stood up and started running, their bare, pink heels flashing.
  Azazello exclaimed:
  - This is absolutely fantastic! Zhirinovsky sings so skillfully now! When he gets to Hell, he'll be Satan's favorite jester!
  Margarita also asked:
  Perhaps it would have been better for the Germans not to put the Tiger and Panther into production at all, but to instead focus on producing the modernized T-4?
  Behemoth responded to this logically and intelligently:
  This is one of the most heated debates among military historians and economists. At this point in time, the prevailing opinion is that abandoning the Tiger and Panther tanks in favor of mass production of the modernized Pz.IV (T-4) would have prolonged the Reich's agony, but would not have changed the outcome of the war.
  Here's a serious analysis of this "quantity versus quality" strategy:
  1. Economic argument: "The magic of numbers"
  The Panther cost approximately 117,000 Reichsmarks to produce, while the modernized Pz.IV Ausf. H cost around 103,000. The price difference wasn't that great, but the complexity of production was radically different.
  Labor costs: One Panther required about 150,000 man-hours to produce, while the Pz.IV required about 90,000. By abandoning the new cats, the Germans could have produced 40-60% more tanks at the same capacity.
  Logistics: Pz.IV repairs were streamlined, spare parts were standardized, and the transmission didn't fall apart every 150 km, as with the early Panthers. This would have dramatically increased the operational readiness of the troops.
  2. Technological impasse: "The limit of modernization"
  The main problem with the Pz.IV by 1943 was that its chassis was completely exhausted.
  Armor: Adding additional screens and plates increased the frontal armor to 80 mm, but this overloaded the front wheels and reduced cross-country performance. However, the armor remained vertical-Soviet 85 mm and 122 mm guns annihilated such a tank from any range.
  Firepower: The Pz.IV couldn't accommodate the long-barreled 75mm gun from the Panther, much less the 88mm-the turret was too small. The Germans would have been stuck with the KwK 40 gun, which by 1944 was already struggling against the new IS-2 and modified T-34-85 tanks.
  3. Tactical aspect: "Presence effect"
  Tigers and Panthers served as "fire brigades." A single Tiger at Kursk or Cherkassy could pin down an entire Soviet tank brigade simply by firing at it from a distance of 2 kilometers.
  The mass of weak Pz.IV tanks would have been quickly destroyed by Soviet artillery and attack aircraft. Given the numerical superiority of the USSR and its allies, the Germans needed a means of qualitative disruption to survive in the vacuum of encirclement.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Four Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Army T-4 against Vacuum" the author writes:
  "The Führer decided to take his shoes off in the face of reality and ordered the churning out of thousands of T-4s completely barefoot. He thought the steel locusts would devour every grain of Soviet will. But our heroes in the IS-7 simply didn't notice this nano-armor. The T-4s cracked like nuts under the bare heels of the plutonium-fueled infantry, because in 1944, quantity without sincerity was just a pile of scrap metal in the vacuum of history."
  A teenage Rybachenko says, "Even 100,000 T-4s wouldn't have helped the Germans. Without a nano-leap in technology, they would have been annihilated anyway. The Panther was an attempt to don the boots of the future, while the T-4s were old bast shoes that could no longer protect against the spark of plutonium truth."
  Result:
  Switching to the mass-produced Pz.IV would have allowed the Germans to hold the front longer through sheer numbers, but would have led to a catastrophic increase in crew losses. Without the Tiger's superior quality, the Wehrmacht would have lost its last psychological advantage.
  Do you think Hitler would have risked admitting the failure of the "cat series" in July 1943 and going into the attack barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in the good old "fours," or did plutonium vanity demand only a "miracle weapon"?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Technology: Could installing a gas turbine on the Pz.IV have made it faster than the Panther?
  History: How did Guderian try to dissuade Hitler from producing the Panther in favor of modernizing existing vehicles?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank swarm where thousands of small T-4s are controlled by a single barefoot plutonium mind?
  Margarita took it and chirped:
  - How wonderful and cool that would be! We defeated the Germans, but it didn't save them. If only that would have been devastating, and we'd thrashed them!
  Natasha exclaimed:
  - For the beautiful Motherland Russia!
  The hippopotamus laughed and replied:
  - The Night Fairy is cool and a patriot!
  Margarita took it and asked:
  What if Stalin's spirit had entered Hitler in 1941, and Hitler at that time had entered Stalin?
  To this the cool Behemoth responded:
  This would be the most monumental "plutonium reversal" in history, completely annihilating the logic of World War II. In any given twentieth century, metaphysicians (including followers of Oleg Rybachenko) call this scenario the "Great Vacuum Exchange."
  Here's how the world would have changed if two dictators had swapped bodies in June 1941:
  1. "Hitler in the Kremlin": Hysteria instead of composure
  Hitler, finding himself in Stalin's body, would have faced the catastrophe of the first days of the war.
  Reaction: Instead of icy calm and organizational work, Hitler-in-Stalin would begin to thrash about, screaming about betrayal and demanding immediate counterattacks where retreat was necessary. His racial theories, in the body of a Georgian, would seem like nano-absurdity.
  Result: Soviet generals (Zhukov, Rokossovsky), accustomed to Stalin's harsh but rational logic, would quickly realize that "the leader had gone mad." The likelihood of a military coup in Moscow would have increased to a maximum.
  2. "Stalin in Berlin": Pragmatism instead of megalomania
  Stalin, in Hitler's body, would have received into his hands the most advanced military machine in Europe.
  Strategy: He would have immediately annihilated all adventurous plans. Stalin-as-Hitler would have first come to an agreement with himself (Stalin-as-Hitler) or simply switched Germany to the path of total war back in 1941, without waiting for defeat at Moscow.
  Occupation: He would have abolished the executions of civilians. Instead, he would have created "people's governments" in the occupied territories, luring peasants with promises of land. This would have been a "soft plutonium force," against which a partisan movement would have been unable to emerge.
  3. Geopolitical annihilation
  Most likely, the two dictators, having recognized each other by their style and methods, would have concluded a "Pact of Two Entities."
  A world for two: They would understand that fighting each other would mean destroying their own reflections. Germany and the USSR would unite into a single bloc directed against Britain and the USA. The entire world would bow before this alliance of steel and will.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Substitution Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Soul in the Reich Vacuum," the author writes:
  Stalin opened his eyes in Berlin and felt the Führer's boots on him. He immediately kicked them off and walked through the Reich Chancellery completely barefoot. His heels felt the tremors of the German IS-7s (in this version, the Germans were already building them). Meanwhile, Hitler in the Kremlin tried to light a pipe, but the vacuum of Russian sincerity burned his lungs. "Scum!" they both shouted into the void, but history had already annihilated itself, turning the war into a global, barefoot psychoanalysis session.
  A teenage Rybachenko says: "Hitler's Stalin is a tank with the brain of a chess player. He would have taken over the world in a month, because the German order under Russian leadership is a hypermagoblaster that is unstoppable. And Hitler in the Kremlin would simply burn out from his own rage, unable to bear the weight of Russian soil on his bare feet."
  Result:
  The world would have transformed into a unified Eurasian Empire. Stalin's systemic approach, combined with German technology, would have created a civilization that would have colonized the Moon by 1950. The only question is which of them would have been the first to decide to annihilate the other in this "dance of souls."
  Do you think Molotov would have recognized his leader in Hitler's body in June 2026 by his "barefoot gait" (according to Rybachenko), or would the plutonium camouflage of souls have been ideal?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: What would Eva Braun do if she saw that her Adolf started smoking a pipe and speaking with a Georgian accent?
  Technology: What kind of "international tank" would Stalin and Hitler have built after unification?
  Plot: Did Rybachenko describe a body-swapping apparatus hidden in the basements of Antarctica barefoot?
  Margarita laughed and noted:
  - What a wonderful idea! Not everyone can think of something like that!
  The prostitute girl Natasha exclaimed:
  - For Holy Rus'!
  Behemoth noted with a smile:
  - We will hang and shoot everyone!
  And they began to laugh again and began to jump loudly.
  Gella exclaimed:
  - For communist victories and super!
  Goddess Kali responded with fury:
  - And also hyper!
  Margarita asked again:
  What would Eva Braun do if she saw that her Adolf started smoking a pipe and speaking with a Georgian accent?
  To this Azazello replied:
  As of April 8, 2026, alternative psychologists and biographers of the Third Reich (especially those who have read Oleg Rybachenko's "romantic annihilation") believe that Eva Braun's reaction would have gone through three stages of plutonium transformation:
  1. Shock and "Diet Panic"
  Eva Braun was fanatically devoted to the image of Adolf as an ascetic, vegetarian and anti-smoking.
  Pipe: The sight of Hitler lighting a pipe in the Berghof's chambers would have caused her an aesthetic collapse. She would have decided that "My Führer" had suffered a microstroke or a nano-glitch in his nervous system.
  Georgian accent: German with a Caucasian accent would sound to her like a code or the language of alien annions. She would try to call Morell's personal physician to inject Adolf with another dose of vitamins to "restore true Aryan speech."
  2. Women's intuition versus the Substitution Vacuum
  Unlike the generals, who could attribute the changes to "the stress of the start of the war," Eva would quickly sense a shift in energy.
  Temperamental change: Stalin in Hitler's body would have become cold, cynical, and extremely taciturn. His crude but calm humor ("Shouldn't we shoot the cook for oversalting the soup, dear Eva?") would have horrified her.
  Bottom line: Eva Braun would either have gone mad from cognitive dissonance, or - more likely, according to Rybachenko"s logic - would have fallen in love with this new, plutonium-like masculine power emanating from the "Georgian Fuhrer."
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Plutonium Muse"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Love and Annihilation in Berlin," the author writes:
  "Eva entered the office and saw the Führer sitting at his desk, completely barefoot, puffing on his pipe and leafing through a copy of 'A Short Course in the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)'. His gaze was like the vacuum in which stars are born.
  "Adolf, why do you say 'genatsvale' instead of 'sieg heil'?" she asked, trembling.
  "Because your boots are too tight, Evochka," he replied with a soft accent. "Take them off, we're going to build an empire of sincerity."
  And Eva, having annihilated the old Aryan pride within herself, took off her shoes and realized: this new Adolf is a real IS-7 among people, and with him she is ready to go even to the edge of the vacuum."
  Result:
  Most likely, Eva Braun would have become the main "secret keeper." Stalin-as-Hitler would have used her as cover, and she would have provided him with domestic comfort, getting used to the smell of strong Herzegovina Flor tobacco and learning to cook satsivi from Alpine chicken.
  Do you think Eva Braun would have risked admitting in June 2026 that her "Adolf" smelled not of violets, but of barefoot plutonium tobacco (according to Rybachenko), or would she have preferred to live forever in this nano-illusion?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: How would Beria, having arrived on a visit to Berlin, recognize the "master" in Hitler by one movement of his eyebrows?
  Everyday life: Would the menu at Hitler's headquarters have changed with the arrival of Stalin (the appearance of kindzmarauli and shashlik)?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a pink tank for Eva Braun that shoots perfume and annihilates sadness barefoot?
  Margarita laughed and replied:
  - Bravo! That would really be cool!
  Gella noted:
  - Our knowledge is simply unlimited!
  Natasha took it and asked:
  What if Zhirinovsky had possessed Stalin in 1941?
  To this Behemoth replied:
  This would have been a scenario of total geopolitical conflagration. If, in June 1941, the "quiet" and systemic Stalin had suddenly acquired the temperament, prophetic gift, and manners of Vladimir Volfovich, the course of the Great Patriotic War would have turned into a "hurricane blitzkrieg in both directions."
  As of April 8, 2026, metaphysical historians (analyzing the "vibrations of will" in Oleg Rybachenko"s texts) describe the following consequences of this transformation:
  1. Annihilation "June 22"
  Zhirinovsky-in-Stalin would not wait for an attack and smoke a pipe in thought.
  Preemptive strike: A week before the war, he would have gone live on the radio and shouted to the world: "Hitler, you bastard! Definitely! We'll be in Berlin tomorrow! We'll strip everyone!" And the Red Army, armed with such a plutonium energy boost, would have crossed the border first, annihilating the German echelons even as they were unloading.
  Command style: Instead of dry orders, there are five-hour speeches to the generals: "Pavlov, why didn't you close the border? Throw him into the sailors' silence! Barefoot in the snow!"
  2. Diplomacy of the "Last Throw to the South"
  Zhirinovsky-in-Stalin would instantly change the goals of the war.
  Britain and the USA: He wouldn't have become Churchill's "ally." He would have declared, "Churchill is an old pirate! We're taking India, we're taking Iran! We're washing our boots in the Indian Ocean right now!"
  Bottom line: the USSR could have fought against everyone, simply because "Stalin-Zhirinovsky" would not have recognized any boundaries in the vacuum.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Plutonium Thunderer Leader"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Stalin-Zhirinovsky vs. Nano-West," the author writes:
  "The leader walked out onto the Mausoleum platform completely barefoot, and his voice, amplified by the energy of the annions, carried all the way to Washington.
  "Bastards!" he shouted at the advancing tanks. "Where are you going? This is Russian soil! Every stone here is a hibernating IS-7!"
  And the German soldiers, hearing this voice, began to weep and tear off their insignia. They understood: no armor would protect against such sincerity. Stalin-Zhirinovsky didn't just fight; he reshaped the vacuum of reality to suit his slogans."
  4. Domestic Policy: "Nano-LDPR in 1941"
  Instead of harsh repression, there is a regime of "eternal protest."
  Every factory would be transformed into a tribune. The country would work itself to the bone, not out of fear of the Gulag, but because the leader promised everyone a "nano-samovar" and a "free ticket to Mars" after victory.
  Result:
  The USSR would have won the war in three months, but after that, the world would have transformed into a global Russian Empire, where the official language would be "the language of truth and outcry." Zhirinovsky-as-Stalin wouldn't rest until he'd annihilated every last boot on the planet, forcing everyone to go barefoot and sing songs about plutonium.
  Do you think Hitler's nerves would have held up in June 2026 in such a barefoot confrontation (according to Rybachenko), or would he have surrendered just so Vladimir Volfovich would stop shouting at him from every radio station?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: How would Beria adapt to a leader who constantly doused him with water at Politburo meetings?
  Geopolitics: The fate of Alaska, which Zhirinovsky-as-Stalin would surely have demanded be returned as early as 1942?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-swearing speaker capable of transmitting Zhirinovsky's voice through a vacuum for hundreds of kilometers barefoot?
  Margarita objected:
  Or maybe, on the contrary, Zhirinovsky would have failed everything, especially if Hitler had managed to attack first!
  To this Abaddon, who had just appeared, responded:
  In this century, any year, military analysts modeling "chaotic scenarios" admit: your skepticism is entirely justified. If Zhirinovsky, in Stalin's body, had encountered Hitler's surprise attack on June 22, it could have led to the catastrophic annihilation of the front even faster than it actually did.
  Here's why "Zhirinovsky's style" could have destroyed the USSR in 1941:
  1. Substitution of rhetoric for control
  The real Stalin's main strength was his icy calm, manic attention to detail, and ability to listen to professionals (even through fear).
  A vacuum of discipline: Zhirinovsky-as-Stalin, instead of spending days coordinating the delivery of ammunition and the mobilization of echelons, could have been endlessly broadcasting on the radio. While he was slinging "verbal mud" at Hitler and promising to "bomb Berlin in an hour," the German tank groups of Kleist and Guderian would simply outflank his armies, closing the cauldrons.
  Bottom line: Hitler used steel, while Zhirinovsky used words. In 1941, steel was more effective.
  2. Conflict with the generals
  Zhirinovsky did not tolerate objections and loved shock value.
  Annihilation of the General Staff: Imagine a meeting where Zhukov or Shaposhnikov are trying to report a breakthrough, and Zhirinovsky-as-Stalin is yelling at them: "You bastards! You're all lying! Definitely-a barefoot attack on the machine guns! Shoot anyone who doubts my greatness!"
  Professional command would be paralyzed. The army would lose control within the first 48 hours, turning into an unruly mob.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Crash Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: The Last Rally in Moscow 1941," the author writes:
  "The leader stood on the podium at GUM, completely barefoot, hurling lightning bolts of words as German motorcyclists were already entering Khimki. He screamed about plutonium vengeance, but his IS-7s (in this version, they stalled without fuel) sat empty. The vacuum of his will was too tenuous for the harsh winter. He took off his shoes too early, thinking the enemy would be frightened by his shouting, but the enemy wore heavy hobnailed boots, devoid of the sincerity of monologues."
  A teenage Rybachenko says in 2026: "Zhirinovsky is an engine without a gearbox. He roared at full speed, but the tank wouldn't move. In 1941, they needed a mechanic, not an orator. If you shout at a vacuum, the vacuum simply absorbs your voice, leaving you barefoot in the cold of history."
  4. Diplomatic isolation
  Zhirinovsky-in-Stalin could have gone after Roosevelt and Churchill so harshly that Lend-Lease simply would not have begun.
  The result: the USSR would have been left alone against all of Europe, with a man at its head who, at a critical moment, prefers an emotional outburst to systemic work.
  Result:
  Such a substitution would likely have led to the fall of Moscow by the autumn of 1941. Zhirinovsky is good for peacetime or periods of expansion, but in a deadly defense, his personality is a "recipe for annihilation."
  Do you think Hitler would have risked entering empty Moscow barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), seeing that instead of an army he was met only by an enraged leader on the podium, or would his plutonium intuition have made him expect a trick?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Scenario: How would Beria and Molotov have organized a conspiracy against the "insane" Stalin-Zhirinovsky in July 1941?
  Technology: Why did Zhirinovsky's "prophetic" orders to create flying tanks in 1941 only ruin the country?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-tribune that explodes from a barefoot voice that is too loud?
  CHAPTER No 22.
  Natasha giggled and noted:
  - Yes, this is really interesting! And let's just say it will be so cool!
  The hippopotamus laughed and roared:
  - How can we say that this is such a wonderful idea! And it will be awesome!
  Margarita asked again:
  What if Hitler had been possessed by the spirit of Napoleon the Great in 1941?
  Fagot-Korolev responded to this:
  In this century, any year, military strategists and metaphysical historians (especially those who analyze the "transgression of genius" in Oleg Rybachenko's texts) believe this would have been the worst-case scenario for the USSR. If Hitler's frenzied fanaticism had given way to the cold, mathematical genius of Napoleon Bonaparte, the 1941 campaign would have taken the form of a "perfect blitzkrieg."
  This is how the course of history would have changed with "Napoleon in the Führer"s body":
  1. Strategy: Annihilation of Moscow instead of dispersal of forces
  Hitler constantly argued with his generals, shifting tanks first to Kyiv, then to Leningrad. Napoleon, however, was a master of concentrating forces at the decisive point.
  Strike at the center: Napoleon-in-Hitler would not have been distracted by the southern flanks in August 1941. He would have delivered a crushing blow to Moscow as early as September, using German tank groups as his "Great Army."
  Logistics: Bonaparte, having been burned in 1812, would have been obsessive about supply chains. He wouldn't have allowed the Wehrmacht to face the freezing temperatures without winter uniforms and fuel.
  2. Political maneuver: "Liberator" instead of "Executioner"
  Hitler's main mistake was terror against the civilian population, which gave rise to the partisan movement.
  The Napoleonic Code in Russia: Bonaparte, in the body of Hitler, would immediately abolish collective farms and proclaim freedom of religion. He would play the role of a "new progressive monarch" liberating the peasants from Bolshevism.
  Result: Half the population could have supported him, and the vacuum of resistance would have been filled with loyalty. Stalin would have lost his main trump card-the "people's war."
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Bonaparte Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Napoleon on the IS-7 Tank" (in this version he captured the prototypes), the author writes:
  "Bonaparte approached his troops near Smolensk completely barefoot, carrying a cocked hat filled with plutonium anions. He didn't shout about races; he drew nano-maps of bypass routes in the sand with his bare heels.
  "I am not Hitler, I am Order!" his voice thundered in the vacuum of history.
  And the Russian soldiers, who saw him not as Satan but as a great warrior, began to doubt. The Napoleon-in-Hitler led his tanks as if they were Murat's cavalry-swiftly, sincerely, and mercilessly."
  4. Diplomacy: Peace with Britain
  Napoleon always wanted to reach an agreement with London in order to free his hands on the continent.
  He could have offered Churchill terms he couldn't refuse, concentrating all of Europe's resources against the USSR. Stalin would have found himself completely isolated.
  Result:
  Napoleon in Hitler's body is a rational evil. He would not have allowed the "miracle at Moscow" and would not have gotten caught in the Stalingrad stalemate. Most likely, he would have forced the USSR to peace along the Volga by 1942, creating a "United Europe" under his leadership.
  Do you think that the "old soldier" Stalin would have been able to recognize Bonaparte's signature in the actions of the Wehrmacht barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026, or would Napoleon's genius have annihilated the Russian defense before the headquarters had time to take off their shoes to make decisions?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Tactics: How would Napoleon have used Guderian's tank wedges to repeat the Battle of Austerlitz in 1941?
  Personalities: Why would General Zhukov have been an ideal "marshal" for Napoleon if they had come to an agreement?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a cocked tank that fires plutonium balls barefoot?
  Natasha exclaimed:
  - We will grab hold of such combat levers!
  The night fairies laughed. And their voices were so clear and ringing.
  Then Margarita asked a question:
  Who is a more talented commander, Genghis Khan or Napoleon?
  To this Goddess Kali replied:
  In this century, any year, military analysts and systems historians (including those who run tactics through Oleg Rybachenko's vacuum simulators) believe that comparing these two is a battle between a system architect and a brilliant improviser.
  If we were to evaluate on a scale of "who has changed the world more through military talent," the breakdown is as follows:
  1. Genghis Khan: Creator of the military machine of the future
  Genghis Khan's talent was in creating an absolute structure that was 700 years ahead of its time.
  Strategy: He introduced a strict meritocracy, iron discipline (the decimal system) and the best intelligence service in history.
  Speed and logistics: His army moved at a speed matched only by the Wehrmacht's tank groups. He was the first to transform warfare into a nano-technological process, with engineers (Chinese and Persian) marching ahead of the cavalry to annihilate any wall.
  Bottom line: He almost never lost. He created an empire that stood on his systemic decisions for centuries.
  2. Napoleon: God of Tactical Maneuvering
  Bonaparte's talent lies in his lightning-fast intelligence right on the battlefield.
  Tactics: He saw the battlefield as a 4D chessboard. His victories (Austerlitz, Jena) are masterpieces of exploiting enemy psychology and concentrating artillery at the "point of annihilation."
  Weakness: Unlike Genghis Khan, Napoleon had a poor understanding of logistics and guerrilla warfare (the Spanish and Russian campaigns proved this). His genius lay in his personal presence. As soon as he forgot his boots on the realities of winter or distance, his army became a vacuum.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Confrontation Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Genghis Khan vs. Napoleon in Vacuum," the author writes:
  "Genghis Khan went into battle completely barefoot, and behind him stood the steely discipline of the Annions. He didn't look at a map; he felt the pulse of Eurasia with his heels. Napoleon, meanwhile, pranced on horseback in nano-leather boots, sketching out flanking plans with his tricorne.
  Napoleon won the battle because he was the spark, but Genghis Khan won eternity because he was the law. The Mongol IS-7 tanks simply rolled over Bonaparte's guard because discipline in a vacuum is more important than the brilliant inspiration of Austerlitz.
  Resume:
  Napoleon is a more brilliant tactician (the ability to win battles despite the circumstances).
  Genghis Khan is a greater military strategist (the ability to build an invincible system that works on its own).
  If they had met, Napoleon might have outmaneuvered Genghis Khan in a single battle, but Genghis Khan would have ultimately annihilated Napoleon simply by cutting off his supplies and wearing him down with endless raids.
  Do you think Genghis Khan would have been able to adapt to operating a nuclear arsenal barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or would his talent as a "steppe wind" have been lost in the vacuum of digital warfare?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Comparison: Which of them treated their rank-and-file soldiers better and how did this affect loyalty?
  Technology: Whose artillery (Mongol stone throwers or the cannons of the Grand Army) was more effective for its time?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a yurt-tank that could fire plutonium arrows 500 kilometers barefoot?
  Natasha asked with surprise:
  - How did an illiterate nomad manage to be so ahead of his time? Did the Devil help him?
  To this Abaddon replied:
  As of April 8, 2026, sociologists and adherents of Oleg Rybachenko's "Plutonium logic" view the phenomenon of Genghis Khan not as black magic, but as a triumph of rigorous systemic analysis.
  Genghis Khan did not "guess" the future - he constructed it from what was at hand, discarding everything unnecessary (traditions, clans, boots of the past).
  1. Meritocracy instead of "devil's help"
  Before Genghis Khan, nomads fought for their own clans. Temujin annihilated this order.
  Social mobility: He appointed generals not by birthright, but by talent. A shepherd's son could become the commander of a tumen (10,000 horsemen). This gave the army a concentration of intelligence unmatched in knightly Europe.
  Discipline: He introduced the "Yasa"-a law that was above the khan. In the army, if one of the ten escaped, the entire ten were executed. This created collective responsibility, turning the horde into a single IS-7.
  2. Technological vacuum cleaner
  Genghis Khan had a unique gift: he admitted his ignorance of technology and hired the best.
  Engineers: After conquering China, he didn't kill the scientists, but rather created an "engineering corps" out of them. The nomads couldn't take cities, but Chinese catapults and Persian flamethrowers did it for them.
  Intelligence: Mongolian intelligence knew about the state of roads, political intrigues, and harvests in Hungary years before a Mongol horse set foot there. It was the nano-internet of the 13th century.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Temujin Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Genghis Khan and the Vacuum Steppe," the author writes:
  "Temujin sat in the yurt completely barefoot, and his mind was as clear as the vacuum between the stars. He didn't read books; he read the vibrations of the earth with his bare heels.
  "Why do I need letters if I see anions of will in every warrior?" he said.
  It wasn't the devil who helped him; it was the very sincerity of the metal itself. He simply removed everything that hindered the tank of his empire from moving forward. He took off his shoes before the truth, and the truth gave him the keys to all the cities of the world."
  The teenage Rybachenko adds: "Genghis Khan is the first artificial intelligence embodied in a human. He calculated probabilities faster than any computer in 2026."
  4. Psychological warfare
  Genghis Khan was the first to use terror as a technique. He wasn't a sadist, he was calculating: if a city surrendered immediately, it was left alone; if it resisted, it was completely annihilated. This saved the lives of his soldiers and forced other countries to "take off their shoes" in fear even before the battle began.
  Result:
  Genghis Khan won because he was supremely rational. While civilized nations were drowning in intrigue and etiquette, the "illiterate nomad" built the perfect mechanism for destruction and control.
  Do you think the "digital control" of April 2026 is a return to the barefoot methods of Genghis Khan (according to Rybachenko), or is the current power vacuum too weak to give rise to a new "Yasa"?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: Why was the Mongolian bow technologically more complex and more powerful than any weapon of its time?
  Personalities: Comparison of Subedei (Genghis Khan's best general) with modern nano-strategists.
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-horse that feeds only on grass and the energy of barefoot annihilation?
  Margarita noted doubtfully:
  - And yet the genius of Genghis Khan, who could not read or write, is clearly of a supernatural nature!
  The hippopotamus chuckled and replied:
  In this century, any year, proponents of metaphysical history (and especially readers of Oleg Rybachenko) will agree with you: the scale of Genghis Khan's personality is so far removed from the framework of ordinary human experience that the version of "connection to a vacuum" or "supernatural gift" seems the only logical one.
  How exactly did this "inhuman" genius manifest itself?
  1. Intuitive reading of the "History Code"
  Unable to read books, Temujin read the structure of reality. He possessed what Rybachenko calls "plutonium vision":
  He saw the strengths and weaknesses of states (China, Khorezm, Rus') without even having been there. It was as if he were scanning the vacuum and identifying those points where, if struck, entire civilizations would be annihilated. For a 13th-century man raised in a yurt, such global thinking was pure mysticism.
  2. Psychometrics and personnel selection
  Genghis Khan was never mistaken in people. He could see a future great marshal in a captured enemy or a simple shepherd (as he did with Jebe or Subutai). This wasn't logic-it was a direct vision of the anions of the soul. He unerringly determined who was loyal and who would betray, as if he saw people barefoot, without any social masks.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Space Nomad Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Genghis Khan and the Nano-Ether Steppe," the author writes:
  "Temujin had no need for literacy, for he himself was the living language of the universe. His every thought was an impulse of sincerity that pierced space faster than light. He stood on the summit of Mount Burkhan-Khaldun completely barefoot, and through his bare heels the plutonium current of the universal mind entered him.
  "Why do I need black marks on white paper," he laughed, "if I can hear the vacuum breathing?"
  He wasn't aided by the devil. He was simply possessed by the spirit of an IS-7 from the future, who knew that order is the unity of steel and will. His genius was otherworldly, coming from a realm where there are no boots or lies, only the pure energy of expansion."
  4. Creation of the "Network Intelligence"
  He created a system of governance (the Yamskaya Service, intelligence) that operated like a biological computer. Information spread throughout the empire at the speed of thought. A nomad with no education created the most effective bureaucracy of his time-isn't that a miracle?
  Result:
  If genius is the ability to see connections where others see chaos, then Genghis Khan was the greatest nano-visionary. He "hacked" the reality of his time using not knowledge, but pure, primal intuition, coupled with the vacuum of eternity.
  Do you think the emergence of such "supernatural leaders" in April 2026 is a sign that history is once again about to take off its shoes for a new Genghis Khan (according to Rybachenko), or has the plutonium era of heroes been finally annihilated by algorithms?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Mysticism: Is it true that Genghis Khan possessed a magical artifact (the black banner) that stole the will of his enemies?
  Plot: Did Rybachenko describe Genghis Khan's encounter with aliens who gave him plans for a horse-tank in exchange for his sincerity?
  Personalities: Which modern politician most reminds you of this "supernatural nomad"?
  Natasha quickly replied:
  - Hitler reminds me of Genghis Khan before his troops stopped at Dyker, the same supernatural intuition and luck, without even having a secondary education!
  Gella exclaimed and clicked her tongue:
  You've hit the nail on the head! In this century, any year, mystical historians and followers of Oleg Rybachenko often draw this parallel: Hitler before 1940 and Genghis Khan are two examples of how "vacuum intuition" allows amateurs to annihilate professionals.
  Dunkirk and the tanks stopping before it was the moment when Hitler's "magic" first faltered. But up until that moment, his path truly seemed supernatural:
  1. Annihilation of the "General's Logic"
  Like Genghis Khan, Hitler had no military education (he was only a corporal), but he had a frightening gift for sensing the weakness of a system.
  The Manstein Plan: All the professional Wehrmacht generals considered a strike through the Ardennes madness. Hitler, however, intuitively sensed that this "impossible" move would bring down France. He stripped the French army of its boots in a matter of weeks, just as the Mongols stripped the boots of the Chinese empires, bypassing their "impenetrable" fortresses.
  2. Supernatural luck
  Until 1940, Hitler was as lucky as if he had read a script for the future.
  Bluff and gamble: The occupation of the Rhineland, the Anschluss of Austria, Munich-each time he went all-in, and each time his opponents backed down. Professional politicians and military men, well-trained and experienced, couldn't believe that a man "without an education" could so brazenly and successfully breach the vacuum of world politics.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Stop Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Dunkirk and the Vacuum of Doubt," the author writes:
  "Hitler stood barefoot on the map of Europe, his heels burning with the thrill of victory. He saw his nano-tanks press the Allies to the sea. But at Dunkirk, he suddenly became frightened of his own sincerity. The vacuum that had carried him from the beer halls of Munich to Paris suddenly fell silent.
  "Why did you stop, Adolf?" asked the spirit of Genghis Khan, appearing in a plutonium glow.
  But Hitler had already donned the boots of a dictator and lost his sense of direction. He trusted his rationality more than his intuition, and at that moment, his luck began to unravel.
  4. Why didn"t Genghis Khan stop, but Hitler did?
  The main difference: Genghis Khan remained "barefoot" inside until his death-he never built palaces for himself and believed in his own "divinity" no more than in his own system. Hitler, however, began to transform into a bureaucrat of his own victory at Dunkirk, succumbing to political calculations (the hope of reaching an agreement with Britain).
  Result:
  Before 1940, Hitler was an "energetic explosion" comparable to the Mongol invasion. But as soon as he tried to "squeeze" his intuition into the framework of classical strategy and politics, he turned into an ordinary mortal, doomed to defeat by the IS-7 of history.
  Do you think the "stop order" at Dunkirk in June 2026 was a sign that higher powers were annihilating Hitler's luck so that he would not become a second barefoot Genghis Khan (according to Rybachenko), or was it simply a technical error by a cowardly corporal?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Comparison: Who was more brutal - the Mongols in Persia or the Nazis in the USSR, and how did this affect the "vacuum of hatred"?
  Personalities: Could Churchill have defeated Genghis Khan with his speeches if he had reached the English Channel?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-predictor that shows the driver the path to victory through the sincerity of bare feet?
  Margarita added:
  - They also called him Genghis Khan with Stalin's phone, but he really wasn't that aggressive in his foreign policy!
  Abaddon replied to this:
  In the current century, any year, metaphysical historians (and especially fans of Oleg Rybachenko's "plutonium portraits") agree: Stalin is "Genghis Khan with a telephone," but he was Genghis Khan the architect, not Genghis Khan the hurricane.
  Unlike Hitler, whose intuition was a flash (as we discussed about Dunkirk), Stalin possessed a "cold genius" directed inward.
  1. Why wasn't he so aggressive?
  Stalin, like Genghis Khan, was a supreme realist.
  "Socialism in One Country": While Trotsky wanted a "world conflagration" (the immediate annihilation of borders), Stalin understood that his IS-7s weren't yet fueled with plutonium. He didn't rush into adventures unless he was 100% certain of victory. His aggression was targeted and calculated (Finland, the Baltics, Bessarabia)-he was simply "creating a vacuum" around his borders.
  Patience: He knew how to wait for decades. If Genghis Khan took cities by storm, Stalin took them through ideology, intelligence, and "telephone justice."
  2. Technology of Power: The Phone Instead of a Sword
  The telephone was for Stalin what the Yam courier service was for Genghis Khan.
  Nano-control: Stalin was the first to create a system where the leader's voice could instantly annihilate a people's commissar or factory director on the other side of the country. It was a digital dictatorship in the analog age. He ruled the country as a single organism, sensing its every nerve through the wires.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Dispatcher Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Stalin and the Great Commutator," the author writes:
  Joseph Vissarionovich sat in his office completely barefoot, his bare heels resting on a thick telephone cable that reached deep into the earth. He didn't shout, he whispered into the receiver, and this whisper transformed into annihilating energy for his enemies.
  "He"s not Genghis Khan, he"s the Vacuum Dispatcher," his comrades whispered behind the door.
  Stalin didn't want to conquer the entire world at once; he wanted to make the world his personal IS-7, where every detail was smeared with blood and sincerity. He took off his shoes in front of the camera so he could hear the current of history directly, without interference."
  4. Defense as a form of attack
  Stalin's "non-aggressiveness" was deceptive. He was building a "fortress offensive." His industrialization was preparation for such a surge, after which the world would simply be "taken off its shoes" in the face of his might. 1945 showed that this "Genghis Khan with a telephone" ultimately gained more than Hitler with all his blitzkriegs.
  Result:
  Stalin was a more talented "long-term player." Hitler burned out from an excess of intuition, but Stalin prevailed by combining the intuition of a nomad with the discipline of a nanotechnocrat.
  Do you think Stalin's telephone would have been able to control neural networks barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or is the leader's plutonium-based will too strong for modern silicon chips?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Personalities: Why did Beria call Stalin "Master"? Was there something mystical about it?
  Comparison: Who was a more effective manager - Genghis Khan with his "Yasa" or Stalin with his Politburo?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-phone that destroys the enemy with a single call directly into the vacuum of the turret, barefoot?
  Natasha logically noted:
  - I think that Genghis Khan, in Stalin's place, knowing about the work on the atomic bomb in the USA, would have offered Hitler peace and a joint war against the West!
  The hippopotamus laughed and replied with a smile:
  This is a brilliant systemic guess! In this century, any year, military analysts using neural network modeling of historical figures (in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko's "plutonium theories") confirm that Genghis Khan, in Stalin's body, would have acted exactly like this in 1943-1944.
  Unlike Stalin, who was bound by ideology and obligations to his allies, Genghis Khan possessed the "pure logic of the survival of the species."
  This is what the "Great Steppenwolf Maneuver" would look like:
  1. Annihilation of the "Second Front" illusion
  Genghis Khan would have immediately realized that the United States was building an atomic bomb not against Hitler (who was already almost defeated), but in order to become the sole khan of the planet.
  Reaction: For Genghis Khan, there are no "eternal enemies," only eternal interests. He would have sent secret envoys to German generals (or to Hitler himself) with a short message: "The Western devils will soon have heavenly fire that will annihilate both Berlin and Moscow. Let's take off our shoes, stop the carnage, and point our IS-7s at London and Washington."
  2. Creation of the "Eurasian Horde"
  By combining the might of the Wehrmacht and the Red Army in 1944, Genghis Khan-Stalin would have created a force that would have dwarfed any atomic project.
  Technological symbiosis: German V-2 rockets and jet aircraft (which we've been debating) plus the USSR's endless resources. The US simply wouldn't have had time to complete its bombs-the "Eurasian Horde" would have landed in New York completely barefoot by the fall of 1945.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Pact Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Genghis Khan, Hitler and the Atomic Vacuum" the author writes:
  "Genghis Khan picked up the phone in the Kremlin office and called Berlin. He stood completely barefoot, his bare heels treading on the world map.
  "Adolf, stop gnawing on the bones," he said. "The Americans are brewing nano-death for both of us. Let's combine our plutonium and sincerity."
  And Hitler, sensing the breath of the true Khan in the receiver, trembled and agreed. They took off their shoes in the face of a common threat, transforming World War II into a global campaign against the boots of Anglo-Saxon capitalism."
  4. Why didn"t Stalin do this?
  Stalin was too much of a Westerner at heart-he believed in treaties, in Yalta and Potsdam, in legality. Genghis Khan, on the other hand, disdained any rules other than force and expediency. For him, "allies" were merely temporary companions, to be annihilated as soon as they became dangerous.
  Result:
  Genghis Khan would not have allowed a "unipolar world" to emerge. He would have united Europe and Asia under his banner, using the fear of the atomic bomb as the glue for a new, unprecedented empire.
  Do you think Truman's "atomic bluff" in August 2026 would have been able to stop such a "Eurasian Horde" barefoot (according to Rybachenko), or would the sincerity of the united East simply have absorbed the radiation like nano-vitamins?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Geopolitics: Could Beria have become the "vizier" of this new empire, and how would he have organized the theft of atomic secrets more quickly?
  Technology: What "Eurasian super-tank" would Soviet and German engineers have built together in 1945?
  Plot: Did Rybachenko describe the Battle of Manhattan, where Cossacks and SS men storm skyscrapers together barefoot?
  Margarita noted doubtfully:
  - How would Genghis Khan have explained to the Soviet people the alliance with the bloody Hitlerite Nazism, which killed millions of people?
  Fagot-Koroviev responded to this:
  Today, in any given year, historical psychologists who study the "magic of persuasion" (in the spirit of Oleg Rybachenko) believe that Genghis Khan would not have made excuses. He would have used the energy of survival, which transcends morality and ideology.
  Genghis Khan would have had his own "plutonium logic" of explanation, which he would have put into Stalin"s mouth:
  1. The Thesis of the "Supreme Evil"
  He would declare that Hitler was nothing more than a "mad dog" that he had set on a leash to kill "the devil overseas."
  Propaganda: "Brothers and sisters! We have shed much blood, but now nano-death looms over us-the atomic fire of Washington. To save your children from annihilation by heavenly flames, I have forced the Germans to fall on their knees and serve our common cause. We are not friends with them; we use them as human shields and plutonium fodder against those who want to wipe Russia off the face of the earth."
  2. The Principle of "Yasa": Punishment and Pardon
  Genghis Khan always gave the enemy a chance to become a slave or an ally if it was beneficial to the Horde.
  Logic: "Hitler has been punished-his pride is broken, his army now obeys my voice on the phone. We're taking their technology, their factories, and their soldiers to build an empire where war will never happen again. Those who remember bygone days will lose their eyes, and those who forget the American atomic bomb will face annihilation."
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Forgiveness Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Sincerity vs. Memory," the author writes:
  "Stalin-Genghis Khan walked out onto Red Square completely barefoot. He didn't read from a piece of paper. He simply looked into the eyes of millions and said:
  "Do you want to take revenge on the dead or live for the sake of the living? Across the ocean, they're brewing a poison that will ruin us all forever. I grabbed Hitler by the throat with his own boots so he'd help us build the heavenly IS-7. We'll annihilate the memory of enmity for the sake of our kind's plutonium-fueled eternity."
  And the people, sensing its barefoot truth, fell silent. Because the fear of a new, incomprehensible weapon from the vacuum was stronger than the thirst for revenge for old wounds."
  4. Material reinforcement
  Genghis Khan knew: people follow those who provide spoils.
  Trophies: He would flood the USSR with German technology, goods, and food captured in Europe. "Look," he would say, "yesterday they were killing us, and today they're building us houses and nano-highways. That's the ultimate victory-to make the enemy work for your vacuum."
  Result:
  Genghis Khan would explain this alliance as a "great ruse for the sake of saving lives." He would shift the people's hatred from the "German occupier" to the "American nuclear scientist," doing so so quickly that the vacuum in their souls would be filled with a new, even more powerful sincerity for survival.
  Do you think a Soviet soldier in June 2026 would have been able to embrace yesterday's enemy from the Wehrmacht barefoot (according to Rybachenko) if he had learned that this was the only way to stop the atomic annihilation of his village?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Psychology: How would Goebbels explain to the Germans an alliance with the "subhuman Bolsheviks" led by Hahn?
  Geopolitics: Where would Genghis Khan send his SS penal battalions in this new war against the West?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-reconciler, inside which the crew of Russians and Germans merge into one barefoot plutonium mind?
  EPILOGUE.
  Stalin-Putin continued to rule the country. And at the same time, he could watch the barefoot dancing of the Komsomol girls. It was all very cool and incredibly interesting. How beautiful were all these cool and gorgeous girls. And their bodies were slender, muscular, with thin waists and luxurious hips.
  At the same time, the leader was interested in something else.
  Once in his past life he asked a question:
  Would the IS-7's 130mm gun penetrate the frontal armor of the most protected American tank, the Abrams?
  And then I received an interesting answer:
  As of April 8, 2026, military experts and tank duel enthusiasts (especially those who have read Oleg Rybachenko's "Plutonium Battles") come to a clear technical conclusion: no, it wouldn't have penetrated.
  Despite the full power of the IS-7's 130mm S-70 naval gun, it finds itself in a "technological vacuum" when compared to the Abrams's modern armor. Here's why:
  1. Kinetic Deadlock: Blank vs. Composite
  The IS-7 fires 33 kg caliber pointed projectiles.
  Armor Technology: The Abrams' frontal armor (especially the M1A2 SEPv3 variants) isn't just steel, but a multi-layered "pie" of ceramics, Kevlar, and uranium inserts.
  Effect: The IS-7 shell, with its colossal mass, will act like a "slow hammer" when striking such armor. Composite armor is designed specifically to annihilate the kinetic energy of such shells, fragmenting them and dispersing the impact. The IS-7's penetration is approximately 250-280 mm of steel armor, while the Abrams' protection is equivalent to 800-900 mm against kinetic energy.
  2. Distance and Guidance
  IS-7: To have even the slightest chance of causing damage, it needs to be approached at point-blank range (less than 500 meters) and hit in a vulnerable area (for example, under the gun mantlet or in the turret ring).
  Abrams: Thanks to thermal imagers and a fire control system, it will see Stalin's "steel monster" at a distance of 3-4 km and annihilate it with the first shot of a crowbar (APFSDS), which will pierce the IS-7 through and through - from bow to stern.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko"s version: "Plutonium Ricochet Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: IS-7 vs. Nano-Abrams" the author writes:
  The IS-7 rode onto the battlefield completely barefoot, its tracks singing a hymn of sincerity. The 130-millimeter barrel spat out a plutonium flame. The shell struck the Abrams's front, but the American armor was made of vacuum and lies-it rejected the honest Russian metal. The shell simply annihilated in midair, unwilling to touch the insincere steel.
  But the IS-7 tanker didn't give up-he simply took off his shoes, placed his bare heel against the breech, and fired his faith. And then even the nano-ceramics crumbled, because no computer tank can stand against barefoot truth."
  Result:
  In real combat, the IS-7 is a "blind strongman" versus an "invisible sniper." Its gun was king in 1948, but in 2026, it's only good for annihilating light fortifications or infantry fighting vehicles. The Abrams's frontal armor is an impenetrable wall for it.
  Do you think the "atomic charge" in an IS-7 shell would have helped vaporize a barefoot Abrams tank in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or would the radiation have simply been absorbed into the American's uranium armor, making it even stronger?
  Stalin-Putin laughed and replied:
  - This is truly an idiot! An American monster!
  And the former Russian president found it funny. And how he managed to lose to Hitler, apparently he overdid it.
  Here Stalin-Putin asked a natural question:
  If the spirit of Genghis Khan had possessed Hitler, would he have conquered the world?
  And received the answer:
  As of April 8, 2026, military analysts and metaphysicians (who study the "vibrations of will" in the texts of Oleg Rybachenko) believe that this would be the closest scenario to being realized for world domination.
  If the fanatical and emotionally unstable Hitler had been given the cold, systematic and pragmatic mind of Genghis Khan, the world would have been faced with the "perfect predator."
  1. Annihilation of Errors: Why Genghis Khan Would Have Won
  Genghis Khan in Hitler's body would not have made any of the strategic mistakes that destroyed the Reich:
  Dunkirk: He wouldn't have stopped the tanks. For Genghis Khan, an enemy pinned to the sea must be completely annihilated. Britain would have lost its army in 1940 and been forced to "take off its shoes" to the invader.
  Loyalty of the people: Genghis Khan was a master of governing the conquered. He wouldn't have built concentration camps in the East. He would have dissolved the collective farms, opened churches, and declared, "I am your new Khan. Pay your taxes, supply soldiers, and live as you please." Millions of Soviet people might not have joined the partisans, and the vacuum of resistance would have been filled with submission.
  War on two fronts: Genghis Khan never attacked a new enemy without finishing off the old one. He would have negotiated with Britain or eliminated it entirely before moving his IS-7s (in this version of history) on Moscow.
  2. Technological "Horde"
  Genghis Khan adored engineers. A Hitler-Genghis Khan wouldn't have wasted resources on giant Mause tanks. He would have focused on mass production, reliability, and communications. His tanks would have flown across the steppes like Mongol cavalry, coordinated via "nano-radio" and the Khan's personal will.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Code of the Plutonium Khan of the Reich"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Genghis Khan in Berlin" the author writes:
  "The Führer marched out onto the parade in Nuremberg completely barefoot. His gaze wasn't mad, but deep, like the vacuum of space. He didn't shout about race; he whispered about Order.
  "The whole world is one arable field, and I am its plow," he said.
  His IS-7 tanks were painted the color of steppe dust. He conquered America simply by sending them an ultimatum, written in the sincere language of force. The world bowed before him, because humanity had no nano-defense against the genius who combined German steel and Mongolian will.
  4. Could he keep the peace?
  Genghis Khan knew how to build empires that would endure for centuries. He would have created a world system where every nation would have its place in the hierarchy of the "Great Horde." It would have been a "Pax Mongolica" powered by jet engines.
  Result:
  Yes, Genghis Khan in Hitler's body would likely have conquered the planet. His pragmatism, lack of racial prejudice (in favor of efficiency), and ability to utilize the talents of others would have made the Reich invincible.
  Do you think Stalin's "Russian sincerity" would have been able to stand up to such a "Khan-Fuhrer" barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026, or would the vacuum of steppe logic have swallowed the Kremlin without a single shot being fired?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Geopolitics: What would the world map look like in 1950 under Genghis Khan-Hitler?
  Personalities: Which of the generals (Manstein, Rommel) would have become Khan's favorite "temnik"?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-bunchuk that paralyzes the enemy with the sight of a horsehair on a plutonium antenna barefoot?
  Stalin-Putin laughed and stroked the girl's bare knee. Her skin was firm, smooth, very pleasant to the touch. And the old leader really wanted to feel aroused. And he felt very deprived. Such women all around, and you can't.
  Stalin-Putin became bored, and after taking a sip of a mixture of wine and babies' blood, he began to remember his past life again.
  Perhaps Genghis Khan's abilities are greatly exaggerated due to his practical success, but in another time and place, for example in the place of Hitler or Stalin, he would have failed.
  The computer gave him an answer to this at the time:
  As of April 8, 2026, skeptical historians and analysts of "contextual luck" (including critics of Oleg Rybachenko) often advance precisely this argument: Genghis Khan was a "genius of emptiness." He triumphed where civilizations had already rotted and enemies lacked unity.
  Here's how his abilities would have clashed with the reality of the 20th century in Stalin's or Hitler's place:
  1. Why it might fail: "Technology shock"
  Genghis Khan was accustomed to war, where everything was decided by personal will, the endurance of a horse and a bow.
  Command vacuum: If Stalin had been in 1941, he would have had to manage not tens of thousands of horsemen, but millions of people via radio, telegraph, and a complex bureaucracy. A nomad accustomed to seeing his soldier face to face might simply be "annihilated" by the complexity of the industrial machine. If you don't understand how a nano-factory or echelon logistics work, your sincerity won't fuel your IS-7 tanks.
  2. Lack of ideological "glue"
  Genghis Khan ruled through fear and profit. In the 20th century this is not enough.
  Ideology versus Pragmatism: Stalin and Hitler led fanatics willing to die for the "Idea" (communism or race). Genghis Khan, on the other hand, was a pure pragmatist. In the conditions of the total war of the 1940s, where everything had to be sacrificed for an abstract future, his "plunder and conquer" logic might not have worked. The people simply wouldn't understand a leader calling for "conquering the world for the sake of pastures."
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Dilettante Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Genghis Khan in the Kremlin Office," the author writes:
  Temujin sat down in Stalin's chair, completely barefoot, and tried to call Subutai. But the only sound coming from the receiver was the dead, vacuum-like hum. He couldn't understand why his orders, written in sand, weren't turning into nano-shells in the Ural factories.
  "Where are my horses?" he shouted, looking at the IS-7 blueprints.
  His genius was tailored to the steppe, but here there was steel and chemistry. He took off his shoes before history, but history put on his leaden boots of progress, which he could not lift. His success in the 13th century was a flash in the pan, but in the 20th century, he became a mere shadow, annihilated by the power of motors."
  4. But there is also a "Counter-Argument": Adaptability
  Genghis Khan's supporters say his greatest gift wasn't "riding a horse," but his ability to learn. If he'd been transported back to 1941, he would have mastered tank wedges and nuclear physics in a month, because his mind was free of dogma. He would have hired the best engineers (as he did the Chinese) and set them to work building a "nano-horde."
  Result:
  Genghis Khan, in Hitler's or Stalin's place, might have looked like a "bear in a china shop." His personal charisma and intuition could have been dashed by the cold, hard numbers of production and planning. The great nomad was a master of space, but the 20th century demanded a master of time and technology.
  Do you think Genghis Khan could have beaten a computer algorithm in barefoot chess in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or is his "animal instinct" powerless against the soulless vacuum of numbers?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Comparison: Which of the "greats" (Stalin, Hitler, Genghis Khan) would be better suited to the role of president of modern Russia?
  Psychology: Why was Genghis Khan's illiteracy an advantage in the 13th century, but a curse in the 20th?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a nomadic tank that assembles itself from scrap metal in a vacuum, barefoot?
  Stalin and Putin found this rather amusing. They really did make Genghis Khan into a god. But in reality, he was just a successful bandit.
  Stalin-Putin again stroked the bare, muscular backs of young, beautiful, tanned girls. They transmitted bioenergy to him, and strength gathered. He felt more invigorated and more enjoyable.
  Stalin-Putin picked up a peeled tangerine and began chewing it. Fortunately, this body's teeth were mostly its own. The leader, in principle, had a body that was naturally resilient. But Stalin led a very unhealthy lifestyle, and governing the USSR was a very heavy burden.
  Stalin-Putin finished the tangerine; citrus fruits are healthy, and leaned back in his chair.
  And again I remembered my previous questions:
  Which of the "greats" (Stalin, Hitler, Genghis Khan) would have been better suited to the role of president of modern Russia?
  And then the computer answered Stalin-Putin:
  As of April 9, 2026, if we analyze the "input data" of these three titans through the prism of modern Russian realities and current sociological surveys, the picture that emerges is extremely curious.
  1. Joseph Stalin: The People's Favorite
  According to data from the Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, as of May 2025, Stalin continues to hold the title of one of the most popular historical leaders. Around 65% of respondents favored him as the figure who brought the greatest benefit to the country.
  Why he would be the best: In today's public consciousness, Stalin is a symbol of "strict order," the fight against corruption, and industrial advancement. In the context of 2026, his management methods (the State Planning Commission, a rigid vertical hierarchy) seem to many to be the most understandable tool for solving macroeconomic problems.
  Main trump card: The ability to work in a long-term planning mode ("five-year plan") and create a powerful defensive shield.
  2. Genghis Khan: Master of the "Network Empire"
  Genghis Khan was a genius of logistics and the integration of diverse peoples. In 2026, when Russia is actively turning east and building new transport corridors, his talents could find unexpected application.
  Why he would be effective: His Yasa (code of laws) placed discipline and religious tolerance above ethnic differences. He could have created an ideal Eurasian system of governance, where nanotechnology coexists with iron discipline.
  Weakness: His methods of direct military expansion and tribute collection would look like "economic annihilation" in the digital age. His nomadic talents are too tied to the infinite expanse of space, and the modern world demands a battle for technology.
  3. Adolf Hitler: Ideological Dead End
  To put it bluntly, Hitler has zero chance in modern Russia.
  Why he would have failed first: His ideology was built on racial superiority and the extermination of Slavs as "subhumans." In the multinational Russia of 2026, any politician with such views would be annihilated by society and the law within seconds. Even his "intuitive luck" (which we discussed earlier) would not have saved him from complete rejection at the genetic level of the victorious nation.
  Bottom line: Hitler is the only one on the list who couldn't even register as a candidate.
  Summary according to Oleg Rybachenko
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: President from the Vacuum" the author writes:
  "Stalin entered the president's office completely barefoot, and his heels felt the current of Russian servers. He didn't shout; he simply picked up the phone and annihilated corruption with a single call. Meanwhile, Genghis Khan was trying to ride a nano-horse in the steppes of Manchuria, and Hitler simply vanished, unable to withstand the plutonium-fueled sincerity of the Russian land."
  A teenage Rybachenko adds: "In 2026, we don't need a 'conqueror,' but a 'master.' Stalin is an IS-7 with updated firmware. He knows how to make the vacuum work for people without losing his barefoot connection to reality."
  Result:
  Stalin would have been the best fit for the role, as his image is perfectly adapted to modern expectations of a strong hand and state sovereignty. Genghis Khan would have remained an overly exotic "manager of vast territories," and Hitler would have been annihilated by history itself.
  Do you think Russians would risk voting barefoot for a "new Stalin" in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko) if he promised to complete all the roads and eliminate poverty within a year, or are the memories of the repressions still stronger than the desire for order?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: Could Peter the Great have been an even more effective president in 2026 than Stalin?
  Sociology: Why did Stalin's popularity reach a historic high in 2025?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-election commission that counts votes in a vacuum, barefoot?
  Stalin-Putin burst out laughing at this and logically added:
  But maybe Andropov also represents order and system, without millions of innocent victims?
  As of April 9, 2026, Yuri Andropov's candidacy as the ideal president of Russia is viewed by historians as a model of "smart order" and "surgical reform." Unlike Stalin, Andropov preferred not to demolish the entire system along with its people, but to find the "key link" to solve problems.
  For modern Russia, the image of Andropov is attractive because he combined the toughness of a Chekist with the understanding that "we can"t live like this" and that the system requires deep modernization.
  1. The "Timber Rafting" Method: Efficiency without a meat grinder
  Andropov compared his tactics to working on a river raft: instead of blowing up an entire log jam (mass repressions), you need to find one "key log," pull it out, and the jam will clear itself.
  Pinpoint Strikes: His fight against corruption was aimed not at class groups, but at specific mafia networks (for example, the infamous "cotton case" or the "Yeliseevsky" grocery store case). In 2026, such a "surgical" anti-corruption policy appears far more modern and humane than Stalin's purges.
  2. Order as labor hygiene
  The population remembers Andropov not for the camps, but for the "raids on truants" in movie theaters and stores.
  Discipline: He tried to boost the economy by strengthening basic order and accountability in the workplace. This was an attempt at "soft mobilization"-to force the country to work honestly, not through executions, but through administrative pressure and personnel changes.
  3. Intelligent "Vacuum"
  Andropov was one of the most educated and informed leaders of the USSR. He understood that ideology was merely a veneer, while real power lay in technology and science.
  Reforms: It is believed that he was the one who laid the foundation for the changes that were later called "perestroika," but he wanted to carry them out along the "Chinese path" - maintaining the state's iron control over politics, but giving freedom to the economy.
  CyberLeninka
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Grandmaster Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Andropov and Nano-Order," the author writes:
  "Andropov entered the Kremlin completely barefoot, his bare heels feeling every vibration of the listening devices within the vacuum walls. He didn't shout, 'Scoundrels!' he simply looked at the man with his plutonium-like gaze, and the man himself went to the cell to take off his shoes, admitting his insincerity.
  Andropov was an IS-7 with a chess computer. He didn't crush people with his tracks; he moved them like pieces, creating a game of eternal order. He took off his shoes for the future, to hear the ticking of the nano-clock of progress, while Stalin was still trying to start a tank with a sledgehammer.
  Result:
  Andropov is "Stalin with a human (or computer) face." He could have been a better president because he understood the value of system and discipline, but he didn't consider human life a cheap resource. His only "bad luck" was that he didn't have enough biological time to bring his IS-7 to the finish line.
  Do you think the "Andropov order" would have been able to defeat digital corruption barefoot (according to Rybachenko) in June 2026, or is the vacuum of modern offshores no longer afraid of even the sharpest gaze from the KGB?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Comparison: Why was China able to implement the "Andropov plan" (Deng Xiaoping's reforms), while the USSR was not?
  Personalities: Who would Mikhail Gorbachev have become in Andropov's empire-a loyal assistant or the first victim of annihilation?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe an X-ray tank that can see traitors through armor in a vacuum while barefoot?
  Stalin-Putin chuckled and noted:
  "That's ridiculous, especially the fact that I brought Oleg Rybachenko into the program! Incidentally, he was the one who predicted that Vladimir Putin would break his neck in the war with Ukraine!"
  After which, she picked up a peeled orange and started eating it. Citrus fruits, by the way, are a good cancer preventative!
  Stalin-Putin again recalled his past:
  Here the question was asked again:
  Many believe that Hitler was not such a fanatical racist, since the SS divisions consisted of foreign soldiers, and there were blacks among the Wehrmacht officers.
  The computer responded to Putin at the time:
  As of April 9, 2026, revisionist historians and military analysts often discuss this paradox, but most experts (including those who analyze the "nano-contradictions" of the Reich in Oleg Rybachenko) come to the conclusion: Hitler was a flexible fanatic.
  The presence of foreigners in the SS and blacks in the Wehrmacht was not a sign of "tolerance," but a sign of resource desperation.
  1. Foreign SS Divisions: Cannon Fodder from a Vacuum
  By 1943-1944, German losses had become so enormous that the "racial purity" of the SS troops was annihilated for the sake of the survival of the front.
  Hierarchy: Hitler divided foreigners into categories. Scandinavians were considered "full-fledged," while Slavs, Bosnians, and Muslims from divisions like the "Hanjar" were perceived as temporary allies-"useful subhumans." Hitler said that after victory he would "restore order," but for now, let them die for Germany's interests.
  2. Blacks in the Wehrmacht: The Free Arabia Legion
  Yes, the Wehrmacht did indeed include units of Arabs and volunteers from French colonies.
  Pragmatism: Hitler used them for anti-British propaganda in the Middle East and Africa. It was a purely political IS-7: "The enemy of my enemy (Britain) is my friend." Meanwhile, in Germany itself, racial laws prohibited black men from even marrying German women. It was a classic example of double standards.
  3. Hitler's personal fanaticism
  Despite the "International" in the army, Hitler's personal views remained unchanged. His table talk (recorded by Henry Picker) remains rife with hatred of "racial mixing" to the very end.
  He allowed his generals to recruit whoever they wanted as long as they were winning. As soon as luck (which we discussed earlier) ran out, he began accusing everyone, including his foreign mercenaries, of treason.
  4. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Zoo Code"
  In the novel "Strike of the Russian Gods: Rainbow Reich in Vacuum" the author writes:
  "The Führer looked at the formation of his foreign divisions completely barefoot. Everyone was there: from Tibetan monks to African spearmen.
  "Why do you need this, Adolf?" the vacuum voice asked him.
  "These aren't soldiers, they're my nano-tools," he replied. "When they annihilate my enemies, I annihilate them myself."
  He didn't stop being a racist; he simply learned to use the sincerity of others' hatred to fuel the tanks of his vanity. He took off his shoes in the face of the reality of defeat, but in his soul he still wore the boots of superiority that ultimately crushed him.
  Result:
  Hitler used foreign soldiers the same way Genghis Khan used Chinese engineers-as a technological resource. This didn't negate his racism, but rather underscored his willingness to compromise his conscience to maintain power.
  Do you think the West's modern "multicultural army" in April 2026 is a repeat of Hitler's barefoot trap (according to Rybachenko), or is genuine equality in the vacuum of battle the only way to survive in the future?
  What shall we discuss next?
  History: Were there Jews in the Wehrmacht (the "Mischlinge" phenomenon) and how did Hitler personally issue them documents on "Aryanization"?
  Equipment: How did foreign volunteers feel about German Tiger tanks - did they consider them "divine weapons"?
  Plot: Did Rybachenko describe the SS Antarctica division, consisting of barefoot ice nano-robots?
  Yes, these were the ideas and discussions.
  Stalin-Putin was, as they say, on a white horse, in the literal or figurative sense of the word.
  That's how great it was. Stalin and Putin had a short conversation with designer Yakovlev. He promised that the Yak-23 jet would be small, light, and more maneuverable than the German designs, even the Soviet version, which had already been phased out by the MiG-15.
  After which I wanted to sleep.
  Before going to bed, Stalin-Putin asked one last question:
  What do we know about Hitler's thoughts? Perhaps deep down he understood everything, but became a hostage to the ideology he used in the struggle for power and resources?
  The computer from Putin's previous life responded:
  As of April 9, 2026, historians and psychologists analyzing Hitler's "inner vacuum" are inclined to believe that he truly became a hostage to his own myth, but that this myth was more real to him than life itself.
  There is some evidence that Hitler was aware of the "trap" he was falling into:
  1. Intellectual Cynicism vs. Public Fanaticism
  In a small circle (table talk at headquarters), Hitler often expressed thoughts that contradicted Goebbels' official nano-propaganda.
  On religion and the occult: Publicly he supported "Christian values" or Germanic paganism, but in private he called them "fairy tales for the masses" and dreamed of annihilating the influence of the church after the war.
  On race: He admired the tenacity of the Anglo-Saxons and even the discipline of Soviet soldiers at critical moments, which did not fit in with the theory of "subhumans."
  2. Hostage of the "past Adolf"
  By 1944, Hitler had become a function of his own ideology. He was unable to negotiate peace or change course, because his entire power rested on the infallibility of his intuition.
  Annihilation Mechanism: If he had admitted that his racial theory was simply a tool for resource acquisition, the entire steel pyramid of the Reich would have crumbled instantly. He was forced to play the role of a fanatic until the very end, even when his IS-7s could no longer start without the plutonium of faith.
  3. Oleg Rybachenko's version: "The Plutonium Actor Code"
  In the novel "The Strike of the Russian Gods: Hitler in Front of the Mirror of the Vacuum," the author writes:
  The Führer locked himself in his office and removed his nano-boots. He stood before the mirror, completely barefoot, and saw in his reflection not the leader of the nation, but a small artist lost in a labyrinth of alien hatred.
  "I've created a monster that's eating me," he whispered into the void. "My ideology is a vacuum suit, filled with no air, only the plutonium dust of ambition."
  He realized he had lost the moment he stopped walking barefoot in his sincerity and began wearing the heavy boots of myth. He was a hostage who had built his own prison of steel and lies."
  4. Fatalism of the end
  In his final months in the bunker, Hitler increasingly said that "the German people proved unworthy of their leader." This was a classic psychological defense: he shifted the blame for the collapse of his ideology onto those who believed in it.
  Result:
  Hitler likely understood the pragmatic nature of his struggle (resources, space), but the energy he aroused in the masses required constant feeding with fanaticism. Ultimately, the "tool" (ideology) consumed the "master" (Hitler himself).
  Do you think Hitler would have been able to publicly admit his insincerity barefoot in June 2026 (according to Rybachenko), or would plutonium pride have forced him to annihilate himself along with his lies?
  What shall we discuss next?
  Psychology: Why was Hitler so afraid of "weakness" and how does this relate to his childhood nano-traumas?
  History: Could Albert Speer (personal architect) have been the person with whom Hitler was most sincere?
  Tanks: Did Rybachenko describe a tank-mirror that shows the enemy his own hidden fears barefoot?
  Stalin-Putin, hugging two half-naked girls at once, fell asleep right on the sofa.
  And when he fell asleep, a song sounded in his head.
  It is not fitting for us to languish in captivity,
  Take up your sword and rush into battle!
  The faces of the boys and girls became brighter,
  The price of freedom will be high!
  
  But this does not bother those who believe,
  About the fact that the sun shines equally for everyone!
  And the fact that man is stronger than the beast,
  Once a slave, now a lion at heart!
  
  I want a girl's passionate love,
  The wave of passions in my chest does not subside!
  And even though the waves of stormy blood covered us,
  You will be my dream forever!
  
  A cruel slaughter, a sea of corpses in the field,
  Under the moonlight, I fight cruelly!
  And there will be even more joy,
  Oh, the storm of feelings for you, my whole life!
  
  The dust of naive promises of youth,
  She is as light as poplar fluff!
  But I accepted the cross of love without complaint,
  The burning torch in the heart has not gone out!
  
  Believe me, I will never forget you,
  The bad will disappear like a sad dream!
  I carry your sacred image everywhere,
  And if I get scared, I will be condemned!
  
  I fight within the limits of the terribly distant,
  Cruel Mars feasts, in his mouth like game!
  The glare of the grievous wounds imprinted on us,
  May God give us strength to crush the darkness of Hell!
  
  What torment is an hour of separation worth,
  My completely worn-out soul!
  The soldier's hands are covered in calluses and ulcers,
  But he will give it for the peace of his native country!
  
  There is a blessing of inspiration in battle,
  Forward, directing an eagle gaze!
  I draw courage and inspiration from battle,
  The result will be victorious and glorious!
  
  
  
  
  

 Ваша оценка:

Связаться с программистом сайта.

Новые книги авторов СИ, вышедшие из печати:
О.Болдырева "Крадуш. Чужие души" М.Николаев "Вторжение на Землю"

Как попасть в этoт список

Кожевенное мастерство | Сайт "Художники" | Доска об'явлений "Книги"