Top ten reasons why there are still millions who vote for the Democratic Party in America today:
Some people have a personal grievance with the Republican Party whose leadership has denied those people privileges that were provided for them by the Democrats. For example: in Wisconsin, the Governor, Congress and Senate signed a law requiring State employees to participate in their pensions and about twice increase its share in paying for health insurance (Act 10). Before this law, State workers' pensions, were paid for almost entirely by taxpayers(1). Of course, now the majority of State employees will wish only for one thing - a return to the previous system and, therefore, will vote for the Democratic Party.
This could be a family matter. Some families for generations have always supported Democrats, and this tradition cannot change within the family, even if some of its members see that our country and they personally win economically. Sadly, but those people belong to the Democrats by birth and are not able to have their own opinion that is independent of anyone else, they just follow the way set long ago by their ancestors when people, circumstances and living conditions were completely different from nowadays.
Members of the Democratic Party themselves will vote for their own party. It seems that they belong to the party not by beliefs (which do not exist, because the words and deeds of the Democratic Party are radically different from each other) but because of material gain. The perfect example for this would be how Democratic Party upper echelon forced the so-called "Affordable Care Act" onto the rest of the country without even discussing it in Congress (2) and then unlawfully adopted special provisions for themselves and their staffers (3) in order to participate in this disaster for working Americans. And while insisting that the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act was not a tax the Supreme Court preserved the law on those grounds (4).
Liberal intellectuals - our elite group. They think that paying for all kinds of programs created, ostensibly, to help the poor, are really helping them. Actually they are aggressive fanatics for this idea, which in reality provides only comfortable existence to the founders. If, for example, we take Charities, then according to CNN report https://www.cnn.com/2013/06/13/us/worst-charities/index.html some of them spent less than 3 cents actually for the program they were established to provide on every dollar received.
I would like to remind those who believe that simply making donations helps poor to get back on their feet:
A rich man had come to Rabbi and asked:
Listen Rabbi I am rich I have money is it good for me to help poor and give them some?
Of course this is good, - answered Rabbi, - but the best would be if you can give those poor jobs.
Jobs - this is what people need, not donations. Donations won't make them strong and independent, on the contrary, they will become dependent, they will become slaves.
And current administration actually is giving people jobs in much better pace than the previous one (5). Even Clinton's and Democrat supporter billionaire investor Marc Lasry admitted that current administration is good for business CNBC on Wednesday 07/18/18 (6).
It is logical nonsense that in the country are available jobs, there are also illegal immigrants who are eager to take those jobs and at the same time there are millions not working people who are not filling those jobs. This only could mean two things:
It is not always profitable to have a job
There is a cultural shift in our society that states that it is perfectly OK not to work.
To overcome those two points there should be more programs on the Federal and State levels that will help working poor people to make their ends meet, programs that will encourage them to work.
At the same time the culture in the country should make a transition from the culture of takers (those who uses society to benefit themselves without giving back to the society) to the culture of givers (those who will give to the society that will in turn benefit them).
Idealists who live in a fantasy world and who believe in beautiful slogans and proclamations about universal love, brotherhood, communism and so on. They are convinced that if the State will take away money from the rich and give it to the poor, poverty will disappear. Those naive souls are not able to comprehend that simply there will be no rich people, and with them the money will disappear also. The poor will become poorer and no one will ever be able to help them. Idealists will never understand that everything the State needs to give people is a job and an opportunity to get an education that meets the requirements of the modern world, regardless of their class affiliation. Today's business world requires more professionals in narrow fields. Our kids will enter this world with all its cruelty, competitiveness and ignorance. At the same time our school educational system is designed to teach all kids the same. However, each person is an individual in the first place that requires more personal approach. Also, we are not all equally talented or we can be equally talented but in completely different not compatible fields, some of us happen to be more artistic, some more talented in humanitarian fields and some in more precise science and math. So to make those talents flourish the education need to be changed to reveal the individual child's potential and ability.
In short that means that the elementary schools need to teach read, write, calculate and the teacher there should be more psychologist that would see in each child what he or she is capable for what could be his potential. Then the educators should give recommendation to the parents as to what middle school would be best for their son or daughter. The middle school's continuing broader education should be more specialized in different fields or subjects. The teachers there should also recommend to the parents if their child should stay in this school or should be transferred to a different one with prevailing subjects in which this child is more talented. The High school should be even more specialized in particular subjects and kids who are more talented in those subjects should attend those specific schools. Of course on any level the parents and children themselves should have an ability to change school. But the main thing is that teachers should always tell the truth to the parents even if parents won't like this truth, and of course teachers should be absolutely neutral in their assumptions regarding each and every child potential.
About 90% of African Americans consistently vote for Democrats. For example, according to the polls Obama got 93% and Hillary Clinton 88% (7) of the African-American votes. The descendants of slaves, to whom the slave-owners-democrats suggest that they are free men. In fact, they are the same slaves as their ancestors. To understand why we can consider those people as slaves in modern time, we need to answer the simple question: What is the purpose of the slave? And there is only one answer to this question: The purpose is to provide wealth to his master. Does it really matter how this can be achieved? Absolutely not. The result is what is important. In the past, slaves physically had to work for their masters themselves, making them wealthier. Today this is not necessary. The slaves should only give their masters votes in elections, thereby ensuring the masters' material needs when they get into the office. The slaves' own needs are kept to a minimum and are provided by masters through government programs. These modern world slaveholders are using collaborators to keep African Americans in full submission. In fact, the true Democratic Party attitude towards those citizens was clearly seen during the President Trump State of the Union Address to a Joint Session of Congress. No democrat raised his ass off the chair to express sympathy for the parents of Kayla Cuevas and Nisa Miсkens, teenagers killed in Long Island in 2016.
The Party of Democrats, as it was in the past and as it remains today, is the party of Slaveholders; it has only changed its strategy and tactics. Today this strategy is based on making the largest possible number of citizens dependent on the State (read: depend on Democratic Party). To those citizens, the Democratic Party will allocate the minimum possible amount of resources, but the party members, especially upper echelon, will consume the maximum from the same State.
Another large group who mainly support Democrats are representatives of the Spanish-speaking community (8). They have been fighting for years to ensure that 1.8 millions of so-called "Dreamers" are legalized in the country. But they did not see that when President Trump asked Congress and the Senate to solve this problem, it was their friends -- the Democrats that killed this idea. It is completely unprofitable for Democrats that "Dreamers" become full citizens. This could have been done during the Obama's first two years presidency, when his party had a majority both in the Senate and in Congress for two full years. But "Dreamers" is the chain on which Latinos are sitting on.
Students - the new generation in general (9). They do not care what to break, just to break and they do not care what the idea that guides them is actually about. With opened mouths they listen to "mishuggener" (10) Sanders, not knowing the history, because it was not taught to them in school, and not having any idea of ??human nature and human relationships. They do not know that by breaking the existing world, they will build only a comfortable one for the half-crazed Sanders and all those deceivers who will be in his entourage. And, of course, for the bureaucracy that they will impose on the country. They, themselves, except for slogans and promises, will not get anything. The same has been already tried with no positive results in different countries at different stages of their development, but they do not know this, because, I repeat, no one has taught them history in schools.
Socialists who are taking over Democratic Party and with whom it is rather quickly leaning towards left. Here are the Mrs. Clinton own words at the Shared Value Leadership Summit in New York City "It's hard to know. But I mean, if you're in the Iowa caucuses and 41 percent of Democrats are socialists or self-described socialists..." (11).
Her words perfectly explain Senator Bernie Sanders popularity and rise of such individuals as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who promote ideas that have never worked in any part of the world. Venezuela with poverty that has climbed up 82% is the latest example. Unfortunately, the real ugly face of Socialism is unknown to the generation of American youth who do not understand that socialism sooner or later with its planned economy always abandons democratic values and sooner or later becomes an oppressive regime. Both left and right regimes in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany (12) are perfect examples of this transition.
It is not a coincidence that with leaning left Democrats become more and more aggressive in their tone. Below is a quote from California Rep. Maxine Waters calling on her supporters to publicly confront and harass members of the Trump administration:
"Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up," Ms. Waters said. "And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere." (13)
And her words and how she pronounces them perfectly fits with:
But, disgusting though it is, the most important thing of this transition to the left is complete abandonment of democratic values by the upper echelon of the FBI and Justice Department during the previous administration. Looking at failed Clinton e-mail investigation and so-called Trump collusion with Russia that is based on false dossier provide enough evidence that FBI and Justice Department become politically motivated. Is this the first step to transform those powerful organizations into KGB or Gestapo? With this in mind and following this simple sequence of events should we now wait for some sort of "Kristallnacht" here in the United States of America?
And finally - fools. Seeing what economic and political processes the representatives of the Democrats party sabotage, (promising to kill FOXCONN deal in Wisconsin during Democratic candidates for governor debate in Wisconsin (14) or how Senate Democrats told Trump not to meet with Putin one (15) on one evidently first not trusting our President and second immediately accusing him of treason right after the meeting thru the voice of former CIA director (March 2013 - January 2017) John Brennan (16). All of this is perfectly understandable including accusations by Brennan if we remember who was his boss and what this boss told Russians (17). It seems that this is Democrats nature not to trust anyone including themselves, especially knowing that their own party leaders screwed Bernie Sanders during primaries in 2016 (18). They can't trust our allies and decided to spy on them under Obama's presidency (19) or even trying to oust those who disagree with their policies (20). It is really hard to keep up with their creativity in attempts to destroy law and order in our country. Just couple days ago San Francisco city's Board of Supervisors adopted the law allowing illegal immigrants to vote in school elections (21). Can this be a first step towards allowing anybody to vote in general elections? Maybe it is better for San Francisco City supervisors go and clean streets of their downtown that has become one of the dirtiest places in the entire world (22). And my favorite: the assistant Law professor from Yale University encourages people to hide illegal immigrants from ICA (23). A law professor is for breaking the law! It seems unimaginable, but in reality perfectly fits within "The five universal laws of human stupidity" (24) by Carlo Maria Cipolla.
So knowing how Democrats conduct themselves, and at the same time, vote for them, can only be the act of a complete fool. Incidentally, this fits into the program of fooling of the population by the Democratic Party, which they persistently impose on the citizens of this country, starting this process of indoctrination from early childhood. The Democrats' goal is to rule fools or/and slaves, which in the modern world is the same.
Saying all above I now have to mention the role of the mass Media that with rare exception strongly stands in favor for Democratic Party. To influence people those organizations successfully adopted the following:
"Propaganda must always address itself to the broad masses of the people.(...)
The art of propaganda consists precisely in being able to awaken the imagination of the public through an appeal to their feelings (...)
The great majority of a nation is so feminine in its character and outlook that its thought and conduct are ruled by sentiment rather than by sober reasoning."
These are the words of Adolf Hitler written in "Mein Kampf" (translated by Ralph Manheim, New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1998). He later emphasizes that those feelings should be biased and not looking for the truth:
"Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and, in so far as it is favorable to the other side, present it to the theoretical rules of justice; yet it must present only that aspect of the truth which is favorable to its own side."
Interestingly enough, he also makes the following statement:
"The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other hand, they quickly forget."
And all of that is exactly what we get today from our media. They address our feelings not reasoning. Time magazine published a photo of a crying little girl from Honduras looking at President Trump as a symbol of struggle against Trump's Zero tolerance policy. Who could resist warm and kind feelings towards the kid and feeling disgusted by the ultimate evil, Mr. Trump? Apparently, the girl was never separated from her mother so it was a fake example to show President Trump and his administration in a negative view. Even if Time Magazine is trying to stress the issue of children separation from parents, it is still a shame to employ such a tactic. And this is not the worst, this is just the easiest and the lightest example. As a whole, the coverage for the current administration is terrible and biased. Let's take Trump's meeting with the leader of North Korea. Trump actually deserves a Nobel Prize if this country denuclearizes. He deserves it now for making this attempt, but he is not Obama who got Nobel Prize in advance without actually achieving anything in the field of Peace and Stability in the world. On the contrary, Obama's policies resulted in destroying world peace and order. Just take a look at Obama's beloved and promoted Arab Spring and the migration crisis it created in the world (25).
To create sensational news that will draw public attention media public opinion manipulators quite often use so-called "Anonymous sources" sometimes referred as administration insiders who can't be disclosed. Well, I know from my family past that socialists in the Soviet Union actually put people in concentration camps, known as "GULAGs", also using "Anonymous sources" to accuse them of crimes they have not committed and the number of murdered in those gulags exceeds anyone's imagination (26). So, why should we trust anonymous sources? If they are telling the truth why wouldn't they tell it openly?
I watched a few minutes of Sunday Meet the Press by CNBC couple weeks ago and one of the hosts said something regarding Trump that he is the least hostile toward Russia than any other President of US in recent history. Her words and how quickly Trump was accused for treason after his meeting with Putin (like commentators were on this meeting and heard everything) are perfect examples that "people quickly forget." So it would be appropriate for me to remind how easily President Obama sold US interests to Russia during his missile defense meeting with then-president of Russia, Medvedev:
BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: This is my last election. And after my election, I have more flexibility.
DMITRY MEDVEDEV, RUSSIAN PRESIDENT: I understand you. I transmit this information to Vladimir -
Obama's words could perfectly explain why his administration was too slow to investigate suspected Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. It could be that White House at that time simply made a conclusion that Russia played in favor of Hillary Clinton with whom Russia had great relationship by getting its hand on US uranium mine.
Which became specifically interesting knowing that at the beginning of this operation Clinton foundation received 31.3 million donation from an interested party in this deal then another 8.65 million as confirmation that everything was moving correctly and finally Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for his lecture in Russia right before the whole deal was finalized.
What a beautiful play by Clintons and Democrats. And maybe Russia played in favor of Clinton. I can only imagine what a sellout of our country this would have been if Hillary had become our President.
I can go on and on with examples how President Trump is treated by mass media, how his family is treated, how the Republicans are treated in general, but the main point of what our mass media is trying to achieve has been already perfectly described by Nazi Germany propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels who said:
His words today illustrate various protest movements who's beneficiaries are Democratic Party representatives, who have no desire to solve any issue. On the contrary they need as many as possible issues up and running so that they continue get votes.
Ariel b Z.
PS I would definitely change my mind toward Democratic Party someday, but first it should change its attitude towards the country we live in completely abolishing socialistic ideas that will benefit only poverty, cruelty and oppression.
One more important, in my view, thing: if we want to live in the society where politicians serve people not another way around, we need to insist that there should be limited terms of service for members of Congress, so that they will be held accountable for their actions. This applies to both parties Republicans and Democrats, some of whose members are sitting in the Senate and Congress for generations.
Actual role of the size of young generation in building and moving society to an extreme is perfectly described by Hunnar Heinsohn professor of sociology at Bremen University in his "youth bulge" theory and "A Demographic Theory of War".